Participants' Views on the Effect of Nature Walks as a Serious Leisure Activity on Psychological Well-Being: A Phenomenological Study

Öz

This study aims to examine the views of participants who engage in nature walks as a serious leisure activity regarding their psychological well-being. To explain the problem situation, interpretative phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. In terms of sample selection, the criterion sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling strategies, was used. Eight participants, including three women and five men, volunteered to participate in the study from a sports club located in Kırıkkale province. The participants' experiences were obtained through semi-structured interview questions. The data were analyzed using the MAXQDA 24 program. The research findings were divided into five themes: Integration with nature and search for meaning, emotional healing and mental balance, personal awareness and ınner discovery, strengthening social bonds, and stress reduction and mental clarity. In conclusion, nature walks are an important leisure activity that supports participants' psychological well-being by satisfying their needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Serious Leisure
• Hiking
• Psychological Well-Being
• Qualitative Method
• Phenomenology

Ciddi Serbest Zaman Etkinliği Olarak Doğa Yürüyüşü Yapan Katılımcıların Psikolojik İyi Oluş Üzerine Etkisine Dair Görüşleri: Bir Fenomenoloji Çalışması

Öz

Bu araştırmada ciddi serbest zaman etkinliği olarak doğa yürüyüşü yapan katılımcıların psikolojik iyi oluşlarına dair görüşlerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma da problem durumunu açıklayabilmek için nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden bir tanesi olan yorumlayıcı fenomenolojik desen kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada örneklem seçiminde ise, amaçlı örnekleme stratejilerinden ölçüt örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya Kırıkkale ilinde bulunan bir spor kulübü üyelerinden 3 kadın 5 erkek toplamda 8 kişi gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Katılımcıların deneyimleri yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme soruları ile elde edilmiştir. Veriler MAXQDA 24 programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları beş temaya ayrılmıştır: Doğa ile bütünleşme ve anlam arayışı, duygusal iyileşme ve ruh dengelenmesi, kişisel farkındalık ve içsel keşif, sosyal bağların güçlenmesi ve stres azaltma ve zihinsel berraklık. Sonuç olarak, doğa yürüyüşlerinin katılımcıların özerklik, yeterlik ve ilişkilenme ihtiyaçlarını tatmin ederek psikolojik iyi oluşlarını destekleyen önemli bir ciddi serbest zaman etkinliği olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ciddi Serbest Zaman
• doğa yürüyüşü
• psikolojik iyi oluş
• nitel yöntem
• fenomenoloji

Kaynakça

1. Aksu, H., S. (2024). Açık alan rekreasyonunun psikolojik, sosyal ve fiziksel iyi oluş üzerindeki çok boyutlu etkileri. Journal of Management, Tourism and Foresight, 1, 63-89.
2. Ardahan, F. (2012). Doğa yürüyüşü yapanların yaşam doyum düzeyleri ile duygusal zeka ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 11-19. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mjh/issue/83254/1437861
3. Avşar, R., ve Güzel Gürbüz, P. (2024). Doğa Sporu Katılımcılarının Macera Davranışı Arama, Merak ve Keşfetme ile Psikolojik İyi Oluş Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Uluslararası Dağcılık ve Tırmanış Dergisi, 7(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.36415/dagcilik.1440644
4. Ayhan, C., ve Eskiler, E. (2024). The relationship between leisure attitude and happiness: The mediating effect of recreational flow experience [Serbest zaman tutumu ile mutluluk arasındaki ilişki: Rekreasyonel akış deneyiminin aracılık etkisi]. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science, 8(1), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.1504810
5. Barton, J., ve Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science ve Technology, 44(10), 3947-3955. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r
6. Bayram, A., Yalcin, I., Sahin, E., Ekinci, N. E., Talaghir, L.-G., ve Iconomescu, T.-M. (2025). The role of recreational flow experience and well-being on re-participation intention: recreational sport participants [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 16 - 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574337
7. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., ve Kaplan, S. (2008). The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207-1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
8. Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., ve Gross, J. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005

