A Hegelian Dialectic Reading of Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
The Picture of Dorian Gray, Hegelian Dialectic, Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis
Teşekkür
Kaynakça
- BAUR, Michael (2015), G. W. F. Hegel: Key Concepts, New York: Routledge.
- BEISER, Frederick C. (2008), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- BENNETT, Michael Y. (2017), Philosophy and Oscar Wilde, Springer.
- BLOOM, Harold (2010), Oscar Wilde, New York: Chelsea House.
- BOLEA, Ştefan (2016), “The Three Shadows from the Picture of Dorian Gray”, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai - Philosophia, 61.2, 71-81. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=443533.
- BURKE, Edmund (1968), A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, J. T. Boulton (Ed.), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
- CARROLL, Joseph (2005), “Aestheticism, homoeroticism, and Christian guilt in The Picture of Dorian Gray”, Philosophy and Literature, 29.2, 286-304. doi:10.1353/phl.2005.0018.
- DAY, Melody (2019), Psychographic Persona Development in the Picture of Dorian Gray (Undergraduate Honors Theses. 64, University of San Diego), Retrieved from https://digital.sandiego.edu/honors_theses/64
- DUGGAN, Patrick (2008), “The Conflict between Aestheticism and Morality in Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray”, Boston University Art & Sciences Writing Program Journal, 1, 60-68. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/writingprogram/journal/past-issues/issue-1/duggan/.
- GORDON, Jan B. (2013), “Wilde’s Investment in Negation: The Picture(s) of Dorian Gray”, English Literature Review, 57, 31-60. Retrieved from http://repo.kyotowu.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/11173/1489/1/0020_057_002.pdf.