Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Aktivite Tutumlarının ve Antisosyal Davranışlarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı ortaokul öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite tutumlarının ve antisosyal davranışlarının incelenmesidir. Çalışmanın araştırma grubunu 2022-2023 Eğitim-Öğretim yılında İstanbul ili Esenyurt ilçesinde Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı’na bağlı üç ortaokulda 5-6-7-8. sınıfta öğrenim gören, yaşları 11 ile 13 arasında değişen, 509 erkek, 537 kız olmak üzere toplam 1046 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “Ortaokul Öğrencileri İçin Fiziksel Aktivite Tutum Ölçeği" ve “Ortaokul Öğrencileri İçin Antisosyal Davranış Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde ve hesaplanmış değerlerin bulunmasında SPSS 25.0 istatistik paket program kullanılmıştır. Veriler ortalama ve standart sapmalar verilerek özetlenmiştir. Verilerin normal dağılım gösterip göstermediği Basıklık ve Çarpıklık (Kurtosis - Skewness) kat sayıları aralığı ile kontrol edilmiştir ve verilerin normal dağıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Veriler normal dağılım gösterdiğinden dolayı ikili küme karşılaştırmaları için bağımsız grup t testi, ikiden fazla küme karşılaştırmaları için Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA) kullanılmıştır. ANOVA sonucu anlamlı farklılıkların kaynağını belirlemek üzere Tukey HSD çoklu karşılaştırma testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan katılımcıların Fiziksel Aktivite Tutum Ölçeği ve Antisosyal Davranış Ölçeği alt boyutlarının puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olup olmadığına, Pearson Momentler Çarpım Korelasyon Katsayısından faydalanılarak bakılmıştır. Bu çalışma kapsamında ölçek güvenirlik katsayısı .77 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Araştırmada anlamlılık düzeyi 0.05 olarak alınmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda ortaokul öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite tutumları ile aile gelir seviyesi ve anne çalışma durumu arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmazken (p>0,05), cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi, anne öğrenim düzeyi ve baba öğrenim düzeyi değişkenleri arasında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmiştir (p<0,05). Antisosyal davranışlarla aile gelir seviyesi arasında anlamlı bir farklılık gözlenmemişken (p>0,05), diğer demografik değişkenler arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Ayrıca Fiziksel Aktivite Tutum Ölçeğinin özgüven alt boyutu ile Antisosyal Davranış Ölçeğinin uygun olmayan davranış alt boyutu arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmazken (p>0,01), diğer alt boyutlar arasında anlamlı farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01) Sonuç olarak, öğrencilerin fiziksel aktivite tutumlarının antisosyal davranışları etkilediği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Antisosyal Davranışlar
• Fiziksel Aktivitiye Yönelik Tutum
• Ortaokul Öğrencileri

Examination of Physical Activity Attitudes and Anti-Social Behaviors of Middle School Students

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the physical activity attitudes and antisocial behaviors of middle school students. The research group of the study consisted of a total of 1046 students, 509 boys and 537 girls, aged between 11 and 13, studying in 5-6-7-8th grades in three secondary schools affiliated to the Ministry of National Education in Esenyurt district of Istanbul province in the 2022-2023 academic year. "Personal Information Form", "Physical Activity Attitude Scale for Secondary School Students" and "Antisocial Behavior Scale for Secondary School Students" were used as data collection tools. SPSS 25.0 statistical package program was used to evaluate the data and to find calculated values. Data were summarized by giving mean and standard deviations. Whether the data were normally distributed was checked with the range of Kurtosis and Skewness coefficients and it was determined that the data were normally distributed. Since the data were normally distributed, independent group t-test was used for pairwise cluster comparisons and One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for more than two cluster comparisons. Tukey HSD multiple comparison test was used to determine the source of significant differences as a result of ANOVA. The Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient was used to determine whether there was a significant relationship between the mean scores of the Physical Activity Attitude Scale and Antisocial Behavior Scale sub-dimensions of the participants who participated in the study. Within the scope of this study, the scale reliability coefficient was calculated as .77. The significance level was taken as 0.05. As a result of the analysis, no significant difference was found between the physical activity attitudes of secondary school students and family income level and mother's working status (p>0.05), while a significant difference was found between gender, grade level, mother's education level and father's education level variables (p<0.05). While no significant difference was observed between antisocial behaviors and family income level (p>0.05), a significant difference was found between other demographic variables (p<0.05). In addition, while no significant difference was found between the self-confidence sub-dimension of the Physical Activity Attitude Scale and the inappropriate behavior sub-dimension of the Antisocial Behavior Scale (p>0.01), significant differences were found between the other sub-dimensions (p<0.01) As a result, it can be said that students' physical activity attitudes affect antisocial behaviors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• antisocial behaviors
• attitude towards physical activity
• secondary school students

Kaynakça

1. 1. Altın Y, İlter İ, Gül M. The Investigation of Attitudes Towards Physical Activity and Their Levels of Life Satisfaction of High School Students. International Journal of Progressive Education, 2021; 17(1):16-34.
