Development, Validity and Reliability of The Social Capital Scale for Adults

Öz

Objective: This study aims to develop the Social Capital Scale for Adults (SCS-A). Random sampling method was used in the study, and individuals were reached via an online survey form. The answers given by 479 individuals who voluntarily participated in the study were edited and analyzed. Method: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) performed item pool. The results were questioned at 0.01 and 0.05 significance levels. Varimax rotation method was used in the study. In the final analysis, the KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) value was calculated as 0.926, Bartlett's Test of Sphericity p<0.05, Chi-square=41517.001 and SD=4465, p=0.000 were obtained. According to the CFA analysis, X2/Degrees of Freedom, GFI, AGFI, RMSEA, SRMR, RMR, CFI, NNFI, IFI, NFI, and PGFI. Based on these findings, it is possible to say that the model is acceptable. Results and Discussion: As a result of EFA, it was found that there were 14 components with eigenvalues above 1 for 95 items, whose contribution to the total explained variance would be taken as basis, and the total explained variance was 71.372%. In SCS-A, all items had the highest correlation value with the factor they were factored into, and the overlap value was not less than 0.1. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of the SCSA scale was found to be 0.966 and the variance explained by the scale was 71.372%. Cronbach's Alpha coefficients of the factors ranged from the lowest F14 = 0.790 to the highest F01 = F14 = 0.961. Accordingly, both the internal consistency of the factors and the internal consistency of the entire scale were at a level that can be considered highly reliable. Considering the findings and results of the study, it is possible to say that the Social Capital Scale for Adults is a reliable scale for the Turkish Population. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the originality of the research, whether through the innovative approach, new discoveries or practical contributions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Capital Scale
• Adults
• Social Capital
• Validity
• Reliability

Kaynakça

1. 1. Bourdieu, P. (2012). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In: Bauer, U., Bittlingmayer, U.H., Scherr, A. (eds) Handbuch Bildungs- und Erziehungssoziologie. Bildung und Gesellschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18944-4_15 http://unirot.blogsport.de/images/bourdieukapital.pdf (date of access: 09/09/2023)
2. 2. Ardahan, F. (2014a). Examining the relation between social capital, life satisfaction and academic achievement: school of physical education and sport case. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(1): 1212-1226.
3. 3. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.
4. 4. Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M. & Avolio, B.J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge .Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. 5. Durkheim, E. S. (1951). uicide: A Study in Sociology. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
6. 6. Field, J. (2008). Sosyal Sermaye, 2. Baskı, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
7. 7. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology Supplement, 94: 95-120.
8. 8. Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

