The Effect of Positional Differences on Technical Parameters in Different Parts of the Pitch in Soccer

Öz

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of positional differences on technical parameters in different parts of the pitch in soccer. For this purpose, 22 healthy male soccer players participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 22±1.46 years, mean height was 176.27±5.76 cm, mean body weight was 68.83±5.60 kg and mean body mass index (BMI) was 21.67± 1.23 kg/m2. The participants were divided into 3 groups according to their positions as defender, midfielder and attackers with 5 people in each group, in addition to this, a fixed group of 5 players was formed and two different goalkeepers were included in the study at different stages of the game. One-Way Anova test was used to determine the difference between the groups. In the first zone, the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) values of the attacker players showed a significant difference, while no difference was observed in the other parameters. In the second zone, only the ball possession (BP) values of midfielder players made a significant difference. In the third zone, both defense and midfielder players made more vertical and diagonal passes (DVP). In conclusion, when the various technical actions of players in different positions in the three zones of the game are analyzed, although there are differences in some parameters, in general, positional differences in different zones do not show a significant change. Keywords: Ball possession, diagonal passes, rating of perceived exertion and soccer.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• diagonal passes
• Ball possession
• rating of perceived exertion
• soccer

Kaynakça

1. 1. Aslan CS, Koç H. Amatör futbolcuların seçilmiş fiziksel, fizyolojik ve motorik özelliklerinin mevkilerine göre karşılaştırılması. cbü beden eğitimi ve spor bilimleri dergisi, 2015, 10.1: 56-65.
2. 2. Bangsbo J, Mohr M, Krustrup P. Physical and metabolic demands of training and match-play in the elite football player. J Sports Sci, 2006, 24(7), 665-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500482529.
3. 3. Barnes C, Archer DT, Hogg B, Bush M, Bradley P. The Evolution of Physical and Technical Performance Parameters in the English Premier League. Int J Sports Med. 2014; 35(13):1095–1100.
4. 4. Borg, G., Hassmén, P., & Lagerström, M.. Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1987, 56, 679-685.
5. 5. Bortnik L, Bruce-Low S, Burger J, Alexander J, Harper D, Morgans R, Carling C, McDaid K, Rhodes D. Physical match demands across different playing positions during transitional play and high-pressure activities in elite soccer. Biol Sport. 2024 Mar;41(2):73-82. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.131815. Epub 2023 Apr 10. PMID: 38524824; PMCID: PMC10955741.
6. 6. Carling C, McCall A, Harper D, Bradley P.Comment on: “The Use of Microtechnology to Quantify the Peak Match Demands of the Football Codes: A Systematic Review”. Sports Med. 2019; 49(2):343–345.
7. 7. Clemente, F.; Mendes, R. Aprender o jogo jogando: Uma justificaçao transdisciplinar. Exedra Rev. Científica 2011, 5, 27–36.
8. 8. Davids K, Araújo D, Correia V, Vilar L. How small-sided and conditioned games enhance acquisition of movement and decision-making skills. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2013;41:154–61.

9. 9. Dellal A, Owen A, Wong DP, Krustrup P, Van Exsel M, Mallo J. Technical and physical demands of small vs. large sided games in relation to playing position in elite soccer. Human movement science, 2012; 31(4), 957-969.
10. 10. Dolci F, Hart N, Kilding A, Chivers P, Piggott B, Spiteri T.. Physical and Energetic Demand of Soccer: A Brief Review. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 2020, 42, 1. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000533.
11. 11. Halouani J, Chtourou H, Gabbett T, Chaouachi A, Chamari K. Small-sided games in team sports training: a brief review. The journal of strength & conditioning research, 2014; 28(12), 3594- 3618.3.
12. 12. Harper D, Carling C, Kiely J. High-Intensity Acceleration and Deceleration Demands in Elite Team Sports Competitive Match Play: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Sports Med. 2019; 49(12):1923–1947.
13. 13. Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Coutts AJ, Sassi AL, Marcora SM. Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. Medicine & Science in sports & exercise, 2004; 36(6), 1042-1047.
14. 14. Jeong, T. S., Reilly, T., Morton, J., Bae, S. W., & Drust, B. Quantification of the physiological loading of one week of “pre-season” and one week of “in-season” training in professional soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(11) 2011; 1161–1166.https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.583671.
15. 15. Joo CH, Hwang-bo K, Jee H. Technical and physical activities of small-sided games in young Korean soc- cer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(8):2164–2173; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001319.
16. 16. Kelly, D.M, Drust, B. The effect of pitchdimensions on heart rate responses and technical demands of small-sided soccer games in elite players. J Sci Med Sports , 2009; 12, 475–479.
17. 17. Kinnerk, P.; Harvey, S.; MacDonncha, C.; Lyons, M. A review of the game-based approaches to coaching literature in competitive team sport settings. Quest 2018, 70, 401–418.
18. 18. Lago-Peñas C, Gómez-Ruano M, Yang G. Styles of play in professional soccer: an approach of the Chinese Soccer Super League. Int J Perform Anal in Sport. 2018; 17(6):1073–1084.
19. 19. Owen A, Twist C, Ford P. Small-sided games: The physiological and technical effect of altering pitch size and player numbers. Insight, 2004; 7(2), 50-53.
20. 20. Serra-Olivares J, Clemente FM, González-Víllora S. Tactical expertise assessment in youth football using representative tasks. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1301; doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2955-1.
21. 21. Stølen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, Wisløff U. Physiology of Soccer: an Update. Sports Med. 2005; 35(6):501–536.
22. 22. Turner AN, Stewart PF. Strength and conditioning for soccer players. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 2014, 36(4), 1-13.