Araştırma Notu

Research Note: Toward A Maqasid Al-Sharia Based Radicalization Index

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2022
  • Abdulkadir Abubakar *
PDF İndir

Research Note: Toward A Maqasid Al-Sharia Based Radicalization Index

Öz

Radicalization denotes the process by which an individual or group adopts or exhibits a violent form of action directly linked to an extremist ideology be it; socio-political, or religious, which is not consistent with the conventional value construct. But radicalization assessment mechanism is obscure. Its structure, scope, and implementation strategy still remain largely unsettled. Central to this mechanism are the risk assessment tools which are used as indicators to assess individual(s) vulnerability. But scholarship on such tools, however, is dominated by the Behavioral Science. Thus, militating against the tools’ suitability within the realm of the religious content of the individual’s thinking. This research note, therefore, takes the religious approach to identify suitable indicators relative to the individual’s value construct. Using the Maqasid Al-Sharia framework, it articulates vulnerability assessment tools which were tested through Focus Discussion (FD) involving ten students (four female and six male) drawn from two universities in Northwest Nigeria. Hence the paper discovered the operational utility of the tools which proved valuable toward providing policy direction at the two levels of aggregation: micro and macro levels of vulnerability risk assessment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Abdulkadir, A. (2012). A Diary of Ethno-religious Crises in Nigeria: Causes, effects, and solutions. Religious Forum Academia. National Association of Religious Scholars. Vol. II No. 1 &2: 270-280.
  2. Fishman, S. (2010). Community-level Indicators of Radicalization: A Data and Methods Task Force. “Report to the Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S Department of Homeland Security. https//:www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_HFD_CommRadReport.pdf
  3. Horgan, J. & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the Terrorists?: Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of De-radicalization Programs. Terrorism and Political Violence. Taylor and Francis Group. Vol. 22 No. 2: 267-291.
  4. Horgan, J. & Taylor, M. (2011). Dis-engagement, De-radicalization and the arc of Terrorism: Future Directions for Research in Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalization Challenge, edited by Coolsae, R. (2011): 176. www.mei.edu
  5. Ibn Asakir (1990). Tarikh Madinatu Dimashq. Vol. 31. Darul Fikr, 169.
  6. Iskow. E. (2018). Index of Radicalization: Islamic Radicalization in Michigan, International institute for counter terrorism.
  7. Jaser, A. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic law: A Systems Approach. Biddles Limited, 18.
  8. Maddy, C. (2017). What went wrong with France’s de-radicalization program. www.theatlantic.com

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Notu

Yazarlar

Abdulkadir Abubakar * Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-3368-0642
Nigeria

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Nisan 2022

Kabul Tarihi

29 Mayıs 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Abubakar, A. (2022). Research Note: Toward A Maqasid Al-Sharia Based Radicalization Index. Terörizm ve Radikalleşme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 397-415. https://izlik.org/JA89MT78GK