Konfederalizm Alternatifi: Gürcü-Oset Çatışmasının Çözümü İçin Yeni Anayasal Düzen

Yıl 2022, , 66 - 88, 30.06.2022

Osman Ercan , Hakan Kolçak

https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.1061923

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu makale, Gürcü-Oset ihtilafını güncel gelişmeleri hesaba katarak incelemekte ve ihtilafın çözümüne ilişkin bir öneri sunmaktadır. Çalışmamıza göre, Gürcistan ve Güney Osetya tarafından anayasal düzlemde ete kemiğe büründürülecek konfederal düzen, iki toplum arasındaki husumetleri ve güvensizliği bertaraf etme sürecine katkı sunabilir. Konfederalleşme, kısa vadede Güney Osetya’nın menfaatine bir durumdur; ancak konfederalleşme adımları vasıtasıyla uzun vadede tezahür edecek pek çok potansiyel gelişme, iki toplum için birlikte yaşamı devam ettirecekleri kamusal alanın inşasına yardımcı olabilir. Gürcü ve Oset otoriteleri tarafından konfederal uygulamalar aracılığıyla pratiğe dökülecek birçok iş birliği ve bütünleşmeci operasyon, kökleşen husumetler ile kurumsallaşan güvensizliği kademeli olarak ortadan kaldırabilir. Bu durum, bölgesel veyahut ulusal bağlılıkların süreç içerisinde konfederal bağlılıklara dönüşmesini beraberinde getirebilir. İki topluluk, somutlaşan konfederal bağlılıkların neticesi olarak ortaya çıkan karşılıklı güven atmosferi içerisinde siyasi devlet teşkilatlanmalarını federal ya da üniter bir yapıya evirebilir. Söz konusu evrilme, gerek tarihî konfederasyonlarca tamamlanmış gerekse güncel konfederal yapılanmalarca takip edilen bir süreçtir. Gürcü ve Oset pozisyonlarını dikkate alarak konfederalleşme önerisini geliştiren çalışmamız, bu önerinin ciddi bir alternatif çözüm yolu teşkil edebileceğini Gürcü devletinin mevcut askerî, ekonomik ve siyasi kabiliyetleri gibi çeşitli dinamikleri göz önünde bulundurarak izah etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gürcistan, Güney Osetya, Donmuş İhtilaf, Egemenlik, Konfederalleşme

The Alternative of Confederalism: A New Constitutional Order for the Resolution of the Georgian- Ossetian Conflict

Öz

This article examines the Georgian-Ossetian conflict by considering recent developments and comes up with a formula for the resolution of the conflict. According to the article, a new confederal order that takes its shape at the constitutional level would contribute to the cessation of the rooted hostilities and the elimination of the institutionalised doubts between the two communities. South Ossetia would benefit from the confederal order in the short run; however, the order would, in the long run, create a public area where the two communities would coexist in a peaceful manner. Collaborationist and integrationist steps taken by the Georgian and Ossetian authorities after the construction of the confederal order would gradually cease the hostilities and eliminate the doubts, ultimately leading to the transformation of regional or national loyalties into confederal allegiances. These allegiances would establish an environment of mutual trust encouraging the communities to turn their confederal union into a federation or unitary state. Such unionist and holistic transformation processes have been completed by historical confederations. Furthermore, present confederal organisations are also carrying out such processes. The article taking into account various matters, e.g. the current Georgian and Ossetian standpoints as well as the present military, financial and political capabilities of the Georgian state, recognises its confederal formula as a worth-examining alternative.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Georgia, South Ossetia, Frozen Conflict, Sovereignty, Confederalism

Kaynakça

• Acaray, D. (2020). “Kafkasya Jeopolitiğinde Odak Noktası Olarak Güney Osetya”. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 168-183.
• Allison, R. (2008). “Moscow Resurgent? Moscow’s Campaign to ‘Coerce Georgia to Peace’”. International Affairs, 84(6), 1145-1172.
• Allison, R. (2009). “The Russian Case for Military Intervention in Georgia: International Law, Norms and Political Calculation”. European Security, 18(2), 173-200.
