A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis on the Nature of and Trends in Decision-Making in Sport

Öz

This study employed a bibliometric approach to examine the research landscape surrounding decision-making in sport. Utilizing the R programming language with the Biblioshiny interface, we analyzed data extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) database to identify prevailing trends and key contributors to this field. Our analysis encompassed 1683 articles published between 1988 and 2024, authored by 5,107 individuals across 112 journals, with an average annual publication rate of 8.42 articles. Key findings highlight the UK as the leading nation in collaborative research within this domain. Davids K. emerged as the most prolific author (n=47), while Victoria University led in institutional productivity (n=53). Keyword analysis revealed a predominant focus on "sport," "performance," and "decision-making," followed by "return," "reliability," and "physical activity." Furthermore, recent trends indicate a growing emphasis on topics such as rehabilitation, reconstruction, and football within the context of sports decision-making. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the evolution and current state of research on decision-making in sport, informing future scholarly endeavors in this area.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sport
• Decision-making
• bibliometric analysis
• R
• Biblioshiny
• Wos

Sporda Karar Verme Sürecinin Doğası ve Eğilimleri Üzerine Sistematik Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışmada, sporda karar verme sürecini çevreleyen araştırma ortamını incelemek için bibliyometrik bir yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. Biblioshiny arayüzü ile R programlama dilini kullanarak, Web of Science (WoS) veritabanından elde edilen verileri analiz ettik ve bu alanda hakim eğilimleri ve önemli katkıda bulunanları belirledik. Analizimiz, 1988 ile 2024 yılları arasında yayınlanan, 112 dergide 5.107 kişi tarafından yazılan ve yıllık ortalama yayın oranı 8,42 makale olan 1683 makaleyi kapsamaktadır. Temel bulgular, Birleşik Krallık'ın bu alandaki işbirlikçi araştırmalarda lider ülke olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Davids K. en üretken yazar olarak ortaya çıkarken (n=47), Victoria Üniversitesi kurumsal üretkenlikte (n=53) başı çekmiştir. Anahtar kelime analizi, ağırlıklı olarak “spor”, “performans” ve “karar verme” konularına odaklanıldığını, bunları “geri dönüş”, “güvenilirlik” ve “fiziksel aktivite” konularının izlediğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, son dönemdeki eğilimler, sporda karar verme bağlamında rehabilitasyon, yeniden yapılanma ve futbol gibi konulara giderek daha fazla vurgu yapıldığını göstermektedir. Bu kapsamlı analiz, sporda karar verme konusundaki araştırmaların evrimi ve mevcut durumu hakkında değerli bilgiler sunmakta ve bu alandaki gelecekteki bilimsel çabaları bilgilendirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Spor
• Karar verme
• Bibliyometrik analiz
• R
• Biblioshiny
• Wos

Kaynakça

1. Aktürk, C. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of clinical decision support systems. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 10(1), 61-74.
2. Alver, B. (2003). Çeşitli kamu kurum ve kuruluşlarında çalışanların empatik becerileri, karar stratejileri ve psikolojik belirtileri arasındaki ilişkiler. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
3. Ardern, C.L., Glasgow, P., & Schneiders, A. (2016). Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(14):853-864.
4. Aydogdu, A. L. F. (2023). Trends of publications on transformational leadership in nursing: a bibliometric analysis. Leadership in Health Services, 37(1), 34-52.
5. Barbosa, W., Prado, T., Batista, C., Câmara, J. C., Cerqueira, R., Coelho, R., & Guarieiro, L. (2022). Electric vehicles: bibliometric analysis of the current state of the art and perspectives. Energies, 15(2), 395.
6. Benckendorff, P. (2009). Themes and trends in Australian and New Zealand tourism research: A social network analysis of citations in two leading journals (1994–2007). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 1-15.
7. Bennett, K. (2016). Reluctant readers: An analysis of educational and LIS literature from 1993-2013. SLIS Connecting. 5(1):84.
8. Bosshard, A. B., Leroux, M., Lester, N. A., Bickel, B., Stoll, S., & Townsend, S. W. (2022). From collocations to call-ocations: using linguistic methods to quantify animal call combinations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76(9), 122.

