Kurumsal Liderlik: Nereden Nereye?

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 354 - 378, 30.06.2021

Talha Sait Atay Oktay Koç

https://doi.org/10.31454/troyacademy.931435

Cited By: 1

Öz

Kurumsal liderlik, Selznick tarafından geliştirilmiş ve fakat 1950’lerde donup kalmış gibi çok fazla incelemeye tabi tutulmamıştır. Dolayısıyla örgütlerde geleneksel liderlik fonksiyonları yanında, değer yaratma ve bunları örgüte aşılama ile etkisini gösteren bu tip liderliği yeniden ele alma zarureti hasıl olmuştur. Mevcut çalışma literatür taraması yoluyla kurumsal liderliğin geçmişten bugüne ve hatta geleceğe uzanan öyküsünü araştırmaktadır. Bu anlamda kamu değeri kavramının giderek daha fazla önem kazandığı bir dönemde, bu tip bir liderliğin örgütler için fark yaratabilecek bir model olabileceği neticesine varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Selznick, Kurumsal Liderlik, Değer, Kamu Değeri, Kurumsallaşma

Kaynakça

• Askeland, H. (2020). “Institutional Leadership: Maintaining and Developing the ‘Good’ Organisation”, Understanding Values Work: Institutional Perspectives in Organizations and Leadership (Ed: Askeland H.; Espedal G.; Løvaas B. J. ve Sirris S.), Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 139-158.
• Barley, S. R. ve Tolbert, P. S. (1997). “Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution”, Organization Studies, 18(1), 93-117.
• Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Barnard, C. (1948). Organization and Management, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Barnard, C. (1968). The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, Free Press, New York.
• Battilana, K., Leca, B. ve Boxenbaum, E. (2009). “How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship”. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107.
• Bernstein, M. (1959). “Executives for Government: Central Issues of Federal Personnel Administration by Paul T. David and Ross Pollock; The Administrative State: An Introduction to Bureaucracy by Fritz Morstein Marx; Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation by Philip Selznick”, American Political Science Review, 53(1), 195-199.
• Besharov, M. L. ve Khurana, R. (2012). Leading Amidst Competing Institutional Demands: Revisiting Selznick’s Conception of Leadership, Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
• Besharov, M. L. ve Khurana, R. (2015). “Leading Amidst Competing Technical and Institutional Demands: Revisiting Selznick’s Conception of Leadership”, Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies (Research in the Sociology of Organizations Vol. 44) (Ed: Kraatz M. S.), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 53-88.
• Biggart, N. W. ve Hamilton, G. G. (1987). “An Institutional Theory of Leadership”, The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 23(4), 429-441.
• Boin, A. ve Christensen, T. (2008). “The Development of Public Institutions”, Administration & Society, 40(3), 271-297.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership, Harper & Row, New York.
• DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). “Interest and agency in institutional theory”, Institutional patterns and organizations, (Ed: Zucker L.), Ballinger, Cambridge, 3-22.
• DiMaggio, P. J. ve Powell, W. W. (1983). “The Iron Cage Revisited Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
• DiMaggio, P. J. ve Powell, W. W. (1991). “Introduction”, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Ed: Powell W. W. ve DiMaggio P. J.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Doig, J. W. ve Hargrove, E. C. (Eds.) (1987). Leadership and Innovation, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
• Garwe, E. C. (2014). “The Effect of Institutional Leadership on Quality of Higher Education Provision”, Research in Higher Education Journal, 22, 1-10.
• Glynn, M. A. ve DeJordy, R. (2010). “Leadership Through and Organization Behavior Lens: A Look at the Last Half-Century of Research”, Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice (Ed: Nohria N. ve Khurana R.), Harvard Business Review, Boston, 119-159.
• Greenwood, R.; Hinings, C. R. ve Whetten, D. (2014). “Rethinking Institutions and Organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1206-1220.
• Hansen, P. Ø.; Chroni S.; Skille, E. Å ve Abrahamsen, F. E. (2021). “Leading and Organising National Teams: Functions of Institutional Leadership”, Sports Coaching Review, 1-22.
• Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group, Harcourt Brace, New York.
• Jung, K. ve Choi, J. (2011). “Institutional Leadership and Perceived Performance: Evidence from the Korean Minister Survey”, The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 26(2), 45-75.
