Landfill Site Selection Using Spatial Information Technologies: A Case Study for Bodrum District

Öz

With the rapid increase of the world's population, waste production is also increasing exponentially. Although these wastes must be disposed of in landfill sites under control according to national and international decrees, some of the waste is still disposed of in wild irregular landfill sites. Environmental pollution and health risks occur as a result of these wild irregular landfill sites. Besides, criteria need to be considered for suitable areas that solid waste landfill sites to be built. One of the areas where solid waste is disposed of in wild irregular landfill sites is the Bodrum district of Muğla province. In this study, related literature for criteria selection was reviewed and analysis for the study area has performed. Since national and international regulations differ for restricted areas, common approaches in the reviewed studies have been used to identify restricted areas. Furthermore; the weight of the criteria was determined according to the usage frequency of each criterion in the literature. As the result, the reclassification maps according to each criterion and the site selection map obtained by weighting all the criteria were produced by the means of the spatial analysis methods of Geographical Information Systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Solid Waste
• Landfill Site Selection
• Criteria
• Analytical Hierarchy Process

Kaynakça

1. Abdel-Basset M, Gamal A, Chakrabortty R K & Ryan M (2021). A new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for location selection of sustainable offshore wind energy stations: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124462.
2. Aguarón J, Escobar M T & Moreno-Jiménez J M (2021). Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(2), 576-583.
3. Aksoy E (2016). Landfill site selection of Antalya city using remote sensing and geographical information systems. Master Thesis, Akdeniz University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Antalya, 120p (in Turkish).
4. Atacan Öğüt A (2011). Sustainable Water and Wastewater Management at Seasonal Population Variations in Touristic Areas: A Case Study From The Bodrum. Doctoral Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul, 323p (in Turkish).
5. Avşar M (2018). A multi goal model proposal for project acceleration. Doctoral Thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul, 144p (in Turkish).
6. Barzehkar M, Dinan N, Mazaheri S, Tayebi R & Brodie G (2019). Landfill site selection using GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation (case study: SaharKhiz Region located in Gilan Province in Iran). SN Applied Sciences, 1-11.
7. Chabuk A, Al-Ansari N, Hussain H, Knutsson S & Pusch R (2016). Landfill siting using GIS and AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process): a case study Al-Qasim Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(1), 530-543.
8. Chaudhry M, Ashraf U, Ali I & Ali S (2020). GIS - Based Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Landfill Site Selection in Lahore, Pakistan. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29(2), 1-11.

9. Dar S, Shah S, Wani M & Skinder S (2018). Identification of suitable landfill site based on GIS in Leh, Ladakh Region. GeoJournal, 1-15.
10. Deniz M & Topuz M (2018). Alternative landfill site selection in Uşak district by using multi-criteria decision making analysis supported by geographical information systems (GIS) with analytic hierarchy process. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(5), 544-578.
11. Franek J & Kresta A (2014). Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 164-173.
12. Gebre S & Getahun K (2020). GIS-based potential landfill site selection using MCDM-AHP modeling of Gondar Town, Ethiopia. African Geographical Review, 1-20.
13. Ghoutum A, Lebga A & Edith K (2020). Landfill site suitability selection using geospatial technology for the Yaounde Metropolitan City and its Environs: case of SoaSubdivision, Cameroon. European Scientific Journal, 16(6), 95-111.
14. Güler D (2016). Alternative landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems: a case study Istanbul Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul, 95p (in Turkish).
15. Kılıç A (2017). Dumper Fires and Their Effects. Fire and Security Journal, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 8-10.
16. Labella Á, Ishizaka A & Martínez L (2021). Consensual Group-AHPSort: Applying consensus to GAHP Sort in sustainable development and industrial engineering. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 152, 107013.
17. Meng F, Liang X, Xiao C & Wang G (2021). Geothermal resource potential assessment utilizing GIS-based multi criteria decision analysis method. Geothermics, 89, 101969.
18. Mohammed H, Majid Z, Yamusa Y, Ariff M, Idris K & Darwin N (2019). Sanitary landfill siting using GIS and AHP. Engineering. Technology & Applied Science Research, 9(3), 4100-4104.
19. Öner B, Çalışkan Eleren S & Salihoğlu N (2019). An Example of Waste Management in Touristic Coastal Areas: Bodrum. Uludağ University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 24(1), 207-218.
20. Özkan B (2018). A GIS-based multi criteria decision analysis for the municipal solid waste landfill site selection and collection system. Doctoral Thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Eskişehir, 153p (in Turkish).
21. Paul M, Negahban-Azar M, Shirmohammadi A & Montas H (2021). Developing a Multicriteria Decision Analysis Framework to Evaluate Reclaimed Wastewater Use for Agricultural Irrigation: The Case Study of Maryland. Hydrology, 8(1), 4.
22. Pham B T, Luu C, Van Phong T, Nguyen H D, Van Le H, Tran T Q, Ta H T & Prakash I (2021). Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology, 592, 125815.
23. Rahmat Z, Niri M, Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei A, Baboli Z & Hosseinzadeh M (2016). Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1-8.
24. Randazzo L, Cusumano A, Oliveri G, DiStefano P, Renda P, Perricone M & Zarcone G (2018). Landfill site selection for municipal solid waste by using AHP method in GIS environment: waste management decision-support in Sicily (Italy). Multidisciplinary Journal for Waste Resources & Residues, 2(1), 78-88.
25. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation Solid Waste Control Regulation, Official Gazette of Publication: 14/3/1991: Number: 20814
26. Saaty T L (2002). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European journal of operational research, 145(1), 85-91.
27. Staines A, Crowley D, Bruen M & O’Connor P (2004). Public Health and Landfill Sites. Department of Public Health Eastern Regional Health Authority, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology University College, Dublin.
28. Şener S, Şener E & Karagüzel R (2011). Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess, 533-554.
29. Yıldırım Ü (2012). Determination of alternative municipal solid waste disposal sites for the city of Mersin using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system methods, Master Thesis, Mersin University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Mersin, 91p (in Turkish).
30. Zhang J, Kou G, Peng Y & Zhang Y (2021). Estimating priorities from relative deviations in pairwise comparison matrices. Information Sciences, 552, 310-327.
31. Zolfaghary P, Zakerinia M & Kazemi, H (2021). A model for the use of urban treated wastewater in agriculture using multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and geographic information system (GIS). Agricultural Water Management, 243, 106490.