The Effect of Warming on Visual Response Time in Dominant and Non-Dominant Lower and Upper Extremities

Yıl 2023, , 348 - 356, 31.12.2023

Abdullah Arguz , Yasemin Bayraktar , Ahmet Kaan Aslan , Yağmur Kocaoğlu , Nurtekin Erkmen

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.1380623

Cited By: 1

Öz

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of warm-up activity on the visual response time of the dominant and non-dominant hand and foot in basketball players. A total of 13 male basketball athletes with an age of 14.38 ± .506 years, height 180.15 ± 8.07 cm, body weight 66.54 ± 13.73 and sports experience 4.69 ± 13.73 years were voluntarily included in the study. Visual response time of the dominant and non-dominant hand and foot were measured before and after the warm-up protocol. The warm-up protocol consisted of a 20-minute warm-up activity including basketball-specific movements and 5-minute stretching movements. Visual response time of the athletes were measured with the Blazepod system. There was no significant difference in the group main effect and time x group interaction of the athletes' hand visual response times after warm-up (F=2.403; p>0.05; F=0.170; p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the time effect (F=22.943; p<0.05). In the comparison of visual response times of both dominant hand (p=0.001) and non-dominant hand (p=0.005), a significant decrease was found in visual response times after warm-up compared to before warm-up. There was no significant difference between the visual response time of the dominant and non-dominant foot after warm-up (U=60.50; p=0.506). No significant difference was detected in the comparison of the visual response times of the dominant foot before warm-up with those after warm-up (Z=-1.804; p=0.071). Similarly, no significant difference was found after warming up in the non-dominant hand (t=2.150; p=0.055). It can be said that the warm-up protocol applied to basketball players increased the visual response times of the dominant and non-dominant hand and this increase was more significant in the dominant hand.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Basketball, Dominant leg, Response time

