ṬUR ʿABDIN’DEKİ SÜRYANİ MİMARİ MİRASININ KORUNMASI: SÜREÇLER VE FARKLI EĞİLİMLER

Yıl 2016, Sayı: 14, 57 - 69, 01.09.2016

Elif Keser Kayaalp

Öz

Bu makale, Güneydoğu Anadolu’da yer alan Ṭur ʿAbdin bölgesi’ndeki Süryani mimari mirasının öneminden bahsettikten sonra, 2001 yılından geçen yıla kadar bu cemaate ait kilise ve manastırlarda devam eden onarım ve yapı faaliyetlerine odaklanacaktır. Bu yapılar, Türkiye’nin problemli bir bölgesinde yer almaktadır ve etnik ve dini bir azınlığa aittir. İnşa faaliyetlerinin arka planındaki duygusal bağları, karar ve uygulama süreçlerini incelemek bu mirası korumak için daha iyi stratejiler geliştirmek için öğretici olacaktır. Bu miras hakkındaki farklı görüşlerden bahsederek ve bazı dikkat çekici örnekleri tartışarak, bu makale, kültürel miras çalışmalarında son on yılda yapılan tartışmalar ışığında Süryani mimari mirasını değerlendirmek için başka türlü bir bakış açısı geliştirmenin gerekliliği üzerinde durmuştur. Bu yeni bakış açısı yapıları fosilleştirmek yerine anlamlarını önceliklendirmeli, bu yapıların ve onları restore etmenin sembolik önemine vurgu yapmalıdır. Ancak bunu yaparken topluluğun katılımından taviz vermeden profesyonellerin de sürece dahil olması sağlanmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Azınlık, Kimlik, Koruma, Yeni Kültürel Miras Teorileri

PRESERVATION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE OF THE SYRIAC CHRISTIANS IN THE ṬUR ʿABDIN: PROCESSES AND VARYING APPROACHES

Öz

After explaining the significance of the architectural heritage of the Syriac Christians in Ṭur ʿAbdin in south-eastern Turkey, this article focuses on the extensive renovation and building projects in many churches and monasteries of this region after 2001 up until the last year. Since these buildings belong to an ethnic and religious minority in a politically sensitive part of Turkey, the investigation of the emotional connections and the decision and application processes behind the construction activities can be useful in developing better strategies for protection. After mentioning the different views on this heritage and discussing some particular cases, the paper argues that there is a need for a new approach to deal with this heritage in the light of the discussions about heritage studies in the past ten years. This new approach should prioritize the meanings of buildings rather than fossilising them and should emphasize the symbolic importance of these buildings and their restorations. However, engagement of professionals, without sacrificing the involvement of the community, must also be secured

Anahtar Kelimeler

Minority, Identity, Conservation, New Heritage Theories

Kaynakça

• BELL, Gertrude. L. and MUNDELL MANGO, Marlia, 1982. The churches and monasteries of the Tur Abdin with an introduction and notes by M. Mundell Mango. London: Pindar Press.
• BİLGE, Yakup, 2011. Mor Gabriel: 1600 yıllık gelenek. İstanbul: Gerçeğe Doğru Kitapları.
• BROCK, Sebastian, 2012. “The Monastery of Mor Gabriel: A Historical Overview and its Wider Significance Today”, editors P. H.Omtzigt, et. al. The Slow Disappearance of the Syriacs from Turkey: And of the Grounds of the Mor Gabriel Monastery: 181-201. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
• HARRISON, Rodney, 2010. “Heritage as a Social Action”, editor S. West. Understanding heritage in practice: 240- 276. Manchester and Milton Keynes: Manchester Univ Press.
• HARVEY, David. C. 2001. “Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies,” International Journal of Heritage Studies 7 (4): 319- 338.
• HOLLERWEGER, Hans, 1999. Turabdin: living cultural heritage: where Jesus’ language is spoken. Linz: Freunde des Ṭur ʿAbdin.
• HOLTORF, Corneliusand FAIRCLOUGH, Graham 2013. “The New Heritage and re-shapings of the past”, editor A. Gonzalez-Ruibal.Reclaiming Archaeology, Beyond the tropes of Modernity: 197-210. London: Routledge.
• KESER-KAYAALP, Elif. 2013. “Églises et monastères du ṬurʿAbdin: les débuts d’une architecture (syriaque)” F. Briquel Chatonnet. Les églises en monde syriaques: 269-288.
• MYDLAND, Leidulf and GRAHN, Wera 2012. “Identifying heritage values in local communities,” International Journal of Heritage Studies 18 (6): 564-587.
• MUNOZ VINAS, Salvador. 2005 Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier.
• MUNDELL, Marlia, 1981. “The sixth century sculpture of the monastery of Deir Zafaran in Mesopotamia”, Actes du XVe Congrès International D’études Byzantines. Athènes1976: 511-28.
• MUNDELL, Marlia and HAWKINS, Ernest. J. 1973. “The Mosaics of the Monastery of Mar Samuel, Mar Simeon, and Mar Gabriel near Kartmin with A note on the Greek inscription by C.Mango”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 27: 279-296.
• OBERKAMPF, Horst 2012. “Almost a miracle- Syriacs are returning to their homelands” editors P. H.Omtzigt, et. al.The Slow Disappearance of the Syriacs from Turkey: And of the Grounds of the Mor Gabriel Monastery: 121- 139. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
• RABO, Gabriel 2013. “Batı Diasporasında Süryaniler ve Süryani Kilisesi,” Mukaddime 7: 101-122.
• SMITH, Laurajane 2006. Uses of Heritage. London:Routledge.
• SMITH, Laurajane 2015. “Theorising museum and heritage visiting” editors Message, Kyleand Witcomb, Andrea. Museum Theory: An Expanded Field: 459-484. Oxford: Blackwell Wiley.
• TEULE, Herman 2012. “Who are the Syriacs?” editors P. H. Omtzigt, et. al. The Slow Disappearance of the Syriacs from Turkey: And of the Grounds of the Mor Gabriel Monastery:47-57. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
• TOZMAN, Markus 2012. “Cadastral Registration of Lands and Preservation Orders in Turkey’s South-East: Subtle forms of Discrimination?” editors P. H. Omtzigt, et. al. The Slow Disappearance of the Syriacs from Turkey: And of the Grounds of the Mor Gabriel Monastery:139-157. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
• VÖÖBUS, Arthur. 1975. The Synodicon in the West Syrian tradition. Louvain: Peeters.
• WINTER, Tim 2014. “Heritage studies and the privileging of theory,” International Journal of Heritage Studies 20 (5): 556-572. http://www.suryaniler.com/ (last accessed on 03.06.2016), a website collecting all the news in the media about the Suryani, as well as short articles by some authors.