DETERMINATION OF THE PEOPLE’S SATISFACTION WHO GO TO THE ZOO FOR RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 44 - 59, 01.10.2017

Huseyin Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.22282/ojrs.2017.20

Öz

This study done for the determination of the people’s satisfaction who go to the Gaziantep Zoo in their leisure time for recreational activity.The population consists of 1316 people who came to the Gaziantep Zoo in 2014 for recreational activity. The survey done by Uysal 2005 used for data collection. The datas obtained in this study statistically analysed by using SPSS 16.0 packaged software. In data analysing; frequency, percentage, average, standard deviation used as statistical method, student t-test used forcomparing two independent groups having variables with normal distribution, ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison tests used for comparing more than two independent groups having variables with normal distribution.As a result of the study, people who come to zoo in their lesiure time mostly inhabit in Gaziantep province, high school graduates and students prefer more to visit zoo, mostof the participants come with the advice of acquaintances, most of them spend more than an hour and a great mojority of them are pleased with the quality of services.

Kaynakça

• Acikkol, C. (1984). Master Plan for Ankara Zoo and The Planning of Aquatic Exhibition Building, Master Thesis, O.D.T.U. Ankara, Turkey.
• Akbaba, G. (2001). Hayvanat bahcelerimiz. Bilim ve Teknik dergisi, 408:28-33.
• Andereck, K., Caldwell, LL. (1994). Motive-based segmentation of a publ ic zoological park market. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12(2):19-31.
• Andereck, KL., Caldwell, LL. (1994). Variable Selection in Tourism Market Segmentation Models. Journal of Travel Research, 33; 40-46.
• Berkyez, S. (1992). Hayvanat Bahcesi Fiziksel Planlamalarda Goz Onunde Bulundurulmasi Gerekli Genel Prensibler, Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Adana, Turkey.
• Bozdogan, AE., Yalcin, N. (2006). Bilim merkezlerinin ilkogretim ogrencilerinin fene karşi ilgi duzeylerinin Egitim Dergisi, 2(7):95-114.
• degişmesine ve akademik başarisina etkisi: Enerji parki. Ege
• Braund, M and Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out‐of‐school learning. İnternational Journal of Science Education, 28(12):1373-1388.
• Couch, AS. (2013). Zoo Visitor Satisfaction With Animal Visibility. Community, Agriculture, Recreation, And Resource Studies Master Of Science Submitted To Michigan State University In Partial Fulfillment The Requirements For The Degree Of.
• Falk, JH and Adelman, LM. (2003). İnvestigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (2):163-176.
• Falk, JH., Reinhard, EM., Vernon, CL., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, NL., and Heimlich, JE. (2007). Why zoos & matter: Assessing the impact of a visit to a zoo or aquarium. Silver Spring MD: Association of Zoos and Aquaria,51(1): 55-79.
• Fradich, H. (1988). Guide Book to The Berlin Zoological Garden and its Aquarium, H. Heenemann GmbH and Co, West Germany, Pp.133-144.
• Gumus, H., Alay Ozgul, S. and Karakılıç, M. (2017). The factors that has an effect on the attendance and location choice of the visitors to the parks and recreations centers for physical activıties. Spormetre. 15 (1), 31-38.
• Gumus, H. (2016). Investigation of Effects of Recreational Areas Usage.Doctoral thesis, Gazi University Health Sciences Institute.
• Gumus, H., Gurbuz, B. and Yildirim Y. (2017). The Investigation of the Relationship Between Preference Factor of Recreation Area and Mood of Recreation Area. 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences & Education Research. 27-29 April, Rome-Italy.
• Gunergun, F. (2006). Turkiye’de hayvanat bahceleri tarihine giris. I. Ulusal Veteriner Hekimligi Tarihi ve Mesleki Etik
• Sempozyumu Bildirileri. Elazig, pp.185-218.
• http://www.gaziantep.com/tr/sehir/gaziantep-hayvanat-bahcesi (Erisim Tarihi:10.11.2014).
• Jarvis, T and Pell, A. (2002). Effect of the Challenger experience on children‟s attitudes to science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10): 979-1000.
• Jones, TW. (1986). What Are Zoos, Garten-und-Landschaft, 85(1):19-23.
• Karanikola, P., Tampakis, S., Tsantopoulos, G and Digbasani, C. (2014). The public zoo as recreation and environmental education area: Visitor’s perceptions and management implications. Wseas Transactions On Environment and Development, Grecee, 10.2224-3496.
• Kenneth, JP. (1987). Zoo Design: The Reality of Wild Illusions, The University of Michigan School of Natural Resources, Washington, pp.193.
• Kenny, HA. (2009). Monkeying around: Examining the effects of a community zoo on the science achievement Toledo, Ohio, USA.
• of third graders. Unpublished dissertation. The University of
