QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: THE PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ON TEACHING PRACTICIUM

Öz

Bu çalışma uygulama okullarında Öğretmenlik Uygulaması dersini alan İngilizce aday öğretmenlerinin öğretmenlik uygulaması, uygulama öğretmeni, uygulama öğretim elemanı ve aday öğretmenlerin öz performans değerlendirmeleri ile ilgili görüşlerini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma 2015-2016 eğitim-öğretim yılında Balıkesir Üniversitesi Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi İngilizce Öğretmenliği Anabilim dalında Öğretmenlik Uygulaması dersini alan 37 aday öğretmeni kapsamaktadır. Bu nitel çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak katılımcıların öğretmenlik uygulaması, uygulama öğretmeni, uygulama öğretim elemanı ve katılımcıların öz performans değerlendirmelerini içeren açık uçlu sorulardan oluşan bir anket kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada ikinci olarak mülakat ve son olarak katılımcıların duygu ve düşüncelerini yazdıkları deneme yazıları nitel veri toplamak amacıyla kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucu aday öğretmenlerin gerçek sınıf ortamında İngilizce öğretmeleri sayesinde birçok farklı konuda tecrübe kazandıklarını ortaya koymuştur. Çalışma aynı zamanda aday öğretmenlerin öğretmenlik uygulaması, uygulama öğretmenleri, uygulama öğretim elemanları ve kendi performanslarını değerlendirme konusundaki olumlu görüşlerinin olumsuz görüşlerine göre daha ağır bastığını ortaya çıkarmıştır. Çalışma katılımcıların olumlu ve olumsuz görüşlerinin nedenlerini ortaya koyması bakımından literatürdeki diğer çalışmalardan farklılık göstermektedir. Çalışmanın sonucu, aday öğretmenlere iyi nitelikte bir eğitim verme sorumluluğunu Eğitim Fakültelerindeki Yabancı Diller Bölümleri ile Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı’nın birlikte paylaşmaları gerektiğini ortaya koymuştur. Bulguların ışığında uygulamaya yönelik bazı tavsiyelerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aday İngilizce öğretmenleri,görüş,öğretmenlik uygulaması,uygulama öğretmeni,uygulama öğretim elemanı,öz-değerlendirme

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: THE PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS’ OPINIONS ON TEACHING PRACTICIUM

Öz

This study was conducted to explore the opinions of pre-service EFL teachers about Teaching Practicum, practice teachers, teacher trainers and their self-evaluations of their performance. The sample group consisted of 37 pre-service EFL teachers taking Teaching Practicum in the department of English Language Teaching, at Balıkesir University, Turkey in the 2015-2016 academic year. The data collection instruments were a questionnaire, which was composed of open-ended questions about the pre-service EFL teachers’ opinions on the course itself, practice teachers, teacher trainers and about their own self-evaluations of their performance as well as in-depth interviews and essay papers which included the participants’ views and opinions. The results indicated that the pre-service EFL teachers seemed to have experience on a wide variety of issues thanks to teaching English in real class settings. The study showed that their positive opinions on aforementioned issues outweighed the negative ones. Since the study revealed the causes of their positive and negative opinions, it differed from the previous studies in the literature. It was concluded from the results that the departments of foreign language teaching in the faculties of education and the Ministry of National Education should share the responsibility of offering good quality training to pre-service teachers. In the light of the findings, some practical recommendations were noted. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pre-service English as a Foreign Language teachers,opinion,teaching practicum,practice teachers,teacher trainers,self-evaluation

Kaynakça

1. Aksit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey, International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 129-137.
2. Alaz, A., & Birinci-Konur, K. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik uygulaması dersine yönelik deneyimleri. I. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi, Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.
3. Ali, M. S., Othman, A. J., & Karim, A. F. A. (2014). Issues and concerns faced by undergraduate language student teachers during teaching practicum experiences. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3), 22-30.
4. Anderson, J. (1998). Service-learning and teacher education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED421481.pdf
5. Aydın, S., Selcuk, A., & Yeşilyurt, M. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının “Okul Deneyimi II” dersine ilişkin görüşleri-Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi örneği. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 75-90.
6. Barton, G. M., Hartwig, K. A., & Cain, M. (2015). International students’ experience of practicum in teacher education: An exploration through internationalisation and professional socialisation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 149-163.
7. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2. See for more information.
8. http://compositionawebb.pbworks.com/f/conducting+in+depth+interviews.pdf.

9. Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Busher, H., Gündüz, M., Cakmak, M., & Lawson, T. (2015). Student teachers’ views of practicums (teacher training placements) in Turkish and English contexts: a comparative study. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(3), 445-466.
10. Caner, M. (2010). A blended learning model for teaching practice course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 78-97.
11. Chambers, D., & Lavery, S. (2012). Service-learning: A valuable component of pre-service teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 17(4), 128-137.
12. Chunmei, Y., & Chuanjun, H. (2015). “We are left in Limbo!”: Chinese EFL student teachers’ teaching practicum experience. Frontiers of Education in China, 10(2), 226-250.
13. Coffey, A., & Lavery, S. (2015). Service-learning: A valuable means of preparing pre-service teachers for a teaching practicum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7). 86-101.
14. Çelik, R. (2017). Quality and diversity: reconsidering John Dewey and some fundamental problems of teacher training system in Turkey. Sustainable Multilingualism, 11(1), 54-71.
15. Day, R.R. (2013). Peer observation and reflection in the ELT practicum Journal of Language and Literature Education, 8, 1-8.
16. Debreli, E. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ belief change and practical knowledge development during the course of practicum. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(7), 37-46.
17. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2016). Analysing learner language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Farrell, T. S. (2008). ‘Here’s the book, go teach the class’ ELT practicum support. RELC Journal, 39(2), 226-241.
20. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K.E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.
21. Gan, Z. (2013). Learning to teach English language in the practicum: What challenges do non-native ESL student teachers face? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 92-108.
22. Genç, H. (2015). A Critical overview of English language teacher education in the Turkish education system: Pre-service and in-service. Akbarov, A. (Ed.) The practice of foreign language teaching: theories and application. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
23. Gökçe, E., & Demirhan, C. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının ve ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan uygulama öğretmenlerinin öğretmenlik uygulaması etkinliklerine ilişkin görüşleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 43-71.
24. Grossman, G. M., Onkol, P.E. & Sands, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkish teacher education: attitudes of teacher educators towards change in an EU candidate nation, International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 139–150.
25. Grossman, G.M., Sands, M.K. & Brittingham, B. (2010). Teacher education accreditation in Turkey: The creation of a culture of quality. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(1), 102-109.
26. Kömür, Ş. (2010). Teaching knowledge and teacher competencies: A case study of Turkish pre-service English teachers. Teaching Education, 21(3), 279-296.
27. Lavery, S., Cain, G., & Hampton, P. (2014). A service-learning immersion in a remote aboriginal community: Enhancing pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 10(2), 39-54.
28. Leathes Report (1918). Modern Studies, Being a Report of the Committee on the Position of Modern Languages in the Educational System of Great Britain. London: HMSO.
29. Merç, A. (2015). Assessing the performance in EFL teaching practicum: Student teachers’ views. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 44-56.
30. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Morales Cortés, Y. A. (2016). Unveiling pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward teaching: The role of pedagogical practicums. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 18(2), 47-61.
32. Ozmen, K. S. (2012). Exploring student teachers’ beliefs about language learning and teaching: A longitudinal study. Current Issues in Education, 15(1), 1-16.
33. Richards, J. C. (2002). 30 years of TEFL/TESL: A personal reflection. RELC Journal, 33(2), 1-35.
34. Salı, P. (2008). Novice EFL teachers' perceived challenges and support needs in their journey to become effective teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
35. Sands, M. & Stevens, D. (2009). Teacher education in Turkey: Issues and trends. Mutua, K., & Sunal, C. S. (Eds.) Research on Education in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Middle East: An Historic Overview. USA: Information Age Publishing.
36. Sarıçoban, A. (2016). Foreign language teaching practicum beliefs of student teachers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(1), 166-176.
37. Stenberg, K., Rajala, A., & Hilppo, J. (2016). Fostering theory-practice reflection in teaching practicums. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 470-485.
38. Şaban, A. (2003). A Turkish profile of prospective elementary school teachers and their views of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(8), 829-846.
39. Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2006). Biographies in talk: A narrative-discursive research approach. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(1), 22-38.
40. Trent, J. (2013). From learner to teacher: Practice, language, and identity in a teaching practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 426-440.
41. Tülüce, H. S., & Çeçen, S. (2016). Scrutinizing practicum for a more powerful teacher education: A longitudinal study with pre-service teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(1), 127-151.
42. Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Yıldız, M., Geçikli, M., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2016). Turkish prospective English teachers’ reflections on teaching practice. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 696-703.
44. Yin, R. K. (2010). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.
45. YÖK (2007). Eğitim fakültesi öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları. (In Turkish). Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu Yayını.