Noise Pollution, Psychiatric Symptoms and Quality of Life: Noise Problem in the East Region of Turkey

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 75 - 81, 01.04.2012

Zafer Akan Ahmet Yılmaz Osman Özdemir Mehmet Ali Korpınar

Öz

Aim: As to clinical examinations, predisposition to aggression and aggressive behavior among drivers are very high in Turkey. For this reason, direct correlation between the noise pollution and general psychological symptoms with quality of life in public transport drivers were investigated in this survey. Material and Methods: Bus drivers of varying bus brands (F, O and P which has different noise levels) were subjected in this study. SCL-90-R and SF-36 questionnaire were used to assess the presence and severity of psychiatric symptoms and quality of life. Sound level meter (Smart Sensor AR844) was used for noise pollution measurements (dB(A)) within the buses and city main streets. Results: According to the measurements; F, O and P brand buses average 65.16 dB(A), 70.86 dB(A) and 75.33 dB(A) noise produces respectively. Especially, P brand mini-bus drivers were found to have worked under continuously high noise (75.33 dB(A), average 11.22±3.86 hours daily). According to psychiatric SCL-90-R and SF-36 assessments, observed psychiatric symptoms were more pronounced between the high noise exposed group than other groups (P<0.001). Discussion: In this survey, we observed that Psychologies and quality of life of bus drivers were affected by the noise pollution and noise pollution had cause to serious psychological symptoms on drivers such as anxiety, depression, hostility, etc., and noise had negative effects over the quality of life, particularly, when drivers were exposed for longer working periods and above certain values Key words: Noise Pollution; Work Place Safety; Psychological Symptoms; Quality of Life; Drivers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Noise Pollution; Work Place Safety; Psychological Symptoms; Quality of Life; Drivers.

Gürültü Kirliliği, Psikiyatrik Semptomlar ve Yaşam Kalitesi: Türkiye'nin Doğu Bölgesinde Gürültü Problemi

Öz

Amaç: Kliniksel bulgulara göre, agresyona yatkınlık ve agrasif davranış Türkiye'de toplu taşıma sürücüleri arasında oldukça yaygındır. Bu sebeple, bu çalışmada, gürültü kirliliği ile psikolojik semptomlar ve yaşam kalitesi arasında doğrudan bir ilişki olup olmadığı toplu taşıma araç sürücüleri üzerinde araştırıldı. Materyal ve Metod: Çeşitli marka ve model araçta (Farklı gürültü seviyelerine sahip P, O, F marka araçlar) çalışan araç sürücüleri bu çalışmaya alınmıştır. Sürücülerin psikiyatrik semptom ve yaşam kalitesi analizleri için SCL-90-R ve SF-36 analiz ölçekleri. Şehir içi ana caddelerde ve araçların içerisindeki gürültü seviyesinin belirlenmesinde gürültü seviye ölçüm cihazı (Smart Sensor AR844) kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: Ölçümlere göre F, O ve P marka araçlar sırasıyla ortalama 65.16 dB(A), 70.86 dB(A) ve 75.33 dB(A) gürültü üretmektedirler. özellikle P marka araç sürücüleri sürekli olarak yüksek gürültü altında çalışmaktadırlar (75.33 dB(A) ortalama 11.22±3.86 saat günlük). Psikiyatrik SCL-90-R ve SF-36 değerlendirmelerine göre gözlenen psikiyatrik semptomlar yüksek gürültüye maruz kalan çalışanlarda diğer iki gruba göre daha belirgindi (P<0.001). Tartışma: Bu çalışma, toplu taşıma araç sürücülerinin psikolojilerinin ve yaşam kalitelerinin gürültü seviyesine bağlı olarak özellikle sürücüler yüksek düzeyde gürültüye maruz kalırlarsa etkilendiğini ve gürültü kirliliğinin anksiete, depresyon, gibi ciddi psikolojik semptonlara yol açarak yaşam kalitesi üzerinde negatif etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur Anahtar kelimeler: Gürültü Kirliliği; İş Yeri Güvenliği; Psikolojik Semptomlar; Yaşam Kalitesi; Sürücüler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gürültü Kirliliği; İş Yeri Güvenliği; Psikolojik Semptomlar; Yaşam Kalitesi; Sürücüler.

