EN
TR
THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM
Öz
The study examines the evolving predictive tactical approaches of states to counter terrorism by utilizing emerging artificial intelligence technologies in a multidimensional manner. The subject under scrutiny in the present study is the development of artificial intelligence in general, and which methods are most prominent in the field of counterterrorism. In this context, firstly the concept of artificial intelligence is discussed, and then the historical development of the concept is focused upon. In the following discussion, the subset of artificial intelligence that is applicable to counterterrorism is analyzed, and the predictive tactical advantages of these subsets are explained. The study delineates a predictive tactical approach to the terrorism threat, accompanied by illustrative applications of the technology. The methodological approach employed is qualitative and interpretive. The findings obtained at the conclusion of the study indicate that, despite the success achieved in the field of security by artificial intelligence technologies, there is a necessity for a strict control mechanism with regard to ethical and moral responsibility. It is imperative that the effective and beneficial use of artificial intelligence in the field of security is predicated on the establishment of moral and legal use, transparency, accountability, and systems determined by national and international standards.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Dağdelen Varol, H. (2025). The Predictive Tactical Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Counterterrorism. Journal of Terrorism and Radicalization Studies, 4(2), pp. 266-287. DOI: 10.61314/traddergi.1691794
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Uluslararası Güvenlik, Uluslararası İlişkilerde Terörizm
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
28 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi
5 Mayıs 2025
Kabul Tarihi
18 Mayıs 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2025 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2
APA
Varol Dağdelen, H. (2025). THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM. Terörizm ve Radikalleşme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 266-287. https://doi.org/10.61314/traddergi.1691794
AMA
1.Varol Dağdelen H. THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM. TRAD. 2025;4(2):266-287. doi:10.61314/traddergi.1691794
Chicago
Varol Dağdelen, Hatice. 2025. “THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM”. Terörizm ve Radikalleşme Araştırmaları Dergisi 4 (2): 266-87. https://doi.org/10.61314/traddergi.1691794.
EndNote
Varol Dağdelen H (01 Haziran 2025) THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM. Terörizm ve Radikalleşme Araştırmaları Dergisi 4 2 266–287.
IEEE
[1]H. Varol Dağdelen, “THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM”, TRAD, c. 4, sy 2, ss. 266–287, Haz. 2025, doi: 10.61314/traddergi.1691794.
ISNAD
Varol Dağdelen, Hatice. “THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM”. Terörizm ve Radikalleşme Araştırmaları Dergisi 4/2 (01 Haziran 2025): 266-287. https://doi.org/10.61314/traddergi.1691794.
JAMA
1.Varol Dağdelen H. THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM. TRAD. 2025;4:266–287.
MLA
Varol Dağdelen, Hatice. “THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM”. Terörizm ve Radikalleşme Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 4, sy 2, Haziran 2025, ss. 266-87, doi:10.61314/traddergi.1691794.
Vancouver
1.Hatice Varol Dağdelen. THE PREDICTIVE TACTICAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FIELD OF COUNTERTERRORISM. TRAD. 01 Haziran 2025;4(2):266-87. doi:10.61314/traddergi.1691794