The Relationship between Physical Education Teachers’ Benefits of Participation in Recreational Activities, Leisure Time Satisfaction Levels, and Cognitive Flexibility

Öz

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between physical education teachers' recreational activity participation, leisure time satisfaction, and cognitive flexibility. The relationship between the benefits that physical education teachers derive from participating in recreational activities, their levels of satisfaction during leisure time, and their cognitive flexibility. A total of 515 participants took part in the research. Out of these, 191 were female and 324 were male. All the participants were employed by physical education departments in Antalya. The teachers who participated in the research were selected using the homogeneous sampling method, which is one of the purposeful sampling methods, and voluntary participation was considered in determining the participants. In the collection of research data, the scales were filled in electronically. The Personal Information Form developed by the researcher was used to obtain sociodemographic data. In addition, the Recreation Utility Scale designed by Ho in 2008 (26), the Leisure Time Satisfaction Scale developed by Beard and Ragheb in 1980 (6), and the Cognitive Flexibility Scale developed by Martin and Rubin in 1995 (34) were used to measure how individuals spend their ‘leisure time’ physically, psychologically, and socially. The data obtained from the scales were analyzed and interpreted through statistical methods based on the research problems. SPSS version 25 statistical programs was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistical analyses, including frequency and percentage distributions of the responses to the scale questions, as well as arithmetic mean and standard deviation scores, interpretive statistical analyses were performed based on the results of the normality analysis of the data, and correlation (Pearson) analysis was used to determine the relationships between variables. The reliability level for this study was accepted as 0.05. When the findings were examined, according to the results of the research, it can be said that the physical education teachers participating in the research generally think that recreational activities are beneficial in terms of physical, psychological, and social aspects. However, they exhibited an attitude that recreational activities contribute more to individuals' physical and psychological characteristics while contributing less to their social lives or socialization. Additionally, it can be said that they are generally satisfied with leisure activities, but they believe that the places where these activities are carried out need to be better designed or increased. The cognitive flexibility levels of physical education teachers were found to be close to "somewhat agree" and they have a positive cognitive flexibility. According to the findings obtained regarding the sub-problem of the research, "Is there a statistically significant relationship between the benefits of physical education teachers' participation in recreational activities, their leisure satisfaction, and cognitive flexibility levels?", it was determined that there were statistically significant (p<0.05), weak, moderate, high, and very high level and positive correlation relationships between the benefits of physical education teachers' participation in recreational activities, leisure satisfaction, and cognitive flexibility levels. In conclusion, based on the findings and results of the research, it can be said that according to the participants, recreational activities are generally beneficial in terms of physical, psychological, and social aspects. Participating physical education teachers are generally satisfied with leisure activities and believe that recreational activities are beneficial in terms of physical, psychological, and social aspects. However, they exhibit an attitude that recreational activities contribute more to individuals' physical and psychological characteristics while contributing less to their social lives or socialization.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Recreation
• Leisure Time Satisfaction
• Cognitive Flexibility
• Physical Education Teacher

Kaynakça

1. 1. Altunkol F. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bilişsel Esneklikleri ile Algılanan Stres Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2011.
2. 2. Akgül BM, Ertüzün E, Karaküçük S. Rekreasyon fayda ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018; 23(1): 25-34.
3. 3. Arslan S. Serbest Zaman-Rekreasyon ve Serbest Zaman Eğitimi. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2013.
4. 4. Aytaç Ö. İşlevselci Yaklaşım Açısından Boş Zaman Sosyolojisi: Kurumlar, Süreçler, Etkinlikler (Rekreasyon Bilimi 2). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi, 2017.
5. 5. Bae MH. Happiness levels and leisure life satisfaction for sports leisure activities participation: Implication for physical education in Korea. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2022; 51(9): 2007-2016. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i9.10555
6. 6. Beard JG, Ragheb MG. Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 1980; 12(1): 20-33.
7. 7. Bilgin M. Bilişsel esnekliği yordayan bazı değişkenler. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2009; 3(36): 142-157.
8. 8. Brocas I, Carrillo JD. Steps of reasoning in children and adolescents. Journal of Political Economy, 2021; 129(7): 2067-2111.

