Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey

Yıl 2002, Sayı: 33, 53 - 75, 01.05.2002
https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000060

Öz

The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey

Yıl 2002, Sayı: 33, 53 - 75, 01.05.2002
https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000060

Öz

This article deals with international norms influencing foreign policy of a state. It looks at the extent to which the OSCE human rights norms influence foreign policy. It also presents the results of a questionnaire survey carried out in Turkey. As far as the types of norms are concerned, the OSCE human rights norms have been divided into substantive and non-substantive norms. The following conceptual hypothesis has been constructed: nonsubstantive human rights provisions of the OSCE documents have more influence than substantive ones on foreign policy with a human rights objective. The research has shown that the OSCE human rights norms guide the decision-making process of foreign policy with a human rights objective. It has also shown that non-substantive human rights provisions of the OSCE documents guide the decision-making process of foreign policy with a human rights objective more than substantive human rights provisions. It is, hovvever, important to note the fact that Turkey has human rights problems, and is in the way of becoming Europeanised, has affected the extent of guidance of the OSCE human rights norms in foreign policy

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Siyaset Bilimi
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Fatih Karaosmanoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2002
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2002 Sayı: 33

Kaynak Göster

APA Karaosmanoğlu, F. (2002). The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations(33), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000060