• Ambrosio, T. ve W. Lange. (2016). “The Architecture of Annexation? Russia’s Bilateral Agreements with South Ossetia and Abkhazia”. Nationalities Papers, 44(5), 673-693.
• Ancak, O. (2020). “Yeni Avrasyacılık Bağlamında Güney Kafkasya’da Türkiye ve Rusya”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 75(3), 1113-1144.
• Anckar, D. (2020). “Small States: Politics and Policies”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 38-54.
• Anjaparidze, Z. (2020). “Changes in the Separatist Abkhazian Government and Implications for Relations With Tbilisi”. Jamestown, 15 Haziran, https://jamestown.org/program/changes-in-the-separatist-abkhazian-government-and-implications-for-relations-with-tbilisi/ (17.01.2022).
• Asker, A. ve Z. Özpınar (2021). “Azerbaycan’ı Zafere Götüren Büyük Taarruz: 44 Günlük Savaşın Anatomisi”. Avrasya İncelemeleri Dergisi, 10(1), 83-106.
• Aublaa, M. (2018). “Possible Challenges to the Republic of Abkhazia in the Focus of Trump Administration’s Geopolitical Interests in the South Caucasus”. Kafkasya Çalışmaları, 3(6), 307-324.
• Baarová, B. (2019). “South Ossetia-Alania: 10 Years since Gaining Partial International Recognition”. Politické Vedy, 22(2), 159-188.
• Bajon, T. (2018). “Liechtenstein and the European Union: A Micro-Switzerland?”. Journal of Political Science and Public Affairs, 6(4), 1-5.
• Baldacchino, G. (2018). “Mainstreaming the Study of Small States and Territories”. Small States & Territories, 1(1), 3-16.
• Baldacchino, G. ve A. Wivel. (2020). “Small States: Concepts and Theories”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2-19.
• Bayar, M. (2021). “National Identity, Foreign Policy and Conflicts in Georgia”. The Changing Perspectives and ‘New’ Geopolitics of the Caucasus in the 21st Century. (Ed. S. Yılmaz ve M. Yorulmaz). Ankara: Astana Yayınları, 35-48.
• Belkahla, M. (2017). Benelux Court of Justice. Luxembourg: Max Planck Institute.
• Benedikter, T. (2009). The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems: Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy. Bolzano: EURAC Institute of Minority Rights.
• Bergmann, J. (2020). The European Union as International Mediator. Cham: Springer.
• Bhandari, S. (2014). “From External to the Internal Application of the Right to Self-determination: The Case of Nepal”. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 21(3), 330-370.
• Biscop, S., J. Coelmont, M. Drent ve D. Zandee. (2013). The Future of the Benelux Defence Cooperation. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
• Blank, S. (1993). “The Soviet Conquest of Georgia”. Central Asian Survey, 12(1), 33-46.
• Bondarevsky, G. (1991). “Relations between RSFSR and Georgia during Civil War and Intervention Years”. World Affairs, 3(1), 67-72.
• Bozkaya, Ö. ve S. Eylemer. (2019). “Güney Kafkasya’da Ülke İçinde Yerinden Edilmiş Kişiler Sorunu: Avrupa Birliği’nin Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 18(1), 109-142.
• Bowker, M. (2011). “The War in Georgia and the Western Response”. Central Asian Survey, 30(2), 197-211.
• Broido, V. (2018). Lenin and The Mensheviks: The Persecution of Socialists under Bolshevism. New York: Routledge.
• Brovkin, V. (1987). The Mensheviks after October: Socialist Opposition and the Rise of the Bolshevik Dictatorship. New York: Cornell University Press.
• Bursens, P. ve B. Crum. (2010). “The Benelux Countries: How Politicization Upset a Pro-integration Coalition”. National Politics and European Integration: From the Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty. (Ed. M. Carbone). Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing, 144-163.
• Casier, T. (2011). “The Bilateral Relations of the Benelux Countries with Russia: Between Rhetorical EU Engagement and Competitive Business Interests”. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 19(2), 237-248.
• Caspersen, N. (2013). “The South Caucasus after Kosovo: Renewed Independence Hopes?”. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(5), 929-945.
