YUMUŞAK GÜÇ YANILGISI

Öz

Yumuşak güç kavramı sert güce alternatif olarak algılanır hale gelmiştir. Ancak yumuşak güç, sert gücün alternatifi olacak şekilde yumuşak bir güç olmayıp çoğu durumda ileri bir sanayi ülkesinin sert gücünün uzantısı olmaktadır. Uluslararası politikada güç bölünemez bir kavramdır. Yumuşak güçlerin tümünün aynı zamanda “sert güç” olması ve “sert güç” olmayan bir “yumuşak güç”ün bulunmaması günümüzdeki uluslararası sistemin gerçeklerini açık bir şekilde sergilemeye yeterli olmaktadır. Güç kavramında köklü bir değişim, ancak uluslararası sistemin de köklü bir değişimden geçmesi halinde mümkün olabilir. Kaldı ki, mevcut durumda yumuşak güç, gerçek anlamıyla güç kavramının gereklerini karşılayamamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yumuşak güç
• hegomanya
• İngiltere
• ABD
• Soğuk savaş

SOFT POWER DELUSION

Abstract

Soft power has gained a status that the concept has been perceived as an alternative to hard power. Yet, soft power is not soft enough to become the alternative of the hard one as it is in most cases nothing more than the extension of hard power, namely an industrial advanced capitalist society. The fact that all of the soft powers are also hard powers and there is not any soft power that is not hard power are adequate enough to demonstrate the realities of the international systems of today. Power in international politics is an indivisible concept. There can only be a transformation in the power concept if there is a true transformation in the power centered logic of the international politics, yet currently soft power is not be able to meet the requirements of a true power concept.

Keywords

• soft power
• hegemony
• Great Britain
• U.S.
• The Cold War

Kaynakça

1. Art, Robert J. (1996), “American Foreign Policy and the The Fungibility of Force”, Security Studies, 5 (4):7-42.
2. Baldwin, David A.(2016), Power and International Politics: A Conceptual Approach (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
3. Beaud, Michel (2001), History of Capitalism 1500-2000(New York: Monthly Review Press).
4. Beyer, Anna Cornelia( 2007),Kenneth Waltz’s Life and Thought: An Interview, y.k. ,t.y.
5. Bowie, Robert R. ve Richard Immerman(1998),Waging Peace: How Eisenhower Shaped an Enduring Cold War Strategy(New York: Oxford University Press).
6. Brown, Seyom(1994)The Faces of Power, Constancy and Change in United States Foreign Policy From Truman To Clinton(New York: Columbia University Press).Carr, E.H.(1946), The Twenty Years’ Crisis:1919-1939(New York: Harper Torchbooks).
7. Cohen, Benjamin J.(2015),Currency Power: Understanding Monetary Rivalry(Princeton: Princeton University Press).
8. Ferguson, Niall( 2003),”Power" ,Foreign Policy, 34(1):18-24.

9. Gilpin, Robert(1981),War and Change in World Politics( New York: Cambridge University Press)
10. Isaacson, Walter(1992),Kissinger(New York: Simon and Schuster).
11. James, Lawrence (1994), Rise and Fall of British Empire (London: Little, Brown and Company)
12. Khruschev, Nikita(1974),Khruschev Remembers: The Last Testament (Boston: Little, Brown and Company)
13. Kumar, Krishan(2017),Visions of Empire: How Five Imperial Regimes Shaped The World (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
14. McDougall, Walter A. (1985),…. the Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of Space Age. (New York: Basic Books). Morgenthau, Hans J.(1968), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace(New York: Alfred A. Knopf) Nye, Joseph S. Jr (1990), “Soft Power”, Foreign Policy 80(3):153-171
15. Nye, JosepJr.(2004), Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics(New York: Public Affairs).
16. Nye, Joseph S.Jr.(2011),The Future of Power(New York: Public Affairs)Nye, Joseph S.Jr.(2008), The Powers to Lead( New York: Oxford University Press).
17. The Kitchen Debate-transcript, https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/1959-07-24.pdf
18. The Roman Empire Episode 4, Grasp of an Empire ,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_0WDpB_lsY
19. Whitfield, Stephen J.(1996), The Culture of the Cold War(Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press)