Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale across gender and time

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 260 - 272, 31.10.2020

Çiğdem Akın Arıkan , Selen Zorbaz

https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.774452

Cited By: 4

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine whether the Turkish version of Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) has measurement invariance according to gender and longitudinal invariance for Turkish university students. First study’s data were collected from 500 university students (366 female, 134 male) whereas 388 students (296 female, 92 male) participated in Study 2 for three times over four-month intervals. Confirmatory factor analysis was used for measurement invariance. According to the results of the Study 1 which was invariance study according to gender, all items on the SWLS provide configural, metric and scalar invariance. In this context, the differences in points obtained on the SWLS by university students according to gender can be used to perform comparison studies. Also, Study 2 revealed that strict longitudinal invariance was found to hold. This means that equality of factor patterns, factor loadings, intercepts and residual variance were determined for university students at four-month time intervals. The SWLS can be used to make longitudinal mean and gender comparisons for Turkish university students.

Keywords

Gender, Longitudinal invariance, Measurement invariance, Satisfaction with life scale

Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin cinsiyete ve zamana göre ölçme değişmezliğinin incelenmesi

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonunun, üniversite öğrenci örnekleminde cinsiyete ve zamana göre ölçme değişmezliğine sahip olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Araştırmanın ilk çalışma grubunu 500 üniversite öğrencisi (366 kadın, 134 erkek), ikinci çalışma grubunu ise dört ay arayla üç kez uygulama yapılan 388 öğrenci (296 kadın, 92 erkek) oluşturmaktadır. Cinsiyete göre ve boylamsal ölçme değişmezliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Cinsiyete göre ölçme değişmezliği sonuçlarına göre, yaşam doyumu ölçeğindeki tüm maddelerin biçimsel, metrik ve ölçek ölçme değişmezliğine sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. Bir başka deyişle kız ve erkek grupların maddelere aynı şekilde yanıt verdiği ve bu gruplardan elde edilen puanların karşılaştırılabilir olduğu elde edilmiştir. Zamana göre ise tam ölçme değişmezliğine sahip olduğu elde edilmiştir. Bu da üniversite öğrencileri için dört aylık zaman aralıklarında faktör örüntülerinin eşitliği, faktör yükleri, kesişimler ve artık varyansın aynı şekilde belirlendiği anlamına gelir. Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği Türk üniversite öğrencileri için boylamsal ortalama ve cinsiyet karşılaştırmaları yapmak için kullanılabilir.

