Infrastructure of Basketball Players Examination of Ethical Decision-Making Attitudes

Öz

Aim: In this study, it was aimed to examine the differences in moral decision-making attitudes of the athletes participating in basketball competitions according to some variables. Method: The study group consists of a total of 232 athletes, 60 women and 172 men, who compete in sports clubs in Denizli province as licensed. The data were delivered to the participants via Google Forms and their voluntary participation in the research was taken as basis. The form used to collect the relevant data in the study consisted of two parts. In the first part, demographic information developed by the researcher, and in the second part, "Moral Decision-Making Attitudes Scale in Infrastructure Sports", which was developed by Lee, Whitehead and Ntoumanis (2007) to measure the moral decision-making attitudes of athletes and adapted to Turkish culture by Gürpınar (2014), was used. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS 25.0 package program. 25.90% of the participants are female and 74.10% are male. Considering the average age, the largest group with 70 people, 30.2% is 13-14 age group, in the category section, with 46 people, 19.83% is U17 group, and at education level, with 101 people, 43.53% is secondary school. forms the group. Results: As a result of the research, when the scores of the athletes from the Moral Decision-Making Attitudes in Youth Sports Scale are examined, it is seen that the total scale score average is 34.80. While the average score in Adopting Cheating sub-dimension was 12.45, it was determined as 9.17 in adopting competitiveness sub-dimension and 13.18 in Protecting Winning Fairly sub-dimension. Conclusion: It can be said that while basketball youth athletes support the sub-dimension of Adopting Fair Wins and Adopting Cheating, they are undecided in the sub-dimension of Adopting Competitiveness. It is seen that there is no significant difference according to gender. According to the results obtained, it is seen that there is an intelligible and positive relationship between the age and competition categories of the athletes and all the sub-dimensions of the scale. A statistically significant difference was found at the p<0.05 level between their educational status, the sub-dimensions of Adopting Cheating, Adopting Competitiveness, and the total scale score. No significant difference was found in the sub-dimension of Maintaining Fair Earnings according to education level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Moral decision making
• licensed athlete
• sport
• competitor
• attitude

Altyapı Basketbol Oyuncularının Ahlaki Karar Alma Tutumlarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmada basketbol müsabakalarına katılan sporcuların bazı değişkenlere göre ahlaki karar alma tutumlarında farklılıkların incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışma grubunu Denizli ilindeki spor kulüplerinde lisanslı olarak mücadele eden 60 kadın 172 erkek olmak üzere toplam 232 sporcudan oluşturmaktadır. Veriler Google Formlar üzerinden katılımcılara ulaştırılmış ve gönüllü olarak araştırmaya katılımı esas alınmıştır. Araştırmada ilgili verilerin toplanması için kullanılan form iki bölümden oluşmuştur. Birinci bölümde araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen demografik bilgiler, ikinci bölümde ise Lee, Whitehead ve Ntoumanis (2007) tarafından sporcuların ahlaki karar alma tutumlarını ölçmek üzere geliştirilen ve Türk kültürüne uyarlaması Gürpınar (2014) tarafından yapılan “Altyapı Sporlarında Ahlaki Karar Alma Tutumları Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 25.0 paket programı kullanılarak istatistiksel analiz yapılmıştır. Katılımcıların % 25,90 ‘ ı kadın % 74,10’ u erkektir. Yaş ortalamalarına bakıldığında en büyük grubu oluşturan 70 kişi ile % 30,2’ sini 13-14 yaş grubu, kategori kısmında ise 46 kişi ile % 19,83’ ünü U17 grubu, öğrenim düzeyinde ise 101 kişi ile % 43,53’ ünü ortaokul grubu oluşturmaktadır. Bulgular: Araştırma sonucunda sporcuların Altyapı Sporlarında Ahlaki Karar Alma Tutumları Ölçeğinden aldıkları puanlar incelendiğinde toplam ölçek puanı ortalamasının 34,80 olduğu görülmektedir. Hileyi Benimseme alt boyutunda ortalama puan 12,45 iken, yarışma severliği benimseme alt boyutunda ortalama puan 9,17 ve Adilce Kazanmayı Korumak alt boyutunda ise 13,18 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Basketbol Altyapı sporcularının Adilce Kazanmayı Benimsemek ve Hileyi Benimsemek alt boyutunu desteklerken, Yarışma severliği Benimsemek alt boyutunda kararsız tutum içinde oldukları söylenebilir. Cinsiyete göre anlamlı bir şekilde farklılık göstermediği görülmektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre sporcuların yaş ve müsabaka kategorileri ile ölçek tüm alt boyutları arasında anlamalı ve pozitif yönde bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir. Öğrenim durumları ile Hileyi Benimsemek, Yarışma severliği Benimsemek alt boyutları ve toplam ölçek puanı arasında p<0.05 düzeyinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur. Adilce Kazanmayı Korumak alt boyutunda öğrenim düzeyine göre anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ahlaki karar alma
• lisanslı sporcu
• spor
• yarışmacı
• tutum