2. 2. Akıncı AY, Türkay IK, Arısoy A, Deniz C. Investigation of high school students' physical education course attitudes according to some variables (Isparta Sample). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Sport Sciences, 2020; 3(3): 53-62.
3. 3. Allen TJ, Dougherty DM, Rhoades HM, Cherek DR. A study of male and female aggressive responding under conditions providing an escape response. The Psychological Record, 1996; 46(4): 651-665.
4. 4. Arslan C, Hamarta E, Arslan E., Saygın Y. Investigation of aggression and interpersonal problem solving in adolescents. İlköğretim Online, 2010; 9(1): 379-388.
5. 5. Balıkçı R. Investigation of the relationship between online game addiction and aggressive behaviors in children and adolescents. Master's Thesis, Fatih Sultan Mehmet University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, 2018.
6. 6. Bayrak B. Aggression tendencies of students aged 10-12 years and determination of the factors affecting this. Master's Thesis, Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, 2011.
7. 7. Belair MA, Kohen DE, Kingsbury M, Colman I. Relationship between leisure time physical activity, sedentary behaviour and symptoms of depression and anxiety: evidence from a populationbased sample of canadian adolescents. BMJ Open, 2018.
8. 8. Beyers JM, Bates JE, Pettit GS, Dodge K. Neighborhood structure, parenting processes and the development of youths' externalizing behaviors: a multilevel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2003; 31: 35-53.

9. 9. Biddle SJ, Ciaccionni S, Thomas G, Vargeer I. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: an updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2019; 42: 55-146.
10. 10. Birgün A, Özen E, Sevim Uğraş B, Sevim Pehlivan B. Investigation of the attitude levels of secondary school students towards physical activity. International Journal of Mountaineering and Climbing, 2020; 3(2): 64-75.
11. 11. Björkqvist K. Gender differences in aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2018; 19: 39-42.
12. 12. Björkqvist K, Lagerspetz KM, Kaukiainen A. Do girls manipulate and boys fight? developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 1992; 18(2): 117-127.
13. 13. Bor W, McGee TR, Hayatbakhsh R, Dean A, Najman JM. Do antisocial females exhibit poor outcomes in adulthood? an australian cohort study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2010; 44 (7): 648-657.
14. 14. Böke H, Norman G. Evaluation of secondary school students' attitu destowards physical education and sports classes: A metaanaly sisstudy. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2021; 13(3): 3042-3056.
15. 15. Bulut S. A social determinant of health; physical activity. Turkish Journal of Hygiene and Experimental Biology, 2013; 70(4): 205-214.
16. 16. Burt AS, Donnellan BM. Development and validation of the subtypes of antisocial behavior questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 2009; 35: 376-398.
17. 17. Cansever D. Investigation of the relationship between perceived parental conflict and aggression in adolescents.Master's Thesis, Akdeniz University Institute of Educational Sciences, Antalya, 2017.
