MALZEME AKIŞ MALİYET MUHASEBESİ: BİR ÜRETİM İŞLETMESİ UYGULAMASI

Öz

Çevre yönetim muhasebe sistemlerinden biri olan Malzeme Akış Maliyet Muhasebesi (MAMM) yöntemi, işletme faaliyetleri sonucu ortaya çıkan malzeme, enerji, sistem ve atıkların çevresel etkilerini değerlendirmek amacıyla geliştirilmiş çevre odaklı bir yönetim muhasebesi yaklaşımıdır. Bu yöntem, işletme yönetiminin daha rasyonel ve sürdürülebilir kararlar almasını sağlamayı hedeflemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı MAMM yönteminin bir çelik kapı imalat işletmesinin maliyet sistemine entegrasyonunu ve bu yöntemle elde edilen verilerin çevresel ve ekonomik etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada hedef ürün olarak Lüks Kabartma PVC ürünü seçilmiş ve üretim sürecinde ortaya çıkan malzeme, enerji, sistem ve atık maliyetleri hesaplanmıştır. Uygulama sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, üretim kaybının en yüksek oranda gerçekleştiği aşamanın Kalite Kontrol ve Ambalajlama (%100) olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, malzeme kayıpları işletmenin üretim maliyetlerinin %7,23’ünü oluştururken geri dönüştürülen malzeme miktarı sadece %0,22’sini oluşturmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Malzeme Akış Maliyet Muhasebe
• Çevre Yönetim Muhasebesi
• Çevresel Performans
• ISO 14051

MATERIAL FLOW COST ACCOUNTING: A CASE STUDY IN A MANUFACTURING BUSINESS

Öz

Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCCA) method, which is one of the environmental management accounting systems, is an environment-oriented management accounting approach developed to evaluate the environmental impacts of materials, energy, systems and wastes resulting from business activities. This method aims to enable business management to make more rational and sustainable decisions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the integration of the MAMM method into the cost system of a steel door manufacturing company and the environmental and economic impacts of the data obtained with this method. In the study, Luxury Embossed PVC product was selected as the target product and material, energy, system and waste costs arising in the production process were calculated. The findings obtained as a result of the application show that the stage with the highest rate of production loss is Quality Control and Packaging (100%). In addition, while material losses constitute 7.23% of the production costs of the enterprise, the amount of recycled material constitutes only 0.22%.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Material Flow Cost Accounting
• Environmental Management Accounting
• Environmental Performance
• ISO 14051

Kaynakça

1. Albez, A. (2022). Malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesi uygulama adımları, hedef ve ilkeler. The International New Issues in Social Sciences 10 (2), 221-246.
2. APO. (2014). Manual on Material Flow Cost Accounting: ISO 14051. Asian Productivity Organization https://www.apo-tokyo.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Manual_on_Material_Flow_Cost_Accounting_ISO14051-2014.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 04.09.202.
3. Andriani, N., & Suhartini, D. (2020). Analysis of environmental management accounting reporting in creating sustainable development. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 12(2), 240-256.
4. Bierer, A., Götze, U., Meynerts, L., & Sygulla, R. (2015), Integrating life cycle costing and life cycle assessment using extended material flow cost accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1289-1301.
5. Büyükarıkan, U. (2021). Malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesinin tarım makineleri işletmesinde uygulanması. Journal of Vocational and Social Sciences of Turkey, 3(6), 19-5.
6. Can A.V. & Aliusta H. (2020). Malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesi (Bir çevresel maliyetleme modeli). Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
7. Christ, K. L. & Burritt, R. L. (2015). Material flow cost accounting: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1378-1389.
8. Dekamin, M. & Barmaki, M. (2019). Implementation of material flow cost accounting (MFCA) in soybean production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 459-465.