• Kurt, E. (2011). Sasali Dogal Yasam Parki Orneginde Hayvanat Bahceleri Uzerine Bir Arastirma. Yuksek
• Lisans Tezi.Ege Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, İzmir, Turkey.
• Kutska, D. (2009). Variation in Visitor Perceptions of a Polar Bear Enclosure Based on the Presence of Natural vs. Un-Natural Enrichment Items. Zoo Biology, 28: 292-306.
• Lukas, KE and Ross, SR. (2005). Zoo visitor knowledge and attitudes toward gorillas and chimpanzees. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4); 33-48.
• Mason, P. (2000). Zoo tourism: The need for more research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(4); 333-339.
• Morgan, JM and Hodgkinson, M. (1999). The motivation and social orientation of visitors attending a zoological park. Environment and Behavior, 31(2): 227-239.
• Oduro, C., Antwi-Boasiako, C.,Yao, F.C.A. (2001). Visitorassessment of Accra Zoo from Ghana Journal of Forestry, 10 (1):27-33.
• Ozgoren, F. (2007). Bos Zaman Pazarlamasi ve Muzecilikte BirUygulamaAdli Yuksek Lisans Tezi. Marmara Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Ozguc, E and Bekdemir, A. (2008). Hayvanat bahcelerinin peyzaj planlama ve tasarim ilkeleri. İstanbul Universitesi Orman Fakultesi Dergisi, 59(1): 59-73. Ozturk, Y. (2012). Turizmde Destinasyon Markalasmasi Uzerine Bir Arastirma:Beypazari Ornegi Yuksek Tezi. Gazi Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu Turizm İsletmeciligi Egitimi Ana Bilim Dali, Ankara, Turkey.
• Pace, S and Tesi, R. (2004). Adult‟s perception of field trips taken within grades K- 12: Eight case studies in the New York metropolitan area. Education, 125(1): 30-40.
• Paris, SG., Yambor, KM and Packard, BW. (1998). Hands-on biology: A museum- school-university Elementary School Journal, 98(3): 267-288.
• partnership for enhancing students‟interest and learning in science.
• Rajack, L., Waren, N. (1996). The modern zoo: How do people perceive zoo animals? Applied Animal Behaviour Science,47:109-118.
• Randler, C. (2010). Animal related activities as determinants of species knowledge. Eurasia Journal of , Science & Technology Education, 6(4): 237-243.
• Randler, C., Baumgartner, S., Eisele, H and Kienzle, W. (2007). Learning at workstations in the zoo: A controlled evaluation of cognitive and affective outcomes. Visitor Studies, 10(2):205-216.
• Randler, C., Kummer, B and Wilhelm, C. (2012). Adolescent learning in the zoo: Embedding a non-formal learning biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology,21(3):384-391.
• environment to teach formal aspects of vertebrate
• Rix, C and McSorley, J. (1999). An investigation into the role that school-based interactive science centres may İnternational Journal of Science Education, 21(6):577-593.
• play in the education of primary-aged children.
• Robinson, E. (1982). The behavior of the museum visitor. New Series No. 5. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
• Saayman, M and Slabbert, E. (2004). A Market Analysis of Visitors to the Pretoria National Zoo. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation. 26:89-96.
• Tofield, S., Coll, RK., Vyle, B and Bolstad, R. (2003). Zoos as a source of free choice learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(1): 67-99.
• Turley, SK. (2001) .Children and the demand for recreational experiences; The case of zoos. Leisure Studies, 20(1):1-18.
• Ural, A and Kilic, I.(2005).“Bilimsel Arastirma Sureci ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi”, Detay Yayincilik, Ankara
• Uysal KC. (2005). Muze Egitimi ve Muze Ziyaretcilerinin Ataturk ve Kurtulus Savasi Muzesi Ziyaretci Profili Araciligiyla İncelenmesi adli Yuksek Lisans Tezi.Ankara Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Muze Anabilim dali,Ankara,Turkey.
• Ulgen, A and Tekin, A. (2000). Gunumuzde degisen hayvanat bahcesi anlayisina onculuk yapan Bogazici Hayvanat Bahcesi. V.Turkiye Ziraat Muhendisligi Teknik Kongresi, Ankara, 1:301-310.
• Wylson, A. (1994). Theme Parks, Leisure Centres, Zoos and Aquaria, Longman Harlow, New York, pp.183.
• Yavuz, M. (2012). Fen egitiminde Hayvanat Bahcelerinin Kullaniminin Akademik Basari ve Kaygiya Etkisi ve Ogretmen-Ogrenci Gorusleri Yuksek Lisans Tezi.Sakarya Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu ilkogretim Anabilim Dali Fen Bilgisi egitim bilimi Dali, Sakarya,Turkey.
• Yilmaz, S. (2007). Hayvanat bahcelerinin doga korumadaki rolu. VII. Ulusal Ekoloji ve Cevre Kongresi, Malatya.
• Yilmaz, S and Ozbilen, A. (2011). Hayvanat bahceleri tasarim ilkeleri ve tipolojileri. Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Orman Fakultesi Dergisi,12 (1):47-56.
• Yilmaz, S., Ozbilen, A. and Mumcu, S. (2010). Effects of spatial differences on visitor perceptions at zoo exhibits. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(16): 2327-2340.