Kaynakça

• 1. Açak M, Karademir T, Taşmektepligil Y, Çalışkan E. The examination of agility and visual reaction values of hearing-ımpaired futsal sportsmen. Selçuk University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2012; 14(2): 283-289.
• 2. Adams RD, Victor M. Mc.Graw-Hill, Principles of Neurology Normal Development and Deviation in Development of The Nervous System. International Edition, Medicine Series, 1989: 457-468.
• 3. Akgün,N..Egzersiz Fizyolojisi. 2nd ed. Ege University press, 1986.
• 4. Aslan AK, Cicioğlu HA, Kocaoğlu Y, Erkmen N. The relationship between the preferred music type in 11-14 age group children and the hand eye response times. National Kinesiology, 2023; 4(1): 38-46.
• 5. Badau D. Baydil B. Badau A. Differences among three measures of response time based on hand laterality in ındividual sports. Sports, 2018; 6(2) 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6020045.
• 6. Bakar, Y, Tuğral A, Özel A, Altundaş YD. Comparison of a 12-week whole-body exergaming program on young adults: Differentiation in flexibility, muscle strength, reaction time, and walking speed between sexes. Clinical Nursing Research, 2020, 29(7): 424-432.
• 7. Bayar P, Koruç Z. Reaksiyon zamanı ve el-göz koordinasyonu ölçer iki aracın Türkiye normlarının saptanmasına yönelik ön çalışma, 2. National Symposium on Sport Sciences, Ankara,1992; 136-43.
• 8. Börklü T. Dolu N. The Hemispheric Differences of Auditory Evoked Potential in Sportsman. Journal of Health Sciences, 2010; 19(2): 108-118.
• 9. Brighenti A. Noé F. Stella F. Schena F. Mourot L. Warm-up ımproves balance control differently in the dominant and non-dominant leg in young sportsmen according to their experience in asymmetric or symmetric sports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022; 19(8), 4562.
• 10. Chen CH, Chang CK, Tseng WC, Chiu C, Dai X, Ye X. Acute effects of different warm-up protocols on sports performance in elite male collegiate handball players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2022; 36(8): 2262–2267.
• 11. Chouamo AK, Griego S, Lopez FAS. Reaction time and hand dominance. The Journal of Science and Medicine, 2021; 1-7.
• 12. Doğar Y, İlhan Ş. Comparison of hand reaction times of athletes with different hand preference and relation of reaction time with ıntelligence level. Journal of Sports Education, 2019; 3(3): 10-19.
• 13. Erol E, 1992. Çabuk kuvvet çalışmalarının 16-18 Yaş Grubu Genç Basketbolcuların Performansına Etkisinin Deneysel Olarak İncelenmesi, Master Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Education, Ankara.
• 14. Ferreira TV, Noce F, Teoldo da Costa I Vieira MM, Costa VTD. Is there a difference by sex in simple response time and impulsivity in Junior Brazilian Judo Team athletes? Arch Budo Sci Martial Art Extreme Sport, 2017; 13: 111-118.
• 15. Gelen E. Acute effects of different warm-up methods on sprint, slalom dribbling, and penalty kick performance in soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2010; 24(4): 950-956.
• 16. Gignac GE, Vernon PA. Reaction time and the dominant and non-dominant hands: an extension of Hick's Law. Personality and individual Differences, 2004; 36(3); 733-739.
• 17. Grıffıth HW. Spor Sakatlıkları Rehberi.Çev.: Şamil Erdoğan, 1st ed. Istanbul Medical Press, 2000.16
• 18. Gündoğan NÜ. The Importance of Left and Right Brain Asymmetries (Lateralization) For Learning and Behavior. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 2005; 25(3);333.
• 19. Heitz RP. The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 150.
• 20. Jain A, Bansal R, Kumar A, Singh KD. A comparative study of visual and auditory response time s on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 2015; 5(2): 124.
• 21. Karadağ A. Kutlu M. Effects of long term soccer training on visual and auditory reaction time of dominant and non-dominant leg in footballers. Fırat Medical Journal, 2006; 11(1): 26-29.
• 22. Kaya M. Effect of reaction developing training on audio-visual feet response time in wrestlers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2016; 11(10): 3251-3257.
• 23. Leong CK. Laterality and reading proficiency in children. Reading Research Qerterly, 1980; 7 185-202.
• 24. Liu Y, See L, Chang S, Lee J, Shieh L, Ning Y, Lim AY, Chen W. Simple and choice response time elite and novice karate athletes and non-athletes. Arch Budo 2018; 14: 267-276.
• 25. Luce RD. Response Times; Their Role ın Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
• 26. Magil RA. Motor Learning: Concept and Applications. McGraw Hill Companies, USA, 1998; 17-18, 87-100.
• 27. Montés-Micó R, Bueno I, Candel J, Pons AM. Eye-hand and eye-foot visual response time s of young soccer players. Optometry (St. Louis, Mo.), 2000; 71(12): 775-780.
• 28. Paillard T, Kadri MA, Nouar MB, Noé F. Warm-up optimizes postural control but requires some minutes of recovery. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2018; 32(10): 2725-2729.
• 29. Perrier ET, Pavol MJ, Hoffman MA. The acute effects of a warm-up including static or dynamic stretching on countermovement jump height, reaction time, and flexibility. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2011; 25(7); 1925-1931.
• 30. Romaratezabala E, Nakamura FY, Castillo D, Gorostegi-Anduaga I, Yanci J. Influence of warm-up duration on physical performance and psychological perceptions in handball players. Res Sports Med, 2018: 26(2), 230–243.
• 31. Stöckel T, Weigelt M Plasticity of human handedness: Decreased one-hand bias and inter-manual performance asymmetry in expert basketball players, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2012: 30(10); 1037 1045.
• 32. Şahinoğlu Z, Özüsakız T. Futbolda Isınma. Ankara: Turkish Football Federation. 1994.
• 33. Taimela S, Kujala UM. Reaction Times with Reference to Musculoskeletal Complaints in Adolescence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1992: 75(3) 1075-1082.