9. 9. Broughton K, Beggs BA. Leisure satisfaction of older adults. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 2007; 31(1): 1-18.
10. 10. Bülbül A, Ölçücü B, Akyol G. Spor elemanlarının rekreasyon fayda farkındalığı ile bedenlerini beğenme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergisi, 2021; 1(50): 110-123. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.934526
11. 11. Chen CC, Cheng CH, Lin SY. The relationship among leisure involvement, leisure benefits, and happiness of elementary school teachers in Tainan county. International Research in Education, 2013; 1(1): 29-51. https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v1i1.3970
12. 12. Coleman D, Iso-Ahola SE. Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. Journal of Leisure Research, 1993; 25: 111-128.
13. 13. Compton DM, Hormachea CR. Facilitating leisure development of inmates in local and county jails. Richmond: Correctional Recreation Project Center For Public Affairs Virginia Commonwealth University, 1979.
14. 14. Cuenca-Amigo M, Aristegui I, Cuenca M, Amigo ML. The importance of leisure in older adults living in Spain. Annals of Leisure Research, 2017; 20(2): 222-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2016.1217493
15. 15. Çakır VO. Üniversite öğrencilerin serbest zaman doyum düzeyleri ile serbest zaman yönetimleri arasındaki ilişki. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2017; 2(3): 17-27.
16. 16. Çelik G. Kamu Kuruluşlarında Çalışan Engelli Bireylerin Serbest Zaman Engellerinin ve Tatmin Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi: Antalya Merkez Örneği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Antalya: Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2011.
17. 17. Çelikkaleli Ö. Bilişsel esneklik ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 2014; 39(176): 339-346.
18. 18. De La Vega R, Parastatidou IS, Ruíz-Barquín R, Szabo A. (2016). Exercise addiction in athletes and leisure exercisers: The moderating role of passion. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2016; 5(2): 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.043
19. 19. Demiral S. Açık Alan Rekreasyonuna Katılan Bireylerin Serbest Zaman Tatmin Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi: Şavşat-Karagöl Örneği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Batman: Batman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2018.
20. 20. Dokuzoğlu G, Sağıroğlu İ, Çevik A. Investigation of the relationship between the levels of leisure time satisfaction and passion in sports who exercise individuals fitness. Journal of Sport Sciences Research, 2023; 8(3): 613-629.
21. 21. Eskiler E, Yildiz Y, Ayhan C. The effect of leisure benefits on leisure satisfaction: Extreme sports. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2019; 21(1): 16-20. HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.522984"https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.522984
22. 22. Gökçe H. Serbest Zaman Doyumunun Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyo-Demografik Değişkenlerle İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2008.
23. 23. Gökçe H, Orhan K. Serbest zaman doyum ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlilik güvenirlik çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Hacettepe J. of Sport Sciences, 2019; 22(4): 139-145.
24. 24. Hacıoğlu N, Gökdeniz A, Dinç Y. Boş Zaman ve Rekreasyon Yönetimi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2017.
25. 25. Heintzman P. The spiritual benefits of leisure. Leisure/Loisir, 2009; 33(1): 419-445. https://beststyletrends.com/benefits-of-recreation-and-leisure/
26. 26. Ho TK. A Study of Leisure Attitudes and Benefits for Senior High School Students at Pingtung City and Country in Taiwan. (Doctoral Dissertation). Daphne: United States Sports Academy, 2008.
27. 27. Hsieh SC, Spaulding A, Riney M. A qualitative look at leisure benefits for Taiwanese nursing students. The Qualitative Report, 2004; 9(4): 604-629.
28. 28. Kalfa S. Spor Bilimleri ve Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Yaşam Doyumu ve Serbest Zaman Doyumunun İncelenmesi: Uşak Üniversitesi Örneği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Muğla: Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2017.
29. 29. Karasar N. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2006.