9. Cetin, M.C., & Kara, M.A. (2024). Effective decision-making scale in sport (SEKVÖ): Validity and reliability study. Gazi J Phys Educ Sport Sci. 29(1):40-52.
10. Chen, J, Ablanedo-Rosas, J.H., Frankwick, G.L., & Arevalo, F.R.J. (2021). The state of artificial intelligence in marketing with directions for future research. Int J Bus Intell Res. 12(2):1-26.
11. Chen, T.T. (2016). The congruity between linkage-based factors and content-based clusters-an experimental study using multiple document corpora. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 67(3):610-619.
12. Chung, K.H., & Cox, R.A. (1990). Patterns of productivity in the finance literature: A study of the bibliometric distributions. J Finance. 45(1):301-309.
13. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative science quarterly, 1-25.
14. De Waelle, S., Van Bostraeten, S., Lenoir, M., Deconinck, F. J., & Bennett, S. J. (2021). Visual cognition and experience mediate the relation between age and decision making in youth volleyball players. Optometry and Vision Science, 98(7), 802-808.
15. Delgado Hernández Y.L., López Regalado O., Calua Cueva M.R, & Moreno Muro, J.P. (2021). Autonomous learning in the educational context: A psychological perspective. ASEAN J Psychiatry. 22(9).
16. Deniz, M. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin karar vermede öz saygı karar verme stilleri ve problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (15), 23-35.
17. Egghe, L., & Rao, I.R. (2008). Study of different h-indices for groups of authors. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 59(8):1276-1281.
18. Falahati, K. (2021).The standard model of rational risky decision-making. J Risk Financial Manag. 14(4):158.
19. Fardal, H., & Sørnes, J.O. (2008). IS strategic decision-making: A garbage can view. Issues Informing Sci Inf Technol. 5.
20. Fernandez-Rodriguez MA, & Alvarez L. (2021). Microgels and nanogels at interfaces and emulsions: Identifying opportunities from a bibliometric analysis. Front Phys. 9:754684.
21. Fontánez, R., De Jesus, K., Frontera, W. R., & Micheo, W. (2023). Return to sports following shoulder injury: Clinical evaluation, isokinetic, and functional testing. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 22(6), 191-198.
22. Fu, H., Yu, B., Wang, H., Tong, H., Jiang, L., Zhang, Y., ... & Lin, J. (2022). Knowledge domain and hotspots concerning photosensitive hydrogels for tissue engineering applications: a bibliometric and visualized analysis (1996-2022). Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 1067111.
23. Gheno G. (2021). BIBLIOBICLUSTER: a bicluster algorithm for Bibliometrics. In: Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations: 17th IFIP WG 12.5 International Conference, AIAI Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, June 25-27, 2021, Proceedings 17. Springer International Publishing; 2021:271-282.
24. Gürer, B., Karababa, E.M., & Canlı, E. (2019). The effect of mental toughness of individuals doing outdoor sports on their decision-making skills. Turk J Sport Exerc. 21(1):144-154.
25. Habib, R., & Afzal, M.T. (2017). Paper recommendation using citation proximity in bibliographic coupling. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 25(4):2708-2718.
26. Hammarfelt, B. (2012). Harvesting footnotes in a rural field: Citation patterns in Swedish literary studies. J Doc. 68(4):536-558.
27. Hamzah, M., Sobey, A. (2012).The use of business metadata to support decision-making processes. Int J Innov Manag Technol, 3(5):557.
28. Hepler, T.J, & Feltz, D.L. (2012). Path analysis examining self-efficacy and decision-making performance on a simulated baseball task. Res Q Exerc Sport. 83(1):55-64.
29. Jankelová N, & Puhovichová D.(2020). Normative and descriptive perception of strategic decision-making. In: SHS Web of Conferences. Vol 83. EDP Sciences; 01027.
30. John, S., & Rajashekar, B. (2011). Qualitative analysis of semantic clustering in early and mid adolescence. Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(1), 13-18.
31. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99-127).
32. Kara M. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between decision-making styles and cognitive flexibility levels of athletes in karate branch [Master's Thesis]. Sakarya, Turkey: Sakarya University of Applied Sciences
33. Karobari, M. I., Maqbool, M., Ahmad, P., Abdul, M. S. M., Marya, A., Venugopal, A., ... & Noorani, T. Y. (2021). Endodontic microbiology: a bibliometric analysis of the top 50 classics. BioMed Research International, 2021(1), 6657167.
34. Koçoğlu E. (2010). Decision-making process of managers in enterprises and the use of information systems in this process: The case of Ankara province [Master's Thesis]. Ankara, Turkey: Institute of Social Sciences
35. Kuwashima, K. (2014). How to use models of organisational decision-making? Ann Bus Adm Sci. 13(4):215-230.
