An Evaluation of the Security Community Approach as a Pre-Constructivist Interation Theory

Öz

Ön İnşacı Bir Bütünleşme Teorisi Olarak Güvenlik Topluluğu Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Karl W. Deutsch ve ekibi tarafından II. Dünya Savaşı sonrası dönemde genel bir bütünleşme teorisi oluşturma iddiasıyla ortaya atılan ve özü itibarıyla İnşacılığın bir öncülü olan Güvenlik Topluluğu Yaklaşımı ele alınmıştır. Bütünleşmeyi açıklamada transaksiyonalist çerçeveyi ve “kolektif kimlik” değişkenini kullanan Yaklaşım, Soğuk Savaş’ın bitişiyle İnşacı Teorinin gündeme güçlü biçimde gelmesine kadar diğer bütünleşme teorileri kadar ilgi görmemiştir. Yeni dönemde İnşacı revizyon ile açıklayıcılığı güçlendirilen ve literatürde daha fazla konu edinilen Yaklaşım, ne var ki İnşacı ontolojisine rağmen “kolektif kimlik” değişkenine bütünleşme olgusu içerisinde yapısal belirleyici bir rol yüklemeye devam etmiştir. Bu çalışma, söz konusu değişkenin İnşacı literatürde son dönemde yer edinen “kolektif kimliklendirme” kavramı ile değiştirilmesinin Yaklaşımın tutarlılığını ve açıklayıcı gücünü güçlendireceğini ve bütünleşme çalışmalarında sıklıkla yer verilen “güvenlik topluluğu” kavramı kadar Yaklaşımın öngördüğü bütünleşme modelinin de ilgi görebileceğini iddia etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Karl W. Deutsch
• bütünleşme
• transaksiyonalizm
• inşacılık
• çoğulcu güvenlik topluluğu
• kolektif kimlik
• kimliklendirme.

Kaynakça

1. Acharya, Amitav, Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, (London: Routledge), 2001.
2. Adler, Emanuel, “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress”, içinde Progress in Postwar International Relations, edit. Emanuel Adler ve Beverly Crawford, (New York: Columbia University Press), 1991.
3. ______________, “Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 1997a, 26 (2), s.249-277.
4. ______________, “Seizing the Middle Ground Constructivism in World Politics”, European Journal of International Relations, 1997b, 3 (3), s.319-363.
5. ______________, “Constructivism and International Relations”, içinde Handbook of International Relations, edit. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse ve Beth A. Simmons, SAGE, 2002, s.112-144.
6. Adler, Emanuel ve Barnett, Michael, “Governing Anarchy: A Research Agenda for the Study of Security Communities”, Ethics & International Affairs, 1996, 10, s.63-98.
7. ______________, (edit.), Security Communities, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1998.
8. ______________, “Security Communities in Theoretical Perspective”, içinde Security Communities, edit. Emanuel Adler ve Michael Barnett, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1998a, s.3-28.

