Investigation of Acute Effects of Using Different Density Foam Roller Models on Hamstring Muscle Stiffness and Flexibility in Professional Soccer Players

Öz

It was aimed to examine the acute effects of the use of foam roller models of different densities on hamstring muscle stiffness and flexibility in professional soccer players. Hamstring muscle's stiffness were evaluated using the Myoton Pro device. The flexybility of the hamstring muscle were evaluated using with the unilateral sit-reach test on 21 male professional soccer players who played in Gaziantep Soccer Club at aged 18-40. Athletes were randomly divided into groups of seven to use soft, medium and hard foam rollers. The athletes applied the method consisting of two sets of one minute on the dominant hamstring muscle. Measurements were made twice, before the application (BA) and after the application (AA). The muscle stiffness measurement of the soccer players was determined BA mean of 16.26 N/m and AA mean of 16.17 N/m.. Flexibility measurement was determined BA mean of 28,36 cm and AA mean of 31,05 cm. It was found that the mean of pre-test and post-test did not differ statistically for muscle stiffness (p>0,05) according to measurement times, but statistically differed for flexibility (p<0,05). As a result of the two-way ANOVA test; It was determined that there was no statistically significant difference on muscle stiffness and flexibility between foam roller models applied at different intensities (p>0,05). It shows that foam roller application is important for increasing muscle flexibility, but there is no difference between foam roller models applied at different intensities in terms of removing muscle stiffness and increasing flexibility.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• soccer
• flexibility
• muscle stiffness
• foam roller

Proje Numarası

2022-041

Kaynakça

1. Knapik JJ. The importance of physical fitness for injury prevention: part 1. J Spec Oper Med. 2015;15(1):123–7.
2. Hoff J, Helgerud J. Endurance and strength training for soccer players: physiological considerations. Sports medicine. 2004;34:165–80.
3. Morin JB, Gimenez P, Edouard P, Arnal P, Jiménez-Reyes P, Samozino P, et al. Sprint acceleration mechanics: the major role of hamstrings in horizontal force production. Front Physiol. 2015;6:169279.
4. Seyhan S. Comparison of Physical and Physiological Performance Features of Parkour and Gymnastics Athletes. Journal of Education and Learning. 2019;8(2):111–6.
5. García-Pinillos F, Ruiz-Ariza A, Moreno del Castillo R, Latorre-Román PÁ. Impact of limited hamstring flexibility on vertical jump, kicking speed, sprint, and agility in young football players. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(12):1293–7.
6. Hug F, Tucker K, Gennisson JL, Tanter M, Nordez A. Elastography for muscle biomechanics: toward the estimation of individual muscle force. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2015;43(3):125–33.
7. Klauser AS, Miyamoto H, Bellmann-Weiler R, Feuchtner GM, Wick MC, Jaschke WR. Sonoelastography: musculoskeletal applications. Radiology. 2014;272(3):622–33.
8. Miyamoto N, Hirata K, Kanehisa H. Effects of hamstring stretching on passive muscle stiffness vary between hip flexion and knee extension maneuvers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(1):99–106.

9. Magnusson SP, Simonsen EB, Aagaard P, Boesen J, Johannsen F, Kjaer M. Determinants of musculoskeletal flexibility: viscoelastic properties, cross‐sectional area, EMG and stretch tolerance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997;7(4):195–202.
10. Watsford ML, Murphy AJ, McLachlan KA, Bryant AL, Cameron ML, Crossley KM, et al. A prospective study of the relationship between lower body stiffness and hamstring injury in professional Australian rules footballers. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10):2058–64.
11. Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, D’Have T, Cambier D. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):41–6. Sullivan KM, Silvey DBJ, Button DC, Behm DG. Roller‐massager application to the hamstrings increases sit‐and‐reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(3):228.
12. Freiwald J, Baumgart C, Kühnemann M, Hoppe MW. Foam-rolling in sport and therapy–potential benefits and risks: part 1–definitions, anatomy, physiology, and biomechanics. Sports Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2016;32(3):258–66.
13. Couture G, Karlik D, Glass SC, Hatzel BM. The effect of foam rolling duration on hamstring range of motion. Open Orthop J. 2015;9:450.
14. MacDonald GZ, Penney MDH, Mullaley ME, Cuconato AL, Drake CDJ, Behm DG, et al. An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27(3):812–21.
15. Sefton J. Myofascial release for athletic trainers, part I: Theory and session guidelines. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training. 2004;9(1):48–9.
16. Fairall RR, Cabell L, Boergers RJ, Battaglia F. Acute effects of self-myofascial release and stretching in overhead athletes with GIRD. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(3):648–52.
17. Cheatham SW, Kolber MJ, Cain M, Lee M. The effects of self‐myofascial release using a foam roll or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recovery, and performance: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(6):827.
18. Cheatham SW, Stull KR. Comparison of three different density type foam rollers on knee range of motion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13(3):474.
19. van der Made AD, Wieldraaijer T, Kerkhoffs GM, Kleipool RP, Engebretsen L, Van Dijk CN, et al. The hamstring muscle complex. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015;23:2115–22.
20. Gajdosik RL. Effects of static stretching on the maximal length and resistance to passive stretch of short hamstring muscles. Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 1991;14(6):250–5.
21. Barnes MF. The basic science of myofascial release: morphologic change in connective tissue. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 1997;1(4):231–8.
22. Reiner MM, Tilp M, Guilhem G, Morales-Artacho A, Konrad A. Comparison of a single vibration foam rolling and static stretching exercise on the muscle function and mechanical properties of the hamstring muscles. J Sports Sci Med. 2022;21(2):287.
23. Balius R, Pedret C, Iriarte I, Sáiz R, Cerezal L. Sonographic landmarks in hamstring muscles. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48:1675–83.
24. Kellis E, Galanis N, Kapetanos G, Natsis K. Architectural differences between the hamstring muscles. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2012;22(4):520–6.
25. Rhodes D, Crowie S, Alexander J. Acute effects of varying densities of foam roller on hamstring flexibility and eccentric strength. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2022;29(3):1–12.
26. Krause F, Wilke J, Niederer D, Vogt L, Banzer W. Acute effects of foam rolling on passive tissue stiffness and fascial sliding: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18:1–6.
27. Okamoto T, Masuhara M, Ikuta K. Acute effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on arterial function. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014;28(1):69–73.
28. Mohr AR, Long BC, Goad CL. Effect of foam rolling and static stretching on passive hip-flexion range of motion. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23(4):296–9.
29. Bradbury-Squires DJ, Noftall JC, Sullivan KM, Behm DG, Power KE, Button DC. Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. J Athl Train. 2015;50(2):133–40.
30. Macgregor LJ, Fairweather MM, Bennett RM, Hunter AM. The effect of foam rolling for three consecutive days on muscular efficiency and range of motion. Sports medicine-open. 2018;4:1–9