DEVLETLERİN DÜZENLEME GETİRİRKEN NEDEN ULUSLARARASI TİCARET HUKUKU VE ULUSLARARASI YATIRIM HUKUKU DENGESİNİ BİLMESİ GEREKİR?

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 187 - 201, 27.12.2017

Pınar Karacan

Öz

Farklı hukuk alanlarının örtüştüğü konular
olabilmektedir.  Örneğin uluslararası
ticaret hukuku ve uluslararası yatırım hukuku farklı gelişmiş ve farklı
amaçlara sahip olsa da birbirinden kopuk değildir ve aralarında etkileşim
bulunmaktadır. Ulusal bir düzenlemenin iki hukuk alanında da sonuçları
olabilecektir.  Bu sebeple devletlerin
ulusal düzenleme yaparken iki hukuk alanına da dikkate alması sorumluluklarını
azaltması açısından çok önemlidir.  Bu
çalışma uluslararası ticaret hukuku ve uluslararası yatırım hukuku arasındaki
etkileşime dikkat çekmeyi ve devlet açısından bu etkileşimin bilinmesinin
önemini vurgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. 
Çalışmada devletin sağlık sebebiyle düzenleme getirme hakki örnek olarak
incelenecektir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Ticaret Hukuku, Uluslararası Yatırım Hukuku, Uluslararası Ticaret Hukuku ve Uluslararası Yatırım Hukuku Etkileşimi, Devletin Düzenleme Getirme Hakkı

WHY DO STATES NEED TO BE AWARE OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW INTERACTION WHEN REGULATING?

Öz

Different areas of law can have overlapping
topics.  International trade law and
international investment law with different historical development and different
goals are not detached from each other. 
There is an interaction between the two areas of law. National
legislation might have consequences in both areas of law.  Thus it is vital for the states when
regulating to take the two legal areas of law into consideration in order to
minimize their liability.  This study
aims to emphasize the interaction between international trade law and
international investment law and show why it is important for the state to be
aware of this interaction with state’s right to regulate on health reasons
example.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International Trade Law, International Investment Law, Interaction Between International Trade Law and International Investment Law, States' Right to Regulate

