Examining the Relationship Between Dynamic Balance Skill and Reactive Agility Performance in Karate Athletes

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between dynamic balance ability and reactive agility performance in karate athletes. A total of 53 karate athletes, 19 females (35.8%) 34 males (64.2%), (mean age: 18.02 ± 1.60 years, mean height 172.13 ± 7.59 cm; mean body weight 64.83 ± 9.75 kg) were included. Dynamic balance ability was tested in three directions: anterior, posterolateral and posteromedial using the "Y Balance Test" platform. Reactive agility performance was evaluated in a SpeedCourt ™ system in a closed space. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was used according to the distribution status to examine the relationship between the variables. Statistical error level was determined as p<0.05. It was determined that there was a positively weak and moderate correlation between the dynamic balance ability of the athletes and their reactive agility performance (r = 0.273 / 0.565, p <0.05). As a result of our study, it was determined that karate athletes with good dynamic balance ability had good agility performance. Having good dynamic balance skill indicates that the athlete has less postural oscillation and more stabilization. We think that this situation will contribute to better reactive agility activities that require constant change of direction. As a result of our study, it is recommended to consider dynamic balance elements in improving reactive agility performance in karate athletes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Speedcourt
• sport
• y balance

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı karate sporcularında dinamik denge becerisi ile reaktif çeviklik performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmaya 19’u kadın (%35,8) 34’ü erkek (%64,2), toplam 53 karate sporcusu (yaş ortalaması: 18,02±1,60 yıl; boy uzunluğu ortalaması 172,13±7,59 cm; vücut ağırlığı ortalaması 64,83±9,75 kg) dâhil edildi. Dinamik denge becerisi “Y Balance Test” platformu kullanılarak anterior, posterolateral ve posteromedial olmak üzere üç yönde test edildi. Reaktif çeviklik performansı kapalı bir alanda SpeedCourt ™ sisteminde değerlendirildi. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla dağılım durumuna göre Pearson veya Spearman korelasyon analizi kullanıldı. İstatistiksel hata düzeyi p<0,05 olarak belirlendi. Sporcuların dinamik denge becerisi ile reaktif çeviklik performansı arasında pozitif yönde zayıf ve orta derecede ilişki olduğu belirlendi (r=0,273 / 0,565, p<0.05). Çalışmamız sonucunda dinamik denge becerisi iyi olan karate sporcularının çeviklik performansının iyi olduğu belirlendi. Dinamik denge becerisinin iyi olması sporcunun postüral salınımın daha az, stabilizasyonunun ise daha fazla olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu durumun sürekli yön değiştirmeyi gerektiren reaktif çeviklik aktivitelerinin daha iyi olmasına katkı sağlayacağını düşünmekteyiz. Çalışmamız sonucunda karate sporcularında reaktif çeviklik performansının geliştirilmesinde dinamik denge unsurlarının dikkate alınması önerilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Speedcourt
• spor
• y balance

Kaynakça

1. 1. Ackland TR, Elliott B, Bloomfield J. Applied anatomy and biomechanics in sport: Human Kinetics. 2009.
2. 2. Ağaoğlu S, Ergin, R. 9-14 yaş badmintoncularda çeviklik, reaksiyon zamanı ve denge parametrelerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Spor Egzersiz ve Antrenman Bilimi Dergisi, 2017; 3(4): 109-119.
3. 3. Altinkök M, Ölçücü B. On yaş tenisçilerde yarışma öncesi postural kontrol ile çeviklik performanslarının incelenmesi. Selçuk University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 2012; 14 (2): 273-276.
4. 4. Atilgan OE. Effects of trampoline training on jump, leg strength, static and dynamic balance of boys. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2013;5(2): 15-25.
5. 5. Bloomfield J, Polman R, O'Donoghue P, McNaughton L. Effective speed and agility conditioning methodology for random intermittent dynamic type sports. Journal of Strength snd Conditioning Research, 2007;21(4): 1093-1100.
6. 6. Düking P, Born D-P, Sperlich B. The Speedcourt: reliability, usefulness, and validity of a new method to determine change-of-direction speed. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2016; 11(1): 130-134.
7. 7. Erdem K, Çağlayan A, Korkmaz O, Kizilet T, Özbar N. Amatör futbolcuların vücut kitle indeksi, denge ve çeviklik özelliklerinin mevkilerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Spor Egzersiz ve Antrenman Bilimi Dergisi, 2015;1(2): 95-103.
8. 8. Erdoğan CS, Fatmanur E, İpekoğlu G, Çolakoğlu T, Zorba E, Çolakoğlu FF. Farklı denge egzersizlerinin voleybolcularda statik ve dinamik denge performansi üzerine etkileri. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2017; 8(1): 11-18.

