Teknik Ölçmede Yararlı Bir Araç Olarak CBS Destekli AHP Yöntemiyle Şanlıurfa Beton Teknolojisinin Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 14 - 21, 28.12.2022

Veysel Aslan , Mehmet Yaşar Sepetçioğlu , Abdurrahman Oktay Yaşar

Öz

Concrete is one of the most important building materials of strategies that reduce the environmental impact of buildings. Building materials, which undertake many tasks in the building, affect the environment of the buildings in a multifaceted way with their ecological feature. Therefore, it is also important to take the right decisions considering the environmental characteristics in the selection of building materials while designing. Since concrete is the most widely used building material globally and regionally today, the fact that it reflects its properties to the majority of the buildings in which it is used also determines the total environmental impact level. Especially since it is a widely used building material, it becomes very important to increase the environmental properties of concrete. An environmental analysis is made by evaluating the life time levels of concrete in terms of building material criteria. Therefore, this is to consider solutions that will reduce the negativities seen in the ecological life cycle. However, in this study, application was made by assigning weights to five criteria such as Customer, Competitor, Location, Transportation and Price selection problem for concrete with the GIS supported AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. It is thought that the results obtained may contribute to the structures in which concrete is used to have more sustainable properties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

GIS, MCDM, AHP Method, Concrete Plant Plant, Site Selection

Teşekkür

Türk Hidrolik Dergisinde Makale yayınlatarak bilime katkı sağlayan başta yazarlara ve tüm kurullara teşekkür ederiz. Editörlük

Evaluation of Sanliurfa Concrete Technology with GIS Supported AHP Method as a Useful Tool in Tecnical Measurement

Öz

Concrete is one of the most important building materials of strategies that reduce the environmental impact of buildings. Building materials, which undertake many tasks in the building, affect the environment of the buildings in a multifaceted way with their ecological feature. Therefore, it is also important to take the right decisions considering the environmental characteristics in the selection of building materials while designing. Since concrete is the most widely used building material globally and regionally today, the fact that it reflects its properties to the majority of the buildings in which it is used also determines the total environmental impact level. Especially since it is a widely used building material, it becomes very important to increase the environmental properties of concrete. An environmental analysis is made by evaluating the life time levels of concrete in terms of building material criteria. Therefore, this is to consider solutions that will reduce the negativities seen in the ecological life cycle. However, in this study, application was made by assigning weights to five criteria such as Customer, Competitor, Location, Transportation and Price selection problem for concrete with the GIS supported AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. It is thought that the results obtained may contribute to the structures in which concrete is used to have more sustainable properties.

Yapıların çevresel etkilerini azaltan stratejilerin en önemli yapı malzemelerinden biri betondur. Yapıda bir çok görevi üstlenen yapı malzemeleri, ekolojik özelliğiyle de çok yönlü bir şekilde yapıların çevresini etkilemektedir. Dolayısıyla tasarım yapılırken yapı malzemesi seçiminde çevresel özellikleri gözönüne alan doğru kararların alınması da önemlidir. Betonun günümüzde küresel ve bölgesel olarak en çok kullanılan yapı malzemesi olması muhasebiyle kendisinde var olan özellikleri kullanıldıkları yapıların büyük çoğunluğuna yansıtması, toplam çevresel etki seviyesini de belirlemektedir. Özellikle yaygın kullanılan bir yapı malzemesi olmasından dolayı, betonun çevresel özelliklerinin artırılması oldukça önemli hale gelmektedir. Betonun, ömür süresi mertebeleri yapı malzemesi kriterleri açısından değerlendirilerek çevresel bir analizi yapılmaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu ekolojik yaşam döngüsü içerisinde görülen olumsuzlukları azaltacak çözümleri gözönüne sermektir. Bununla beraber bu çalışmada, CBS destekli çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden biri olan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) yöntemi ile betonun; Müşteri, Rakip, Bulunduğu Konum, Ulaşım ve Fiyat seçimi problemi gibi beş kritere ağırlıklar atanarak uygulama yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçların betonun kullanıldığı yapıların daha sürdürülebilir özelliklere sahip olmasına katkıda bulunabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

