Physical education teachers; physical activity level and affecting factors (the example of Çanakkale)

Öz

The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between the physical activity levels of physical education teachers working in schools in Canakkale town and counties and gender, age, years of service, marital status and region of residence.  A total of 124 physical education teachers working in schools linked to the Ministry of National Education in the teaching year 2012-2013 participated in the study.  To determine variables such as gender, age, height, weight, marital status, years of service and area of residence, the researchers developed a data collection form. To determine levels of physical activity, the long form of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) was used.  The work activity levels and total activity levels were calculated according to the gender, age, years of service, marital status and area of residence of the physical education teachers. For differential analysis of variables, the non-parametric Mann Whitney U test and Kruskall Wallis test were used.  While there was no significant difference found between the physical activity levels of physical education teachers and gender, age and years of service (p>0.05), there was a significant difference according to area of residence (p<0.05). The physical activity level of physical education teachers is affected by the area they live in. Teachers living close to Canakkale provincial town or in areas with high socio-economic levels were found to have higher levels of physical activity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Exercise; IPAQ; physical activity levels; physical education teachers

Kaynakça

1. Arabacı R, Çankaya C.Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin araştırılması. Uludağ Ünv. Eğt. Fak. Dergisi, 2007; 1(20): 1-15.
2. Arslan C, Koz M, Gür E, Mendeş B.Üniversite öğretim üyelerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ve sağlık sorunları arasındaki ilişki. F.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2003; 17(4): 249-258.
3. Brown DW, Balluz LS, Heath GW.Associations between recommended levels of physical activity and health-related quality of life. Findings from the 2001 behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS) survey. Preventive Medicine, 2003; 37: 520-528.
4. Burton NW, Turrell G.Occupation, hour worked and leisure-time physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 2000; 31: 673-681.
5. Cauley JA, Donfield SM, Laporte RE, Warhaftig NE.Physical activity by socioeconomic status in two population based cohorts. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1991; 23: 343-351.
6. Cavill N, Kahlmeier S, Racioppi F.Avrupa’da fiziksel aktivite ve sağlık: eyleme geçirecek kanıtlar (Ter. Türkiye Sağlıklı Kentler Birliği). Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. 2006.
7. Clarke KK, Freeland-Graves J, Klohe-Lehman DM, Milani TJ, Nuss HJ, Laffrey S.Promotion of physical activity in low-income mothers using pedometers. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2007; 107(6): 962-967.
8. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AF, Both ML, Ainswort BE.International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003; 35: 1381-1395.

9. Erkal M, Güven Ö, Ayan D. Sosyolojik Açıdan Spor. Der Yayınları, Üçüncü Basım. İstanbul, 1998: 150-152.
10. Geçkil E, Yıldız S.Adölesanlara yönelik beslenme ve stresle başetme eğitiminin sağlığı geliştirmeye etkisi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, 2006; 10(2): 19-28.
11. Genç A, Şener Ü, Karabacak H, Üçok K. Kadın ve erkek genç erişkinler arasında fiziksel aktivite ve yaşam kalitesi farklılıklarının araştırılması. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, 2011; 12: 145-150.
12. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Wells JCK, Lima RAC.Physical inactivity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian Adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003; 35(11): 1894-1901.
13. Haase A, Steptoe A, Sallis JF, Wardle J.Leisure-time physical activity in university students from 23 countries: associations with health beliefs, risk awareness, and national economic development. Preventive Medicine, 2004; 39: 182–190.
14. Heyward VH. Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise Prescription. 5th ed. USA: Human Kinetics. 2006: 2-11.
15. Karaca A.Yetişkin bireylerde orta ve yüksek şiddetli fiziksel aktivitenin cinsiyete göre incelenmesi. Hacettepe Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2008; 19(1), 54-62.
16. Öztürk M. Üniversitede eğitim-öğretim gören öğrencilerde uluslararası fiziksel aktivite anketinin geçerliliği ve güvenirliği ve fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2005.
17. Sağlam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, Tokgozoglu L. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2010; 111(1): 278-284.
18. Santiago JA, Disch JG, Morales J.Elementary physical education teachers content knowledge of physical activity and health-related fitness. The Physical Educator, 2012; 69: 395-412.
19. Savcı S, Öztürk M, Arıkan H, İnal D, Tokgözoğlu L.Üniversite öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arş, 2006; 34: 166-172.
20. Taylor WC, Blair SN, Cummings SS, Wun CC, Malina RM.Childhood and adolescent physical activity patterns ve adult physical activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1999; 31(1): 118-123.
21. Yalçınkaya M, Özer F, Karamanoğlu YA.Sağlık çalışanlarında sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. TSK. Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 2007; 6(6): 21-34.
22. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). (2005). IPAQ – Scoring Protocol.
23. Zaybak A, Fadıloğlu Ç.Üniversite öğrencilerinin sağlığı geliştirme davranışı ve bu davranışı etkileyen etmenlerin belirlenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 2004; 20(1): 77-95.