9. ______________, “A Framework for the Study of Security Communities”, içinde Security Communities, edit. Emanuel Adler ve Michael Barnett, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1998b, s.29-65.
10. ______________, “Studying Security Communities in Theory, Comparison, and History”, içinde Security Communities, edit. Emanuel Adler ve Michael Barnett, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1998c, s.429-430.
11. ______________, “Taking Identity and Our Critics Seriously”, Cooperation and Conflict, 2000, 35(3), s.321-329.
12. Adler, Emanuel ve Greve, Patricia, “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance”, Review of International Studies, 2009, 35 (1), s.59-84.
13. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Gözden Geçirlmiş Baskı, (London: Verso), 1991.
14. Bellamy, Alex, Security Communities and Their Neighbours: Regional Fortresses or Global Integrators?, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 2004.
15. Bjola, Corneliu ve Kornprobst, Markus, “Security Communities and the Habitus of Restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq”, Review of International Studies, 2007, 33, s.285-305.
16. Bremberg, Niklas, “The European Union as Security Community-Building Institution: Venues, Networks and Co-operative Security Practices”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2015, 53 (3), s.674-692.
17. Bucher, Bernd ve Jasper, Ursula, “Revisiting ‘Identity’ in International Relations: From Identity as Substance to Identifications in Action”, European Journal of International Relations, 2017, 23 (2), s.391-415.
18. Bucholtz, Mary ve Hall, Kira, Language and Identity. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, (Oxford: Blackwell), 2004.
19. Büyüktanır, Derya, “Toplumsal İnşacı Yaklaşım ve Avrupa Bütünleşmesinin Açıklanmasına Katkıları”, Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2015, 14 (2), s.1-24.
20. Cederman, Lars Erik, “Exclusion Versus Dilution: Real or Imagined Trade-off?”, içinde Constructing Europe’s Identity: The External Dimension, edit. Lars Erik Cederman, (USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers), 2001.
21. Checkel, Jeffrey T., “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework”, International Organization, 2005, 59(4), s.801-826.
22. ______________, “Social Construction and Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1999, 6(4), s.545-560.
23. ______________, “Why Comply: Social Learning and European Identity Change”, International Organization, 2001, 55(3), s.553-588.
24. ______________, “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory”, World Politics, 1998, 50 (2), s.324-348.
25. Dedeoğlu, Beril, “Yeniden Güvenlik Topluluğu: Benzerliklerin Karşılıklı Bağımlılığından Farklılıkların Birlikteliğine”, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 2004, 1, (4), s.1-23.
26. Deutsch, Karl W., Nationalism and Social Communication, (Cambridge: The MIT Press), 1953.
27. ______________, Political Community at the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement, (New York: Doubleday & Company), 1954.
28. ______________, “Communication Theory and Political Integration”, içinde The Integration of Political Communities, edit. Philip E. Jacob ve James V. Toscano, (Philadelphia, New York: J. B. Lippincott Company), 1964.
29. ______________, Nationalism and Its Alternatives, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf), 1969b.
30. ______________, The Analysis of International Relations, 2. Baskı, (Englewood: Prentice Hall), 1978.
31. ______________, Tides Among Nations, (New York: Free Press), 1979.
32. Deutsch, Karl W. et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, (USA: Greenwood Press), 1969a.
33. Deutsch, Karl W. ve Foltz, William J. (edit.), Nation-Building, (New York: Atherton Press), 1963.
34. Deutsch, Karl W. ve Merritt, Richard L., “Transnational Communications and the International System” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1979, 442, s.84-97.
35. Ditrych, Ondrej, “Security Community: A Future for a Troubled Concept?”, International Relations, 2014, 28 (3), s.350-366. Eilstrupp-Sangiovanni, Mette, Debates on European Integration, (UK: Red Globe Press), 2006.
36. Fligstein, Neil, “Who Are the Europeans and How Does This Matter for Politics?,” içinde European Identity, edit. Jeffrey T. Checkel ve Peter J. Katzenstein, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2009, s.132-166.
37. Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, (Cambridge: Polity Press), 1991.
38. ______________, The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structuration, (Berkeley: University of California Press), 1984.
39. Goff, Patricia M. ve Dunn, Kevin C., “Introduction: In Defense of Identity”, içinde Identity and Global Politics, edit. Patricia M. Goff ve Kevin C. Dunn, (USA: Palgrave Macmillan), 2004.
40. Guzzini, Stefano, “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations”, European Journal of International Relations, 2000, 6 (2), s.147-182.
41. Haas, Ernst B., “The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing”, içinde Regional Politics and World Order, edit. Richard A.Falk ve Saul H.Mendlovitz, (San Francisco: W.H.Freeman), 1973.
42. Hollis, Martin ve Smith, Steve, “Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations”, Review of International Studies, 1991, 17 (4), s.393-410.
43. Hopf, Ted, “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”, International Security, 1998, 23 (1), s.172-200.
44. Hyde-Price, Adrian, Security and Integration in Mitteleuropa: Towards a New Research Agenda, Paper Presented at the European Communities Studies Association, USA, 1997.
45. Jackson, Robert ve Sorenson, George, Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 5. Baskı, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 2006.
46. Jenkins, Richard, Social Identity, 3. Baskı, (USA and Canada: Routledge), 2008.
47. Karacasulu, Nilüfer ve Uzgören, Elif, “Explaining Social Constructivist Contributions to Security Studies”, Perceptions, 2007, s.27-48.
48. Karp, Regina, Military Capabilities and the Evolution of the Transatlantic Security Community, Swedish Institute of International Affairs, UI Papers, 2014.
49. Kolasi, Klevis, “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Sosyal Ontoloji Kavrayışının Meta-teorik Eleştirisi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2018, 13 (59), s.3-18.
