The Perspectives of the European Union and Qatar on the 2022 World Cup

Öz

This study aims to investigate Qatar’s and the EU’s perspectives on the 2022 World Cup. Through a case study of the 2022 World Cup, the study evaluated the EU’s and Qatar’s views on the tournament using conceptual frameworks and the literature review approach, which involved gathering pertinent articles, political discourses, reports, books, etc. The concept of soft power has been used to analyze Qatar’s strategy. The concept of civilizing power has been applied to the EU’s perspective to examine these differing views, and it is the study’s original contribution. The study’s limitation is that it just examines the EU’s and Qatar’s discourses and actions toward the 2022 World Cup. The study has observed that Western nations, particularly those in the EU, emphasized concerns about Qatar’s democratic practices and human rights record, arguing that a country lacking these values should not host such an event. In contrast, Qatar saw the event as an opportunity to share its values and strengthen its position in the political arena.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• The Case of the 2022 World Cup
• the EU’s Civilizing Power
• Qatar’s Soft Power and Sport Diplomacy

Avrupa Birliği ve Katar’ın 2022 Dünya Kupası’na Dair Perspektifleri

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Katar ve AB’nin 2022 Dünya Kupası'na ilişkin bakış açılarını incelemektir. Çalışma, 2022 Dünya Kupası’na ilişkin vaka çalışması aracılığıyla, AB ve Katar’ın turnuvaya ilişkin bakış açılarını kavramsal çerçevelerle ve ilgili makaleler, siyasi söylemler, raporlar ve kitapların toplanmasını içeren literatür taraması yaklaşımını kullanarak değerlendirmiştir. Katar’ın iddialarını analiz etmek için yumuşak güç kavramı, AB’nin iddiaları açıklamak içinse medenileştirici güç kavramı kullanılmıştır ve bu durum çalışmanın özgün katkısını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın sınırlılıkları, sadece AB ve Katar’ın 2022 Dünya Kupası’na yönelik söylem ve eylemlerini incelemesidir. Çalışmada, özellikle AB ülkeleri başta olmak üzere Batılı ülkelerin, Katar’ın demokratik uygulamaları ve insan hakları sicili konusundaki endişelerini dile getirerek, bu değerlere sahip olmayan bir ülkenin böyle bir etkinliğe ev sahipliği yapmaması gerektiğini savunduklarını göstermektedir. Bun karşın, Katar, kendi değerlerini paylaşmak ve siyasi alandaki konumunu güçlendirmek için bu etkinliği bir fırsat olarak görmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 2022 Dünya Kupası Vakası
• AB’nin Medenileştirici Gücü
• Katar’ın Yumuşak Gücü ve Spor Diplomasisi

Kaynakça

1. Akşar, Tuğrul (2022). “Katar Dünya Futbol Şampiyonası’na ne Katar?” https://www.ekonomim.com/kose-yazisi/katar-dunya-futbol-sampiyonasina-nekatar/674691. (Accessed 07.11.2023).
2. Al Marri, Abdulrahman, and Hind Al Ansari (2023). “World Cup in Qatar: Human Rights and Normalization.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/88890 (Accessed 07.11.2023).
3. Al Thani, Mohammed (2021). “Channelling Soft Power: The Qatar 2022 World Cup, Migrant Workers, and International Image.” The International Journal of the History of Sport 38(17): 1729–52.
4. Al-Emadi, Ahmed, Abdel Latif Sellami, and Adam Mohamedali Fadlalla (2022). “The Perceived Impacts of Staging the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar.” Journal of Sport & Tourism 26(1): 1–20.
5. Al-Kubaisi, Hissa A. (2023). “The 2022 World Cup and Shifts in Qatar’s Foreign Policy.” Journal of Arabian Studies 13(1): 30-50.
6. Al-Naimi, Larbi Sadiki Rwoda, and Najla Al-Naimi (2018). “Self-Other Perceptions: ‘Worlding’ in the World Cup Al Jazeera Centre for Studies.” http://studies.aljazeera.net/en/reports/2018/01/perceptions-worlding-world-up180115093732638.html (Accessed 07.11.2023).
7. AlKhalifa, Hussa K., & Farello, Anna (2021). The soft power of Arab women’s football: changing perceptions and building legitimacy through social media. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(2): 241-257.
8. Ataman, Muhittin (2022). “World Cup 2022: Massive Hypocrisy of the West toward Qatar |Column.” Daily Sabah. https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/world-cup2022-massive-hypocrisy-of-the-west-toward-qatar (Accessed 07.11.2023).