• Cenusa, D., M. Emerson, T. Kovziridse ve V. Movchan (2014). Russia’s Punitive Trade Policy Measures towards Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
• Chankvetadze, N. ve K. Murusidze. (2020). “Challenges of COVID-19 in Areas of Protracted Conflict”. Middle East Institute, 11 Mayıs, https://www.mei.edu/publications/challenges-covid-19-areas-protracted-conflict (16.01.2022).
• Cheterian, V. (2012). “The Origins and Trajectory of the Caucasian Conflicts”. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(9), 1625-1649.
• Coene, F. (2009). The Caucasus: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
• Cogen, M. (2015). An Introduction to European Intergovernmental Organizations. Surrey: Ashgate.
• Conversi, D. (2016). “Sovereignty in a Changing World: From Westphalia to Food Sovereignty”. Globalizations, 13(4), 484-498.
• Corbett, J. ve J. Connell. (2020). “Small States in the Pacific”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 343-360.
• Cornell, S. (2002). “Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective”. World Politics, 54(2), 245-276.
• Cornell, S. (2007). Georgia after the Rose Revolution: Geopolitical Predicament and Implications for U.S. Policy. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute.
• Cornell, S. ve F. Starr. (2006). The Caucasus: A Challenge for Europe. Washington: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute.
• Cornell, S. ve N. Nilsson. (2009). “Georgian Politics since the August 2008 War”. Demokratizatsiya, 17(3), 251-268.
• Crawford, J. (1976). “The Criteria for Statehood in International Law”. British Yearbook of International Law, 48(1), 93-182.
• Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• de Vries, J. (2008). “Venturing into Unknown Territory: The Preparation and Formulation of the Second Benelux Structural Outline”. European Planning Studies, 16(6), 853-876.
• de Waal, T. (2012). “A Broken Region: The Persistent Failure of Integration Projects in the South Caucasus”. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(9), 1709-1723.
• de Waal, T. (2020). “Can the Coronavirus Reset the Abkhazia Conflict?”. Carnegie, 2 Nisan, https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/81436 (14.01.2022).
• Drent, M. (2014). Sovereignty, Parliamentary Involvement and European Defence Cooperation. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
• Drent, M., D. Zandee ve L. Casteleijn. (2014). Defence Cooperation in Clusters: Identifying the Next Steps. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
• Drent, M., K. Homan ve D. Zandee. (2013). Bold Steps in Multinational Cooperation: Taking European Defence Forward. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
• Ducháček, I. (1982). “Consociations of Fatherlands: The Revival of Confederal Principles and Practices”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 12(4), 129-177.
• Ducháček, I. (1985). “Consociational Cradle of Federalism”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 15(2), 35-49.
• Dugard, J. (1987). Recognition and the United Nations. Cambridge: Grotius Publications.
• Dugard, J. ve D. Raič. (2006). “The Role of Recognition in the Law and Practice of Secession”. Secession: International Law Perspective. (Ed. M. Kohen). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94-137.
• Dumbadze, A. (2020). “Georgian President Thanks WHO for Assisting Population in Abkhazia”. Georgia Today, 20 Mart, http://www.georgiatoday.ge/ne-ws/20055/Georgian-President-Thanks-WHO-for-Assisting-Population-in-Abkhazia (15.01.2022).
• Dumieński, Z. (2014). Microstates as Modern Protected States: Towards a New Definition of Micro-Statehood. Auckland: Institute of International Affairs.
• Eckert, A. (2002). “Constructing States: The Role of the International Community in the Creation of New States”. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 13(1), 19-39.
• Ediger, M. (2018). “International Law and the Use of Force Against Contested States: The Case of Taiwan”. New York University Law Review, 93(6), 1668-1706.
• Elazar, D. (1982). “Confederation and Federal Liberty”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 12(4), 1-14.
• Elazar, D. (1987). Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
• Elazar, D. (1995a). Federalism: An Overview. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council Publishers.
• Elazar, D. (1995b). “From Statism to Federalism: A Paradigm Shift”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25(2), 5-18.
• Elazar, D. (1996). “Introduction: Using Federalism Today”. International Political Science Review, 17(4), 349-351.
• Elazar, D. (1997). “Contrasting Unitary and Federal Systems”. International Political Science Review, 18(3), 237-251.
