BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 9, 103 - 119, 01.01.2016

Öz

In early adulthood, one of the most important need for individual is known to be intimacy. Cognitive theories emphasizes that negative experiences in childhood are internalized as internal working models which contain enduring and resistant negative beliefs about the self, the environment, and other people. These internal working models are called as early maladaptive schemas. Studies suggest that entering a serious relationship or remaining single depends on individuals’ early maladaptive schemas. Thus, the purpose of the current study is to investigate the influence of gender on university students’ early maladaptive schemas. Participants of this study were composed of 247 Ufuk University students. Participants were selected by purposive sampling method. The Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form YSQ-S Young & Brown, 1994 and demographic information form was used to gather data. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the data. The findings of the study indicated that significant gender difference on three of the early maladaptive schemas which are emotional deprivation, social isolation and defectiveness

Kaynakça

  • Abele, A. E. & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763.
  • Arnstein, R. L. (1984). Developmental issues for college students. Psychiatric Annals, 14, 647-652.
  • Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Beck, A. T. (1976).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Becker, J. B., Monteggia, L. M., Perrot-Sinal, T. S., Romeo, R. D., Taylor, J. R., Yehuda, R., Block, B., Pristach, C. A. (1992). Diagnosis and management of the paranoid patient. Update 2006:http://www.drplace.com/Diagnosis_and_management_of_the_paranoid_pa tient.16.19884.htm [04.02.2007].
  • Bolen, R. M. , Scannapieco, M. (1999).Prevalence of child sexual abuse: A corrective meta-analysis. Social Service Review,73,281–313.
  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books. (Original ed. 1969).
  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
  • Brenning,K. ,Bosmans, G., Braet, C. &Theuwis, L.(2012). Gender Differences in Cognitive Schema Vulnerability and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents.BehaviourChange 29 ( 3). 164–182, DOI 10.1017/bec.2012.15
  • Calvete, E. (2008). Justification of Violence and Grandiosity Schemas as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior in Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1083- 1095. DOI 10.1007/s10802–008–9229–5
  • Cámara, M. &Calvete, E. (2012).Early maladaptive schemas as moderators of the impact of stressful events on anxiety and depression in university students.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34 (1), 58–68: DOI 10.1007/s10862-011-9261-6
  • Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
  • Góngora, V., Grinhauz, A. & Suárez Hernández, N. (2009). Eating disorders in adolescents: A study of behaviours and cognitions. Psicologia Clinicay Psicopatologia, 16, 25-31.
  • IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows.Version 20.0.Armonk. NY: IBM Corp.
  • Lumley, M. N., & Harkness, K. L. (2007). Specificity in the relations among childhood adversity, early maladaptive schemas, and symptom profiles in adolescent depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 639-657. DOI: 10.1007/s10608–006–9100–3
  • Muris, P. (2006). Maladaptive schemas in non-clinical adolescents: Relations to perceived parental rearing behaviors, big five personality factors and psychopathological symptoms. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 405-413.
  • Oei, T.P.S., & Baranoff, J. (2007). Young schema questionnaire: review of psychometric and measurement issues. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 78-86.
  • Prinstein, M. J., & Aikins, J. W. (2004). Cognitive moderators of the longitudinal association between peer rejection and adolescent de- pressive symptoms.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 147–158.
  • Richman, A., Miller, P.M., & Solomon, M. (1988). The socialization of infants in suburban Boston. InW. Damon (Series Ed.)&R. LeVine, P. Miller,&M.West (Vol. Eds.), Newdirections for child development: No. 40. Parental behavior in diverse societies (pp. 65-74). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Schmidt, N. B., Joiner, T. E., Young, J. E., & Telch, M. J. (1995). The schema questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(3), 295-321.
  • Shorey, R. C., Anderson, S. E., Stuart, G. L. (2012). Gender Differences in Early Maladaptive Schemas in a Treatment-Seeking Sample of Alcohol-Dependent Adults.Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 108–116, 2012, DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2011.629706
  • Shorey,R. C., Anderson, S. E. and Stuart, G. L. (2012). Gender Differences in Early Maladaptive Schemas in a Treatment-Seeking Sample of Alcohol-Dependent Adults. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 108–116, DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2011.629706
  • Stein, D. J. (1992). Schemas in the cognitive and clinical sciences: An integrative construct. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 2(1), 45-63.
  • Tabachnick. B. G..&Fidell. L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
  • Young, J. E. (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema- focused approach (rev. ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
  • Young, J. E. (2005). Young Schema Questionnaire–Short Form. New York: Schema Therapy Institute.
  • Young, J. E. (2006).Young Schema Questionnaire (German ver-sion, YSQ-S3)(H. Berbalk, J. Grutschpalk, E. Parfy, & G. Zar-bock, Trans.). Eckernförde: Institut für Schematherapie.
  • Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1990).Young schema questionnaire. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.
  • Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1999).Young schema questionnaire: Short version. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.
  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., &Weishaar, M. E. (2003).Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: The Guilford Press.

