Concurrent Training Method in Footballers; Speed and Agility

Öz

This study aims to investigate the effects of the concurrent training method on the speed and agility performance of football players aged 18 and above. Nineteen volunteer football players competing in the Konya Amateur Super League participated in our study. This study was conducted on a total of 19 volunteer football players with an average age of 20.42±1.07 years. The participants were randomly divided into experimental (n=10) and control (n=9) groups. All participants had normal physical characteristics and had no history of injury. Before the study, 20m speed, 30m speed and agility pre-tests were applied to both groups on the football field. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 software. Within the scope of descriptive statistics, arithmetic mean values and standard deviation values were calculated and presented. In the tests performed before the study, the experimental group's speed (20m) pre-test average was found to be 2.88±.09 sec., speed (30m) pre-test average was found to be 3.90±.17 sec., and agility pre-test average was found to be 9.49±.50 sec. In the control group, the speed (20m) pre-test average was determined as 2.81±.13 sec., speed (30m) pre-test average was 3.84±.12 sec., and agility pre-test average was 9.31±.35 sec. No statistically significant difference was found in the speed (20m), speed (30m) and agility pre-test results of the experimental and control group athletes who participated in the research (p>0.05). While the experimental group was subjected to a 6-week simultaneous training program in addition to the normal training program, the control group only continued their routine training. In the post-tests conducted after the 6-week study, the speed (20m) post-test average of the experimental group was determined as 2.59±.19, speed (30m) post-test average was 3.49±.19 sec., and agility post-test average was 8.88±.35 sec. In the control group, the speed (20m) post-test average was measured as 2.83±.11 sec., the speed (30m) post-test average was 3.82±.12 sec., and the agility post-test average was 9.30±.45 sec. When the within-group comparison of the experimental and control group athletes in the research was examined, a significant difference was found in the speed (20m), speed (30m) and agility pre-test - post-test values of the concurrent training group athletes (p<0.05). No significant difference was found in the pre-test - post-test speed (20m), speed (30m) and agility values in the control group athletes. When the post-test results of the experimental and control group athletes in the research were compared, a statistically significant difference was found between the 20 m and 30 m speed tests and agility tests (p<0.05). As a result, it was observed that the simultaneous training method was effective in improving the speed and agility performances of football players during the competition period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Agility
• Concurrent Training
• Football
• Speed

Futbolcularda Eş Zamanlı Antrenman Metodu; Sürat Ve Çeviklik

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 18 yaş ve üzeri futbolculara uygulanan eş zamanlı antrenman metodunun sürat ve çeviklik üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Çalışmamıza, Konya Amatör Süper Ligi’nde mücadele eden 19 gönüllü futbolcu katılmıştır. Bu çalışma yaş ortalaması 20,42±1,07 yıl olan toplam 19 gönüllü futbolcu üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcılar random (rastegele) sistemiyle deney (n=10) ve kontrol (n=9) gruplarına ayrılmıştır. Tüm katılımcılar normal fiziksel özelliklere sahip olup herhangi bir sakatlık geçmişine sahip değildir. Her iki grubada çalışma öncesinde futbol sahasında 20m. sürat, 30m. sürat ve çeviklik ön testler yapılmıştır. Veri analizi, SPSS 26.0 yazılımı kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler kapsamında, aritmetik ortalama değerleri ve standart sapma değerleri hesaplanmış ve sunulmuştur. Çalışmaya başlamadan önce yapılan testlerde deney grubu sürat (20m) ön test ortalaması 2,88±,09 sn., sürat (30m) ön test ortalaması 3,90±,17 sn., çeviklik ön test ortalaması 9,49±,50 sn. olarak bulunmuştur. Kontrol grubunda ise sürat (20m) ön test ortalaması 2,81±,13 sn., sürat (30m) ön test ortalaması 3,84±,12 sn., çeviklik ön test ortalaması 9,31±,35 sn. olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmaya katılan deney ve kontrol grubu sporcularında sürat (20m), sürat (30m) ve çeviklik ön test sonuçlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık tespit edilmemiştir (p>0,05). Deney grubu, normal antrenman programına ek olarak 6 haftalık eş zamanlı antrenman programına tabi tutulurken, kontrol grubu yalnızca rutin antrenmanlarına devam etmiştir. Yapılan 6 haftalık çalışma sonrrasında yapılan son testlerde deney grubu sürat (20m) son test ortalaması 2,59±,19, sürat (30m) son test ortalaması 3,49±,19 sn., çeviklik son test ortalaması 8,88±,35 sn. olarak belirlenmiştir. Kontrol grubunda ise sürat (20m) son test ortalaması 2,83±,11sn., sürat (30m) son test ortalaması 3,82±,12 sn., çeviklik son test ortalaması 9,30±,45 sn. olarak ölçülmüştür. Araştırmada bulunan deney ve kontrol grubu sporcularında grup içi karşılaştırmaya bakıldığında eş zamanlı antrenman grubu sporcularının sürat (20m), sürat (30m) ve çeviklik ön test - son test değerlerinde anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Kontrol grubu sporcularında ön test - son test sürat (20m), sürat (30m) ve çeviklik değerlerinde anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır. Araştırmada yer alan deney ve kontrol grubu sporcularının son test sonuçları karşılaştırıldığında, 20 m ve 30 m sürat testleri ile çeviklik testleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Sonuç olarak, eş zamanlı antrenman metodunun, müsabaka döneminde futbolcuların sürat ve çeviklik performanslarını geliştirmede etkili olduğu görülmüştür

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çeviklik
• Eş Zamanlı Antrenman
• Futbol
• Sürat