• Ellison, B. (2011). “Russian Grand Strategy in the South Ossetia War”. Demokratizatsiya, 19(4), 343-366.
• Ekinci, D. (2019). “İnşacılık, Kimlik, ‘Üretilmiş’ Vatandaşlar: Rusya’nın Abhazya ve Güney Osetya’da Vatandaşlık Politikaları”. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 16(61), 97-109.
• Fabry, M. (2012). “The Contemporary Practice of State Recognition: Kosovo, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Their Aftermath”. Nationalities Papers, 4(5), 661-676.
• Gabisonia, A. (2012). “Formation of the Georgian National Discourse”. Identity Studies, 4(1), 66-81.
• George, J. (2008). “Minority Political Inclusion in Mikheil Saakashvili’s Georgia”. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(7), 1151-1175.
• German, T. (2006). Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Collision of Georgian and Russian Interests. Paris: French Institute of International Relations.
• German, T. (2012). “Securing the South Caucasus: Military Aspects of Russian Policy towards the Region since 2008”. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(9), 1650-1666.
• German, T. (2016). “Russia and South Ossetia: Conferring Statehood or Creeping Annexation?”. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(1), 155-167.
• Gerrits, A. ve M. Bader. (2016). “Russian Patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Implications for Conflict Resolution”. East European Politics, 32(3), 297-313.
• Gözler, K. (2018). Devletin Genel Teorisi: Bir Genel Kamu Hukuku Ders Kitabı. Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi.
• Groenendijk, K. (2004). “Reinstatement of Controls at the Internal Borders of Europe: Why and Against Whom?”. European Law Journal, 10(2), 150-170.
• Hakyemez, Y. (2004). Mutlak Monarşilerden Günümüze Egemenlik Kavramı: Doğuşu, Gelişimi, Kavramsal Çerçevesi ve Dönüşümü. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Hamilton, R. (2018). August 2008 and Everything After: A Ten-Year Retrospective on the Russia-Georgia War. Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute.
• Hanks, R. (2009). “‘Multi-vector Politics’ and Kazakhstan’s Emerging Role as a Geo-strategic Player in Central Asia”. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 11(3), 257-267.
• Harding, L. ve M. Prothero. (2008). “Russia Signs Ceasefire Deal but Troops Stay in Georgia”. The Guardian, 17 Ağustos, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/17/russia.georgia (13.01.2022).
• Hauer, N. (2020). “Abkhazia, Georgia and COVID: An Opportunity from Crisis”. Middle East Institute, 28 Eylül, https://www.mei.edu/publications/abkhazia-georgia-and-covid-opportunity-crisis (12.01.2022).
• Hewitt, G. (1990). “Aspects of Language Planning in Georgia (Georgian and Abkhaz)”. Language Planning in the Soviet Union. (Ed. M. Kirkwood). New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 123-144.
• Hewitt, G. (2013). Discordant Neighbours: A Reassessment of the Georgian-Abkhazian and Georgian-South Ossetian Conflicts. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
• Hill, W. (2010). “Reflections on Negotiations and Mediation: The Frozen Conflicts and European Security”. Demokratizatsiya, 18(3), 219-227.
• Hoch, T. (2020). “Independence or Unification with a Patron State? Not Such Dichotomous Ideas as One Would Think: Evidence from South Ossetia”. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 12(1), 68-89.
• Hopkirk, P. (2001). The Great Game: On Secret Service in High Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ichijo, A. (2009). “Sovereignty and Nationalism in the Twenty-first Century: The Scottish Case”. Ethnopolitics, 8(2), 155-172.
• Janelidze, O. (2018). “The Democratic Republic of Georgia (1918-1921)”. Remembrance and Justice, 31(1), 168-190.
• Jones, E. (2003). The Benelux Countries: Identity and Self-interest. Bologna: John Hopkins Bologna Centre.
• Jones, S. (1988). “The Establishment of Soviet Power in Transcaucasia: The Case of Georgia 1921-1928”. Soviet Studies, 40(4), 616-639.
• Jones, S. (1995). “The Georgian Language State Program and its Implications”. Nationalities Papers, 23(3), 535-548.
• Kakachia, K. (2010). “Between Russian Assertiveness and Insecurity: Georgia’s Political Challenges and Prospect after the Conflict”. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7(26), 87-104.