BİLİŞSEL ŞEMALARDA CİNSİYET FARKI

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 9, 103 - 119, 01.01.2016

Öz

Erken yetişkinlik döneminde en önemli ihtiyaç yakın ilişki kurma olarak bilinmektedir. Bilişsel teoriler çcukluk dönemindeki yaşantıların içselleştirildiğini ve bunların kişinin kendisi, çevresi ve etrafındaki insanlar hakkındaki inançlarını içeren dirençli ve dayanıklı içsel çalışan modelleri oluşturduğunu vurgulamıştır. Bu içsel çalışan modeller erken dönem uyumsuz şema olarak adlandırılmıştır. Çalışmalar ciddi bir ilişkiye girmenin veya tek kalmanın erken dönem uyumsuz şemalara ve cinsiyete bağlı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, cinsiyetin üniversite öğrencilerinin erken dönem uyumsuz şemalarına etkisini incelemektir. Bu çalışmanın örneklem grubunu 247 Ufuk Üniversitesi öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Katılımcılar amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilmiştir. Bilgiler, Young Şema Ölçeği-Kısa Form YSQ-S Young & Brown, 1994 ve demografik bilgi formuyla toplanmıştır.Elde edilen verilere, tek yönlü varyans analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, cinsiyetin üç erken dönem uyumsuz şemayı etkilediğini göstemiştir, bu şemalar duyusal yoksunluk, sosyal izolasyon ve kusurluluktur. Bunun dışında kız öğrencilerin erkek öğrencilerden daha fazla uyumsuz şemaya sahip olduğu bulunmuştur