30. 30. Kocaer G, Yaşartürk F. Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin mesleğe yönelik tutum, serbest zaman ilgilenim ve rekreasyon faaliyetlerine yönelik fayda düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Bartın ili örneği). Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2022; 8(2): 608-623.
31. 31. Konter E, Kueh YC, Kuan G. Relationship between passion and courage among the experienced male soccer players. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2020; 27(4): 85-96. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2020.27.4.8
32. 32. Kwon YH, Cheung YK, Ahn B. W. Effect of outdoor sports participants on leisure facilitation, recreation specialization, and leisure satisfaction: Yacht and golf participants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021; 18(15): 8128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158128
33. 33. Lucas JJ, Moore KA. Psychological flexibility: Positive implications for mental health and life satisfaction. Health Promot Int., 2020; 35: 312-20.
34. 34. Martin MM, Rubin RB. A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 1995; 76(2): 623-626.
35. 35. Odacı H, Çıkrıkçı Ö, Çıkrıkçı N, Aydın F. An exploration of the associations among cognitive flexibility, attachment styles and life satisfaction. Int J Happiness Dev., 2019; 5: 242-256.
36. 36. Odacı H, Cikrikci Ö. Cognitive flexibility mediates the relationship between big five personality traits and life satisfaction. Applied Res Quality Life, 2019; 14: 1229-1246.
37. 37. Öge RM. Okul Psikolojik Danışmanlarının Serbest Zaman Doyumu ile Bilişsel Esneklikleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul: Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, 2020.
38. 38. Özgür Ö. Fitness Katılımcılarının Serbest Zaman Doyumu ile Mutluluk Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sakarya: Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, 2021.
39. 39. Öztaş İ. Farklı Kurumlarda Çalışan Memurların Serbest Zaman Doyum ve Mutluluk Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi: Kırıkkale İli Örneği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ağrı: Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2018.
40. 40. Ram D, Alammar M. Level and relationships of life satisfaction with cognitive flexibility and resilience in IT professionals. Indian J Occup Environ Med., 2022; 26(2): 84-90. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_213_21. Epub 2022 Jul 4. PMID: 35991196; PMCID: PMC9384874.
41. 41. Sadeghi M, Imeni F, Bavazin F. Students’ satisfaction of life: Prediction based on religiosity, meaning in life and cognitive flexibility. Women’s Studies Soc. Psychol., 2018; 16: 195-222.
42. 42. Serarslan MZ, Bakır M. 1988. Turizm pazarlamasında sporun yeri ve Türkiye açısından değerlemesi. İstanbul Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , 1988; 9: 28-30.
43. 43. Sevin HD, Özil L. The relationship between teachers' level of participation in recreation activities and emotional ıntelligence and life satisfaction. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2019; 7(3): 2038-2065.
44. 44. Türken H. Kırıkkale’de Görev Yapan Sağlık Çalışanlarının Serbest Zaman Etkinliklerinde Sporun Yeri. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Kırıkkale: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2018.
45. 45. Üstün ÜD, Üstün-Aktaş N. 2020. Üniversite öğrencilerinin rekreasyonel etkinliklerin faydaları hakkındaki farkındalıklarının incelenmesi. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2020; 7(1): 38-48. https://doi.org/10.33468/sbsebd.128
46. 46. Wankel LM, Berger BG. The personal and social benefits of sport and physical activity. US: Venture Publishing, 1991.
47. 47. Yılmaz S. Serçeme vadisinin rekreasyonel kullanım potansiyelinin belirlenmesi. Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi, 2004; 13(51): 1-6.
48. 48. Yoo J. Attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and happiness are mediated by satisfaction with leisure activities. Scientific Reports, 2022; 12(1): 11723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022- 16012-w
49. 49. Yue GJ. The relationship between leisure involvement of remote control plane activities and leisure benefits. (Master Thesis). Taiwan: University of the Great Leaf School of Management, 2012.