• Karagiannis, E. (2014). “The Russian Interventions in South Ossetia and Crimea Compared: Military Performance, Legitimacy and Goals”. Contemporary Security Policy, 35(3), 400-420.
• Kazantsev, A., P. Rutland, S. Medvedeva ve I. Safranchuk. (2020). “Russia’s Policy in the ‘Frozen Conflicts’ of the Post-Soviet Space: From Ethno-politics to Geopolitics”. Caucasus Survey, 8(2), 142-162.
• Keating, M. (2012). “Rethinking Sovereignty: Independence-lite, Devolution-max and National Accommodation”. Revista d’Estudis Autonòmics i Federals, 16(1), 9-29.
• Koca, M. (2019). “Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dönemde ABD ve Rusya’nın Güney Kafkasya Politikaları”. Anadolu Strateji Dergisi, 1(1), 15-36.
• Kohen, M. (2006). “Introduction”. Secession: International Law Perspective. (Ed. M. Kohen). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-20.
• Kolçak, H. (2017). “Associate Statehood for Scotland as the Way to Stay in both the United Kingdom and the European Union: The Liechtenstein Example”. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 17(1), 40-58.
• Kolçak, H. (2020a). “Confederal Agreements: A Proposal to Resolve Secession-related Minority Issues”. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 208-232.
• Kolçak, H. (2020b). “Secession as Undesirable Scenario: Reasons for Unity”. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 147-163.
• Kolçak, H. (2021). “A Confederalist Demand to Transform the Liberal Discourse: A Comprehensive Analysis of International Minority Protection Regimes”. Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 3-41.
• Kolçak H. ve O. Ercan. (2021). “Konfederal Birlik: Gürcü-Abhaz İhtilafının Çözümü İçin Yeni Anayasal Düzen”. Karadeniz Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(13), 377-408.
• Kolstø, P. ve H. Blakkisrud. (2008). “Living with Non-recognition: State- and Nation-building in South Caucasian Quasi-states”. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(3), 483-509.
• Kuchins, A. ve I. Zevelev. (2012). “Russian Foreign Policy: Continuity in Change”. The Washington Quarterly, 35(1), 147-161.
• Kukhianidze, N. (2019). “The Dimensions of Georgia’s Frozen Conflicts”. New Eastern Europe, 38(5), 54-59.
• Kymlicka, W., J. Raviot ve S. Lee. (1997). “Living Together: International Aspects of Federal Systems”. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 5(1), 1-50. Lang, D. (1966). The Georgians. London: Thames and Hudson.
• Lapidoth, R. (1992). “Sovereignty in Transition”. Journal of International Affairs, 45(2), 325-346.
• Lapidoth, R. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts. Washington: United States Institute for Peace Press.
• Lauterpacht, H. (1944). “Recognition of States in International Law”. The Yale Law Journal, 53(3), 385-458.
• Lee, E. (2017). The Experiment: Georgia’s Forgotten Revolution 1918-1921. London: Zed Books.
• Lewis, C. (2020). “Contemporary Russian Messianism under Putin and Russian Foreign Policy in Ukraine and Syria”. The Slavonic and East European Review, 98(3), 531-559.
• Light, M. (2010). “The Russo-Georgian War of 2008: A Conflict Announced in Advance?”. Europe-Asia Studies, 62(9), 1579-1582.
• Lister, F. (1996). The European Union, the United Nations, and the Revival of Confederal Governance. London: Greenwood Press.
• Littlefield, S. (2009). “Citizenship, Identity and Foreign Policy: The Contradictions and Consequences of Russia’s Passport Distribution in the Separatist Regions of Georgia”. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(8), 1461-1482.
• Lynch, D. (2020). “OSCE Early Warning in Georgia”. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7(26), 139-148.
• Maass, M. (2020). “Small States: Surviving, Perishing and Proliferating through History”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 20-37.
• MacCormick, N. (1999). Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Maes, I. ve A. Verdun. (2005). “Small States and the Creation of EMU: Belgium and the Netherlands, Pace-setters and Gate-keepers”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(2), 327-348.
