Comparison of selected physical fitness components among male football players of different playing positions

Öz

The purpose of this study was to examine the level of physical fitness among male football players in relation to their different playing positions i.e. goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders and attackers. A sample of forty (N = 40) male football players (mean ± SD: age 20.45 ± 1.70 years, height 1.84 ± 4.07 m, weight 81.62 ± 5.45 kg, BMI 23.99 ± 1.66m), which includes ten each goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders and attackers, who participated in inter-college competitions of Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India, was selected. All the participants were informed about aim and methodology of the study and they volunteered to participate in this study. The study was conducted on selected physical fitness variables i.e. power, speed and agility. One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to find out the significance of differences with regard to selected physical fitness variables among football players of different playing positions. Scheffe’s post-hoc test was applied to see the direction and significance of differences where ‘F’ value found statistically significant. The level of significance was set at 0.05. While comparing the means, it is revealed that midfielders and attackers had almost the same power, speed and agility. However, midfielders and attackers had shown better power and agility than their counterparts; goalkeepers and defenders. Further, significant differences were found between football players of different playing positions with regard to the variables power (p˂0.05) and agility (p˂0.05), but insignificant differences were found on the variable speed respectively (p˃0.05).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Agility; attackers; defenders; goalkeepers; midfielders; power; speed

Kaynakça

1. Al-Hazzaa HM, Alumuzaini KS, Al-Rafaee A, Sulaiman MA, Dafterdar MY. Al-Ghamedi A, Khuraiji KN. Aerobic and anaerobic power characteristics of Saudi elite soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2001; 41: 54–61.
2. Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A. Holme I. Engebretsen L. Bahr R. Physical fitness, Injuries, and Team performance in soccer. Med.Sci. Sport Exerc, 2004; 36 (2): 278-285.
3. Astrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology: Physiological basis of exercise (3 ed.). New York: Macmillian.1986.
4. Bangsbo J. The physiology of soccer with special reference to intense intermittent exercise. Acta Physiologica Scandinavia.1994; 151 (619), 1-156.
5. Bangsbo J, Norregaard L, Thorsoe F. Activity profile of competition soccer. Canadian Journal of applied sports science.1991; 16: 110-116.
6. Bloomfield J, Polman R, O'Donoghue P. Physical demands of different positions in FA Premier League soccer. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2007. 6(1): p. 63-70.
7. Boone J, Vaeyens R, Steyaert A, Bossche LV, Bourgois J. Physical fitness of elite Belgian soccer players by player position. J Strength Cond Res.2912; 26(8):2051-7.
8. Bunc V, Psotta R. Physiological profile of very young soccer players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2001; 41(3): 337-341.

9. Burgess DJ, Naughton G, Norton KI. Profile of movement demands of national football players in Australia. J Sci Med Sport, 2006; 9(4): 334-41.
10. Cabri J, De Prof E, Dufour W, Clarys JP. The relationship between muscular strength and kick performance. In: Science and Football. Reilly, T, Lees, A, Davids, K, Murphy, W, eds. London: E. and F. N. Spon. 1998; 168–193.
11. Coopoo Y, Mcnaughton LR. Selected fitness profiles of football players in relation to their playing position. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance, December (Supplement 2), 2012;189-197.
12. Fleishman EA. The structure and measurement of physical fitness. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall, Inc.1964.
13. Getchell B. Physical Fitness: A Way of Life, 2nd ed. New York:John Wiley and Sons, Inc.1979.
14. Gil SM, Gil Ruiz F, Irazusta A, Irazusta J. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of young soccer players according to their playing position: relevance for the selection process. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21:438–45.
15. Johnson B L, Nelson JK. Practical measurements for evaluation in physical Education, 3rd Ed. Delhi: Surjeet Publications.1982.
16. Polman R, Walsh D , Bloomfield J, Nesti M. Effective conditioning of female soccer players. Journal of sports sciences, 2004; 22(2): 191-203.
17. Puga N, Ramos J, Agostinho J, Lomba, I, Costa O, Freitas F. Physical profile of a first division Portuguese professional soccer team. In: Science and Football II. Reilly, T, Clarys, J, and Stibbe, A, eds.London: E & FN Spon, 1993; 40–42.
18. Reilly T, Thomas V. A motion analysis of work-rate in different positional roles in professional football match-play. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1976; 2:87-89.
19. Rienzi E, Drust B, Reilly T, Carter JEL, Martin A. Investigation of anthropometric and work-rate profiles of elite South American international soccer players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2000; 40: 162-169.
20. Reeves SL, Poh BK, Brown M, Tizzard NH, Ismail MN. Anthropometric measurements and body composition of English and Malaysian footballers. Malaysian Journal of Nutrition, 1999; 5: 79-86.
21. Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: Clas- sifications, training and testing. Journal of Sports Science, 2006; 24: 919- 932.
22. Smekal G, Von SP, Rihacek C, Pokan R, Hofmann P, Baron R, Tschan H, Bachi N. A physiological profile of tennis match play. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2001; 33(6): 999-1005.
23. Sporis G, Jukic I, Ostojic SM, Milanovic D. Fitness profiling in soccer: physical and physiologic characteristics of elite players." J Strength Cond Res, 2009; 23(7):1947-53.
24. Witvrouw E, Danneels L , Asselman P , D‟Have T, Cambier D. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players a prospective study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003; 31(1):41-46.
25. Wong P, Hong Y. Soccer injury in the lower extremities. Br J Sports Med, 2005; 39(8): 473-82.