9. 9. Erkmen N, Taşkin H, Sanioğlu A, Kaplan T, Baştürk D. Relationships between balance and functional performance in football players. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2010; 26(2010): 21-29.
10. 10. Gabbett TJ, Kelly JN, Sheppard JM. Speed, change of direction speed, and reactive agility of rugby league players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2008;22(1):174-181.
11. 11. Hammami R, Granacher U, Pizzolato F, Chaouachi M, Chtara M. Associations between Change of Direction, Balance, Speed, and Muscle Power in Prepubescent Soccer Players. Journal of Athletic Enhance, 2017; 6(6);6-2.
12. 12. Hrysomallis C. Balance ability and athletic performance. Sports medicine, 2011: 41(3); 221-232.
13. 13. Johnston W, O’Reilly M, Liston M, McLoughlin R, Coughlan GF, Caulfield B. (2019). Capturing concussion related changes in dynamic balance using the Quantified Y Balance Test–a case series of six elite rugby union players. Paper presented at the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).
14. 14. Katis A, Kellis E. Effects of small-sided games on physical conditioning and performance in young soccer players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 2009; 8(3): 374-380.
15. 15. Lloyd RS, Read P, Oliver JL, Meyers RW, Nimphius S, Jeffreys I.. Considerations for the development of agility during childhood and adolescence. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 2013;35(3): 2-11.
16. 16. Miller MG, Herniman JJ, Ricard MD, Cheatham CC, Michael TJ. The effects of a 6-week plyometric training program on agility. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 2006;5(3): 459-465.
17. 17. Okudur A, Sanioğlu A. 12 Yaş Tenisçilerde Denge ile Çeviklik İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2012;14(2): 165-170.
18. 18. Pojskic H, Åslin E, Krolo A, Jukic I, Uljevic O, Spasic M, Sekulic D. Importance of reactive agility and change of direction speed in differentiating performance levels in junior soccer players: reliability and validity of newly developed soccer-specific tests. Frontiers in physiology, 2018;9:506.
19. 19. Robinson R, Gribble P. Kinematic predictors of performance on the Star Excursion Balance Test. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2008;17(4): 347-357.
20. 20. Sekulic D, Pehar M, Krolo A, Spasic M, Uljevic O, Calleja-González J, Sattler T. Evaluation of basketball-specific agility: applicability of preplanned and nonplanned agility performances for differentiating playing positions and playing levels. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2017; 31(8): 2278-2288.
21. 21. Sekulic D, Spasic M, Mirkov D, Cavar M, Sattler, T. Gender-specific influences of balance, speed, and power on agility performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2013;27(3): 802-811.
22. 22. Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2006;24(9): 919-932.
23. 23. Sibenaller B, Martino MA, Massey K, Butler S. The Relationship between Balance and Agility in Collegiate Athletes. Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 2010;5(2).
24. 24. Šimek S, Milanović D, Jukić I. The effects of proprioceptive training on jumping and agility performance. Kinesiology, 2007;39(2):131-141.
25. 25. Sisic N, Jelicic M, Pehar M, Spasic M, Sekulic D. Agility performance in high-level junior basketball players: the predictive value of anthropometrics and power qualities. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2015;56(7-8):884-893.
26. 26. Sporis G, Jukic I, Milanovic L, Vucetic V. Reliability and factorial validity of agility tests for soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2010;24(3): 679-686.
27. 27. Sucan S, Yilmaz A, Yusuf C, Cem S. Aktif futbol oyuncularinin çeşitli denge parametrelerinin değerlendirilmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2005;14(1):36-43.
28. 28. Turner A, Walker S, Stembridge M, Coneyworth P, Reed G, Birdsey L, Barter P, Moody J. A testing battery for the assessment of fitness in soccer players. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 2011;33(5): 29-39.
29. 29. Zemková E. Assessment of balance in sport: science and reality. Serbian Journal of Sports Sciences, 2011;5(4):127-139.