Görüş Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

LOGISTICS 4.0 AND HYPER-CONNECTED URBAN LOGISTICS

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 2, 76 - 92, 29.06.2025

Öz

With the recent developments in the world, new trade routes are developing. This situation is changing the direction of movement of global trade moving cargo. For this reason, it is important to make our cities more resilient. While transforming our cities with constantly changing high technologies, necessary precautions should also be taken against the negative situations caused by climate change. This is possible with the collaborative approach of all actors in the city. For this reason, a conceptual framework for hyper-connected urban logistics has been created in our study to express this paradigm shift. In the second part of the study, urban logistics and its stakeholders are explained, and in the third part, the concept of logistics 4.0 hyper-connected logistics cities is explained. In the conclusion part of the study, suggestions for future studies are made.

Kaynakça

  • Bektas, T., Crainic, T. G., & van Woensel, T. (2017). From managing urban freight to smart city logistics networks. In K. Gakis & P. Pardalos (Eds.), Network design and optimization for smart cities (pp. 143–188). World Scientific.
  • Canitez, F. (2019). Pathways to sustainable urban mobility in developing megacities: A socio-technical transition perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 319–329.
  • Crainic, T. G., & Montreuil, B. (2016). Physical internet enabled hyperconnected city logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.074
  • Crainic, T. G., Klibi, W., & Montreuil, B. (2023). Hyperconnected city logistics: A conceptual framework. In Handbook on city logistics and urban freight (pp. 398–421). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Dolati Neghabadi, P., Evrard Samuel, K., & Espinouse, M. L. (2019). Systematic literature review on city logistics: Overview, classification and analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 865–887.
  • Fernandez, M. A., & Marín, V. (2020). Towards a more hyperconnected, smart, and sustainable urban logistics: Development and applications of urban logistics platforms 4.0. 2020 IEEE 13th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA49782.2020.9353917
  • Frazzon, E., Rodriguez, C. M., Pereira, M., Pires, M., & Uhlmann, I. (2019). Towards supply chain management 4.0. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2).
  • Gül, A., & Çobanoğlu, Ş. (2017). Avrupa’da akıllı kent uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi ve Çanakkale’nin akıllı kente dönüşümünün analizi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(Kayfor 15 Özel Sayısı), 1543–1565.
  • Hu, W., Dong, J., Hwang, B. G., Ren, R., & Chen, Z. (2019). A scientometrics review on city logistics literature: Research trends, advanced theory and practice. Sustainability, 11(10), 2724.
  • Kaur, R., & Awasthi, A. (2018). City logistics: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management, 1(2), 160–188.
  • Kim, N., Montreuil, B., Klibi, W., & Kholgade, N. (2021). Hyperconnected urban fulfillment and delivery. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 145, 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102104
  • Lindholm, M., & Browne, M. (2013). Local authority cooperation with urban freight stakeholders: A comparison of partnership approaches. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13(1), 20–38.
  • Montreuil, B. (2011). Toward a physical internet: Meeting the global logistics sustainability grand challenge. Logistics Research, 3, 71–87.
  • Murillo, D., Buckland, H., & Val, E. (2017). When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 66–76.
  • Nathanail, E., Gogas, M., & Adamos, G. (2016). Smart interconnections of interurban and urban freight transport towards achieving sustainable city logistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.078
  • Nathanail, E., Karakikes, I., Mitropoulos, L., & Adamos, G. (2021). A sustainability cross-case assessment of city logistics solutions. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(1), 219–240.
  • OECD. (2003). Delivering the goods: 21st century challenges to urban goods transport. OECD Publications. https://www.itf-oecd.org/delivering-goods-21st-centurychallenges- urban-goods-transport
  • Paddeu, D., Fancello, G., & Fadda, P. (2017). An experimental customer satisfaction index to evaluate the performance of city logistics services. Transport, 32(3), 262–271.
  • Rodrigue, J. P., & Dablanc, L. (n.d.). What is city logistics? In J. P. Rodrigue (Ed.), City logistics: Concepts, policy and practice. MetroFreight Consortium, Dept. of Global Studies & Geography, Hofstra University. https://globalcitylogistics.org/
  • Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., Montreuil, B. (2014a). Analogies between internet network and logistics service networks: Challenges involved in the interconnection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(6), 1207–1219.
  • Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., Hakimi, D., & Montreuil, B. (2014b). Interconnected logistic networks and protocols: Simulation-based efficiency assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 52(11), 3185–3208.
  • Tadić, S., Zečević, S., & Krstić, M. (2015). City logistics – status and trends. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, (in press).
  • Taniguchi, E., & Van Der Heijden, R. E. (2000). An evaluation methodology for city logistics. Transport Reviews, 20(1), 65–90.
  • Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R. G., Yamada, T., & van Duin, R. (2001). City logistics: Network modelling and intelligent transport systems. Pergamon.
  • Taniguchi, E., & Tamagawa, D. (2005). Evaluating city logistics measures considering the behavior of several stakeholders. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 3062–3076.
  • Taniguchi, E., Imanishi, Y., Barber, R., James, J., & Debauche, W. (2014). Public sector governance to implement freight vehicle transport management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 345–357.

LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 2, 76 - 92, 29.06.2025

Öz

Dünyada yaşanan son gelişmelerle birlikte yeni ticaret yolları gelişiyor. Bu durum küresel ticaret hareket eden yüklerin hareket yönünü değiştiriyor. Bu sebeple şehirlerimizi daha dirençli hale getirmemiz önemli. Sürekli değişen yüksek teknolojilerle şehirlerimizi dönüştürürken aynı zamanda iklim değişikliğinden kaynaklanan olumsuz durumlara karşı da gerekli önlemlerin alınması gerekir. Bu da şehirdeki tüm aktörlerin işbirlikçi yaklaşımı ile mümkündür. Bu sebeple çalışmamızda bir paradigma değişikliğini ifade eden hiper bağlantılı kentsel lojistiğe ilişkin kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmanın ikinci bölümünde kentsel lojistik ve paydaşları, üçüncü bölümde ise lojistik 4.0 hiper bağlantılı lojistik şehirler kavramı açıklanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuç bölümünde ise ileriye yönelik çalışmalara ilişkin öneriler getirilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Bektas, T., Crainic, T. G., & van Woensel, T. (2017). From managing urban freight to smart city logistics networks. In K. Gakis & P. Pardalos (Eds.), Network design and optimization for smart cities (pp. 143–188). World Scientific.
  • Canitez, F. (2019). Pathways to sustainable urban mobility in developing megacities: A socio-technical transition perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 319–329.
  • Crainic, T. G., & Montreuil, B. (2016). Physical internet enabled hyperconnected city logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.074
  • Crainic, T. G., Klibi, W., & Montreuil, B. (2023). Hyperconnected city logistics: A conceptual framework. In Handbook on city logistics and urban freight (pp. 398–421). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Dolati Neghabadi, P., Evrard Samuel, K., & Espinouse, M. L. (2019). Systematic literature review on city logistics: Overview, classification and analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 865–887.
  • Fernandez, M. A., & Marín, V. (2020). Towards a more hyperconnected, smart, and sustainable urban logistics: Development and applications of urban logistics platforms 4.0. 2020 IEEE 13th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA49782.2020.9353917
  • Frazzon, E., Rodriguez, C. M., Pereira, M., Pires, M., & Uhlmann, I. (2019). Towards supply chain management 4.0. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2).
  • Gül, A., & Çobanoğlu, Ş. (2017). Avrupa’da akıllı kent uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi ve Çanakkale’nin akıllı kente dönüşümünün analizi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(Kayfor 15 Özel Sayısı), 1543–1565.
  • Hu, W., Dong, J., Hwang, B. G., Ren, R., & Chen, Z. (2019). A scientometrics review on city logistics literature: Research trends, advanced theory and practice. Sustainability, 11(10), 2724.
  • Kaur, R., & Awasthi, A. (2018). City logistics: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management, 1(2), 160–188.
  • Kim, N., Montreuil, B., Klibi, W., & Kholgade, N. (2021). Hyperconnected urban fulfillment and delivery. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 145, 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102104
  • Lindholm, M., & Browne, M. (2013). Local authority cooperation with urban freight stakeholders: A comparison of partnership approaches. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13(1), 20–38.
  • Montreuil, B. (2011). Toward a physical internet: Meeting the global logistics sustainability grand challenge. Logistics Research, 3, 71–87.
  • Murillo, D., Buckland, H., & Val, E. (2017). When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 66–76.
