Geleneksel ve Modern Güreşçilerin Görsel ve İşitsel Reaksiyon Sürelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 429 - 434, 30.07.2023

Muhammet Hakan Mayda , Ahmet Koyunlu

https://doi.org/10.22282/tojras.1317739

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı geleneksel güreş ve modern güreş sporcularının görsel ve işitsel reaksiyon sürelerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Çalışma, geleneksel (n=22) ve modern (n=24) güreş yapan toplam 46 profesyonel ağır sıklet güreşçi üzerinde uygulanmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan sporcular yağlı güreş, aşırtmalı aba güreşi, kapışmalı aba güreşi, karakucak güreşi, kısa şalvar güreşi gibi geleneksel güreşler ile serbest güreş ve Greko-Romen güreşi gibi modern güreşlerle uğraşan güreşçilerdi. Görsel ve işitsel reaksiyon süresi için (İRZ: cognitivefun.net) bilgisayar sistemi kullanılarak ölçümler alınmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda ulaşılan verilerin istatistiki olarak değerlendirilmesinde SPSS paket programı kullanıldı. İstatistiksel değerlendirme sonucunda modern güreş ile ilgilenen güreşçilerin geleneksel güreş ile ilgilenen güreşçilere göre, görsel reaksiyon (fastest), görsel reaksiyon (slowest) ve görsel reaksiyon (average) zamanı ortalamaları daha iyi bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Yine işitsel reaksiyon (slowest) ve işitsel reaksiyon (average) zamanı değerlerinde de modern güreşçilerin lehinde anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Geleneksel güreşçilerin daha iyi düzeyde işitsel reaksiyon (fastest) zamanı ortalamalarına sahip olduğu bulunmuştur ama istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir (p>0,05). Sonuç olarak, modern güreş müsabaka sürelerinin geleneksel güreşe göre daha kısa olması nedeniyle modern güreş müsabakaları daha hareketli geçmektedir. Dolayısıyla her iki güreşçi de kendi müsabakalarına göre antrenman yaptıkları için geleneksel güreşçilerin tepki sürelerinin modern güreşçilere göre daha az geliştiği söylenebilir. Geleneksel güreş sporcularına daha fazla reaksiyon süresi geliştirici antrenmanlar yapmaları önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Görsel reaksiyon, geleneksel güreş, işitsel reaksiyon, modern güreş.

Comparison of Visual and Auditory Reaction Times of Wrestlers Engaging in Traditional and Modern Wrestling

Öz

The aim of this study is to compare the visual and auditory reaction times of the athletes engaged in traditional wrestling and modern wrestling. Heavyweight athletes (n=22) who are involved in traditional wrestling such as oil wrestling, plaid aba wrestling, competitive aba wrestling, karakucak wrestling, short shalwar wrestling, and modern wrestling such as freestyle wrestling and Greco-Roman (n=24) wrestling were included in the study. Measurements were taken using the computer system (IRZ: cognitivefun.net) for visual and auditory reaction time. SPSS package program was used for statistical evaluation of the data obtained as a result of the study. As a result of the statistical evaluation, it was found that the average of visual reaction (fastest), visual reaction (slowest) and visual reaction (average) time of the wrestlers who are interested in modern wrestling compared to the wrestlers who are interested in traditional wrestling (p<0.005). In addition, it was found that the traditional wrestlers were at a better level in the average of the auditory reaction (fastest) time between the two groups (p>0.005), and the auditory reaction (slowest) and auditory reaction (average) time values were found to be significant between modern wrestlers and traditional wrestlers in favor of modern wrestlers (p<0.005). As a result; due to the fact that the duration of the competitions of modern wrestling is shorter than that of traditional wrestling, the competitions in modern wrestling are more active. Traditional wrestling is more stable than modern wrestling. Therefore, since both wrestlers train according to their own competitions, it can be said that traditional wrestlers have less improved reaction time than modern wrestlers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Visual reaction, traditional wrestling, auditory reaction, modern wrestling