9. Atlı, Altay (2022). “Katar 2022 Dünya Kupası: Tartışmalar, ekonomik ve jeopolitik boyutları.” Fikir Turu. https://fikirturu.com/ekonomi/katar-2022-dunya-kupasi-tartismalarekonomik-ve-jeopolitik-boyutlari/ (Accessed: 07.11.2023).
10. Barbé, Esther, and Pol Morillas (2019). “The EU Global Strategy: The Dynamics of a More Politicized and Politically Integrated Foreign Policy.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32(6): 753–70.
11. BBC (2022). “Katar 2022: Tarihin en tartışmalı Dünya Kupası olabilir mi?” BBC News Türkçe. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/cd1g1d2ndjko (Accessed 07.11.2023).
12. Beck, Peter (2020). “Conclusion:‘Good Kicking’ Is Not Only ‘Good Politics’ but Also ‘Good Diplomacy.’” Heather L. Dichter (ed.) Soccer Diplomacy: International Relations and Football Since 1914 (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky): 221-51.
13. Bianco, Cinzia, and Sebastian Sons (2023). “More than a Game: Football and Soft Power in the Gulf.” The International Spectator 58(2): 92–106.
14. Brannagan, Paul Michael, and Richard Giulianotti (2018). “Soft Power and Soft Disempowerment: Qatar, Global Sport and Football’s 2022 World Cup Finals.” Jonathan Grix (ed.). Leveraging Mega-Event Legacies (Routledge.): 89–105.
15. Brannagan, Paul Michael, Danyel Reiche, and Lorraine Bedwell. (2023). “Mass Social Change and Identity Hybridization: The Case of Qatar and the 2022 FIFA World Cup.” Identities 30 (6): 900-918.
16. Britannica (2025). “Government and Society” https://www.britannica.com/place/Qatar/Government-and-society (Accessed 06.03.2025).
17. Britannica (2025). “History of Qatar” https://www.britannica.com/place/Qatar/History (Accessed 06.03.2025). Cebeci, E. Münevver (2015). “İdeal Güç Avrupa: Avrupa Birliği-Türkiye İlişkileri Üzerinden Bir Çözümleme.” Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 23(2): 41–57.
18. Çelik Yücel, Efsun. (2018). “The EU and the Mediterranean: A Postcolonial Analysis.” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of European Studies, Department of European Union Politics and International Relations, Türkiye.
19. Çetin, Cem. (2022). “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Bir Kamu Diplomasisi Aracı Olarak Spor: ABD ve Katar Örnekleri.” Journal of Health and Sport Sciences 5(2): 35–46.
20. Craig, Matt (2022). “The Money Behind The Most Expensive World Cup In History: Qatar 2022 By The Numbers” https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattcraig/2022/11/19/themoney-behind-the-most-expensive-world-cup-in-history-qatar-2022-by-thenumbers/ (Accessed 04.03.2025).
21. Del Sarto, Raffaella A (2016). “Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, Its Borderlands, and the ‘Arab Spring.’” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54(2): 215–32.
22. Dichter, Heather L (2020). “‘Football More Important than Berlin’: East German Football vs. NATO, 1960-64.” Heather L. Dichter (ed.) Soccer Diplomacy: International Relations and Football Since 1914 (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky):116-137.
23. Dorsey, James M. (2022). “The Qatar World Cup: Footballing for Soft Power.” RSIS Commentaries, (no:104). https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/bitstream/10356/162718/2/CO22104.pdf (accessed 04.03.2025).
24. Dun, Susan (2014). “No Beer, No Way! Football Fan Identity Enactment Won’t Mix with Muslim Beliefs in the Qatar 2022 World Cup.” Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events 6(2): 186–99.
25. Dun, Susan (2023). “The Game is Still Beautiful without Beer: Qatar 2022’s New Model for Alcohol Availability at the FIFA World Cup.” Journal of Arabian Studies 13(1): 195–218.
26. Elsey, Brenda (2020). “‘Because We Have Nothing’: The 1962 World Cup and Cold War Politics in Chile.” Heather L. Dichter (ed.) Soccer Diplomacy: International Relations and Football Since 1914 (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky): 94-115.
27. Euronews (2023). “How Qatar Delivered on Its 2022 Promise.” Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2023/01/05/fifa-world-cup-qatar-2022-how-qatardelivered-on-its-promise (Accessed 07.11.2023).
28. Fadila, Havvanur (2022). “Qatar World Cup: The West’s Eurocentric and Orientalist View |Opinion.” Daily Sabah. https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/qatar-world-cupthe-wests-eurocentric-and-orientalist-view (Accessed 07.11.2023).
29. Government Communications Office (2025). “Qatar National Vision 2030 A Roadmap for Transformation” https://www.gco.gov.qa/en/state-of-qatar/qatar-national-vision2030/our-story/ (Accessed 06.03.2025).
30. Griffin, Thomas Ross (2019). “National Identity, Social Legacy and Qatar 2022: The Cultural Ramifications of FIFA’s First Arab World Cup.” Soccer & Society, 20(7–8): 1000–1013.
31. Henderson, Joan C. (2014). “Hosting the 2022 FIFA World Cup: Opportunities and Challenges for Qatar.” Journal of Sport & Tourism 19(3–4): 281–98.
32. Kaplan, Hilal. (2022). “Dünya Kupası artık gerçekten ‘Dünya’ Kupası.” Sabah. https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/hilalkaplan/2022/11/22/dunya-kupasi-artikgercekten-dunya-kupasi (Accessed 07.11.2023).
