Green Radiology: Sustainable Medical Imaging
Öz
Radiology units contribute significantly to the carbon footprint of the healthcare sector due to high energy consumption and waste production. This review article aims to examine strategies to reduce environmental impacts by addressing the concept of sustainable radiology. Current studies on sustainable radiology in the literature were analyzed and applications for energy consumption, water use, waste management and disposal of pharmaceutical waste were evaluated. Research shows that environmental impact can be reduced by adopting energy-saving devices, waste management, recycling and water-saving systems in radiology departments. In addition, ecological damage can be minimized by controlled use and disposal of contrast agents. Adoption of sustainable practices by radiology professionals can contribute to the prevention of environmental pollution and preservation of the ecological balance of the healthcare system. In this context, it is of great importance for health policies to encourage sustainable radiology practices.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Radiology, Radioactive Waste, Sustainable Development, Waste Management
Kaynakça
- 1.International Energy Agency. Global energy crisis: how the energy crisis started, how global energy markets are impacting our daily life, and what governments are doing about it. Published December 1, 2022. Accessed [01.01.2025]. https://www.iea.org/topics/global-energy-crisis
- 2.Hoeven E. Blackouts loom as record heat wave blankets California. Calmatters. Published September 7, 2022. Accessed [01.01.2025]. https://calmatters.org/newsletters/whatmatters/2022/09/california-heat-wave-blackouts/
- 3.Karliner JS, Boyd R, Ashby B, et al. Healthcare’s climate footprint: how the health sector contributes to the global climate crisis and opportunities for action. Healthcare Without Harm and ARUP. Published September 23, 2019. Accessed [02.01.2025]. https://noharm-global.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/5961/HealthCaresClimateFootprint_092319.pdf
- 4.Rocque RJ, Beaudoin C, Ndjaboue R, et al. Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333
- 5.Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW. The carbon footprint of a renal service in the United Kingdom. QJM. 2010;103(12):965-975. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcq150
- 6.Büttner L, Posch H, Auer TA, et al. Switching off for future: cost estimate and a simple approach to improving the ecological footprint of radiological departments. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;8:100320. doi:10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100320
- 7.Chua ALB, Amin R, Zhang J, et al. The environmental impact of interventional radiology: an evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from an academic interventional radiology practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(6):907-915. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.009
- 8.Brown MJ, Forster BB. Climate change: how radiologists can help. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022;73(3):456-457. doi: 10.1177/08465371211064217
- 9.Rawashdeh, M, Ali MA, McEntee M, et al. (2024). Green radiography: Exploring perceptions, practices, and barriers to sustainability. Radiography. 30(2024), S62–S73. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.019
- 10.Heye T, Knoerl R, Wehrle T, et al. The energy consumption of radiology: energy- and cost-saving opportunities for CT and MRI operation. Radiology. 2020;295(3):593-605. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192084