Analysis of Dominant and Non-dominant Biceps and Deltoid Muscle Volumes of Badminton Players

Öz

ABSTRACT

The main purpose of this study is to analyze whether there is a difference between dominant and non-dominant biceps and deltoid muscle volumes of badminton players.Also hand grip strengthlevels were compared dominant and non-dominant hands of badminton players.14 registered badminton players between the ages of 11 and 14, who have been playing badminton for at least 5 years and practicing at least 5 days a week, have participated in this study. The muscle volumes of the participants were determined through an MR (1.5 T Philips Achieva Netherlands) device. The T1 weighed MR images of 5 mm section thickness of dominant and non-dominant deltoid and biceps muscle volumes of the participants were obtained, and the lines were drawn at each section at the work station of the related muscle and the sectional area was calculated. The muscle volume was obtained by multiplying the resulting sectional area by the section thickness (Cavalieri principle). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the data obtained in this study.It was observed that the dominant deltoid muscle volumes of the players were more than their non-dominant muscle volumes (p<0.01). Dominant and non-dominant biceps muscle volumes of the players were analyzed and it was observed that the dominant biceps muscle volumes of the players were more than their non-dominant biceps muscle volumes (p<0.01).Dominant hand grip strength values were found to be higher than non-dominant hand (p<0.01).It was consequently observed that the dominant biceps and deltoid muscle volumes and the dominant grip strength values were higher of badminton players than non-dominant side.These results suggest that the badminton players should also focus on exercises for improving the non-dominant side of their bodies.Otherwise, it can lead to muscle imbalance and injury.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• badminton,muscle volume

Kaynakça

1. 1-Akarsu, S. Relations among handedness, reaction time, menocular shifts from binocular focal point and IQ in sedentary subjects and athletes in different sports. Master thesis. University of Atatürk. Physiology Department. Erzurum,2004.
2. 2-Akça, G. Evaluation of gleno humeral joint range of motion, scapular dyskinesis and shoulder proprioception in elite tenis players. Master thesis.Institute of Health Sciences.University of 9 Eylül. İzmir, 2006.
3. 3-Armstrong, C. A., & Oldham, J. A. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume), 1999; 24(4): 421-425.
4. 4-Baron, R., Petschnig, R., Bachl, N., Raberger, G., Smekal, G., & Kastner, P. Catecholamine excretion and heart rate as factors of psychophysical stress in table tennis. Int J Sports Med, 1992; 13(7): 501-5.
5. 5-Beyer, E., & Hofmann, V. K. Dictionary of Sport Science. Schorndorf, 1992. 6-Ducher, G., Jaffré, C., Arlettaz, A., Benhamou, C. L, & Courteix, D. Effects of long-term tenis playing on the muscle-bone relationship in the dominant and non-dominant forearms. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Can. J. Appl. Physiol, 2005; 30(1): 3-17.
6. 7-Ellenbecker, T. S. A total arm strength isokinetic profile of highly skilled tenis players. Isokinetics and Exercise Science,1991; 1(1): 9-21.
7. 8-Griffin, K. M., Bonci, C., & Sloane, B. Prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder injuries in throwing athletes. In: NicholasJA, Hershman EB, PosnerMA, editors. The Upper Extremity In Sports Medicine. 2nd ed. USA :Churcill Livingstone pres, 1995: 721-747.
8. 9-Kong, P. W., & Burns, S. F. Bilateral difference in hamstrings to quadriceps ratio in healthy males and females. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2010;11(1): 12-17. 10-Mitsionis, G., Pakos, E.E., Stafilas, K.S., Paschos, N., Papakostas, T., & Beris, A.E. Normative data on hand grip strength in a Greek adult population. International Orthopaedics,2009; 33(3): 713–717.

9. 11-Ng, G. Y., & Fan, A. C. Does elbow position affect strength and reproducibility of power grip measurements?. Physiotherapy,2001; 87(2): 68-72.
10. 12-Omesegaard, B. O. IBF Physical Training For Badminton. Mailingbeck A/S. Denmark, 1996: p37-51.
11. 13-Perry, J., & Glausman, R. E. Biomechanics of throwing. In: Nicholas JA, Hershman EB, Posner MA, editors. The Upper Extremity In Sports Medicine. 2nd ed. USA :Churcill Livingstone pres,1995:697-719.
12. 14-Peterson, P., Petrick, M., Connor, H., & Conklin, D. Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. Am J OccupTher, 1989;43(7): 444–447.
13. 15-Rahnama, N., Lees, A., & Bambaecichi, E. A comparison of muscle strength and flexibility between the preferred and non-preferred leg in English soccer players. Ergonomics,2005; 48(11-14): 1568-1575.
14. 16-Rosene, J. M, Fogarty, T. D., & Mahaffey, B. L. Isokinetic hamstrings: quadriceps ratios in inter collegiate athletes. Journal of Athletic Training,2001; 36(4): 378–383.
15. 17-Tok, M. I. The effects of vibration training on spinal excitability. PhD thesis, University of Ege, Institute of Health Sciences. İzmir, 2007.
16. 18-Yazıcı, A. G. Comparison between lateralization levels of athletes who do exercises actively and their dynamic and static balance and some physical features. PhD thesis. Institute of Health Sciences.University of Atatürk. Erzurum, 2012.