Social Paradigms Shaping Leisure Research Designs: A Systematic Review

Öz

Researchers conduct their studies in accordance with their perspective and philosophy that they ground on. There are philosophical hypothesis and specific beliefs that guide them to define and understand the underlying reasons of a case. These philosophical hypotheses stand out in every stage of the research including conducting the theory, type and method of the research and reporting. The purpose of this study is to review leisure studies in Turkey systematically in the context of paradigms and enlighten historical process of paradigms in the research. Document analyses are used as data collection technique. In accordance with the purpose of this study, literature review is performed in three data bases by using 9 keywords in Turkish and English in total 134 articles are evaluated based on both abstract and full review. It is detected that historical process of leisure studies accompanied by quantitative researches, but qualitative and mix type researches taken place in literature after 2010. Functional Paradigm is dominated when research types are embraced, and survey researches performed more in the Functionalist Paradigm. Institutions providing recreation education are also recommended to support qualitative and mixed method research in order for current approaches in the field to be followed and qualified studies to be put forth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Paradigms
• Leisure
• Systematic Review

Kaynakça

1. Referans1: Baki A, Gökçek T. Karma yöntem araştırmalarına genel bir bakış. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2012; 11(42), 1-21.
2. Referans2: Bali RK, Wickramasinghe N, Lehaney B. Knowledge Management Primer. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
3. Referans3: Borg WR, Gall MD, Gall JP. Educational Research: An Introduction. 8th ed. Newyork: Longman Inc., 2006.
4. Referans4: Burrell G, Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Routledge, 1979.
5. Referans5: Büyuköztürk S, Çakmak K, Akgün OE, Karadeniz S, Demirel F. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2014.
6. Referans6: Cooper JA. Routledge Encyclopaedia of Educational Thinkers. Routledge: Taylor & Francis, 2016.
7. Referans7: Crawford DW, Godbey G. Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sci, 1987; 9, 119-127. doi: 10.1080/01490408709512151.
8. Referans8: Creswell JW, Fetters MD, Ivankova NV. Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Ann Fam Med, 2004; 2(1), 7-12.

9. Referans9: Creswell JW. Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Bütün M, Demir SB, translator. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 2013.
10. Referans10: Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı (2001- 2005). Ankara: 2020. Available from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Sekizinci-Be%C5%9F-Y%C4%B1ll%C4%B1k-Kalk%C4%B1nma-Plan%C4%B1-2001-2005.pdf.
11. Referans11: Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. Yedinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı (1996- 2000). Ankara: 2020. Available from: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Yedinci-Be%C5%9F-Y%C4%B1ll%C4%B1k-Kalk%C4%B1nma-Plan%C4%B1-1996-2000%E2%80%8B.pdf.
12. Referans12: Godbey GC, Caldwell LL, Floyd M, Payne LL. Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. Am J Prev Med, 2005; 28(2), 150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.027.
13. Referans13: Gunbayi İ, Sorm S. Social paradigms in guiding social research design: The functional, interpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, 2018; 9(2), 57-76.
14. Referans14: Gürbüz B, Karaküçük S. (2007). Boş zaman engelleri ölçeği-28: Ölçek geliştirme, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Gazi Beden Egitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2007; 12(1), 3-10.
15. Referans15: Habermas J. Knowledge and Human Interests: A General Perspective in Knowledge and Human Interests. Cambridge: Policy, 1987.
16. Referans16: Jackson N, Carter P. In defence of paradigm incommensurability. Organ Stud, 1991; 12(1), 109-127.
17. Referans17: Karaçam Z. Sistematik derleme metodolojisi: Sistematik derleme hazırlamak icin bir rehber. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 2013; 6(1), 26-33.
18. Referans18: Lawson T, Jones M, Moore R. Advanced Sociology through Diagrams. UK: Oxford University Press. 2000.
19. Referans19: Mastin L. The basic of philosophy, [updated 2020 February 15; cited 2008]. Available from: http://www.lukemastin.com/philosophy/branch_positivism.html.
20. Referans20: Merriam SB. Nitel Araştırma. Turan S. translator. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2013.
21. Referans21: Morgan D. 1998 Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qual Health Res, 1998; 8, 362-376. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800307.
22. Referans22: Murphy J, Vriesenga M, Storey V. Educational administration quarterly, 1979-2003: An analysis of types of work, methods of investigation, and influences. Educ Admin Quart, 2007; 43(5), 612-628. doi: 10.1177/0013161X07307796.
23. Referans23: Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. Enhancing the interpretation of significant findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 2004; 9(4), 770-792. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/ 2004.1913.
24. Referans24: Pablo IA. Dictionary of World Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2001.
25. Referans25: Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
26. Referans26: Silk M, Caudwell J, Gibson H. Views on leisure studies: Pasts, presents & future possibilities? Leisure Stud, 2017; 36(2), 153-162. doi:10.1080/02614367.2017.1290130.
27. Referans27: Spracklen K. The future of work and leisure. Annals of Leisure Research. 2007; 20(3), 394-396. doi: 10.1080/11745398.2017.1317462.
28. Referans28: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003.
29. Referans29: Tesch R. Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tolls. Bristol: PA: Falmer Press, 1990.
30. Referans30: Trueman CR. Anti-positivism, [updated 2020 April 23; cited 2015]. https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/sociology/research-methods-in-sociology/anti-positivism/.
31. Referans31: Yerlisu Lapa T, Köse E. Günbayı I. Türkiye’de yapılan rekreasyon araştırmaları: Sistematik bir derleme. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018; 29(2), 87-104.
32. Referans32: Yükseköğretim Kurumu. Üniversiteler. Ankara; 2020. Available from: https://www.yok.gov.tr/universiteler/universitelerimiz.
33. Referans33: Yükseköğretim Kurumu. Yükseköğretim Kanunu (2547). Ankara; 2020. Available from: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2547.pdf.
34. Referans34: Zorba E. Türkiye’de rekreasyona bakış açısı ve gelişimi. Gazi Haber Dergisi, 2008; 52-55.