-

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the profile and the life satisfaction (LS) of male Recreational Fishers (RF) and to find out the motivational factors for participating in recreational fishing (RFG) in Turkey and compare the LS of RF and non-participants of recreational fishing (NPF). The sampling of this study consisted of 359 RF, 284 NPF, totally 643 participants. As a result of this study, it was found that the major factors motivating for fishing are “commune with nature”, “relaxation”, “to affect health positively”, “to get away from demand”, and “to be happy”. It was found that the factors motivating for fishing have statistically meaningful correlations with demographic variables and LS as well as each other and there are statistically meaningful differences among groups of the demographic variables as marital status, occupation, and with whom one goes for fishing, RF and NPF. Namely, strength of the factors motivating people for fishing is dependent to the demographic variables. Furthermore, it was found statistically meaningful correlations between LS and the demographic variables

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Recreational fishing, life satisfaction, motivational factors, fishing in Turkey

Motivational factors for recreational fishing, the profile and life satisfaction level of recreational fishers and nonparticipants of fishing in Turkey

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the profile and the life satisfaction (LS) of male Recreational Fishers (RF) and to find out the motivational factors for participating in recreational fishing (RFG) in Turkey and compare the LS of RF and non-participants of recreational fishing (NPF). The sampling of this study consisted of 359 RF, 284 NPF, totally 643 participants. As a result of this study, it was found that the major factors motivating for fishing are “commune with nature”, “relaxation”, “to affect health positively”, “to get away from demand”, and “to be happy”. It was found that the factors motivating for fishing have statistically meaningful correlations with demographic variables and LS as well as each other and there are statistically meaningful differences among groups of the demographic variables as marital status, occupation, and with whom one goes for fishing, RF and NPF. Namely, strength of the factors motivating people for fishing is dependent to the demographic variables. Furthermore, it was found statistically meaningful correlations between LS and the demographic variables. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Recreational fishing; life satisfaction; motivational factors; fishing in Turkey.

Kaynakça

1. Ardahan F. Rekreasyonel Egzersize Güdüleme Ölcegi’nin (REMM) Cesitli Demografik Degiskenlere Göre Incelenmesi: Antalya Ornegi. I. Rekreasyon Arastirmalari Konresi 12-15 Nisan 2012, Proceedings Book, 57-72, Kemer,Antalya, 2012.
2. Ardahan F, Yerlisu Lapa T. Outdoor recreation: the reasons and carried benefits for attending outdoor sports of the participants of cycling and/or trekking activities. Int. J. Human Sciences, 2010; 8(1), 1327-1341.
3. Ardahan F. The Profile of the Turkish Mountaineers and Rock Climbers: The Reasons and the Carried Benefits for Attending Outdoor Sports and Life Satisfaction Level. 8th International Conference Sport and Quality of Life. 10-11 November 2011, Congress Center Brno/Czech Republic, 2011.
4. Ardahan F. Duygusal Zeka ve Yasam Doyumu Arasindaki Iliskinin Doga Sporu Yapanlar Orneginde Incelenmesi, International Congress on Sports, Economics and Management, Izmir, Turkey, 2011.
5. Aslan Z. Sanayilesme ve kentlesmenin dogada rekreasyon faaliyetlerine duyulan gereksinimi arttirici etkisi. Ekoloji ve Cevre Dergisi, 1993; (8), 22-24.
6. Beard J G, Ragheb MG. Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 1980; 12(1): 20–33.
7. Becchetti L, Rica EG, Pelloni A. The Relationship between Social Leisure and Life Satisfaction: Causality and Policy Implications, Soc Indic Res. 2011; DOI 10.1007/s11205-011-9887-5.
8. Buchanan T. Commitment and leisure behavior: A theoretical perspective. Leisure Sciences, 1985; 7: 401– 420.

