Examination of the physical profiles of physically handicapped female badminton players

Yıl 2018, , 1 - 8, 30.04.2018

Mehmet Fatih Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.364194

Cited By: 3

Öz

This
research was conducted to determine physical characteristics of physically
handicapped women badminton players and to examine the effects of badminton
sport on the physical characteristics of physically handicapped women. A total
of 43 women including physically handicapped badminton players (n= 20) and
control group consisting of physically handicapped (n= 23) participated
voluntarily to the researh. In accordance with the obstacle classification
determined by the International Physically Handicappeds Badminton Federation,
handicapped female badminton players were composed of two groups including
SL-3, SL-4, SU-5 (standing players, n= 11) and WH-1, WH-2 (wheelchair players,
n= 9). In control groups, disabled persons with inactive lifestyle (standing,
n= 13 and wheelchair, n= 10) were included in the study. In order to identify the physical characteristics
of the participants; stature, weight, BMI, upper extremity length
(arm-forearm-hand), circumference (arm-forearm), flexibility, balance, modified
sit-ups, modified abdominal endurance, hand grip strength, plate tapping and
modified push-up tests were made. SPSS 21.0 program was used in the analysis of
the data and differences between the groups were determined by Mann-Whitney U
test. Significancy level was considered as p <0.05. In
the result of the study, significant
differences were determined according to control groups In the parameters of
weight, BMI, balance, modified sit-ups, hand grip strength, plate tapping and
modified push-up parameters of female disabled badminton players playing
standing and in the parameters of weight, BMI, flexibility, modified sit-ups,
modified abdominal endurance, and plate tapping of wheelchair badminton
players. As a result, it is determined that badminton sports improve the
physical properties of physically handicapped women. In addition, it can be
said that badminton sport can have a positive contribution in
the process of raising the physical fitness levels of persons with disabilities
who are deprived of some physical capacity and adaptation to life conditions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Para-badminton, physically disabilitiy, physical features

Kaynakça

• 1. Adam C. Eurofit: handbook for the Eurofit tests of physical fitness Rome: Italian National Olympic Committee, Central Direction for Sport's Technical Activities Documentation and Information Division, 1988.
• 2. Auxter D, Pyfer J, Huettig C. Principles and Methods of Adapted Physical Education and Recreation. 9th ed, New York: McGraw Hill, 2001.
• 3. Aytar A, Pekyavas NO, Ergun N, Karatas M. Is there a relationship between core stability, balance and strength in amputee soccer players? A pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012; 36(3): 332-338.
• 4. Cooper RA, Quatrano LA, Axelson PW, Harlan W, Stineman M, Franklin B, Krause JS, Bach J, Chambers H, Chao EY, Alexander M, Painter P. Research on physical activity and health among people with disabilities: A consensus statement. J of Rehabil Res Dev, 1999; 36(2): 142-154.
• 5. Devillard X, Rimaud D, Roche F, Calmels P. Effect of training programs for spinal cord injury. Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique, 2007; 50(6): 490-498.
• 6. Easterby R, Kroemer KHE, Chaffin DB. Anthropometry and Biomechanics. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1982.
• 7. Ergun N, Baltacı G. Spor Yaralanmalarında Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Prensipleri. Ankara: Pelikan Yayınevi, 2014.
• 8. Ergun N, Baltacı G. Spor Yaralanmalarında Fiztoyetrapi ve Rehabilitasyon Prensipleri (2. bs.). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Yayınları, 2006.
• 9. Giacobbi PR, Stancil M, Hardin B, Bryant L. Physical activity and quality of life experienced by highly active individuals with physical disabilities. APAQ, 2008; (25)3: 189-207.
• 10. Günay M, Tamer K, Cicioğlu İ. Spor Fizyolojisi ve Performans Ölçümü. (3. Baskı). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi, 2013.
• 11. Gür A. Özürlülerin Sosyal Yasama Uyum Süreçlerinde Sportif Etkinliklerin Rolü. Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Özürlüler Dairesi Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2001.
• 12. Hutzler Y, Chacham-Guber A, Reiter S. Psychosocial effects of reverse-integrated basketball activity compared to separate and no physical activity in young people with physical disability. Res Dev Disabil, 2013; 34(1): 579-587.
• 13. Hutzler Y, Ochana S, Bolotin R, Kalina E. Aerobic and anaerobic arm-cranking power outputs of males with lower limb ımpairments: relationship with sport participation ıntensity, age, ımpairment and functional classification. SpinalCord, 1998; (36)3: 205–212.
• 14. Kale R. Okullarda ve Kulüplerde Badminton. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2011.
• 15. Kulig K, Newsam CJ, Mulroy SJ, Rao S, Gronley JK, Bontrager EL, Perry J. The effect of level of spinal cord injury on shoulder joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech, 2001; 16(9): 744-751.
• 16. Otman AS, Demirel H, Sade A. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Prensipleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Yayınları, 1995.
• 17. Özdemir G, Ersoy G. Engelli sporcularda beslenme, sağlık ve performans etkileşimi. Türk Fizik Tıp Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 2009; 55: 116-121.
• 18. Sahlberg ME, Svantesson U, Thomas EM, Strandvik B. Muscular strength and function in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest, 2005; 127(5): 1587-1592.
• 19. Samuelsson KA, Tropp H, Gerdle B. Sholder pain and its consequences in paraplegic spinal cord-injured, wheelchair users. Spinal Cord, 2004; 42(1): 41-46.
• 20. Silfies SP, Ebaugh D, Pontillo M, Butowicz CM. Critical review of the impact of core stability on upper extremity athletic injury and performance. Braz J Phys Ther, 2015; 19(5): 360-368.
• 21. Sucharitha BS, Reddy AV, Madhavi K. Effectiveness of plyometric training on anaerobic power and agility in female badminton players. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research And Bio-Science, 2014; 3(4): 754-761.
• 22. Tomchuk D. Companion Guide to Measurement and Evaluation for Kinesiology, Chapter 4, Local Muscular Endurance Testing, 2010.
• 23. Tolfrey VL, Batterham AM, Tolfrey K. Scaling behavior of VO2 peak in trained wheelchair athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc, 2003; 35(12): 2106–2111.
• 24. Tsigilis N, Douda H, Tokmakidis SP. Test-retest reliability of the eurofit test battery administered to university students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2002; 95(3): 1295-1300.
• 25. Van Drongelen S, De Groot S, Veeger HE, Angenot EL, Dallmeijer AJ, Post MW, Woude LH. Upper extremity musculoskeletal pain during and after rehabilitation in wheelchair-using persons with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2006; 44(3): 152-159.
• 26. Veeger HEJ, Rozendaal LA, Van der Helm FCT. Load on the shoulder in low intensity wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech, 2002; 17: 211-218.
• 27. Vicen JA, Del Coso J, Millan CG, Salinero JJ, Abian P. Analysis of dehydration and strength in elite badminton players. Plos One Journal, 2012; 7(5): 1-8.
• 28. Wilhite B, Shank J. In praise of sport: promoting sport participation as a mechanism of health among persons with a disability. Disabil Health J, 2009; 2(3): 116-127.
• 29. Yazıcıoğlu K, Yavuz F, Göktepe AS, Tan AK. Influence of adapted sports on quality of life and life satisfaction in sport participants and non-sport participants with physical disabilities. Disabil Health J, 2012; 5(4): 249-253.
• 30. Zorba E, Saygın Ö. Fiziksel Aktivite ve Fiziksel Uygunluk. (2. Baskı). İstanbul: İnceler Ofset, 2009.