9. 9. Dasgupta, P. ve Serageldin, I. (1999). Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank.
10. 10. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1–24.
11. 11. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
12. 12. Fukuyama, F. (1999). Social Capital and Civil Society (Conference), The Institute of Public Policy, George Mason University, October 1, 1999, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/1999/reforms/fukuyama.htm. (date of access: 12/09/2023)
13. 13. Glaeser, E.L. (2001). The formation of social capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2:34–40.
14. 14. Grootaert, C. and Van Bastelaer, T. (2002). Social capital: from definition to measurement. In: Grootaert
15. C, van Bastelaer T, eds. Understanding and measuring social capital: a multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications; 2002 pp. 41:84
16. 15. Heral, İsmail. (2006). “Sosyal Sermaye”, http://www.eastweststudies.org/tr/makale_detail.php? makale=58&tur=100 (date of access: 13 Mayıs 2010).
17. 16. Fidan, Y. & Yurdasever, E. (2017). A Study On Social Capital Profile of Vocational School Students: The Case Of Ordu University Social Sciences Vocational School. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 15(1):219-248. Doi: 10.18026/cbayarsos.297890.
18. 17. Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360—80
19. 18. Claridga, T. (2018). Explanation of the different levels of social capital: individual or collective? Social Capital Research & Training, Dunedin, New Zealand.
20. 19. Payne, G.T., Moore, C.B., Griffis, S.E. & Autry, C. W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of management, 37(2), 491-520.
21. 20. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster: New York.
22. 21. Putnam, R.D. (2001). Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/6/1825848.pdf. (date of access: 12/09/2023)
23. 22. Onyx, J. & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities, Journal of Applied Behavioral
24. Science, 36(1): 23-42.
25. 23. Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V. N., and Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring social capital. An integrated questionnaire. World Bank Working paper no. 18, The World Bank, Washington, DC. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/515261468740392133/pdf/281100PAPER0Measuring0social0c apital.pdf (Erişim tarihi 12/09/2023)
26. 24. Chen, X., Stanton, B., Gong, J., Fang, X., ve Li, X. (2009). Personal Social Capital Scale: an instrument for health and behavioral research. Health education research, 24(2), 306-317.
27. 25. Wang, P., Chen, X., Gong, J. & Jacques-Tiura, A. J. (2014). Reliability and validity of the personal social capital scale 16 and personal social capital scale 8: two short instruments for survey studies. Social Indicators Research, 119, 1133-1148 DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0540-3
28. 26. Meek, S., Ryan, M., Lambert, C. & Ogilvie, M. (2019). A multidimensional scale for measuring online brand community social capital (OBCSC). Journal of Business Research, 100, 234-244.
29. 27. Zhao, S., Li, Y., Su, Y. & Sun, L. (2021). Reliability and validity of the Chinese general social capital scale and its effect on physical disease and psychological distress among Chinese medical professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6635.
30. 28. Maķevica, D., Šuriņa, S., Perepjolkina, V. & Mārtinsone, K. (2022). Development and initial validation of the second version of the Multidimensional social capital scale (MSCS V2). In SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 25-37).
31. 29. Forsell, T., Tower, J. ve Polman, R. (2022). Development of a scale to measure social Capital in Recreation and Sport Clubs. Leisure Sciences, 42(1), 106-122.
32. 30. Ardahan, F. (2023). Development Of Social Capital Scale for Adolescent, Validity, and Reliability Study for Turkish Population. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 10(2):55-77. DOI: 10.46827/ejpe.v10i2.4955
33. 31. Ardahan, F. (2022). Developing Quality of Life Scale, Making Its Validity and Reliability for Turkish Population. Journal of Global Sport and Education Research, 5 (1), 18-38. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jogser/issue/70487/1092828
34. 32. Ardahan, F. (2012). Sosyal Sermaye Ölçeği geçerlilik, güvenirlilik çalışması, Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri
35. Dergisi, 9(2):773-789.
36. 33. Hjøllund, L. & Svendsen, G.T. (2000). Social capital: A standard method of measurement. Working papers 00-9, Aarhus School of Business, Dept. of Economics
37. 34. Narayan, D. & Cassidy, M.F. (2001). A Dimentional to Measuring Social Capital: Development and Validation of A Social Capital Inventory. Current Sociology. 49(2): 59-69.
38. 35. Stone, W. (2001). Measuring social capital. Towards a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life. Research paper no. 24, February 2001.
39. 36. Alanen, A. & Niemelainen, S. (2003). Sosiaalisen paaoman subjektiivisten mittareiden etsintaa luottamus, ystavyyssuhteet ja toiminta aluetasolla Suomessa. (In Finnish, abstract in English). [Search of subjective measures of social capital – trust, friendships and participation at the regional level in Finland.] Available from http://www.tilastokeskus.fi/org/tut/dthemes/papers/sospaa.pdf.
40. 37. Archuleta, A. J. & Miller, C. R. (2011). Validity evidence for the translated version of the Personal Social Capital Scale among people of Mexican descent. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 2(2), 39-53
41. 38. Ardahan, F. (2014b). Bireylerin Sosyal Sermaye Profili: Antalya Örneği. ASOS Journal, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(8): 38-56. dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.435.
42. 39. Harper, R. (2002). The measurement of social capital in the United Kingdom. Office for National Statistics. Available from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/52/2382339.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi 12/09/2023)