• Manz-Christ, G. (2009). The Principality of Liechtenstein – Encounter with a Small State. Vaduz: Government Spokesperson’s Press and Information Office.
• Markedonov, S. (2015). “The South Ossetia Conflict”. Frozen Conflicts in Europe. (Ed. A. Bebler). Berlin: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 111-118.
• Mautner, M. (1981). “West Bank and Gaza: The Case for Associate Statehood”. Yale Journal of International Law, 6(2), 297-360.
• Mehmed, A. (2021). “Arap Devletlerinin İkinci Karabağ Savaşı’na Yönelik Tutumu”. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 124-137.
• Meijer, E. (2015). “The Radical Left in Benelux”. Socialism and Democracy, 29(3), 71-80.
• Mikhelidze, N. (2009). “After the 2008 Russia‐Georgia War: Implications for the Wider Caucasus”. The International Spectator, 44(3), 27‐42.
• Mitchell, L. (2006). “Democracy in Georgia since the Rose Revolution”. Orbis, 50(4), 669-676.
• Mnatsakanyan, I. (2018). “The Quest for Coherence in EU Crisis Management in the South Caucasus: The Case of South Ossetia”. Europolity, 12(2), 87-114.
• Nagashima, T. (2019). “Russia’s Passportization Policy toward Unrecognized Republics: Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria”. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(3), 186-199.
• Nan, S. (2010). “The Roles of Conflict Resolution Scholars in Georgian-Abkhaz and Georgian-South-Ossetian Conflict and Conflict Resolution”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(2), 237-258.
• Nelson, L. ve P. Amonashvili. (1992). “Voting and Political Attitudes in Soviet Georgia”. Soviet Studies, 44(4), 687-697.
• Nikitin, A. (2020). “Legal Norms or Ad Hoc Fixes? International Legal Aspects of Russian Military Involvement in Conflict Settlements in the Caucasus”. Caucasus Survey, 8(2), 163-178.
• Nilsson, N. (2018). Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia. Washington: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute.
• O’Loughlin, J., V. Kolosov ve G. Toal. (2014). “Inside the Soviet De Facto States: A Comparison of Attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(5), 423-456.
• O’Reilly, K. ve N. Higgins. (2009). “The Use of Force, Wars of National Liberation and the Right to Self-Determination in the South Ossetian Conflict”. International Criminal Law Review, 9(3), 567-583.
• Öğütçü, B. ve M. Yılmaz. (2021). “Dağlık Karabağ Sorununda Uluslararası Arabuluculuk”. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 162-191.
• Özdaşlı, E. (2021). “İkinci Karabağ Savaşı’nda Ermenilerin Sivillere Yönelik Saldırılarının Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 51-83.
• Özgen, C. (2021). “44 Günün Ardından: 2020 Karabağ Savaşı’nın Askeri Açıdan Analizi”. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 104-123.
• Pallin, C. ve F. Westerlund. (2009). “Russia’s War in Georgia: Lessons and Consequences”. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 20(2), 400-424.
• Panke, D. ve J. Gurol. (2020). “Small States: Challenges and Coping Strategies in the UN General Assembly”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 83-97.
• Parastaev, A. (2021a). “Op-ed: What Hampers Vaccination in South Ossetia”. JAMnews, 1 Ekim, https://jam-news.net/op-ed-what-hampers-vaccination-in-south-ossetia/ (15.01.2022).
• Parastaev, A. (2021b). “Op-ed: Funerals and Covid-19 in South Ossetia”. JAMnews, 30 Kasım, https://jam-news.net/op-ed-funerals-and-covid-19-in-south-ossetia/ (15.01.2022).
• Paşa, E. (2021). “Karabağ Sorunu: Tarihi Gerçekler, Jeopolitik Çıkarlar ve Çözüm Süreci”. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 192-215.
• Pavković, A. (2011). “Recursive Secession of Trapped Minorities: A Comparative Study of the Serb Krajina and Abkhazia”. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 17(3), 297-318.
• Pavković, A. ve P. Radan. (2007). Creating New States: Theory and Practice of Secession. Hampshire: Ashgate.
• Pearce, B. (1954). “The Ossetians in History”. A People Reborn: The Study of North Ossetia. (Ed. A. Rothstein). London: Lawrence & Wishart, 14-19.