GIS, MCDM, AHP Method, Concrete Plant Plant, Site Selection, Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme, Beton Santrali Tesisi, Arazi Seçim

Kaynakça

• [1]. Albayrak, H. F. (1988). Concrete Pocket Book. DSI. Headquarters, Ankara. https://www.nadirkitap.com
• [2]. Aslan, V., & Sepetcioglu, M. Y. (2022). Modeling Of Groundwater Potential And Quality Of Harran Plain By Gis Supported Ahp And Topsis Methods. Turkish Journal of Hydraulics, 6(1), 31-41. https://dergipark.org.tr
• [3]. Choice, E. (2000). Team.(2001). Expert Choice. Inc, Pittsburgh. https://dergipark.org.tr
• [4]. DSI (General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works), (2012). Sanliurfa Balikligol Karst Hydrogeology Survey Report. T.R. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Department of Geo technical Services and Groundwater, Karst Research Branch Directorate, Ankara (in Turkish).
• [5]. Guler, D. (2016). Alternative solid waste landfill site selection with analytical hierarchy method and geographic information systems: The case of Istanbul province (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Science and Technology). https://polen.itu.edu.tr
• [6]. Guzel, A. (2020). Natural features geography of Sanliurfa province. The Journal of International Social Research, 13(71), 195-2015. https://scholar.google.com.tr
• [7]. Jesiya, N. P., & Gopinath, G. (2020). A fuzzy based MCDM–GIS framework to evaluate groundwater potential index for sustainable groundwater management-A case study in an urban-periurban ensemble, southern India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 11, 100466.
• [8]. Kapluhan, E. (2014). The Importance and Necessity of the Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in Geography Teaching. Marmara Journal of Geography, (29). http://www.marmaracografya.com
• [9]. Karaatli, M., Omurbek, N., Budak, I., & Okan, D. A. Ğ. (2015). Ranking of livable provinces with multi-criteria decision making methods. Selcuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (33), 215-228. https://dergipark.org.tr
• [10]. Karadayi, T. T., & Cosgun, N. (2021). Approaches to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Concrete in the Life Cycle Process. Journal of Sustainable Environment, 1(1), 1-6. https://dergipark.org.tr
• [11]. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multi criteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.scirp.org
• [12]. Millet, I., & Saaty, T. L. (2000). On the relativity of relative measures–accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 205-212.
• [13]. Pacheco-Torgal, F., Miraldo, S., Ding, Y., & Labrincha, J. A. (2013). Targeting HPC with the help of nanoparticles: an overview. Construction and Building Materials, 38, 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.013
• [14]. Saaty, T. L. (1980). Analytical Hierarchy Process McGraw Hill Company. NY, USA. https://www.scirp.org
• [15]. Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS publications. https://www.amazon.com
• [16]. Saroglu, F. (1981). Factors Influencing the Geomorphological Development of Eastern Anatolia: Geomorphology, Teketonics, Volconism Relations. https://www.jmo.org.tr
• [17]. Sen, Z. (2004). Modeling principles with fuzzy logic in engineering. Water Foundation. https://www.kitapyurdu.com
• [18]. Topcu, Y. I. (2004). A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey. Building and environment, 39(4), 469-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.009
• [19]. URL-1, THBB, (2017). 2013-2014 ready-mixed concrete sector statistics, -ready-mixed-concrete-sector-data, 22062015, http://www.thbb.org/media/74449/2013-2014
• [20]. Yucel, T. (1987). Turkish geography. Turkish Culture Research Institute. https://books.google.com
• [21]. Zahedi, F. (1986). The Analytic Hierarchy Process—a survey of the method and its applications. interfaces, 16(4), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96