Keywords

Boylamsal değişmezlik, Cinsiyet, Ölçme değişmezliği, Yaşam doyumu ölçeği

References

• Anaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew language version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 267-274. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-009-9476-z
• Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(5), 815-826. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00180-9
• Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcı́a-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1255-1260. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332
• Bayani, A. A., Koocheky, A. M., & Goodarzi, H. (2007). The reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Iranian psychologists, 3(11), 259-60.
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press Publications.
• Checa, I., Perales, J., & Espejo, B. (2019). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale by gender, age, marital status and educational level. Quality of Life Research, 28(4), 963-968. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2066-2
• Çivitçi, A. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinde genel yaşam doyumu ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlar arasındaki ilişkiler [The relationships between global life satisfaction and psychological needs in university students]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 321-336.
• Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., & Aarø, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20(8), 1307-1317. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9859-x
• Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 37-69. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015678915305
• Dağlı, A., & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of the satisfaction with life scale into Turkish: The study of validity and reliability]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(59). 1250-1262. DOI:10.17755/esosder.75955
• Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
• Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497-527. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y
• Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
• Dimitrova, R., & del Carmen, D. E. A. (2015). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale in Argentina, Mexico and Nicaragua. Social Inquiry into Well-being, 1, (1) 32-39. DOI: 10.13165/SIIW-15-1-1-04
• Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99(3), 413-429. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4
• Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E., & Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 177-205.
• Emerson, S. D., Guhn, M., & Gadermann, A. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: reviewing three decades of research. Quality of Life Research, 26(9), 2251-2264. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2
• Esnaola, I., Benito, M., Antonio-Agirre, I., Axpe, I., & Lorenzo, M. (2019). Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescence. Quality of Life Research, 1-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02224-7
• Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158-164. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158
• Geiser, C. (2012). Data Analysis with Mplus (Methodology in the Social Sciences). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 293-301. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-006-9036-7
• Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., Da Fonseca, P. N., & de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 267-277. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0
• Guhn, M., Ark, T. K., Emerson, S. D., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Gadermann, A. M. (2018). The Satisfaction with Life Scale adapted for Children: Measurement invariance across gender and over time. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1261. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000598
• Gündoğar, D., Gül, S. S., Uskun, E., Demirci, S., & Keçeci, D. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinde yaşam doyumunu yordayan etkenlerin incelenmesi [Investigation of the predictors of life satisfaction in university students]. Klinik Psikiyatri, 10(1), 14-27.
• Hinz, A., Conrad, I., Schroeter, M. L., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E., Zenger, M., ... & Herzberg, P. Y. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), derived from a large German community sample. Quality of Life Research, 27(6), 1661-1670. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1844-1
• Jang, S., Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Allen, T. D., Cooper, C. L., Lapierre, L. M., ... & Abarca, N. (2017). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale across 26 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(4), 560-576. DOI: 10.1177/0022022117697844
• Jovanović, V. (2017). Measurement invariance of the Serbian version of the satisfaction with life scale across age, gender, and time. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 555-563. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000410
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences. The Guilford Press: New York.
• Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Kaprio, J., Honkanen, R. J., Viinamäki, H., & Koskenvuo, M. (2005). The stability of life satisfaction in a 15-year follow-up of adult Finns healthy at baseline. BMC Psychiatry, 5(1), 4. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-5-4
• Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yaşam doyumu düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması [A comparison of life satisfaction of normal and delinquent adolescence] (Unpublished master’s thesis) Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Kyeunghae Lee, K., Brekke, J. S., Yamada, A. M., & Chou, C. P. (2010). Longitudinal invariance of the satisfaction with life scale for individuals with schizophrenia. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(2), 234-241. DOI: 10.1177/1049731509347860
• Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). How stable is happiness? Using the STARTS model to estimate the stability of life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(5), 1091-1098. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.005
• Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 127-143. DOI: 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90002-5
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525-543.
• Millsap, R. E., & Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2012). Investigating measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 380– 392). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Moksnes, U. K., Løhre, A., Byrne, D. G., & Haugan, G. (2014). Satisfaction with life scale in adolescents: Evaluation of factor structure and gender invariance in a Norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 657-671. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0451-3
• Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
• Özgür, G., Gümüş, A. B., & Durdu, B. (2010). Evde ve yurtta kalan üniversite öğrencilerinde yaşam doyumu [Life satisfaction of university students living at home or in the dormitory]. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 1(1), 25-32.
• Sachs, J. (2003). Validation of the satisfaction with life scale in a sample of Hong Kong university students. Psychologia, 46(4), 225-234. DOI: 0.2117/psysoc.2003.225
• Shevlin, M., Brunsden, V., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(5), 911-916. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00088-9
• Sovet, L., Atitsogbe, K. A., Pari, P., Park, M. S. A., & Villieux, A. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale in Togo: A three-step approach. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 66(5), 243-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2016.06.002
• Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 482. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482
• Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 92(1), 25. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-008-9295-7
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Tomás, J. M., Gutiérrez, M., Sancho, P., & Romero, I. (2015). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) by gender and age in Angola. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 182-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.008
• Tuzgöl-Dost, M. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam doyumunun bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Examining life satisfaction levels of university students in terms of some variables]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 2(22), 132-143.
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. DOI: 10.1177/109442810031002
• Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Longitudinal invariance analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 396-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.002
• Yetim, Ü. (1993). Life satisfaction: A study based on the organization of personal projects. Social Indicators Research, 29(3), 277-289.