Problems Faced by Students with Intellectual Disabilities in Their Participation in Sports Education: Parent Views

Öz

Intellectual disability is a disorder that affects the child's daily social and practical skills. For this reason, unhealthy diet, sedentary lifestyle and physical movement limitation are the most common lifestyle problems in children with intellectual disabilities. Parents' opinions, attitudes, alexithymic conditions and social skill levels are effective in the participation of students with intellectual disabilities and other special needs in sports education. The aim of this research is to examine the problems encountered by students with intellectual disabilities in their participation in sports education in terms of parents' opinions. The study is based on the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), one of the social model theories, as a theoretical framework. The research is a case study, one of the qualitative research approaches. In this research, the study group was reached by the maximum variation sampling method. Parents of children with intellectual disabilities in different cities of Turkey were included in the research in the 2021-2022 academic year. During the research process, three different study groups receiving special education and rehabilitation center, special lower class and inclusive education were studied. Data were collected by individual interview technique. The data obtained from all three groups were thematic analysis and analyzed by creating codes, categories and themes. As a result of the analysis of the data obtained, the findings were collected under four main themes in accordance with the theoretical framework. These are individual problems, social problems, problems caused by the physical environment and problems caused by politics. As a result of the research, it was determined that, according to the parents, the reason why their children with intellectual disabilities cannot participate in sports training is primarily due to problems arising from society. This situation can be evaluated within the exosystem and macro system according to SEM. Based on this model, which focuses on the individual and examines the effects on the individual, the two systems located at the outermost center have the greatest impact on individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Students with Intellectual Disabilities
• Sports Training
• Parents
• Socio-ecological Model
• Special education

Kaynakça

1. 1. Bertelli MO, Bianco A, Merli MP, Luis Salvador-Carulla L. The person-centered health model in intellectual developintellectual disorders/intellectual disability. Eur. J. Psychiatry, 2015; 29:239–248. doi: 10.4321/S0213-616320150004000.
2. 2. Vlot-van Anrooij K, Koks-Leensen M, van der Cruijsen A, Jansen H, van der Velden K, Leusink G, Hilgenkamp,T, Naaldenberg J. How can care settings for people with intellectual disabilities embed health promotion? J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil., 2020; 33:1489–1499. doi: 10.1111/jar.12776
3. 3. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı. Türkiye fiziksel aktivite rehberi. Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu, Ankara. 2014; https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/saglikli-beslenme-ve-hareketli-hayat-db/Dokumanlar/Rehberler/Turkiye_Fiziksel_Aktivite_Rehberi.pdf. 04.04.2023 tarihinde erişim sağlanmıştır.
4. 4. Akşit S, Öner, Ç, Dağ R, İkizler HC.. Özel eğitim gereksinimli bireylerle çalışan eğitimcilerin yeterlilik algıları üzerine nitel bir araştırma. ISPESCONGRESS 2021 4. Uluslararası Beden Eğitimi, Spor, Rekreasyon ve Dans Kongresi 10-11 Eylül 2021 içinde (s. 191-218). İstanbul: İstanbul Rumeli Üniversitesi
5. 5. Giagazoglou P, Arabatzi F, Dipla K, Liga M, Kellis E. Effect of a hippotherapy intervention program on static balance and strength in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Research in developintellectual disabilities, 2012; 33(6), 2265-2270.
6. 6. Kao MS, Wang, CH. Impact of Frisbee game course on the upper limb motor function of students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developintellectual Disabilities, 2018; 64(2), 96-104.
7. 7. Erofeeva MA, Ulyanova IV, Plakhotnikova IV, Kurilyuk YE, Egorov VA, Kochetkov IG. Reforming and developing socialization of children with limited abilities (mild intellectual disability). Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 2019; 16(2).
8. 8. Wu PF, Chang YW, Chen TB, Chang LC. The effects of ıntegrated step training into the physical education curriculum of children with ıntellectual disabilities. ınternational journal of environmental research and public health, 2021; 18(21), 11340.