• Perry, V. (2015). “Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Does the Road to Confederation Go through the EU?”. International Peacekeeping, 22(5), 490-510.
• Petro, N. (2008). “Legal Case for Russian Intervention in Georgia”. Fordham International Law Journal, 32(5), 1524-1549.
• Pisciotta, B. (2020). “Russian Revisionism in the Putin Era: An Overview of Post-communist Military Interventions in Georgia, Ukraine, and Syria”. Italian Political Science Review, 50(1), 87-106.
• Potier, T. (2001). Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia: A Legal Appraisal. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
• Raič, D. (2002). Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
• Ram, H. (2020). “From Menshevik to Bolshevik: The Legacies of Georgian Modernism”. The Slavonic and East European Review, 98(1), 139-151.
• Rayfield, D. (2012). Edge of Empires: A History of Georgia. London: Reaktion Books.
• Rezvani, B. (2020). “Russian Foreign Policy and Geopolitics in the Post-Soviet Space and the Middle East: Tajikistan, Georgia, Ukraine and Syria”. Middle Eastern Studies, 56(6), 878-899.
• Rezvani, D. (2014). Surpassing the Sovereign State: The Wealth, Self-rule and Security Advantages of Partially Independent Territories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rezvani, D. (2015). “Partial Independence Beats Full Independence”. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(3), 269-296.
• Rigamonti, C. (2011). “The New Swiss Patent Litigation System”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 2(1), 3-17.
• Sammut, D. ve N. Cvetkovski. (1996). Confidence-building Matters: The Georgia-South Ossetia Conflict. London: Vertic.
• Saparov, A. (2010). “From Conflict to Autonomy: The Making of the South Ossetian Autonomous Region 1918-1922”. Europe-Asia Studies, 62(1), 99-123.
• Saparov, A. (2015). From Conflict to Autonomy in the Caucasus: The Soviet Union and the Making of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno Karabakh. London: Routledge.
• Sarapuu, K. ve T. Randma-Liiv. (2020). “Small States: Public Management and Policy-making”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 55-69.
• Sarıkaya, Y. (2011). “Georgian Foreign Policy after the August 2008 War”. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 31(1), 1-16.
• Sarıkaya, Y. (2021). “İran’ın İkinci Karabağ Savaşı Tutumu: Takke Düştü Kel Göründü”. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 84-103.
• Sichinava, D. (2020). “Georgians Increasingly Open to Compromise with Abkhazia and South Ossetia”. Oc-media, 24 Ağustos, https://oc-media.org/features/datablog-georgians-increasingly-open-to-compromise-with-abkhazia-and-south-ossetia/ (17.01.2022).
• Silverström, S. (2008). “The Competence of Autonomous Entities in the International Arena: With Special Reference to the Aland Islands in the European Union”. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 15(2), 259-271.
• Smith, J. (1998). “The Georgian Affair of 1922: Policy Failure, Personality Clash or Power Struggle?”. Europe-Asia Studies, 50(3), 519-544.
• Sotiriou, S. (2019). “The Irreversibility of History: The Conflicts in South Ossetia and Abkhazia”. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(3), 172-185.
• Souleimanov, E. (2013). Understanding Ethnopolitical Conflict: Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia Wars Reconsidered. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Souleimanov, E., E. Abrahamyan ve H. Aliyev. (2018). “Unrecognized States as a Means of Coercive Diplomacy? Assessing the Role of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Russia’s Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus”. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18(1), 73-86.
• Sönmezoğlu, F., H. Güneş ve E. Keleşoğlu. (2017). Uluslararası İlişkilere Giriş. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
• Stepan, A. (2013). “A Revised Theory of Federacy and a Case Study of Civil War Termination in Aceh, Indonesia”. Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places. (Ed. J. McEvoy ve B. O’Leary). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 231-252.
• Stevens, M. (1977). “Asymmetrical Federalism: The Federal Principle and the Survival of the Small Republic”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 7(4), 177-203.
• Suksi, M. (2013). “Explaining the Robustness and Longevity of the Aland Example in Comparison with Other Autonomy Solutions”. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 20(1), 51-66.