• Kraatz, M. S. (2009). “Leadership as Institutional Work: A Bridge to the Other Side”, Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (Ed: Lawrence T. B; Suddaby R. ve Leca B.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 59-91.
• Kraatz, M. S. ve Moore, J. H. (2002). “Executive Migration and Institutional Change”, The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 120-143.
• Kraatz, S. M.; Flores, R. ve Chandler, D. (2020). “The Value of Values for Institutional Analysis”, Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 1-91.
• Lawrance, T. B. ve Shadnam, M. (2008). “Institutional Theory”, (Ed.) Wolfgang Donsbach. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2288-2293.
• Lawrance, T. B.; Suddaby, R. ve Leca, B. (2009). “Introduction: Theorizing and Studying Institutional Work”, Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organization (Ed: Lawrance T. B.; Suddaby R. ve Leca B), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-28.
• Levitsky, S. (1998). “Institutionalization and Peronism: The Concept, the Case and the Case for Unpacking the Concept”, Party Politics, 4(1), 77-92.
• Lewis, E. (1984). Public Entrepreneurship: Toward a Theory of Bureaucratic Political Power, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
• Mayo, E. (1960). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Viking Press, New York.
• Meyer, J. W. ve Rowan, B. (1977). “Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
• Meyer, J. W. ve Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
• Neumann, S. (1941). “Leadership: Institutional and Personal”, The Journal of Politics, 3(2), 133-153.
• Podolny, J. M.; Khurana, R. ve Hill-Popper, M. (2004). “Revisiting the Meaning of Leadership”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 1-36.
• Powell, W. W. ve Colyvas, J. A. (2008). “Microfoundations of Institutional Theory”, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Ed: Greenwood R.; Oliver C.; Suddaby R. ve Sahlin K.), Sage Publications, London, 276-298.
• Riccucci, N. M. (1995). Unsung Heroes: Federal Execucrats Making a Difference, Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C..
• Roethlisberger, F. J. ve Dixon, W. J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Scott, W. R. (1987). “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511.
• Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
• Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation, Harper & Row, New York.
• Selznick, P. (1996). “Institutionalism “Old” and “New””, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270-277. Shinn, C. W. (1996). “Taking Stock of Institutional Thought: Institutions, Institutionalization, and Institutional Effects”, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 18(2), 31-41.
• Silva, J. B. (2020). “Institutional Leadership-The Historical Case Study of a Religious Organisation”, Understanding Values Work: Institutional Perspectives in Organizations and Leadership (Ed: Askeland H.; Espedal G.; Løvaas B. J. ve Sirris S.), Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 81-95.
• Stogdill R. M. (1948). “Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature”, The Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-71.
• Struminska-Kutra, M. ve Askeland, H. (2020). “Foxes and Lions: How Institutional Leaders Keep Organisational Integrity and Introduce Change”, Understanding Values Work: Institutional Perspectives in Organizations and Leadership (Ed: Askeland H.; Espedal G.; Løvaas B. J. ve Sirris S.), Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 117-138.
• Suddaby, R. (2010). “Challenges for Institutional Theory”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14-20.
• Suddaby, R.; Bitektine, A. ve Haack, P. (2017). “Legitimacy”, Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478.
• Suddaby, R.; Seidl D. ve K Lê J. (2013). “Strategy as Practice Meets Neo-Institutional Theory”, Strategic Organization, 11(3), 329-344.
• Terry, L. D. (1995). “The Leadership-Management Distinction: The Domination and Displacement of Mechanistic and Organismic Theories”, The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 515-527.
• Washington, M.; Boal, K. B. ve Davis, J. N. (2008). “Institutional Leadership: Past, Present, and Future”, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Ed: Greenwood R.; Oliver C.; Sahlin K. ve Suddaby R.), Sage Publications, London, 721-735.
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society, University of Califomia Press, Berkeley.
• Zucker, L. G. (1977). “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence”, American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.
• Zucker, L. G. (1987). “Institutional Theories of Organization”, Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.