33. Lahm, Philipp. (2022). “Holding the World Cup in Qatar Has Damaged Football and I Will Not Be Going.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2022/nov/15/world-cup-qatar-damaged-football-philipp-lahm (Accessed 07.11.2023).
34. Lo, Alioune Aboutalib. (2023). “Leveraging Sports for Public Diplomacy Outcomes: The Case of Qatar’s FIFA World Cup 2022.” Anadolu Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5(1): 33–49.
35. Mikelis, Kyriakos. (2016). “From Civilizing Mission to Soft Power? European Powers and the Politics of Attraction.” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Europe in Discourse: Identity, Diversity, Borders Athens, September 23-25, 2016. 73-86.
36. Miller, Alex (2022). “Qatar's World Cup cash bonanza” https://abmagazine.accaglobal.com/global/articles/2022/nov/business/qatar-s-world-cup-cash-bonanza.html (Accessed 04.03.2025).
37. Mitzen, Jennifer. (2006). “Anchoring Europe’s Civilizing Identity: Habits, Capabilities and Ontological Security.” Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 270–85.
38. Nye Joseph. S. (2008). The Powers to Lead. Oxford University Press.
39. Nye, Joseph S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs Books, New York.
40. Nygård, Håvard Mokleiv & Gates, Scott (2013). Soft power at home and abroad: Sport diplomacy, politics and peace-building. International area studies review, 16(3): 235-243.
41. Oyman, Nihat (2023). “Dindarlığın Değişen Yüzü Ekseninde Spor Organizasyonları: Katar 2022 Dünya Kupası Örneği.” Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8(1): 39–50.
42. Parliament, European. (2021). “The 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar Turning the Spotlight on Workers’rights.” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2021)698856 (Accessed 07.11.2023).
43. Parliament, European. (2022). “P9_TA (2022)0427 Situation of Human Rights in the Context of the FIFA World Cup in Qatar European Parliament Resolution of 24 November 2022 on the Situation of Human Rights in the Context of the FIFA World Cup in Qatar (2022/2948(RSP)).” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0427_EN.html (Accessed 07.11.2023).
44. Pomeranz, Kenneth (2005). “Empire & ‘civilizing’ missions, Past & Present.” Daedalus 134(2): 34–45.
45. Reiche, Danyel (2023). “Introduction: Qatar’s World Cup Goals – Domestic Development and Global Influence.” Journal of Arabian Studies 13(1): 1–11.
46. Reuters (2022). “World Cup 2022: Why Is Qatar a Controversial Location for the Tournament?” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/world-cup-2022-why-is-qatarcontroversial-location-fifa-tournament-2022-11-15/ (Accessed 07.11.2023).
47. Shearer, Derek (2014). “To Play Ball, Not Make War.” Harvard International Review, 36(1): 53-57.
48. Siccardi, Francesco (2022). “Has the World Cup Changed Qatar?” Carnegie Europe. https://carnegieeurope.eu/2022/10/24/has-world-cup-changed-qatar-pub-88214 (Accessed 07.11.2023).
49. Simón, Juan Antonio (2020). “Football, Diplomacy, and International Relations during Francoism, 1937–1975.” Heather L. Dichter (ed.) Soccer Diplomacy: International Relations and Football Since 1914 (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky): 48-69.
50. Snyder, Sarah B. (2020). “Playing on the Same Team: What International and Sport Historians Can Learn from Each Other.” Heather L. Dichter (ed.) Soccer Diplomacy: International Relations and Football Since 1914 (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky): 18-30.
51. Solomon, Ty. (2014). “The Affective Underpinnings of Soft Power.” European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 720–741.
52. Sözmen, Mithat Fabian. (2022). “Katar 2022’deki sorun ‘insan hakları’nın ötesinde.” Evrensel.net. https://www.evrensel.net/yazi/88430/katar-2022deki-sorun-insanhaklari-nin-otesinde (Accessed 07.11.2023). Stivachtis, Yannis A. (2018). “The ‘Civilizing’ Empire: The European Union and the MENA Neighborhood.” Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies 4(2): 91–106.
53. Thani, Salma, and Tom Heenan (2017). “The Ball May Be Round but Football Is Becoming Increasingly Arabic: Oil Money and the Rise of the New Football Order.” Soccer & Society 18(7): 1012–1026.
54. Whitman, Richard. (2011). Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Springer.
55. Zayadin, Hiba (2021). “Migrant Workers and the Qatar World Cup” Human Rights Watch, https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/08/02/migrant-workers-and-qatar-world-cup (Accessed 04.03.2025).
56. Zeigler, Mark (2022). “Column: Will Our Conscience Allow Us to Shut up and Watch This World Cup?” San Diego Union-Tribune. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/ sports/soccer/story/2022-11-14/soccer-world-cup-qatar-fifa-corruption-migrantworkers-heat-stadiums-football-zeigler-column (Accessed 07.11.2023).
57. Zielonka, Jan. (2001). “The Ideology of Empire: The EU’s Normative Power Discourse.” İn 2001 Dahrendorf Symposium LSE & Stiftung Mercator.
58. Zielonka, Jan. (2013). “Europe’s New Civilizing Missions: The EU’s Normative Power Discourse.” Journal of Political Ideologies 18(1): 35–55