43. 40. Looman, W. S. (2006). Development and testing of the social capital scale for families of children with special health care needs. Research in nursing & health, 29(4), 325-336.
44. 41. Looman, W. S. & Farrag, S. (2009). Psychometric properties and cross-cultural equivalence of the Arabic Social Capital Scale: Instrument development study. International journal of nursing studies, 46(1), 45-54.
45. 42. Ardahan, F. (2018). Comparison of the Social Capital, Life Satisfaction, Achievement Perception and Emotional Intelligence Level of the Volunteers and Non-Volunteers. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. 4(6):45-68. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1249064
46. 43. Ardahan, F. (2014c). Sosyal Sermaye, Yaşam Doyumu ve Akademik Başarı İlişkisi: Akdeniz Üniversitesi, BESYO Örneği. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1): 1212-1226.
47. 44. Deniz Öz, N. and Ardahan, F. (2019). Köyde Rekreasyon Engelleri Ölçeği Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlilik Çalışması, Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, XI(1):131-141.DOI: 10.13114/MJH.2019.453
48. 45. Ardahan, F. and Yakut Tekmenüray, B. (2022). Development of Recreational Barriers Scale of Mothers with Child Between 0-2 Years Old and Making Its Validity and Reliability for Turkish Population. Journal of Global Sport and Education Research, 5 (1), 64-85. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jogser/issue/70487/1085645
49. 46. Spellerberg, A. (1997). Towards a framework for the measurement of social capital. In D. Robison (Ed.), Social capital and policy development. Victoria, University of Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.
50. 47. Van der Gaag, M.P.J. & Webber, M. (2008). Measurement of individual social capital: Questions, instruments, and measures. In Social capital and health (pp. 29-49). New York, NY: Springer New York
51. 48. Bowling, A. (1997). Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurements scales. London: Open University Press. pp. 109.
52. 49. Kay, A. & Pearce, J. (2003). Soziales Kapital. CBS Network Services Limited und Technologie-Netzwerk Berlin e.V. Berlin.
53. 50. Uçar, E. (2016). The Study of Reliability and Validıity of Social Capital Scale. Ihlara Journal of Educational Researh IHEAD, 1(1): 19-40.
54. 51. Koutra, K., Orfanos, P., Roumeliotaki, T., Kritsotakis, G., Kokkevi, A. ve Philalithis, A. (2012). Psychometric validation of the youth social capital scale in Greece. Research on social work practice, 22(3), 333-343.
55. 52. Aminzadeh, K., Denny, S., Utter, J., Milfont, T. L., Ameratunga, S., Teevale, T. & Clark, T. (2013). Neighbourhood social capital and adolescent self-reported wellbeing in New Zealand: a multilevel analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 84, 13-21.
56. 53. Paiva, P. C. P., Paiva, H. N. D., Oliveira Filho, P. M. D., Lamounier, J. A., Ferreira, E. F. E., Ferreira, R. C., ... ve Zarzar, P. M. (2014). Development and validation of a social capital questionnaire for adolescent students (SCQ-AS). PloS one, 9(8), e103785.
57. 54. Deniz, Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama. Ankara Üniv Eğ Bil Fak Dergisi. 40:1–16.
58. 55. Esin MN. (2015). Veri toplama yöntem ve araçları & veri toplama araçlarının güvenirlik ve geçerliği. İçinde: Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin NM, editörler. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik, 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Kitapevleri; ss.193–231
59. 56. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975;28(4):563-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
60. 57. Gözüm, S. and Aksayan, S. (2003). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 1, 3- 14.
61. 58. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
62. 59. Auerbach, C. & Beckerman, N. L. (2011)4. HIV and PTSD: a confirmatory factor analysis of the PCL screening instrument. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(2), 152–164.
63. 60. Aytaç, M. & Öngen, B. (2012). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yeni çevresel paradigma ölçeğinin yapı geçerliliğinin incelenmesi, İstatistikçiler Dergisi, 5, 14-22.
64. 61. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Multivariate statistics for the social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
65. 62. Field, A. (2000). Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. London, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
66. 63. Bayram, N. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS İle Veri Analizi, Ezgi Kitabevi, Bursa.
67. 64. Sümer N. (2000). Structural Equation Models (In Turkish: Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri). Turkish Journal of Psychology (In Turkish: Türk Psikoloji Yazıları). 3(6):49-74
68. 65. Schreiber, J.B., Nora, A., Stage, F.K., Barlow, E.A. & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research. 99(6): 323-338.
69. 66. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J. & Peschar, J.L. (2006). OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing. 6(4): 311-360.
70. 67. McPherson, K.E., Kerr, S., Morgan, A., McGee, E., Cheater, F. M., McLean, J. & Egan, J. (2013). The association between family and community social capital and health risk behaviours in young people: an integrative review. BMC public health, 13(1), 1-13.
71. 68. Ehsan, A., Klaas, H. S., Bastianen, A. ve Spini, D. (2019). Social capital and health: A systematic review of systematic reviews. SSM-population health, 8, 100425.
72. 69. Erkuş, A. (2014). Ölçek Geliştirme Yöntemleri II: Psikolojik Değişkenin Ne ve Nasıl Olduğunu Ortaya Çıkarmanın Tek Yolu, Faktör Analitik Yöntemler ve Yeni Bir Öneri. Erkuş A (Der.) Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme-I, Temel kavramlar ve işlemler içinde (ss.92-112). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.