Kaynakça

1. Atalay, A., (2016). The moral decision-making attitudes of students studying at universities in Turkey, Journal of Academic Social Research, (4)31, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.1331
2. Buszard, T., Masters, S.W.R., Farrow, D., (2017). “The generalizability of working-memory capacity in the sport domain”, Current Opinion in Psychology, (16), 54-57, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.018
3. Cevizci, A. (2003). Dictionary of philosophy terms. Paradigm Publications.
4. Cağlayan, A., Ozbar, N., Turkmen, N., & Onturk, Y. (2017). Investigation of moral decision-making attitudes of students of faculty of sports sciences and physical education and sports school, International Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology Research, 10 (2), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.17360/UHPPD.2017.3.8
5. Erol, E., Cicioğlu, I. & Pulur, A. (1999). The effect of endurance training for 13-14 years old men's basketball players on body composition and some physical, physiological and blood parameters. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 4 (4), 12-20. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gbesbd/issue/27962/298548
6. Gürpinar, B., (2014). Adaptation of moral decision-making attitudes scale in youth sports to Turkish culture: A study of validity and reliability in a Turkish sample. Journal of Education and Science, 39(176): 405-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3643
7. Kangalgil, M., Temel, A., Emre, T. & İnan, T. (2023). Examining the Attitudes of Youth Athletes to Moral Decision Making and Depravity . Journal of Youth Studies, 11(29), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.898598
8. Karasar, N., (2011). Scientific Research Methods. Ankara: Nobel Publications.

9. Kiranli, S., & Ilgan, A., (2007). Ethics in the decision-making process in educational organizations, Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Education, 0(14), 150-162.
10. Küçük, V., Koc, H., (2004). The relationship between human and sports in the process of psycho-social development. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (10), - . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dpusbe/issue/4752/65286
11. Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Development of the attitudes to moral decision-making in youth sport questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(3), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.002
12. Ozen, S., (2015). Ethics, moral theory and science, science and business ethics, Turkish economic enterprise and business ethics association, Journal of Business Ethics, 8 (1), 109-149. https://doi.org/10.12711/tjbe.2015.8.1.0151
13. Sahan, H., (2007). The role of sports activities in the socialization process of university students, Doctoral Thesis, Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute, Department of Public Relations and Publicity.
14. Temel, A., Emre, T., & Emre, R. (2021). Examining the moral decision-making attitudes of football coaches. Turkish Studies, 16(2), 757-771. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.49990
15. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi (TUBA), (2020). Covid-19 Pandemic assessment report 34, 21-30. Ankara.
16. Van Mullem, P.W., & Stoll, S.K. (2012). The impact of reflection on ethical decision making for sport leaders, Journal of Contemporary Athletics, 6(4):233-242. 7b6427e719ede8cdaa3b834bd427e79c
17. Yıldırım, S. (2016). Examining the differences in moral attitudes of those who come to sports centers, Master Thesis, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sports Teaching, Burdur.