18. 18. Cao L, Cao J, Zhao J. Family, welfare and delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2004; 32: 565-576.
19. 19. Chandler JM. Egocentrism and antisocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 1973.
20. 20. Cengiz Ö, Kılıç MA, Soylu Y. Investigation of middle school students' attitudes towards physical education course. Academy of Social Sciences Journal, 2018; 1(2): 141-149.
21. 21. Coley RL, Morris JE, Hernandez D. Out-of-school care and problem behavior trajectories among low-income adolescents: individual, family, and neighborhood characteristics as added risks. Child Development, 2004; 75: 948-965.
22. 22. Çetin L. Quality of life in classroom teachers and some factors affecting it. Master's Thesis, Cumhuriyet University Institute of Health Sciences, Sivas, 2010.
23. 23. Çetinkaya Yıldız E, Hatipoğlu Sümer Z. Perception of environmental risk, environmental safety and school climate in predicting aggressive behaviors. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, 2010; 4(34): 161-173.
24. 24. Demirbaş T. The effect of physical activity level of individuals on healthy lifestyle and health perception during the Covid-19 pandemic process. Master's Thesis, Selçuk University Institute of Health Sciences, Konya, 2021.
25. 25. Donat Bacıoğlu S, Özdemir Y. Relationships between aggressive behaviors of primary school students and age, gender, achievement status and anger. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 2012; 2(2): 169-187.
26. 26. Ergür G. Examination of the aggression tendencies and self-esteem levels of second level students who play violent computer games.Master's Thesis, Istanbul Arel University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, 2015.
27. 27. Fan X, Chen M. Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Educationa l Psychology Review, 2001; 13: 1-22.
28. 28. Giles JW, Heyman GD. Preschoolers' use of trait-relevant information to evaluate the appropriateness of an aggressive response. Aggressive Behavior, 2005; 31: 498-509.
29. 29. Göksel AG, Caz Ç. Investigation of Anatolian high school students' attitudes towards physical education course. Marmara University Journal of Sport Sciences, 2016; 1(1): 1-9.
30. 30. Gönültaş O, Atıcı M. Investigation of anger levels and aggression levels of senior high school students according to some variables. Çukurova University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 2014; 23(1): 370-386.
31. 31. Gullane E, Moore S. Risk taking in adolescents and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Adolescence, 2000; 23(4): 393-407.
32. 32. Güler M. Development of criminal behavior in children and adolescents from the perspective of social psychology. Journal of TBB, 2010; 89: 355-372.
33. 33. Güllü M, Şarvan Cengiz Ş, Öztaşyonar Y, Kaplan B. Investigation of secondary school students' attitudes towards physical education and sports course according to some variables (Şanlıurfa Province Example). Gaziantep University Journal of Sport Sciences, 2016; 1(2): 49-61.
34. 34. Haskan Avcı Ö. The frequency of violence tendency in adolescents. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 2015; 8(1): 106-124.
35. 35. Hoşgörür V, Polat M. Reasons for absenteeism of secondary school students (söke district example). MSKU Faculty of Education, 2015; 2(1): 25-42.
36. 36. Ibrahimli R. Investigation of middle school students' attitudes towards physical education and sports course and physical activity levels. Unpublished Master's thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Sports Education, Istanbul, 2019.
37. 37. Kaner S. Antisocial behavior tendency inventory development studies. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara, 1991.
38. 38. Karakulak F. Aggression tendency in adolescents exposed to domestic violence in childhood.Master's Thesis, Istanbul Gelisim University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, 2018.
39. 39. Kaya Z, İkiz FE, Asıcı E. Prediction of adolescents' aggression level in terms of value orientations, gender and parents' education level. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 2019; 27(1): 75-84.
40. 40. Keiley MK, Lofthouse N, Bates JE, Dodge KA, Pettit GS. Differential risks of covarying and pure components in mother and teacher reports of externalizing and internalizing behavior across ages 5 to 14. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2003; 31: 267-283.