Kaynakça

• Suter AH. The Hearing Conservation Amendment: 25 Years Later. Noise Health 2009; 11: 2-7. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.45306
• Evans GW. The Psychological Costs of Chronic Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution. In R. L. Isaacson & K. F. Jensen (Eds.), The Vulnerable Brain and Environmental Risks, Volume 3: Toxins in Air and Water. New York: Plenum. 1994; pp 167-182. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00014
• Babisch W, Beule B, Schust M, Kersten N, Ising H. Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiology 2005; 16: 33-40. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147104.84424.24
• Aydin Y, Kaltenbach M. Noise perception, heart rate and blood pressure in relation to aircraft noise in the vicinity of the Frankfurt airport. Clin Res Cardiol 2007; 96: 347- 58. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-007-0507-y
• EPA Public health and welfare criteria for noise 1973;. 550: 4-73-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. DOI: 10.1002/9780470479216
• Babisch W. Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence has increased. Noise Health 2006; 8: 1-29. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.32464
• Geen RG. Powers PC. Shock and Noise as Instigating Stimuli in Human Aggression. Psychological Reports, 1971; 28, pp. 983-5. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1971.28.3.983
• Mokhtar M, Kamaruddin S, Khan ZA, Mallick Z. A study on the effects of noise on industrial workers in Malaysia. J. Tech 2007; 46(A): 17-30. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.44.584
• Juang DF, Lee CH, Yang T, Chang MC. Noise pollution and its effects on medical care workers and patients in hospitals. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech 2010;. 7(4): 705-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04319.x
• Spreng M. Central nervous system activation by noise. Noise & Health 2000; 2(7): 49-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00415- 003-0237-7
• Berglund B, Lindvall T. Community noise. Document prepared for the World Health Organization. Archives of the Center for Sensory Research 1995; 2(1): Stockholm, Center for Sensory Research. DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639- 00202
• Maschke C, Rupp T, Hecht K. The influence of stressors on biochemical reactions – a review of present scientific findings with noise. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2000; 203: 45-53. DOI: 10.1078/S1438-4639(04)70007-3
• Banerjee D, Chakraborty SK, Bhattacharyya S,
• Gangopadhyay A. Appraisal and mapping the spatial temporal distribution of urban road traffic noise. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech 2009; 6(2): 325-35. DOI: CNKI:SUN:QDHY.0.2001-01-002
• Mohammadi Roozbahani M, Nassiri P, Jafari Shalkouhi P. Risk assessment of workers exposed to noise pollution in a textile plant. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech 2009; 6(4): 591-6. DOI: st09065
• Mishra RK, Parida M, Rangnekar S. Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise along bus rapid transit system corridor. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech 2010; 7(4): 737-50.
• Stansfeld S et al. Road traffic noise and psychiatric disorder: prospective findings from the Caerphilly Study. British Medical Journal 1996; 313(7052): 266-7. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.266
• Derogatis LR. The Symptom Checklist-90-revised.
• Minneapolis, MN: NCS Assessments 1992; DOI: 10.1007/s10862-009-9141-5
• Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short- Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
• Evans GW, Bullinger M, Hygge S. Chronic noise exposure and psychological response: A prospective study of children living under environmental stress. Psychological Science 1998; 9: 75-7.
• Hiramatsu K, et al. An analysis of the general health questionnaire survey around airports in terms of annoyance reaction. Internoise, Inrets, Nice 2000.
• Miyakita, et al. Is residential sound-proofing an effective measure in reducing the effects of aircraft noise? Internoise 1998, Noise Control Foundation. 1998.
• Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B. Subjective reactions to traffic noise with regard to some personality traits. Environment International 1997; 23: 221-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0160- 4120(97)00008-1
• Yoshida T, Osada Y, Kawaguchi T, Hoshiyama Y, Yoshida K, Yamamoto K. Effects of road traffic noise on inhabitants of Tokyo. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1997; 205: 517-22. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1020
• Fyhri A, Klæboe R. Road traffic noise, sensitivity, annoyance and self-reported health. A structural equation brand exercise. Environment International 2009; (35): 91- 7. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.08.006
• Stansfeld SA. Noise, noise sensitivity and psychiatric disorder: epidemiological and psychophysiological studies. Psychological Medicine Monograph Supplement 22, CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge 1992. DOI: 10.1017/S0264180100001119
• Stansfeld S, et al. Road traffic noise and psychiatric disorder: prospective findings from the Caerphilly Study. British Medical Journal 1996; 313(7052): 266-7. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.266
• Knipschild P, Oudshoorn N. VII. Medical effects of aircraft noise: drug survey. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 1977; 40: 197- 200. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700060109
• Passchier-Vermeer W. Sleep disturbance and aircraft noise exposure. TNO-PG, Leiden, Report No. 2002.027. 2002. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.113-a14
• Nassiri P, Azkhosh M, Mahmoodi A, et al. Department of Occupational Health, School oAssessment of noise induced psychological stresses on printery workers Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech 2011; 8(1): 169-76. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.222
• Halpern D. Mental health and the built environment: More bricks than mortar? London, UK: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 1995. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016911012749
• How to cite this article: Akan Z, Yilmaz A,
• Özdemir O, Korpinar MA. Noise Pollution,
• Psychiatric Symptoms and Quality of Life: Noise
• Problem in the East Region of Turkey. JIUMF
• ; 19(2): xx-xx. DOI: 10.7247/jiumf.19.2.3