• Talmon, S. (2005). “The Constitutive Versus the Declaratory Theory of Recognition: Tertium Non Datur?”. The British Yearbook of International Law, 75(1), 101-181.
• Tarkhanova, Z. (2020). “S. Ossetian Officials Turn to Russia for Help Following Coronavirus Outbreak”. JAMnews, 29 Ekim, https://jam-news.net/coronavirus-south-ossetia-outbreak-russia/ (15.01.2022).
• Tchantouridzé, L. (2020). “Legitimacy Force and Power in the Conflict over South Ossetia”. Post-Soviet Conflicts: The Thirty Years’ Crisis. (Ed. A. Askerov, S. Brooks ve L. Tchantouridzé). London: Lexington, 83-114.
• Toal, G. (2008). “Russia’s Kosovo: A Critical Geopolitics of the August 2008 War over South Ossetia”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 49(6), 670-705.
• Toal, G. ve J. O’Loughlin. (2013). “Inside South Ossetia: A Survey of Attitudes in a De Facto State”. Post-Soviet Affairs, 29(2), 136-172.
• Toria, M., N. Pirtskhalava, E. Kekelia ve K. Ladaria. (2019). “Trapped in the Past: Memories of Georgian Internally Displaced Persons on the Margins of Society”. Nationalities Papers, 47(3), 429-444.
• Traynor, I., L. Harding ve H. Womack. (2008). “Georgia and Russia Declare Ceasefire”. The Guardian, 16 Ağustos, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/16/georgia.russia2 (19.01.2022).
• UKG. (2020). The COVID-19 Challenge in Post-Soviet Breakaway Statelets. Brussels: Crisis Group Publication Office.
• Vachridze, Z. (2012). “Two Faces of Nationalism and Efforts to Establish Georgian Identity”. Identity Studies, 4(1), 82-88.
• van Nimwegen, S. (2017). “The Need for the Netherlands and Belgium to Further Integrate Police Cooperation: An Example for Europe?”. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 8(3), 323-333.
• Veenendaal, W. (2015). “A Big Prince in a Tiny Realm: Smallness, Monarchy, and Political Legitimacy in the Principality of Liechtenstein”. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(2), 333-349.
• Veenendaal, W. (2020). “Politics of the Four European Microstates: Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and San Marino”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 150-167.
• Venema, A. (2020). “The Sum of All Friends: Improving Cross-border Intelligence Sharing in Europe – The Case of the Benelux”. The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs, 22(1), 5-19.
• Vidmar, J. (2012). “Explaining the Legal Effects of Recognition”. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 61(2), 361-387.
• Wakizaka, K. (2020). “Rogers Brubaker’in Diaspora-Anayurt-Konuk Eden Ülke İlişkileri Teorisi Çerçevesinde Gürcistan’daki Osetler, Abhazlar ve Çeçen-Kistleri Yorumlamak”. Türkiye Rusya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 116-143.
• Watts, R. (1998). “Federalism, Federal Political Systems, and Federations”. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 117-137.
• Welt, C. (2010). “The Thawing of a Frozen Conflict: The Internal Security Dilemma and the 2004 Prelude to the Russo-Georgian War”. Europe-Asia Studies, 62(1), 63-97.
• Wirt, F. (1982). “The Tenacity of Confederacy: Local Service Agreements in the Family of Governments”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 12(4), 103-127.
• Witlox, F., W. Dullaert ve B. Jourquin. (2007). “Fostering Transport and Logistics Research in the Benelux Countries”. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(4), 325-329.
• Wivel, A. (2020). “Small States in Europe”. Handbook on the Politics of Small States. (Ed. G. Baldacchino ve A. Wivel). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 99-112.
• Wolff, S. (2011). “Post-conflict State Building: The Debate on Institutional Choice”. Third World Quarterly, 32(10), 1777-1802.
• Wolff, S. (2013). “Conflict Management in Divided Societies: The Many Uses of Territorial Self-governance”. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 20(1), 27-50.
• Wouters, J. ve M. Vidal. (2008). Towards a Rebirth of Benelux?. Leuven: Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies.
• Zonneveld, W. ve A. Faludi. (1997). “Vanishing Borders: The Second Benelux Structural Outline”. Built Environment, 23(1), 4-13.