9. Braun, V., ve Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis : A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://digital.casalini.it/9781526417305
10. Braun, V., ve Clarke, V. (2019). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
11. Codina, N., Montesinos, J., V., P., Valenzuela, R., ve Stebbins, R. A. (2024). Perspectivas temporales tras el ocio serio de la juventud. Cauriensia. Revista anual de Ciencias Eclesiásticas, 19, 1167-1190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-4256.19.1167
12. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. (M Bütün ve D. S. Beşir, Trans.). Siyasal Kitapevi.
13. Deci, E. L., ve Ryan, R., M. (Eds.). ( 2004). Handbook of self-determination research. . University Rochester Press.
14. Deci, E. L., ve Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
15. Demir, A., Barut, A. İ., Ballıkaya, E., ve Çifçi, F. (2019). Doğa yürüyüşü ve yamaç paraşütü sporu yapan bireylerin yaşam doyumu ve özyeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Examination of Life Satisfaction And Self-Efficacy In Trekking And Paragliding Individuals]. Spor Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 137-145. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/seder/issue/44750/578964
16. Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C., ve Lucas, R. E. (2009). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener (pp. 67-100). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_4
17. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., ve Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
18. Dilmaç, E. (2023). Ekstrem sporcularda rekreasyonel akış deneyiminin esenlik algısı üzerine etkisi (Yüksek lisans tezi, Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Rekreasyon Anabilim Dalı). Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi.
19. Grady, M. P. (1998). Qualitative and action research: A practitioner handbook. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
20. Guba, E. G., ve Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
21. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., ve Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(Volume 35, 2014), 207-228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
22. Hayosh, T. (2017). Engagement is serious leisure as practice for coping with the stress of daily life. World Leisure Journal, 59(3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2017.1345485
23. Kane, M. J., ve Zink, R. (2004). Package adventure tours: markers in serious leisure careers. Leisure Studies, 23(4), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261436042000231655
24. Karabulut, E. O. (2024). Doğa yürüyüşü yapan bireylerin psikolojik dayanıklılık ve yaşam doyumlarının incelenmesi [Examination of Psychological Resilience and Life Satisfaction of Individuals Who Engage in Nature Walks]. Yalova Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 31-46. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yalovaspor/issue/84037/1398954
25. Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., ve Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1007.
26. Kim, J., ve Park, S.-H. (2018). Leisure and health benefits among Korean adolescents with visual impairments. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 13(1), 1435097. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1435097
27. Koca, C. (2017). Spor bilimlerinde nitel araştırma yaklaşımı. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(1), 30-48.
28. Koçak, F. (2016). Cycling in Turkey: Reasons and benefits of cycling. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 5760-5771.
29. Mansourian, Y. (2024). From serious leisure to passionate pastime: expanding the conceptual landscape. Leisure Studies, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2024.2413055
30. McLean, D. D., Hurd, A. R., ve Rogers, N. B. (2008). Kraus’ recreation and leisure in modern society ((8th Edition). ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers
31. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
32. Özant, M. İ., Durhan, T. A., Demirel, M., ve Zorba, E. (2025). Recreational activity motivation and perceived health outcomes in recreation from men's perspective. Journal of Men's Health, 21(3), 127-136.
33. Özkurt, B., Altın, Y., Eskiler, E., & Küçükibiş, H. F. (2025). Spora devam niyeti ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Madde tepki kuramı ve klasik test kuramına dayalı geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(2), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.1593920
34. Punch, S., Russell, Z., ve Graham, E. (2022). Serious leisure experience in a dyadic pursuit: elite player motivations and participation in tournament bridge. Leisure Studies, 41(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2021.1942524
35. Ryff, C., D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1069.
36. Sandelowski, M. (2008). Theoretical saturation. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 875–876). Sage Publications.
37. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., ... & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907.
38. Savin-Baden, M., ve Howell Major. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice (1st Edition ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003377986
39. Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
40. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd
41. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., ve Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 411–433. 
42. Stebbins, R., A. (2015). The serious leisure perspective. In Leisure and positive psychology: Linking activities with positiveness (pp. 11-40). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
43. Stebbins, R. A., & Sachsman, D. B. (2017). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. Routledge.
44. Stebbins, R., A. (1982). Serious Leisure:A Conceptual Statement. Pacific Sociological Review, 25(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388726
45. Stebbins, R., A. (2005). Choice and experiential definitions of leisure. Leisure Sciences, 27(4), 349-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400590962470
46. Stebbins, R., A. (2018). Leisure and the positive psychological states. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1374444
47. Tao, S., Dai, T., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, B., ve Jiang, H. (2024). How do built environment characteristics influence bus use patterns across neighbourhood types in Beijing? A machine-learning analysis. Travel Behaviour and Society, 35, 100756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100756
48. Tez, Ö. Y., Gürbüz, P. G., ve Esentaş, M. (2021). Regulatory role of gender in the effect of outdoor recreation self-efficacy on the recreational risk-taking behavior. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.33468/sbsebd.164
49. Tezcan, N., ve Dilmaç, E. (2024). The impact of the recreational flow experience on the perception of wellness among individuals engaged in extreme sports. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 8(3), 734-749. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1540910
50. Twohig-Bennett, C., ve Jones, A. (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166, 628-637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030
51. Wang, J., ve Tian, H. (2024). Serious leisure and successful aging among elderly air volleyball players: examining the mediating role of social support and flow experience [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 15 - 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403373
52. Wilson, M. L., ve Elsweiler, D. (2010). Casual-leisure Searching: the Exploratory Search scenarios that break our current models.
53. Zhou, L., Chlebosz, K., Tower, J., ve Morris, T. (2020). An exploratory study of motives for participation in extreme sports and physical activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(1), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1627175