Kaynakça

1. Aguiar, M., Botelho, G., Lago, C., Maças, V., and Sampaio, J., (2012). A Review On The Effects of Soccer Small-Sided Games. Journal of Human Kinetics, 33(2012), 103-113.
2. Bangsbo, J., Iaia, F. M., and Krustrup, P., (2008). The Yo-Yo İntermittent Recovery Test: A Useful Tool for Evaluation of Physical Performance in İntermittent Sports. Sports Medicine, 38, 37-51.
3. Berryman, N., Mujika, I., and Bosquet, L., (2019). Concurrent Training for Sports Performance: The 2 Sides of the Medal. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 14(3), 279-285.
4. Blechschmied, R., Hermse, M., Gäbler, M., Elferink-Gemser, M., Hortobágyi, T., and Granacher, U., (2024). Sequencing Effects of Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training on Selected Measures of Physical Fitness in Young Male Soccer Players: A Randomized Matched-Pairs Trial. Sports Medicine-Open, 10(1), 62.
5. Eniseler, N., (2018). Bilimin Işığında Sınırlı Alan Oyunları. 1. Baskı. Bassaray Matbaası, Manisa, Türkiye.
6. Enright, K., Morton, J., Iga, J., and Drust, B., (2015). The Effect of Concurrent Training Organisation in Youth Elite Soccer Players. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 115, 2367-2381.
7. Faigenbaum, A. D., Bellucci, M., Bernieri, A., Bakker, B., and Hoorens, K., (2005). Acute Effects of Different Warm-Up Protocols on Fitness Performance in Children. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(2), 376-381.
8. Gabler, M., Prieske, O., Hortobágyi, T., and Granacher, U., (2018). The Effects of Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training on Physical Fitness and Athletic Performance in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 9, 1057.

9. García, F., Laredo-Aguilera, J. A., Muñoz-Jiménez, M., and Latorre-Román, P. A., (2019). Effects of 12-week concurrent high-intensity interval strength and endurance training program on physical performance in healthy older people. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(5), 1445-1452.
10. Gençoğlu, C., (2008). Hentbolcularda Üst Ekstremiteye Uygulanan Pliyometrik Egzersizin Atış Hızı ve İzokinetik Kas Kuvvetine Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
11. Hama, K. K., and Magied, A., (2014). Effect of Concurrent Traınıng on Vo 2 Max, Certaın Physıcal Varıables and Spıke Performance for Young Female Volleyball Players. Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport/Science, Movement and Health.
12. Hill-Haas, S. V., Dawson, B. T., Coutts, A. J.,and Rowsell, G. J., (2009). Physiological Responses and Time–Motion Characteristics of Various Small-Sided Soccer Games in Youth Players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(1), 1-8.
13. Hoff, J., Wisløff, U., Engen, L. C., Kemi, O. J., and Helgerud, J., (2002). Soccer Specific Aerobic Endurance Training. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(3), 218-221.
14. Hoff, J., and Helgerud, J., (2004). Endurance and Strength Training for Soccer Players: Physiological Considerations. Sports Medicine, 34, 165-180.
15. Jones, T. W., Howatson, G., Russell, M., and French, D. N., (2016). Performance and Endocrine Responses to Differing Ratios of Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(3), 693-702.
16. Little, T., (2009). Optimizing The Use Of Soccer Drills for Physiological Development. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 31(3), 67-74.
17. McGawley, K., and Andersson, P. I. (2013). The order of concurrent training does not affect soccer-related performance adaptations. International journal of sports medicine, 34(11), 983-990.
18. Owen, A. L., Wong, D. P., McKenna, M., and Dellal, A., (2011). Heart Rate Responses and Technical Comparison Between Small-vs. Large-sided Games in Elite Professional Soccer. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(8), 2104-2110.
19. Paul, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., and Nassis, G. P., (2016). Agility in Team Sports: Testing, Training and Factors Affecting Performance. Sports Medicine, 46(3), 421-442.
20. Petre, H., Löfving, P., and Psilander, N., (2018). The Effect of Two Different Concurrent Training Programs on Strength and Power Gains in Highly-Trained İndividuals. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 17(2), 167.
21. Rampinini, E., Impellizzeri, F. M., Castagna, C., Abt, G., Chamari, K., Sassi, A., and Marcora, S. M., (2007). Factors İnfluencing Physiological Responses to Small-Sided Soccer Games. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(6), 659-666.
22. Reilly, T., (2006). The Science of Training-Soccer: A Scientific Approach to Developing Strength, Speed and Endurance. Routledge.
23. Sanchez-Sanchez, J., Gonzalo-Skok, O., Carretero, M., Pineda, A., Ramirez-Campillo, R., and Nakamura, F. Y., (2019). Effects of Concurrent Eccentrıc Overload and Hıgh-Intensıty Interval Traınıng on Team Sports Players Performance. Kinesiology, 51(1), 119-126.
24. Schlegel, P., Režný, L. and Fialová, D., (2020) Pilot study: Performanceranking Relationship Analysis in Czech Crossfiters. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16, 1-12.
25. Seipp, D., Quittmann, O. J., Fasold, F., and Klatt, S., (2023). Concurrent Training in Team Sports: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 18(4), 1342-1364.
26. Tarakcı, S., (2022). Futbolda Eş Zamanlı Uygulanan Kuvvet ve Dayanıklılık Antrenmanlarının Bazı Fiziksel, Fizyolojik ve Psikolojik Parametreler üzerine Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Universitesi, İstanbul.
27. Winter, C., and Pfeiffer, M., (2016). Tactical Metrics That Discriminate Winning, Drawing and Losing Teams in Uefa Euro 2012®. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(6), 486-492.
28. Wong, P. L., Chaouachi, A., Chamari, K., Dellal, A., and Wisloff, U., (2010). Effect of preseason concurrent muscular strength and high-intensity interval training in professional soccer players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(3), 653-660.