9. Bultena G, Field D. Structural effects in national park going. Leisure Sciences, 1980; 3(3), 221-240.
10. Burger, J. 2002. Consumption patterns and why people fish. Environmental Research Section A. 2002; 90, 125- 135.
11. Buss DM. The evolution of happiness. Am Psychol. 2000; 55:15-23.
12. Busseri MA, Sadava SW. A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2011; 15, 290–314.
13. Chen YC, Li RH, Chen SH. Relationships Among Adolescents’ Leisure Motivation, Leisure Involvement, and Leisure Satisfaction: A Structural Equation Model, Soc Indic Res, 2011: DOI 10.1007/s11205-011-9979-2
14. Coleman FC, Figueira WF, Ueland JS, Crowder LB. The Impact of United States Recreational Fisheries on Marine Fish Populations. Science, 2004; 305, 1958.
15. Cooke SJ, Cowx IG. The Role of Recreational Fishing in Global Fish Crises. BioScience, 2004; 54(9), 857-859.
16. Crandall R. Motivation for leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1980; 12(1): 45-54.
17. Dann S. Youth recruitment into fishing: The influence of familial, social, and environmental factors ad implications for education intervention strategies to develop aquatic stewardship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1993.
18. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985; 49, 71-75.
19. Demiroglu C. A Questionnaire Study on Yachting in Göcek Bays, Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Master Thesis, Ankara, 2003.
20. Ditton RB, Holland SM, Anderson DK. Recreational Fishing as Tourism. Fisheries, 2002; 27(3): 17-24.
21. Ditton R. Human dimensions of fisheries. In M. Manfredo, J. Vaske, B. Bruyere, D. Field, P. Brown (Eds.), Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge (pp. 199–208). Jefferson City, MO: Modern Litho, 2004.
22. Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M. Do we really know what makes us happy: A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being? Journal of Economic Psychology, 2008; 29: 94–122.
23. Driver BL, Brown P, Peterson G. Benefits of leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc., 1991.
24. Eryılmaz A. The relationship between adolescents’ subjective well-being and positive expectations towards future, The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 2011; 24:209-215.
25. Fedler A, Ditton R. Understanding angler motivations in fisheries management. Fisheries, 1994; 19: 6–13.
26. Floyd MF, Nicholas L, Lee I, Lee JH, Scott D. Social Stratification in Recreational Fishing Participation: Research and Policy Implications, Leisure Sciences, 2006; 28(4): 351-368.
27. Fordyce MW. Development of a program to increase happiness. J Couns Psychol, 1977; 24:11–521.
28. Fordyce MW. A Program to Increase Happiness: Further Studies, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1983; 30(4): 483-498.
29. Government of Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation, 1994. A Look at Leisure. No: 34. http://www.tpr.alberta.ca/recreation/ars/surveypdf/LL 34_favourite_activities.pdf. Accessed on 24 April 2012.
30. Harrington M, Dawson D. Who has it best? Women’s labor force participation, perceptions of leisure and constraints to leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1995; 27; 4–25.
31. Henderson K, Bialeschki D. A sense of entitlement to leisure as constraint and empowerment for women. Leisure Sciences, 1991; 12, 51-65.
32. Herridge KL, Shaw SM, Mannell RC. An exploration of women’s leisure within hetero sexual romantic relationships. Journal of Leisure Research, 2003; 35,
33. Hicks MW, Platt M. Marital happiness and stability: A review of the research in the sixties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1970; 32, 553-574.
34. Hunt K, Ditton RB. Perceived Benefits of Recreational Fishing to Hispanic-American and Anglo Anglers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2001; 6(3), 153-172.
35. Hunt K, Ditton RB. Freshwater fishing participation patterns of racial and ethnic groups in Texas. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2002; 22: 52–65.
36. Ibrahim H, Cordes KA. Outdoor Recreation, Enrichment for a Lifetime (2nd Edition), Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing, 2002.
37. Jackson EL, Henderson KA. Gender-based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 1995; 17: 31–51.
38. Jennings G. Water-Based Tourism, Sport Leisure, and Recreation Experiences, Elsevier, New York, 2007.
39. Kelly JR, Steinkamp MW, Kelly JR. Later-life satisfaction: Does leisure contriute? Leisure Sciences, 1987; 9(3): 189-199.
40. Kelly J. Leisure style: A hidden core. Leisure Sciences, 1983; 5(4): 321-337.
41. Kindal A, Shores DS, Myron FF. Constraints to Outdoor Recreation: Stratification Perspective, Leisure Sciences, 2007; 29: A 227–246. Multiple Hierarchy
42. Knopf R, Driver B, Bassett JR. Motivations for fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 1973; 38: 191–204.
43. Laws JL. A feminist review of marital adjustment literature: The rape of locke. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1971; 33: 483-516.
44. Lindsay JJ, Ogle RA. Socioeconomic patterns of outdoor recreation use near urban areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 1972; 4(2), 19–24.
45. Lee J, Scott D, Floyd MF. Structural inequalities in outdoor recreation participation: A multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 2001; 33(4): 427-449.
46. Leeworthy VR, Bowker JM, Hospital JD, Stone EA. Projected Participation in Marine Recreation: 2005 & 2010. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and http://coastalsocioeconomics.noaa.gov/core/nsre/nsrefo recast.pdf. Accessed on 25 March 2012.
47. Levi J. Sign of the times: an outdoor education Project with profoundly deaf and hearing children. The Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 1994; 11(2): 23-25.
