Philosophical Basis of Social Work Ethics

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 85 - 97, 15.04.2010

Özge Sanem Özateş

Öz

The ethics,
which is the guide of being right and good in the act of people and relations
with other people, is center of social work profession of which subject is
‘human’. Social work ethics argues whichever appropriate activity of social
workers makes right conduct at the professional practices. For this reason, it
is important to know the main philosophical ethical approaches, which are,
provide a basis for the social work ethics. Thus, it can be possible to
describe the values that are adopted by social work and ethical principles,
which guide to practice. For these reasons in this article it has been tried to
answer the question of ‘what ethics is’ and handled the main philosophical
ethical approaches, which are provide a basis for the social work ethics, and
social work ethics. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ethics, social work ethics

SOSYAL HİZMET ETİĞİNİN FELSEFİ TEMELLERİ

Öz

Kişilerin
eylemlerinde ve diğer insanlarla olan ilişkilerinde doğru ve iyi olana ilişkin
yol gösterici olan etik, öznesi ‘insan’ olan sosyal hizmet mesleğinin
merkezinde yer alır. Sosyal hizmet etiği -en yalın ifadeyle-, mesleki
uygulamalarda uzmanların hangi uygun yapıp etmelerinin doğru eylemi ortaya
çıkarabileceğini tartışır. Bu nedenle, sosyal hizmet etiğine kaynaklık eden
temel felsefi etik yaklaşımların bilinmesi önemlidir. Böylelikle sosyal
hizmetin benimsediği değerlerin ve uygulamalara rehberlik eden etik ilkelerin
tanımlanabilmesi mümkün olacaktır.Bu nedenlerden dolayı makalede, etik nedir
sorusuna yanıt aranmaya çalışılmış ve sosyal hizmet etiğinin oluşturulmasında
temel alınan felsefi etik yaklaşımlar ile sosyal hizmet etiği ele alınmıştır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik, sosyal hizmet etiği

Kaynakça

• Ain, E. J. (2001). Ethical Dilemmas of New York City Social Workers (A Thesis of Doctor Degree), New York: Yeshiva University.
• Aristoteles. (1998). Nikomakhos’a Etik. çev: Saffet Babür, Ayraç Yayınları, Ankara.
• Akarsu, B. (1999). Ahlak Felsefesi (Ahlak Öğretileri-2). İnkılap Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Akarsu, B. (1998). Mutluluk Ahlakı (Ahlak Öğretileri-1). İnkılap Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Banks, S. (2008). Critical Commentary: Social Work Ethics. British Journal of Social Work. 38, 1238-1249.
• Banks, S. (1998). Professional Ethics in Social Work-What Future?. British Journal of Social Work. 28, 213-231.
• Biehal, N. ve Sainsbury, E. (1991). From Values of Rights in Social Work. British Journal of Social Work. 21, 245-257.
• Boland, K. (2002). Ethical Decision-Making Among Hospital Social Workers (A Thesis of Doctor Degree), Pennsylvania: Marywood University.
• Brill, C. K. (2001). Looking at the Social Work Profession Through the Eye of the NASW Code of Ethics. Research on Social Work Practice. 11, 223-234).
• Butler, I. (2002). A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research. British Journal of Social Work. 32, 239-248.
• Clark, C. (2006). Moral Character in Social Work. British Journal of Social Work. 36, 75-89.
• Congress, E. ve McAuliffe, D. (2006). Social Work Ethics. International Social Work. 49, 151-164.
• Dominelli, L. ve Hollaway, M. (2008). Ethics and Governance in Social Work Research in the UK. British Journal of Social Work. 38, 1009-1024.
• Gottfried, K. S. ve D’Aprix, A. (2006). Ethics for Academics. Social Work Education. Vol: 25, No: 3, 225-244.
• Healy, L. M. (2007). Universalism and Cultural Relativism in Social Work Ethics. International Social Work. 50, 11-26.
• Kant, I. (1995). Ahlak Metafiziğinin Temellendirilmesi. çev: İoanna Kuçuradi, Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, Çeviri Dizisi: 4, Ankara.
• Kinderknecht, C. H. (1995). Social Work Ethical Violations: The Experience of One State Regulatory Board (A Thesis of Doctor Degree), Kansas: University of Kansas.
• Kuçuradi, İ. (1999). Etik. Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, Simurg Dizisi: 5, Ankara.
• Llyod, L. (2006). A Caring Profession? The Ethics of Care and Social Work with Older People. British Journal of Social Work. 36, 1171-1185.
• Lovat, T. ve Gray, M. (2008). Towards a Proportionist Social Work Ethics: A Habermasian Perspective. British Journal of Social Work. 38, 1100-1114.
• Manning, S. S. (1990). Ethical Decisions: A Grounded Theory Approach to the Experience of Social Work Administrators (A Thesis of Doctor Degree), Denver: The Faculty of the Graduate School of Social Work University of Denver.
• MacIntyre, A. (2001). Ethik’in Kısa Tarihi, Homerik Çağdan Yirminci Yüzyıla. 22. Paradigma Kitabı, Felsefe Dizisi 14. Kitap, Engin Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• McBeath, G. ve Webb, S. A. (2002). Virtue Ethics and Social Work: Being Lucky, Realistic, and not Doing ones Duty. British Journal of Social Work. 32, 1015-1036.
• Oğuz, Y. (2001). Felsefi Yaklaşımların Işığında Klinik Etiğe Giriş. Klinik Etik. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, İstanbul.
• Reamer, F. G. ve Abramson, M. (1982). The Teaching of Social Work Ethics. The Hasting Center Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, New York.
• Webb, S. A. ve McBeath, G. B. (1989). A Political Critique of Kantian Ethics in Social Work. British Journal of Social Work. 19, 491-506.
• Wesley, S. C. (1997). Values and Ethics in Undergraduate Social Work Education Administrators (A Thesis of Doctor Degree), Ohio: Case Western Reserve University.
• Wilks, T. (2004). The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research into Social Work Values. Qualitative Social Work. 3, 1, 78-87.