36. Laborde, S., Dosseville, F., & Allen, M. S. (2016). Emotional intelligence in sport and exercise: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 26(8), 862-874.
37. Lastella, M., Onay, Z., Scanlan, A. T., Elsworthy, N., Pitchford, N., & Vincent, G. E. (2020). Wakeup call: reviewing the effects of sleep on decision-making in athletes and implications for sports officials. Front Psychol.
38. Lee, H.Y., Chung, C.Y., & Wei, G. (2022). Research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020. In: Frontiers in Education. Vol 7. Frontiers Media SA; 765233.
39. Liu, S., Song, L., Dai, W., Liu, M., Zhang, H., Zhang, X., ... & Hu, Y. (2023). Worldwide productivity and research trend of publications concerning electroactive materials and spinal cord injury: A bibliometric study. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1094059.
40. Mandell, M.B. (1988). The consequences of improving dissemination in garbage-can decision processes: Insights from a simulation model. Knowledge. 9(3):343-361.
41. Mayer, J., Burgess, S., & Thiel, A.(2020). Return-to-play decision-making in team sports athletes: A quasi-naturalistic scenario study. Front Psychol. 11:1020.
42. Mendes, G.H., Oliveira, M.G., Gomide, E.H., & Nantes, J.F.D. (2017). Uncovering the structures and maturity of the new service development research field through a bibliometric study (1984-2014). J Serv Manag. 28(1):182-223.
43. Nerur, S.P., Rasheed, A.A, & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strateg Manag J. 29(3):319-336.
44. Ni, Q., Amalfitano, N., Biasioli, F., Gallo, L., Tagliapietra, F., & Bittante, G. (2022). Bibliometric review on the volatile organic compounds in meat. Foods;11(22):3574.
45. Nichols, J. J., Morgan, P. B., Jones, L. W., & Efron, N. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of ophthalmic journals. JAMA Ophthalmology, 141(7), 651-657.
46. Oraby, T., & Bauch, C.T. (2015). Bounded rationality alters the dynamics of paediatric immunisation acceptance. Sci Rep. 5(1):10724.
47. Özkaya, A. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of the publications made in STEM education area. Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 590-628.
48. Papamichail, K.N., & Robertson, I. (2003). Supporting societal decision-making: A process perspective. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 12(2-3):203-212.
49. Park, H., You, S., & Wolfram, D. (2018). Informal data citation for data sharing and reuse is more common than formal data citation in biomedical fields. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol.69(11):1346-1354.
50. Raab, M. (2012). Simple heuristics in sports. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(2), 104-120.
51. Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2009). The role of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput Hum Behav. 25(6):1195-1206.
52. Roca, A., & Williams, A.M. (2017). Does decision-making transfer across similar and dissimilar sports? Psychol Sport Exerc. 31:40-43.
53. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and psychological measurement, 55(5), 818-831.
54. Simon H. (1987). Decision-making and organisational design: Organization theory, selected readings.
55. Smith, D., & Keegan, R. (2023). Managing vulnerabilities in practitioner decision-making within sport psychology services: Responding to the evidence base. J Appl Sport Psychol. 35(3):433-454.
56. Thompson, D.F., & Walker, C.K. (2015). A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy. 35(6):551-559.
57. Tonbuloglu, B., & Akbel, B.A. (2023). Research trends in the field of emergency remote teaching: A bibliometric analysis of open access literature. Online Learn. 27(1):485-517.
58. Uzun, N.B. (2022). Global research trends in measurement invariance: A systematic biometric analysis on framework and knowledge structures. Int Innov Educ Reser. 2(2):1-46.
59. Walton, P. (2019). Information evolution and organisations. Information.10(12):393.
60. Yao, L., Zhang, L., Tai, Y., Jiang, R., Cui, J., Gang, X., & Liu, M. (2024). Visual analysis of obesity and hypothyroidism: a bibliometric analysis. Medicine, 103(1), e36841.
61. Yılmaz, M. (2006). Lotka law and library and information science literature in Turkey. Türk Kütüphaneciliği. 16(1):61-69.
62. Yu, K., Gong, R., Hu, S., & Luo, S. (2019). Using fractal theory to study application in library and information science. In: 2019 International Conference on Organisational Innovation (ICOI 2019). Atlantis Press; 779-782.
63. Zanon, F., Cesarano, C., Cotroneo, Y., Fusco, G., Budillon, G., & Aulicino, G. (2022). Remote sensing of sea surface salinity: A bibliometric analysis. Advances in Oceanography and Limnology, 13(2).
64. Zhou, Q. (2022). Assessing books' academic impacts via integrated computation of multi-level citation information. Electron Libr. 40(4):338-358.
65. Zhou, X., & Sun, S. (2017). Bibliography-based quantitative translation history. Perspectives. 25(1):98-119.