Kaynakça

• Açıkada, C. & Ergen, E. (1990). Science and sport. Ankara: Büro-Tek Ofset Printing.
• Ağaoğlu, S. A. , İmamoğlu, O. , Kishalı, N. F. & Çebi, M. (2001). Investigation of some physilogic and antropometric characteristics. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 1(3), 59-67.
• Aslan, C. S. , Özer, U. & Dalkıran, O. (2016). Examination of coordination and reaction characteristics in girls according to age variable. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Health Sciences Institute, 4 (1), 27-33.
• Auxter D., Pyfer J. & Hunettig C. (1993). Adapted physical education and reaction. (7. Ed.) Mosby, USA.
• Baić, M., Trajković, N., Djordjevic, D., Stankovic, M., & Pekas, D. (2022). Strength profile in wrestlers-a systematic review. Archives of Budo, 18, 151-164.
• Bayraktar, I., Deliceoğlu, G., Yaman, M., & Yaman, Ç. (2012). The comparison of some physical and physiological parameters of sprinters and throwers with same age wrestlers. International Refereed Academic Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, 2(2), 37-46.
• Bıyıklı, Y. (1993). The role of public institutions in training young wrestlers and the example of Bursa region. Istanbul: Istanbul Wrestling Specialization Club Conservation Foundation Publication.
• Bompa, T. O. (2007). Training theory and method-periodization. Ankara: Sports Bookstore.
• Catelli, R., & Manaham, R. (1990). Reaction time and movement time. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 22(1), 75-77.
• Chaabene, H., Negra, Y., Bouguezzi, R., Mkaouer, B., Franchini, E., Julio, U., & Hachana, Y. (2017). Physical and physiological attributes of wrestlers: an update. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 31(5), 1411-1442.
• Cicioğlu, İ., Kürkçü, R., Eroğlu, H., & Yüksek, S. (2007). Seasonal variation of physical and physiological characteristics of 15-17 age group wrestlers. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 5(4), 151-156.
• Cieśliński, I., Gierczuk, D., & Sadowski, J. (2021). Identification of success factors in elite wrestlers—An exploratory study. PloS One, 16(3), e0247565.
• Çolakoğlu, H. (1986). Children and sports. Ankara: National Education Printing House.
• Çolakoğlu, M., Selamoğlu, S., Gündüz, N., Acarbay, Ş., & Çolakoğlu, S. (1993). The effects of isometric exercise on the correction of hamstring/quadriceps strength ratios of sprinters and jumpers. Journal of Sport Sciences, 4(1), 24-33.
• Dündar, U. (1996). Training theory. Ankara: Bagirgan Publishing House.
• Eroğlu, H. (2002). The effect of rapid weight loss on some physiological parameters in wrestlers. Master Thesis. Gazi University, Ankara.
• Günay M., Tamer K., Cicioğlu İ. (2006). Sports physiology and performance measurement. Anakara: Baran Ofset.
• İmamoğlu, O., Çebi, M., Kishalı, N. F., & Tunç, T. Investigation of some anthropometric and physiological parameters in female judo national team athletes. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 1(1), 34-40.
• Kahraman, A. (1989). Turkish wrestling until the Republic. Ankara: Ministry of Culture.
• Karakuş, S., Küçük, V., & Koç, H. (1996). Reaction tımes of badminton athletes participating in the 1995 balkan championship. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 1(2), 11-17.
• Kılıç, R., Sevim, Y., Aydos, L., & Günay, M. (1996). Investigation of the effects of circular quick strength training on some conditional characteristics of 14-16 age group wrestlers. HU Journal of Sport Sciences, 5(1).
• Kürkçü, R., Çalışkan, E., Şirinkan, A., & Erciş, S. (2010). The effects of exercise on the reaction time of adolescent wrestlers. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 9(4), 3-11.
• Maria Lopez-Gullon, J., Muriel, X., Dolores Torres-Bonete, M., Izquierdo, M., & Garcia-Pallares, J. (2011). Physical fitness differences between Freestyle and Greco-Roman elite wrestlers. Archives of Budo, 7(4), 217-225.
• Mokha, R., Kaur, G., & Sidhu, L. S. (1992). Effect of training on the reaction time of Indian female hockey players. The Journal of Sports Medicine And Physical Fitness, 32(4), 428-431.
• Özer, U. (2007). The effect of mini tennis training on the development of coordination and reaction time in 8-11 year old girls. Master Thesis. Cumhuriyet University, Sivas.
• Pancar, Z., Özdal, M., Pancar, S., & Biçer, M. (2016). Investigation of visual and auditory simple reaction time of 11-18 aged youth. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 2(4), 145-152.
• Sirico, F., Romano, V., Sacco, A. M., Belviso, I., Didonna, V., Nurzynska, D., & Di Meglio, F. (2020). Effect of video observation and motor imagery on simple reaction time in cadet pilots. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 5(4), 2-9.