Kaynakça

  • Abele, A. E. & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763.
  • Arnstein, R. L. (1984). Developmental issues for college students. Psychiatric Annals, 14, 647-652.
  • Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Beck, A. T. (1976).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Becker, J. B., Monteggia, L. M., Perrot-Sinal, T. S., Romeo, R. D., Taylor, J. R., Yehuda, R., Block, B., Pristach, C. A. (1992). Diagnosis and management of the paranoid patient. Update 2006:http://www.drplace.com/Diagnosis_and_management_of_the_paranoid_pa tient.16.19884.htm [04.02.2007].
  • Bolen, R. M. , Scannapieco, M. (1999).Prevalence of child sexual abuse: A corrective meta-analysis. Social Service Review,73,281–313.
  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books. (Original ed. 1969).
  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
  • Brenning,K. ,Bosmans, G., Braet, C. &Theuwis, L.(2012). Gender Differences in Cognitive Schema Vulnerability and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents.BehaviourChange 29 ( 3). 164–182, DOI 10.1017/bec.2012.15
  • Calvete, E. (2008). Justification of Violence and Grandiosity Schemas as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior in Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1083- 1095. DOI 10.1007/s10802–008–9229–5
  • Cámara, M. &Calvete, E. (2012).Early maladaptive schemas as moderators of the impact of stressful events on anxiety and depression in university students.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34 (1), 58–68: DOI 10.1007/s10862-011-9261-6
  • Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
  • Góngora, V., Grinhauz, A. & Suárez Hernández, N. (2009). Eating disorders in adolescents: A study of behaviours and cognitions. Psicologia Clinicay Psicopatologia, 16, 25-31.
  • IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows.Version 20.0.Armonk. NY: IBM Corp.
  • Lumley, M. N., & Harkness, K. L. (2007). Specificity in the relations among childhood adversity, early maladaptive schemas, and symptom profiles in adolescent depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 639-657. DOI: 10.1007/s10608–006–9100–3
  • Muris, P. (2006). Maladaptive schemas in non-clinical adolescents: Relations to perceived parental rearing behaviors, big five personality factors and psychopathological symptoms. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 405-413.
  • Oei, T.P.S., & Baranoff, J. (2007). Young schema questionnaire: review of psychometric and measurement issues. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 78-86.
  • Prinstein, M. J., & Aikins, J. W. (2004). Cognitive moderators of the longitudinal association between peer rejection and adolescent de- pressive symptoms.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 147–158.
  • Richman, A., Miller, P.M., & Solomon, M. (1988). The socialization of infants in suburban Boston. InW. Damon (Series Ed.)&R. LeVine, P. Miller,&M.West (Vol. Eds.), Newdirections for child development: No. 40. Parental behavior in diverse societies (pp. 65-74). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Schmidt, N. B., Joiner, T. E., Young, J. E., & Telch, M. J. (1995). The schema questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(3), 295-321.
  • Shorey, R. C., Anderson, S. E., Stuart, G. L. (2012). Gender Differences in Early Maladaptive Schemas in a Treatment-Seeking Sample of Alcohol-Dependent Adults.Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 108–116, 2012, DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2011.629706
  • Shorey,R. C., Anderson, S. E. and Stuart, G. L. (2012). Gender Differences in Early Maladaptive Schemas in a Treatment-Seeking Sample of Alcohol-Dependent Adults. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 108–116, DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2011.629706
  • Stein, D. J. (1992). Schemas in the cognitive and clinical sciences: An integrative construct. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 2(1), 45-63.
  • Tabachnick. B. G..&Fidell. L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
  • Young, J. E. (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema- focused approach (rev. ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
  • Young, J. E. (2005). Young Schema Questionnaire–Short Form. New York: Schema Therapy Institute.
  • Young, J. E. (2006).Young Schema Questionnaire (German ver-sion, YSQ-S3)(H. Berbalk, J. Grutschpalk, E. Parfy, & G. Zar-bock, Trans.). Eckernförde: Institut für Schematherapie.
  • Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1990).Young schema questionnaire. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.
  • Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1999).Young schema questionnaire: Short version. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.
  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., &Weishaar, M. E. (2003).Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: The Guilford Press.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Ayşe Irkörücü Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 9

Kaynak Göster

APA Irkörücü, A. (2016). GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(9), 103-119.
AMA Irkörücü A. GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. Ocak 2016;5(9):103-119.
Chicago Irkörücü, Ayşe. “GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS”. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5, sy. 9 (Ocak 2016): 103-19.
EndNote Irkörücü A (01 Ocak 2016) GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5 9 103–119.
IEEE A. Irkörücü, “GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS”, Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 5, sy. 9, ss. 103–119, 2016.
ISNAD Irkörücü, Ayşe. “GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS”. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 5/9 (Ocak 2016), 103-119.
JAMA Irkörücü A. GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2016;5:103–119.
MLA Irkörücü, Ayşe. “GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS”. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 5, sy. 9, 2016, ss. 103-19.
Vancouver Irkörücü A. GENDER DIFFERENCE IN EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2016;5(9):103-19.