Relationship between anthropometric parameters and speed performance: A kinanthropometric research

Öz

The purpose in this study; determined of relationship between anthropometric parameters and speed performance. In this purpose; 118 sedentary university students age 21.2 ± 2.1 year, body weight 62.2 ± 10.7 kg and height 168.2 ± 8.1 cm participated in this study voluntarily. 30 m speed performance with stature (shoulder, chest, trunk, waist, hip, thigh, knee, calf and ankle) and (height, fathoms, upper arm, fore arm, all arms, trunk, thigh, leg and all leg) girths was measured. Statistical analysis was made in SPSS 22.0 packed program for Windows. Data from the measured of arithmetic means, standard deviation, lowest and highest values was found. Relationship between anthropometric parameters and speed performance was tested by Pearson's Correlation. According to Data from the measured; there were significant relationship in  between speed values of workgroups and body weight, shoulder girths, chest girths, trunk girths, waist girths (p<0.01), leg girths (p<0.05) and there were significant relationship in  between speed values of workgroup and height, fathoms length, fore arm length, all arm length, trunk length, leg length (p<0.01), thigh length (p<0.05). It can be said increases in speed values, if girths and length values increase.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Anthropometric parameters,speed and sedentary,kinanthropometry

Kaynakça

1. Astrand PO, Roah K 1986. Textbook of Work Physiology. Third edition. Mc.Graw Hill Company New York. p.18-141.
2. Behnke. AR, Royce J. Body size, shape and composition of several types of athletes. J. Sports. Med. 1966; 6:75.
3. Bencke J, Damsgaard R, Saekmose A, Jorgensen P, Jorgesen K, Klausen K. Anaerobic power and muscle strength characteristics of 11 year old elite and non-elite boys and girls from gymnastics, team handball, tennis and swimming. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2002; 12: 171–178.
4. Bostancı Ö, Uzun A, Emirzeoğlu M, Kabadayı M, Şahin B, Bilgiç S. To examine the height-body relations of footballers who are students at physical education and sports with some anthropom. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2004; 6(2): 26-34.
5. Bourgois J, Claessens AL, Vrijens J, Philippaerts R, Renterghem BV, Thomis M, Janssens M, Loos R, Lefevre J. Anthropometric characteristics of elite male junior rowers. British Joournal of Sports Medicine, 2002; 34(3):213–217.
6. Bozlar O. Investigation of the physical education and sports high school students their anthropometric features and Somatotype characteristics. Master Thesis. Karadeniz Technical University. Education Science Institute. Department of Physical Education and Sports Teacher. Trabzon. 2011.
7. Claessens AL. Talent detection and talent development: kinanthropometric issues. Acta Kinesiologiae Universitatis Tartuensis. 1999; 4: 47-64.
8. Ergen E, Sardella F, Monte AD. The relationship of maximal alactacid anaerobic power to somatotype in trained subjects. Br. J. Sports Med, 1985; 19(4): 221.

9. Gabbett TJ. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of amateur rugby league players. Br J Sports Med, 2000; 34(4):303–307.
10. Harvey RG. An anthropometric survey of growth and physique of the populations of KarKar Island and Lufa Subdistrict. New Guinea. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 1974; 268: 279-292.
11. Heimer S, Misigoj M, Medved V. Some anthropological of top volleyball players in SFR Yugoslavia. The Journal of Sports Medicine Fitness,1988; 28: 200-208.
12. Hopper MN. Somatotype in high performance female netball players. BJSP Med, 1977; 31: 197-199.
13. Kalkavan A, Yaman M, Karakuş S. Torun CK. Yaman Ç. CihanH. Investigation of the KTU Giresun Education Faculty students their anthropometric features and Somatotype characteristics. Journal of Gazi University Physical Education and Sports Science, 1977; 2(1): 1-8.
14. Kidd D, Winter M. Some anthropometric characteristics of the national junior hammer squad. Br J Sports Med, 1983; 17: 152.
15. Kukolj M, Ugarkovic D, Jaric S. Profiling anthropometric characteristics and functional performance of 12 to 18-year-old elite junior soccer players. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 2003; 45:403–418.
16. Malina RM. Anthropometric correlates of strength and motor performance. Exercise and Sports Science Review. 1975; 3: 249.
17. Malina RM. Maturatural Considerations in Elite Young Athletes. In Perspectives in Kinanthropometry (edited by J. A. P. Day). Champaign. III: Human Kinetics,1986; 29-43.
18. Mohamed H, Vaeyens R, Matthys S, Multael M, Lefevre J, Lenoir M., Philippaerts R. Anthropometric and performance measures for the development of a talent detection and identification model in youth handball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2009;27(3): 257-266.
19. Ozer K. Kinanthropometry. Morphological Planning in Sports. Nobel Publishing Distribution Trade Ltd. Co.,2009, pp. 2-6.
20. Parizkova J. Body composition and physical fitness. Curr Anthrop, 1968; 9:273.
21. Poliszczuk T, Mosakowska M. Anthropometric profile of Polish elite badminton players. Medsportpress,2010; 1(6): 45-46.
22. Ross WD, Marfell-Jones MJ. 1991. Kinanthropometry. Physiological Testing of the High-Performance Athlete. Ed. MacDougall. J.D.. Wenger. HA,Gren HJ, 2. Edith. Illinois. Human Kinetics Books, 1991.
23. Ross WD, Marfell-Jonsen MJ. 1991. Kinanthropometry. Physiological Testing of the High-Performance Athlete. Editor: MacDougall. JD, Wenger HA, Green. H.J. Human kinetics Books. Champain, Illnois.
24. Ross WO. Brown SR, Yu JW. Faulkner RA. 1977. Somatotype of Canadian figure skaters. J Sports Med, 17: 195.
25. Saenz-Lopez P, Ibanez SJ, Gimenez J, Sierra A, Sanchez M. Multifactor characteristics in the process of development of the male expert basketball player in Spain. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2005; 36. 151–171.
26. Sharma SS, Dixit NK. Somatotype of athletes and their performance. Int. J. Sports Med. 1985; 6 (3): 16.
27. Slater GJ, Rice AJ, Mujika, I, Hahn AG, Sharpe K, Jenkins, DG. Physique traits of lightweight rowers and their relationship to competitive success. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005; 39(10):736-4.
28. Slaughter MH, Lahmann TC, Misner JE. Association of somatotype and body composition to physical performance in 7-12 year-old girls. J Sports Med, 1980; 20: 189.
29. Sodhi HS. Physique of top-ranking Indian wrestlers. J Sports Med, 1983; 23:59.
30. Song Thomas MK, Cipriano N. Effects of seasonal training on physical and physiological anaerobic performance of elite young wrestlers. Journal of Sports and Medicine, 2007; 6(Cssı-2): 34-38.
31. Thelwell RC, Greenlees IA, Weston NJV. Using psychological skills training to develop soccer performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2006; 18: 254–270.
32. Toriola AL, Salokun SO, Mathur DN. Somatotype characteristics of male sprinters, basketball, soccer and field hockey players. Int J Sports Med, 1985; 6(6): 344.
33. Weineck J. Functional Anatomy in Sports. Translator: Elmaci AS, Ankara: Bagirgan Publishing House, 1998.
34. Yaprak Y, Aslan A, Taşer H. Considering the relationship between VO2max, cardiac output, pulmonary function and anthropometric measurements at university students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2008; 10(1): 12-20.
35. Yorulmaz F, Taşkınalp O, Yaprak M, Turut M, Mesut R. Some anthropometric features of male medical school students from Trakya. Balkan Medical Journal, 1998; 3: 85-90.