Expectations and Challenges of Small Ruminant Enterprises Regarding Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services: A Case Study of Van Province, Türkiye

Öz

The primary aim of this study is to assess the level of satisfaction of small ruminant farmers benefiting from Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services and to identify the challenges they face, their expectations, and their suggestions for improvement. This study was conducted on 58 small ruminant enterprises located in the İpekyolu, Gürpınar, Tuşba, Edremit, and Gevaş districts of the Van province, Türkiye. The inclusion criteria for the study were that the enterprises must be engaged in small ruminant breeding and actively utilize Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with enterprise owners using a structured survey with 55 questions. The primary objective of this research is to identify the expectations of these enterprises from consultancy services and the challenges encountered during this process. According to the research findings, younger enterprise owners utilize these services less frequently. The majority of the participants (%46.55) were primary school graduates. In terms of herd size, 37.93% of the enterprises owned 201 or more heads of livestock, while another 37.93% owned between 101 and 200 heads. The study revealed high levels of satisfaction, with 84.48% of the owners being "very satisfied" and 13.79% being "satisfied" with the services provided. Animal health and vaccination practices were identified as the leading areas of support received under the scope of the service (37.93%). Regarding the competence of service providers, 89.66% of the owners stated that the consultants were highly qualified, and all participants (100%) expressed that the consultants allocated sufficient time to them. The most frequently requested support areas by breeders were grants and subsidy applications (63.79%), followed by animal diseases (18.97%), agricultural mechanization (12.07%), and innovation in agricultural activities (5.17%). In conclusion, while small ruminant enterprises are generally satisfied with the Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services, it is recommended that these services be further expanded and strengthened.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Expectations
• challenges
• livestock
• agricultural extension
• consultancy service

Etik Beyan

KARAR NO 2025/17-05. Yürütücülüğünü Ziraat Fakültesi, Hayvan Yetiştirme ve Islahı Anabilim Dalı öğretim üyesi Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Hasan ÇELİKYÜREK’in yapmayı tasarladığı, "Van İli Küçükbaş Hayvancılık İşletmelerinin Tarımsal Yayım ve Danışmanlık Hizmetlerinden Beklentileri ve Çözüm Önerileri” adlı çalışmasının, ilgili kurumlardan izin almak ve kişisel hak ve hürriyetler kanununa dikkat edilmesi kaydıyla, Fen ve Mühendislik Etik Kuralları ve İlkeleri çerçevesinde herhangi bir sakınca olmadığına toplantıya katılan üyelerin oy birliğiyle karar verilmiştir.

Kaynakça

1. Abacı, N.İ., 2023a. Agricultural extension system in USA and evaluations in terms of Türkiye. The Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 9(Supplementary Issue 1): 62-79. (In Turkish).
2. Abacı, N.İ., 2023b. Challenges faced by agricultural advisors in Samsun province and proposed solutions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 11(11): 2137-2145. (In Turkish).
3. Anonymous, 2006. EK 1: Tarımsal Yayım ve Danışmanlık Hizmetlerinin Düzenlenmesine Dair Yönetmelik. Tarih: 8 Eylül 2006, Sayı No: 26283, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Resmi Gazete, Türkiye.
4. Anonymous, 2014. Tarımsal Yayım ve Danışmanlık Hizmetlerine Destekleme Ödemesi Yapılması Hakkında Tebliğ. Tarih: 4 Temmuz 2014, Tebliğ No: 2014/15, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Resmi Gazete, Türkiye.
5. Anonymous, 2016. Tarımsal Yayım ve Danışmanlık Hizmetlerine Destekleme Ödemesi Yapılması Hakkında Tebliğ. Tarih: 10 Ekim 2016, Tebliğ No: 2016/25, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Resmi Gazete, Türkiye.
6. Anonymous, 2019. IBM Corp, Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
7. Anonymous, 2024. 2025-2027 Yıllarında Yapılacak Bitkisel Üretime Yönelik Desteklemeler İle Diğer Bazı Tarımsal Desteklemelere Ödeme Yapılmasına Dair Tebliğ. Tarih: 31 Aralık 2024, Tebliğ No: 2024/39, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Resmi Gazete, Türkiye.
8. Anonymous, 2025. Tarımsal Danışmanlık Faaliyetleri. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, (https://www.tarim orman.gov.tr/Konular/Egitim-Ve-Yayim/Tarimsal-Danismanlik), (Accessed: 20.04.2025).

9. Aydın Eryılmaz, G., Kılıç, O., Boz, İ., Kaynakçı, C., 2020. Evaluating the adoption of agricultural innovations and information sources of dairy cattle farms: the case of Bafra and Canik districts of Samsun province, Turkey. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10(2): 1361-1369. (In Turkish).
10. Cengiz, N., 2018. A research on the efficiency of agricultural advisory and extension services: The case of Antalya. Ph.D. Thesis, Namık Kemal University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Tekirdağ, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
11. Durmuş, H., 2018. A study on developing agricultural extension and advisory system in Manisa. MSc Thesis, Akdeniz University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Antalya, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
12. İmamoğlu, H., Çobanoğlu, F., 2018. Impact assessment of agricultural consultancy service in Balıkesir region. Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science, 22(2): 263-274. (In Turkish).
13. Kılıç, O., Aydın Eryılmaz, G., 2020. Structural characteristics of dairy cattle farms in Samsun province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 7(3): 637-645. (In Turkish).
14. Kılıç, O., Yakıştıran, E., Boz, İ., 2026. Structural characteristics and problems of dairy cattle farms: The case of Amasya province, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(1): 50-58. (In Turkish).
15. Kızılaslan, N., Çukur, T., 2018. Local knowledge and it’s relation with agricultural extension. 2nd International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics, 27-28th April, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Alanya, Türkiye, pp. 132-141. (In Turkish).
16. Kızılaslan, N., Erdemir, S., 2013. Roles of agricultural advisors at agricultural extension and at advisory system and perspectives to the system (Tokat province central district survey). Gaziosmanpaşa Journal of Scientific Research, 6: 67-84. (In Turkish).
17. Kızılaslan, N., Ünal, Y., 2013. Detection of farmers’ awareness for agricultural extension (Tokat/Erbaa case). Gaziosmanpaşa Journal of Scientific Research, 5(2013): 1-9. (In Turkish).
18. Sever, A., Boz, İ., 2012. Tarım yayımcısı ve danışmanların iş memnuniyeti ve kaliteli hizmet vermesini etkileyen faktörler: Kahramanmaraş örneği. 10. Ulusal Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi, 5-7 Eylül, Konya, Türkiye, pp. 1103-1111. (In Turkish).
19. Şenyüz, E., Bahsi, N., 2023. Level of utilization of agricultural extension and advisory services and information sources of farmers in Amasya province, Turkey. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(2): 477-488. (In Turkish).
20. Şimşek, Y. B., Armağan, G., 2020. Perceived quality in agricultural extension and consultancy services: An application in Aydın province. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2): 150-169. (In Turkish).
21. Yumaklı, İ., 2023. 2024 Yılı Bütçe Sunuşu. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, (https://kutuphane.tarimorman.gov .tr/vufind/Record/1250774), Ankara, Türkiye.
22. Yurttaş, Z., Atsan, T., Keskin, A., 2009. Tarımsal Yayım ve İletişim Teknikleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Ofset Tesisi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 67, Erzurum, Türkiye.