50. Koschut, Simon, “Regional Order and Peaceful Change: Security Communities as Via Media in International Relations Theory”, Cooperation and Conflict, 2014, 49 (4), s.519-535.
51. Kratochwil, Friedrich ve Ruggie, John Gerard, “International Organisation: A State of the Art on an Art of the State”, International Organization, 1986, 40, (4), s.753-776.
52. Kucera, Tomas, “What European Army? Alliance, Security Community or Post-national Federation, International Politics, 2017, 56, s.321-338.
53. Kuhn, Theresa, “Individual Transnationalism, Globalisation and Euroscepticism: An Empirical Test of Deutsch’s Transactionalist Theory”, European Journal of Political Research, 2011, 50, s.811-837.
54. Lynch, Marc, State Interests and Public Spheres: The International Politics of Jordan’s Identity, (New York: Columbia University Press), 1999.
55. Mattern, Janice Bially, “The Power Politics of Identity”, European Journal of International Relations, 2001, 7(3), s.349-397.
56. McSweeney, Bill, Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2004.
57. Morse, Edward L., “Transnational Economic Processes”, içinde Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction, edit. Robert O.Keohane ve Joseph S. Nye, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), s.23-48.
58. Müller, Harald, A Theory of Decay of Security Communities with an Application to the Present State of the Atlantic Alliance, Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series, Institute of European Studies, (UC Berkeley), 2006.
59. Nelsen, Brent F. ve Stubb, Alexander, The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, 3. Baskı, 2003.
60. Nye, Joseph S., “Comparative Regional Integration: Concept and Measurement”, International Organization, 1968, 22 (4), s.855-880.
61. Onuf, Nicholas, "Constructivism: A User's Manual", içinde International Relations in a Constructed World, edit. Vendulka Kubálková, Nicholas Onuf ve Paul Kowert, (New York: M.E. Sharpe), 1998.
62. ______________, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press), 1989.
63. Pouliot, Vincent, “The Alive And Well Transatlantic Security Community: A Theoretical Reply To Michael Cox”, European Journal of International Relations, 2006, 12 (1), s.119-127.
64. Price, Richard ve Reus-Smit, Christian, “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism”, European Journal of International Relations, 1998, 4 (3), s.259-294.
65. Puchala, Donald, “The Integration Theorists and the Study of International Relations”, içinde The Global Agenda: Issues and Perspectives, edit. Charles W.Kegley ve Eugene R.Wittkopf, (New York: Random House), 1984.
66. Reus-Smit, Christian, “Constructivism”, içinde Theories of International Relations, 3. Baskı, edit., Scot Burchil et al., (USA: Palgrave Macmillan), 2005, 188-212.
67. Rieker, Pernille, Security, Integration and Identity Change, (NUPI Working Paper 611), 2000.
68. Ringmar, Erik, Identity, Interest and Action, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1996.
69. Risse, Thomas, “Beyond Iraq: The Crisis of the Transatlantic Security Community”, Die Friedens-Warte, 2003, 78 (2/3), s.173-193.
70. Rosamond, Ben, “Theories of Political Integration”, içinde The European Union Handbook, edit. Jackie Gower ve Ian Thomson, (London: Fitzroy Dearborn), 2002, s.37-49.
71. ______________, Theories of European Integration, (Great Britain: Palgrave), 2000.
72. Smith, Steve, “The Self-Images of A Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory”, içinde International Relations Today, 3. Baskı, edit. Ken Booth ve Steve Smith, 1997.
73. Stahl, Bernhard, Lucke, Robin ve Felfeli, Anna, “Comeback of the Transatlantic Security Community? Comparative Securitisation in the Crimea Crisis”, East European Politics, 2016, 32 (4), s.525-546.
74. Theys, Sarina, “Constructivism”, içinde International Relations Theory, edit., Stephen McGlinchey, Rosie Walters ve Christian Scheinpflug, (England: E-International Relations Publishing), 2017.
75. Tusicisny, Andrej, “Security Communities and Their Values: Taking Masses Seriously”, International Political Science Review, 2007, 28 (4), s.425-449.
76. Vesa, Unto, “Back to Deutsch. Integration, Peaceful Change, and Security Communities”, içinde Changes in the Northern Hemisphere (Research Report 52), edit. Kakönen Jyrki, (Tampere: Tampere Peace Research Institute), 1993, s.159-164.
77. Wagenen, Richard W. Van, “The Concept of Community and the Future of the United Nations”, International Organization, 1965, 19 (3), s.812-827.
78. Walker, R.B.J., Inside–Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1993.
79. Walt, Stephen M., “International Relations: One World Many Theories” Foreign Policy, 1998, 110, s.29-46.
80. Weaver, Carol, “Black Sea Regional Security: Present Multipolarity and Future Possibilities”, European Security, 2011, C.20, S.1, s.1-19.
81. Wendt, Alexander, “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory”, International Organization, 1987, 41, (3), s.335-370.
82. ______________, “Anarchy is What States Make of It”, International Organization, 1992, 46 (2), s.394-419.
83. ______________, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”, American Political Science Review, 1994, 88 (2), s.384-96.
84. ______________, “Constructing International Politics”, International Security, 1995, 20, (1), s.71-81.
85. ______________, “Identity and Structural Change in International Politics”, içinde Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, edit. Yosef Lapid ve Friedrich Kratochwil, (London, Boulder: Lynne Rienner), 1996.
86. ______________, Social Theory of International Politics, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1999.
87. ______________, Uluslararası Siyasetin Sosyal Teorisi, 2. Baskı, çev. Helin Sarı Ertem ve Suna Gülfer Ihlamur Öner, (İstanbul: Küre Yayınları), 2016.
88. Wiberg, Hakan, “Security Communities: Emmanuel Adler, Michael Barnett and Anomalous Northerners”, Cooperation and Conflict, 2000, 35 (3), s.289-298.
89. Williams Michael C. ve Neumann, Iver, “From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia and the Power of Identity”, Millennium, 2000, 29 (2), s.357-387.
90. Williams, Michael C., “Identity and the Politics of Security”, European Journal of International Relations, 1998, 4 (2), s.204-225.
91. Worchel, Stephen, “A Developmental View of the Search for Group Identity”, içinde Social Identity: International Perspectives, edit. Stephen Worchel et al., (London: SAGE Publications), 1998.
92. Zehfuss, Maja, Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2002.