9. Huang, S. Y., Chiu, A. A. & Chao, P. C. ve Wang, N. (2019). The application of material flow cost accounting in waste reduction. Sustainability, 11 (1270), 1-27.
10. Ichimura, H. & Takakuwa, S. (2013). Decision making on manufacturing system from the perspective of material flow cost accounting. Winter Simulations Conference (WSC), Washington, USA, 1973-1983.
11. IPOINT (2015). Material flow cost accounting: Resource efficiency made simple, https://www.ipoint-systems.com/blog/material-flow-cost-accounting-resource-efficiency-made-simple/ Erişim Tarihi: 16.11.2024.
12. Jasch, C. (2009). Environmental and Material Flow Cost Accounting. Viyana: Springer
13. Karimi A., Fatehifar E., Shokri R. & Mahmoodi E. (2019). Evaluating the products quality of the vacuum distillation unit by using MFCA method. Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Technology, 6(1), 15-27.
14. Kaya, N. (2021). Malzeme akışı maliyet muhasebesi: Vaka değerlendirmeleri. Bartın Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12 (23), 252-278.
15. Khan, M. K. & Rasid, Z. A. (2016). “Material Flow Cost Accounting as a Useful Innovation”. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy (IJIBS), 6 (2), 1-9.
16. Kılıç, G., & Akdoğan, N. (2023). Malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesi ve iş ve inşaat makineleri sektörü üzerine uygulama, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15 (3), 1944-1956.
17. Kıllı, M. & Gülmez, C. (2020). Çevresel performansı iyileştirme ve maliyet tasarrufu sağlama aracı olarak malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesi: bir üretim işletmesinde örnek uygulama”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (2), 71-90.
18. Kızılyalçın, D.A. (2021). Malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesi: literatürden uygulama örnekleri, International Journal of Disciplines Economics & Administrative Scienves Studies, 7 (28), 207-225.
19. Kokubu, K. & Tachikawa, H. (2013). Handbook of sustainable engineering, Kauffman, J., Lee, K.-M. (Ed.), Material flow cost accounting: significance and practical approach içinde, 351-369, Netherlands: Springer.
20. Kokubu K., & Kitada, H. (2015). Material flow cost accounting and existing management perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1279-1288.
21. Kokubu, K. & Nakajima, M. (2004). Michiyasu material flow cost accounting in Japan: A new trend of environmental management accounting practice, Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Singapore. 1-16.
22. Nakajima M. (2004). On the differences between material flow cost accounting and triditional cost accounting- ın reply to the questions misunderstandings on material flow cost accounting, Kansai University Review of Business and Commerce, 6, 1-20.
23. Özçelik, F. (2017). Çevre yönetim muhasebesi uygulamaları için yeni bir yaklaşım malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesi, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(4), 927-948.
24. Schmidt, M. & Nakajimai M. (2013). Material flow cost accounting as an approach to ımprove resource efficiency in manufacturing companies, Resources, 2, 358-369.
25. Schmidt, M. (2015). The interpretation and extension of Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) in the context of environmental material flow analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1310-1319.
26. Schmidt, A., Götze, U., & Sygulla, R. (2015). Extending the scope of material flow cost accounting-methodical refinements and use case, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1320-1332.
27. Schaltegger, S., & Zvezdov, D. (2015). Expanding material flow cost accounting. Framework, review and potentials, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1333-1341.
28. Sulong, F., Sulaiman, M., & Norhayati, M. A. (2015), Material flow cost accounting (MFCA) enablers and barriers: The case of a Malaysian small and medium-sized enterprise (SME)”,Journal of Cleaner Production 108, 1365-1374.
29. Syarif, A. M. & Novita, (2018). Environmental management accounting with material flow cost accounting: strategy of environmental management in small and medium-sized enterprises production activities. Indonesian Management and Accounting Research, 17(02), 144-167.
30. Sygulla, R., Bierer, A. ve Götze, U. (2011). Material flow cost accounting – proposals for ımproving the evaluation of monetary effects of resource saving process designs. In: Proceedings of the 44th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 1-3 June 2011, Madison, Wisconsin, 1-16.
31. Tran, N. H., Hoang, T. H., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2020). Environmental management accounting perception and implementation in the automobile industry in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 941-949.
32. Tran T. T., & Herzig C. (2020). Material flow cost accounting in developing countries: A systematic review. Sustainability,12(13), 5413.
33. Wagner, B. (2015). A report on the origins of Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) research activities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1255-1261.
34. Walz M., & Guenther E. (2021). What effects does material flow cost accounting have for companies? Evidence from a case studies analysis. J Ind Ecol, 25, 593–613.
35. Yagi, M., & Kokubu, K. (2018). Corporate material flow management in Thailand: The way to material flow cost accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 763-775.
36. Yereli, A. N., & Yakın, V. (2009). Çevresel yönetim muhasebesi aracı olarak malzeme akış maliyet muhasebesi yöntemi. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış 27, 69-90.