41. 41. Keskin Ö. Investigation of secondary school students' attitudes towards physical education course according to some variables: The case of Sakarya province. Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sports Teaching, Master's thesis, Sakarya, 2015.
42. 42. Köksal F. The relations between control focus and aggressive behaviors. Doctoral Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum, 1991.
43. 43. Laird RD, Pettit GS, Dodge, KA, Bates JE. Best friendships, group relationships and antisocial behavior in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 1999; 19(4): 413-437.
44. 44. Moffitt TE. Adolescence-limitedand life course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 1993; 100: 674-701.
45. 45. Morrison GM, Furlong MJ, Morrison RL. School violence to school safety: reframing the issue for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 1994; 23(2): 236-256.
46. 46. Mulye TP, Park JM, Nelson CD, Adams SH, Irwin CE, Brindis CD. Trends in adolescent and young adult health in the united states. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2009; 45(1): 8-24.
47. 47. Nelson MC, Story M, Larson NI, Neumark-Sztainer D, Lytle LA. Emerging adulthood and college-aged youth: an overlooked age for weight-related behavior change. Obesity, 2008; 16(10): 2205-2211.
48. 48. Özgür G, Yörükoğlu G, Baysan Arabacı. High school students' perceptions of violence, violence tendency levels and affecting factors. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 2011; 2(2): 53-60.
49. 49. Pethkar V, Shraddha Naik S, Sonawane, S. Attitude stoward physical activityan ditsmea surement. Journal of Physical Education and Sportvol, 2010; 29(4): 30 -36.
50. 50. Sağlam A, İkiz F. Examining the relationship between secondary school students' violence tendencies and their school engagement levels. Elementary Education Online, 2017; 16(3): 1235-1246.
51. 51. Savcı S, Öztürk M, Arıkan H, İnal İD, Tokgözoğlu L. Physical activity levels of university students. Turkish Cardiol Assoc. Archives, 2006; 34(3): 166-172.
52. 52. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics (sixth ed.).Pearson Education Inc. Boston, MA, 2013.
53. 53. Taşkın S. Investigation of antisocial behaviors in secondary school students. Master's Thesis, Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences, Kırşehir, 2022.
54. 54. Türksoy KK, Özlü K. Investigation of the relationship between middle school students' attitudes towards physical education course and sportsmanship behaviors. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 2022; 11(3): 1304-1321.
55. 55. Ünişen A, Demirbağ B. Investigation of vandalism in secondary school students in terms of family relationships and some variables (Adıyaman province example). Education Sciences (NWSAES), 2016; 11(2): 49-60.
56. 56. Van Lier PA, Vitaro F, Barker ED, Koot HM, Tremblay RE. Developmental links between trajectories of physical violence, vandalism, theft and alcohol-drug use from childhood to adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2009; 37(4): 481-492.
57. 57. Werner NE, Crick NR. Relational aggression and social-psychological adjustment in a college sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1999; 108(4): 615-623.
58. 58. Yavuzer Y. Aggression/violence in schools: risk factors and prevention strategies related to schools and teachers. Journal of National Education, 2011; 41(192): 43-61.
59. 59. Yetiş Ü, Aytaç KY, Çalğan G. Investigation of the attitudes of secondary school students towards physical education and sports course. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Sciences 2022; 5(2): 906-917.
60. 60. Yıldız E, Erci B. Investigation of the relationship between parental attitudes and adolescent aggression. Journal of Düzce University Institute of Health Sciences, 2011; 1(3): 6-11.
61. 61. Yıldızer G, Bilgin E, Korur EN, Yılmaz Y, Demirhan G. Development of physical activity attitude scale for secondary school students. Journal of sport sciences, 2019:63-73.
62. 62. Yönet E, Çalık F, Yaşartürk F, Çimen K. Investigation of High School Students' Participation in Recreational Activities and Aggression-Violence Tendencies. IntJSCS. 2016; 4(1): 368-82.
63. 63. Zorba E, Saygın Ö. Physical activity and physical fitness. Ankara, Perspektif Matbaacılık, 2017.