Kaynakça

• Esen Akıntürk ve Pınar Baklacı, “İki Taraflı Yatırım Antlaşmaları Hakkında Genel Bir İnceleme”, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, C. XXV/S. 4/Aralık, 2009, 477-536, (Akıntürk and Baklacı)
• Jose E. Alvarez, “‘Beware: Boundary Crossing’-A Critical Appraisal of Public Law Approaches to International Law”, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 17, 2016, 171-228
• Pınar Baklacı, Uluslararası Yatırım Hukukunda En Çok Gözetilen Ulus Muamelesi, Beta Yayınları, 2009, İstanbul, (Baklacı)
• Pınar Baklacı, “Uluslararası Yatırımlarda Dolaylı Kamulaştırma ve Düzenleyici Yetkiler”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, 28 (1-2), 2008, 1-24, (Baklacı 2)
• Tomer Broude, “Investment and Trade: The ’Lottie and Lisa’ of Interna-tional Economic Law?”, in Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy, World Trade Forum, Roberto Echandi & Pierre Sauve (ed), Cambridge University Press, 2013, 144-148
• Julien Chaisse, “Exploring the Confines of International Investment and Domestic Health Protections-Is a General Exceptions Clause a Forced Perspec-tive?”, American Journal of Law & Medicine, 39, 2013, 332-360
• Sedat Çal, Uluslararası Yatırım Tahkimi ve Kamu Hukuku İlişkisi, Ankara, Seçkin 2009
• Nicholas DiMascio and Joost Pauwelyn, “Nondicrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin”, American Journal of International Law (10 Am. J. Int’l L. 48) 2008, (DiMascio&Pauwelyn)
• Chris Downes,”Worth Shopping Around? Defending Regulatory Autonomy under the SPS and TBT Agreements,” World Trade Review, 2015, V. 14, Issue 4, 553-578
• Hümeyra Zeynep Nalçacıoğlu Erden, Milletlerarası Yatırım Hukukunda Dolaylı Kamulaştırma, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2015
• Gleesson, Tienhara, Faunce, “Challenges to Australia’s National Health Policy from Trade and Investment Agreements”, Ethics and Law, MJA 2011, 196:1-3 (Gleesson)
• Faruk Kerem Giray, Milletlerarası Yatırım Tahkiminde Kamulaştırmadan Doğan Tazminat ve Tazminatın Hesaplanmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler, Beta, İstanbul, 2. Bası, 2013.
• Melida Hodgson, “International Trade Law and International Investment Law: Complexity and Coherence”, Remarks by ASIL Proceedings, 2014, 252
• Pınar Karacan, “Uluslararası Ticaret Hukuku ve Uluslararası Yatırım Hukuku Etkileşimi: Devletin Sağlık Sebebiyle Düzenleme Getirme Hakkı”, Kadir Has Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, Aralık 2015, 77-95
• Meri Koivusalo, “Policy Space for Health and Trade and Investment Agreements”, Health Promotion International, Vol.29, No.S 1, p. i30
• Jaemin Lee, “Complementing Each Other or Stoking Further Complexity? Interaction between International Investment Law and International Trade Law”, Journal of World Trade, 47, No 2, 2013, 421-446
• Junianto James Losari and Michael Ewing-Chow, “A Clash of Treaties: The Lawfulness of Countermeasures in International Trade Law and International Investment Law”, The Journal of World Investment and Trade, 16, 2015, 274-313 (Losari & Chow)
• Bryan Mercurio, “International Investment Agreements and Public Health: Neutralizing a Threat Through Treaty Drafting”, Bulletin World Organ, 2014, 92:520-525
• Andrew Newcombe, “The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law”, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2005
• Joost Pauwelyn, “The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators are from Venus, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies”, October 1, 2015, (Pauwelyn), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2549050
• Joost Pauwelyn, “The Re-Convergence of International Trade and Investment Law: Causes, Questions, and Reform, International and Investment law”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), Vol 108, April 2014, 255-258, (Pauwelyn (2))
• Sergio Puig, “The Merging International Trade and Investment Law”, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 33, Issue 1, 2015, 1-59.
• Sergio Puig, “International Regime Complexity and Economic Law En-forcement”, Journal of International Economic Law, 2014, 17, 491-516 (Puig (2))
• Giorgio Sacerdoti, “Trade and Investment Law: Institutional Differences and Substantive Similarities”, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2014, 1-12
• W. S. Schill, “Editorial: US versus EU Leadership in Global Investment Governance”, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 17, 2016, 1-6
• Thow, Snowdon, Labonte, Gleeson, Stuckler, Hattersley, Schram, Kay, Friel, “Will the Next Generation of Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements Undermine Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases? A Prospective Policy Analysis of TPP Agreement”, Health Policy, 119, 2015, (Thow)
• M. Sornarajah, International Law on Foreign Investment, 2nd Edition, West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004
• Bilgin Tiryakioğlu, Doğrudan Yatırımların Uluslararası Hukukta Korunması, Ankara, Dayınlarlı Hukuk Yayınları, 2003 Markus Wagner, “Regulatory Space in International Trade Law and International Investment Law”, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law (U. Pa. Int’l L, Vol.36), 1.
• Valentina S Vadi, “Global Health Governance at a Crossroads: Trademark Protection v. Tobacco Control in International Investment Law”, Stanford Journal of International Law (48 Stan. Int’l L 93), 2012
• Tania Voon, “Evidentiary Challenges for Public Health Regulation in International Trade and Investment Law,” Journal of International Economic Law, 2015, V.18, Issue 4, 795-826.
• Catherine Yannaca-Small, ““Indirect Expropriation” in International In-vestment Law”, 22, https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2004_4.pdf