9. 9. Kozak M, İlhan EL, Yarayan YE. Zihinsel yetersizlik, spor ve ruhsal uyum ilişkisi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2019; 13(1), 51-65.
10. 10. Alves MLT, Storch JA, Harnisch G, Strapasson AM, da Cunha Furtado, OLP, Lieberman, L. ... & Duarte E. Physıcal educatıon classes and ınclusıon of chıldren wıth dısabılıty: Brazılıan teachers’perspectıves. Movimento, 2017; 1229-1244.
11. 11. Greguol M, Malagodı BM, Carraro A. Inclusion of students with disabilities in physical education classes: teachers' attitudes in regular schools. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, 2018; 24, 33-44.
12. 12. Haegele J, Zhu X, Davis S. Barriers and facilitators of physical education participation for students with disabilities: An exploratory study. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2018; 22(2), 130-141.
13. 13. Hutzler Y, Meier S, Reuker S. Zitomer M. Attitudes and self-efficacy of physical education teachers toward inclusion of children with disabilities: a narrative review of international literature. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2019; 24(3), 249-266.
14. 14. Maher AJ, Fitzgerald H. Initial teacher education and continuing professional development: the perspectives of special school physical education teachers. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 2020; 11(1), 18-33.
15. 15. Tanure Alves ML, Grenier M, Haegele J A, Duarte E. ‘I didn’t do anything, I just watched’: perspectives of Brazilian students with physical disabilities toward physical education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2020; 24(10), 1129-1142.
16. 16. Petrie K, Devcich J, Fitzgerald H. Working towards inclusive physical education in a primary school:‘some days I just don’t get it right’. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2018; 23(4), 345-357.
17. 17. Siebert EA, Hamm J, Yun J. Parental influence on physical activity of children with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2017; 64(4), 378-390.
18. 18. Dülger B. Özel eğitim uygulama okullarında öğrenim gören öğrencilerin anne baba ve yasal varislerinin beden eğitimi ve spor dersinden beklentilerinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Adnan Menderes üniversitesi, Aydın, 2020.
19. 19. Kurt Ö, Coşkun. Yetişkin zihin engelli bireye sahip ailelerin çocuklarının fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2018; 4(3), 1-9.
20. 20. İlhan L. Zihinsel engelli çocuğu olan anne-babaların çocuklarının özel eğitimleri sürecinde beden eğitimi ve spor etkinliklerine yaklaşımlarının değerlendirilmesi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2009; 3(1), 38-48.
21. 21. Atasoy T, Pekel A. Zihinsel engelli çocuğa sahip ailelerin sporun etkilerine yönelik farkındalık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2021; 4(2), 96-107.
22. 22. Gül SO, Vuran SN. Normal sınıflara devam eden özel gereksinimli öğrencilerin kaynaştırma uygulamasına ilişkin görüşleri ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 2015; 40(180).
23. 23. Günaydın B, Mirzeoğlu N, Hakan A. Zihin engelliler beden eğitimi dersi içerik ve uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2019; 19(1), 235-242.
24. 24. Houston J, van der Mars H, Lorenz KA. Physical activity patterns in students with physical disabilities in general physical education and inclusive recess settings. Palaestra, 2018; 32(3).
25. 25. Namlı S, Suveren S. Üniversitelerin beden eğitimi ve spor bölümlerinde okuyan engelli öğrencilerin uyum düzeyleri ve beklentileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 2019; 20(3), 445-470.
26. 26. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
27. 27. Shelton LG. The Bronfenbrenner primer: A guide to develecology. New York: Routledge, 2019.
28. 28. Vella SA, Cliff DP. Okely AD. Socio-ecological predictors of participation and dropout in organised sports during childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Nutritionand Physical Activity, 2014; 11(1), 1-10.
29. 29. Martínez-Andrés M, Bartolomé-Gutiérrez R, Rodríguez-Martín B, Pardo-Guijarro MJ, Garrido-Miguel M, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Barriers and facilit at or stole i sure physical activity in children: a qualitative approa chusing the socio-ecologica lmodel. International Journal of Environ İntellectual Researc Hand Public Health, 2020; 17(9), 3033.
30. 30. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 2006; 27, 297-322.
31. 31. Argan M, Gürbüz B, Koçak F. Atıcı M. Engelli sporcuların objektifinden spor deneyimini görmek: engelleyici faktörlerin sosyo-ekolojik model perspektifinden analizi. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2021; 32(2), 75-97.
32. 32. Banks-Wallace J. Staggering under the weight of responsibility: The impact of culture on physical activity among African American women. Journal of Multicultural Nursing and Health, 2000; 6(3), 24–30.
33. 33. Humbert M, Chad K, Spink K, Muhajarine N, Anderson K, Bruner M, Girolami T, Odnokon P. Designing a youth physical activity pro- gram: factors that influence physical activity partic- ipation among high- and low-ses youth. Qualitative Health Research, 2006; 16, 467-483.
34. 34. Davey L. The application of case study evaluations. practical assessment, research & evaluation, 2009; 8(2), 1-3.
35. 35. Patton M Q. Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme Yöntemleri (M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir, çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2014.
36. 36. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2018.
37. 37. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 2006; 3(2), 77-101.
38. 38. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
39. 39. Shields N, Synnot A. Perceived barriers and facilitators to participation in physical activity for children with disability: A qualitative study. BMC Pediatri, 2016; 16 :9. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0544-7
40. 40. Kurtbeyoğlu Z, Demirtaş VY. Özel öğrenme güçlüğü tanılı çocuğu olan anne-babaların algılanan sosyal destek ve depresyon düzeyleri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2020; (50), 228-242.
41. 41. Schleien SJ, Miller KD, Walton G, Pruett S. Parent perspectives of barriers to child participation in recreational activities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 2014; 48(1), 61-73.
42. 42. Suarez-Balcazar Y, Early A, Maldonado, Garcia CP, Arias D, Zeidman A, Agudelo-Orozco A. Community-based participatory research to promote healthy lifestyles among Latino immigrant families with youth with disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2018; 25(5), 396-406.
43. 43. Njelesani J, Leckie K, Drummond J, Cameron D. Parental perceptions of barriers to physical activity in children with developintellectual disabilities living in Trinidad and Tobago. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2015; 37(4), 290-295.
44. 44. Columna L, Prieto, Elias-Revolledo G, Haegele J A. The perspectives of parents of youth with disabilities toward physical activity: A Systematic Review. Disability and Health Journal, 2020; 13(2), 100851.
45. 45. Akşit S. Almanya üniversitelerinde beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmeni yetiştirme ders programlarının incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Pamukkale üniversitesi, Denizli, 2019.
46. 46. Justus- Liebig Universitaet Giessen. Orientierungs- und Betriebspraktikum. HLbG § 15: Praktika und schulpraktische Studien. https://www.uni-giessen.de/de/fbz/zentren/zfl/studium/sps/opbp sayfasından erişilmiştir, 2023.