48. Loomis DK, Ditton RB. Analysis of Motive and Participation Differences between Saltwater Sport and Tournament Fishermen. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1987; 7(4): 482-487.
49. Lubchenko J. Saltwater Recreational Fishing. NOAA Sheet, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/PartnershipsCommuni cations/rec_fishing_facts.pdf. Accessed 22 February
50. Lucas R. Wilderness use and users: Trends and projections. In J.C. Hendee, G. H. Stankley and R.C. Lucas (Eds.), Wilderness management (pp. 356-390), Colorado: North American Press, 1990.
51. Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon KM, Schkade D. Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 2005; 9: 111–131.
52. Manfredo M, Driver BL, Tarrant MA. Measuring leisure motivation: a meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. Journal of Leisure Research, 1996; 28(3): 188-213.
53. Manning RE. Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for Satisfaction. (2nd Edition). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press, 1999.
54. McKenzie MD. How are adventure education program outcomes achieved? A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 2000; 5(1): 19-28.
55. McLean DD, Hurd AR, Rogers NB. Kraus’ Recreation and Leisure in Modern Society. Jones and Barlett Publishers, Sudburry, 2008.
56. National Marine Fisheries Service. Fisheries Economics of the United States, 2008. U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st5/publication/econ/200 8/FEUS%202008%20ALL.pdf. Accessed on 25.03.2012.
57. Olsson LE, Garling T, Ettema D, Friman M, Fujii S. Happiness and Satisfaction with Work Commute, 2012; doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0003-2.
58. Otacioglu GS. Analysis of job and life satisfaction of music teachers. Turkish Journal Music Education, The Refereed Scholarly journal of the Muzik Egitim Yayinlari, 2008; 1(1): 37-45. 59. Pigram JJ, Jenkins Management. Routledge, Oxon, 2006. JM. Outdoor Recreation
59. Pinker S. The sexual paradox: Men, women and the real gender gap. New York: Scribner, 2008.
60. Pinquart M, Silbereisen RK. Patterns of fulŞllment in the domains of work, intimate relationship, and leisure. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2010; 5:
61. Prayaga P, Rolfe J, Stoeckl N. The value of recreational fishing in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: A pooled revealed preference and contingent behavior model. Marine Policy, 2010; 34: 244-251.
62. Sagcan M. Recreation and Tourism (Rekreasyon ve Turizm). İzmir: Cumhuriyet Press (Basımevi), 1986.
63. Schmitter C, Zisselman M, Woldow A. Life satisfaction in centenarians residing in long-term care. Annals of Long Term Care, 2003; 7(2): 437-442.
64. Schrestha RK, Seidl AF, Moraes AS. Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models. Ecological Economics, 20002; 42: 289-299.
65. Schwarz N, Kahneman D, Xu J. Global and episodic reports of hedonic experience. In R. Belli, F. Stafford, & D. Alwin (Eds.), Calendar and diary methods in life course research (pp. 157–174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
66. Scott D, Munson W. Perceived constraints to park usage among individuals with low incomes. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 1994; 12(4): 79-96.
67. Shaw SM, Henderson KA. Gender analysis and leisure constraints: An uneasy alliance. In E.L. Jackson (Ed.). Constraints to leisure (pp.23 34). State College, PA: Venture Publishing, 2005.
68. Solop FI, Hagen KK, Ostergen D. Back to nature: Visiting or not visiting our national parks. Public Perspective, 2001; 12 (4): 41-43.
69. Stone AA, Shiffman SS, DeVries MW. Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 26–39). New York: Russell- Sage, 1999.
70. Sung-Mook H, Giannakopoulos E. The Relationship of satisfaction with life to personality characteristics. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary & Applied; 1994; 128(5): 547.
71. Tanrivermis E. A Research about the planning of water recreation-sports activities in Ankara circumstances (Not published doctoral thesis in Ankara University in Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences) [Original in Turkish: Ankara Kosullarinda suya dayali rekreasyon-spor faaliyetlerinin planlanmasi uzerine bir arastirma]. Ankara, 2000.
72. Telman N, Unsal P. Calisan Memnuniyeti. Epsilon Yayınevi, 2004.
73. Toth JF Jr, Brown RB. Racial and gender meanings of why people participate in recreational fishing. Leisure Sciences, 1997; 19: 129–136.
74. TUIK. Time Usage Statistics 2006 (Original in Turkish: Zaman Kullanim Istatistikleri 2006). Ankara: TUIK Publishing, 2008.
75. TUIK. (2012). Bitirilen eğitim düzeyi, cinsiyet ve yaş grubuna göre nüfus – 2011.
76. TUIK.http://rapor.tuik.gov.tr/reports/rwservlet?adnks db2&ENVID=adnksdb2Env&report=wa_turkiye_cinsi yet_yasgrp_egitim_top.RDF&p_xkod=egitim_kod&p_ yil=2011&p_dil=1&desformat=html. 03.04.2012. Accessed on
77. Vilhelmson B. Daily mobility and the use of time for different activities: The case of Sweden. Geo Journal, 1999; 48: 177–185.
78. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988; 54: 1063–1070.
79. Wearing B. Leisure and Feminist Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999.
80. White MP, Dolan P. Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 2009; 20: 1000– 1008.
81. White TH. Relative importance of education and income participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 1975; 7(3): 191-199. in outdoor recreation
82. Wilde GR, Riechers RK, Ditton RB. Differences in Attitudes, Fishing Motives, and Demographic Characteristics between Tournament and Non- tournament Black Bass Anglers in Texas, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1988; 18(2): 422-431.