Comparison of multiple intelligence fields of physical education and sports college students

Öz

Aim of this study was to identify and compare the areas of multiple intelligence of School of Physical Education and Sports students according to some parameters. Research group consists of 185 people, chosen randomly, who studied at Sakarya and Gaziantep University School of Physical Education and Sports during the academic year of 2014–2015. In this research "Self-Evaluation Survey in Multiple İntelligence" developed by Gardner and adapted toTurkish and customized the validity and reliability of this survey by Saban was used as a data collection tool. "Anova Test" was used to determine the differences between intelligence scores, and "Tukey HSD Test” was used to define the different group. The data collected by using survey was analyzed by using Spss 21 for Windows package program. As a result of the this study, In contrast to students' social, physical, inherent and naturist intelligence, there is a significant difference between linguistic, visual and musical intelligence in favor of the female students and logical intelligence in favor of the males students. In addition linguistic intelligence of subjects was found significantly different according to their deparment variables. Logical, visual, physical, musical, social, inherent and naturist intelligence were found at the same level. School of Physical Education and Sports students were found significantly higher level of logical, visual, physical and naturist intelligence areas. Moreover, department of Sports Management students were showed higher level of linguistic, musical, social and inherent intelligence areas, in comparison to other School of Physical Education and Sports departments’ students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• School of Physical Education and Sports; Multiple Intelligences; Student

Kaynakça

1. Altınmakas O. Examining the multiple intelligence distribution of professional basketball players in means of the positions on the team. Master Thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, 2011.
2. Altınok E. Examine of multiple intelligence areas on physical education students according to some variables. Graduation Thesis, Institute of Health Sciences, Selçuk University, Konya, 2008.
3. Bümen NT. Okulda Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı, Pegem A Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2005.
4. Çinkılıç İ, Soyer F. An investigation the relation between multiple intelligence areas of pre-service physical education teacher and their problem solving skills. Spor Yönetimi ve Bilgi Teknolojileri Dergisi (Elektronik Dergi), 2013; 8(1): 4-16.
5. Demirel Ö. (Ed.). Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler, Pegem A Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2007.
6. Ermiş E. A comparison of the multiple intelligences of university students who do sports regularly and the students do not in terms of specific variables. Doctoral Thesis, Institute of Health Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 2012.
7. Ermiş E, İmamoğlu O, Erilli NA. The effect of sports on the bodily-kinesthetics and interpersonal multiple intelligences scores of university students. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches, 2012; 3(2): 23-29.
8. Gardner H. Zihin Çerçeveleri, Alfa Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2004.

9. Gardner H. Çoklu Zekâ Yeni Ufuklar, Optimist Yayınları, İstanbul, 2013.
10. Güllü M, Tekin M. Comparison of multiple intelligence areas of students at sports high schools and public high schools. Niğde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2009; 3(3): 247-258.
11. Hoşgörür V, Katrancı M. The dominant field of the students in the department of elementary education and physical education and sports (A sample of education faculty of university of Kırıkkale). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2007; 24: 33-42.
12. İzci H, Sucu HÖ. İnvestigating multiple intelligence profiles of university students (Nevşehir University Sample). İnönü University Journal of Educational Science Institute, 2014; 1(1): 12-21.
13. Karasar N. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 2009.
14. Kartal B. The comparison of student athletes in different sports and sedentary students according to multiple intelligent theory. Master Thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon, 2012.
15. Kaya HB, Karakaş G, Gizdem S. Examining the relationship between physical/kinesthetic intelligence and academic successes of physical education and sport students. Celal Bayar University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2015; 10(1): 66-74.
16. Kul M, Bozkuş T, Erol Z, Elçi G. A research on the comparison of the multiple intelligence types of the candidates who succeeded and failed in the entrance exams of physical education and sports school. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 2014; July: Special Issue 1: 891-897.
17. Özgüven E. Zekâ Nedir?, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Dairesi Test ve Araştırma Bürosu, Ankara, 1961.
18. Saban A. Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı ve Türk Eğitim Sistemine Yansıması, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 2010.
19. Selçuk Z, Kayılı H, Okut L. Çoklu Zekâ Uygulamaları, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 2003.
20. Tekin M. The searching of creativity and multiple intelligences areas between the students in the high school level students who do sports and those who don’t. Doctoral Thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, 2008.
21. Tural M. Section of physical education and sport in college students according to the comparison of the multiple intelligence theory. Master Thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, 2009.
22. Ürgüp S. İnvestigating of multiple intelligences of students in three different departments of the school of physical education and sports. Master Thesis, Institute of Health Sciences, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, 2015.
23. Yavuz KE. Eğitim ve Öğretimde Çoklu Zekâ Teorisi ve Uygulamaları, Ceceli Yayınları, Ankara, 2004.