Araştırma Makalesi

International Relations Theory as a Social Science

Sayı: 25 1 Mayıs 1995
  • Burcu Bostanoğlu
PDF İndir
EN TR

International Relations Theory as a Social Science

Öz

Alıhough its subjcct mattcr covcrs dccisions and pratiqucs whose
dircct or indirect influcncc on thc livcs of statcs, countries and thcreforc,
individuals cannot bc neglectcd, thc study of intcrnational Relations (IR) has
yet failcd to achicvc a status of proper scicncc. This essay inquires the
relative position of thc disciplinc versus general social thcory, its
comparative povcrty in thc cpistcmological1
and mcthodological altcrnative
approachcs and poses the question vvhether this povcrty is an outeome of the
thcorctical povcrty; or more concisely, thc domination of the disciplinc by
onc single paradigm for half a ccntury: Rcalism. So far, thc study contends,
thc political and social milicu in vvhich intcrnational Relations has developed
as an acadcmic pursuit, vvas not sufficiently ripe for a compctition of
theoretical pcrspcclivcs. Thc occurrcnccs of the last tvvo dccadcs in thc ficld
have refleeted on the pcrception and conccptuali/.ation of statcs' relations vvilh
cach other and on a plethora of thcorctical approachcs the basic tenet of vvhich
is an opposilion to ıhc posilivist orienied realist thcory of IR.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Gabricl Almond and G. Bingham Povvell, Comparative Politics: System, Process and Policy, Boston, Liltlc Brovvn Pub., , 1978.
  2. Büşra Ersanlı Behar, İktidar ve Tarih: Türkiye'de Resmi Tarih Tezinin Oluşumu (1929-1937), İstanbul, Afa Yayınları, 1992.
  3. Montgomcry Norman Birnbaum, The Radical Renewal: The Politics of Ideas in Modern America, Nevv York, Panthcon, 1988.
  4. T.B. Bottomore, Toplumbilim, Çcv. Ünsal Oskay, Ankara, Doğan Yayınları, 1977.
  5. James Der Dcrian, Michacl Shapiro, International Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, Lcxington, Lcxington Books, 1989.
  6. Stephcn Gill, American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission, Cambridgc, Cambridge Univcrsity Press, 1990.
  7. S. Gill, D. Law, The Global Political Economy, Perspectives, Problems and Policies, Whcatshcaf, Hertfordshire, Harvestcr, 1988.
  8. 1995] INTERNATIONAL RELATİONS THEORY AS SOCİAL SCIENCE

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Siyaset Bilimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Burcu Bostanoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mayıs 1995

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Ocak 1995

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1995 Sayı: 25

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bostanoğlu, B. (1995). International Relations Theory as a Social Science. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 25, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000119
AMA
1.Bostanoğlu B. International Relations Theory as a Social Science. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 1995;(25):105-116. doi:10.1501/Intrel_0000000119
Chicago
Bostanoğlu, Burcu. 1995. “International Relations Theory as a Social Science”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, sy 25: 105-16. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000119.
EndNote
Bostanoğlu B (01 Mayıs 1995) International Relations Theory as a Social Science. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 25 105–116.
IEEE
[1]B. Bostanoğlu, “International Relations Theory as a Social Science”, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, sy 25, ss. 105–116, May. 1995, doi: 10.1501/Intrel_0000000119.
ISNAD
Bostanoğlu, Burcu. “International Relations Theory as a Social Science”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 25 (01 Mayıs 1995): 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000119.
JAMA
1.Bostanoğlu B. International Relations Theory as a Social Science. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 1995;:105–116.
MLA
Bostanoğlu, Burcu. “International Relations Theory as a Social Science”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, sy 25, Mayıs 1995, ss. 105-16, doi:10.1501/Intrel_0000000119.
Vancouver
1.Burcu Bostanoğlu. International Relations Theory as a Social Science. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 01 Mayıs 1995;(25):105-16. doi:10.1501/Intrel_0000000119