  • Nathanail, E., Gogas, M., & Adamos, G. (2016). Smart interconnections of interurban and urban freight transport towards achieving sustainable city logistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.078
  • Nathanail, E., Karakikes, I., Mitropoulos, L., & Adamos, G. (2021). A sustainability cross-case assessment of city logistics solutions. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(1), 219–240.
  • OECD. (2003). Delivering the goods: 21st century challenges to urban goods transport. OECD Publications. https://www.itf-oecd.org/delivering-goods-21st-centurychallenges- urban-goods-transport
  • Paddeu, D., Fancello, G., & Fadda, P. (2017). An experimental customer satisfaction index to evaluate the performance of city logistics services. Transport, 32(3), 262–271.
  • Rodrigue, J. P., & Dablanc, L. (n.d.). What is city logistics? In J. P. Rodrigue (Ed.), City logistics: Concepts, policy and practice. MetroFreight Consortium, Dept. of Global Studies & Geography, Hofstra University. https://globalcitylogistics.org/
  • Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., Montreuil, B. (2014a). Analogies between internet network and logistics service networks: Challenges involved in the interconnection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(6), 1207–1219.
  • Sarraj, R., Ballot, E., Pan, S., Hakimi, D., & Montreuil, B. (2014b). Interconnected logistic networks and protocols: Simulation-based efficiency assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 52(11), 3185–3208.
  • Tadić, S., Zečević, S., & Krstić, M. (2015). City logistics – status and trends. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, (in press).
  • Taniguchi, E., & Van Der Heijden, R. E. (2000). An evaluation methodology for city logistics. Transport Reviews, 20(1), 65–90.
  • Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R. G., Yamada, T., & van Duin, R. (2001). City logistics: Network modelling and intelligent transport systems. Pergamon.
  • Taniguchi, E., & Tamagawa, D. (2005). Evaluating city logistics measures considering the behavior of several stakeholders. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 3062–3076.
  • Taniguchi, E., Imanishi, Y., Barber, R., James, J., & Debauche, W. (2014). Public sector governance to implement freight vehicle transport management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 345–357.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Akıllı Hareketlilik
Bölüm Görüş Makalesi
Yazarlar

Atiye Tümenbatur

Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Nisan 2025
Kabul Tarihi 17 Haziran 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Haziran 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Tümenbatur, A. (2025). LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı(2), 76-92.
AMA Tümenbatur A. LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı. Haziran 2025;(2):76-92.
Chicago Tümenbatur, Atiye. “LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK”. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı, sy. 2 (Haziran 2025): 76-92.
EndNote Tümenbatur A (01 Haziran 2025) LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı 2 76–92.
IEEE A. Tümenbatur, “LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK”, Ulaştırma ve Altyapı, sy. 2, ss. 76–92, Haziran2025.
ISNAD Tümenbatur, Atiye. “LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK”. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı 2 (Haziran2025), 76-92.
JAMA Tümenbatur A. LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı. 2025;:76–92.
MLA Tümenbatur, Atiye. “LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK”. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı, sy. 2, 2025, ss. 76-92.
Vancouver Tümenbatur A. LOJİSTİK 4.0 ve HİPER BAĞLANTILI KENTSEL LOJİSTİK. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı. 2025(2):76-92.