Do artificial intelligence investments improve environmental sustainability? Evidence from the business processes and support services sector

Öz

This study examines the long-run relationship between AI-related venture capital investments in the business processes and support services sector and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The analysis was conducted using a panel dataset of 13 countries (Canada, China, Finland, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Singapore, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States) covering the period 2012-2023. CO2 emissions are used as the dependent variable, while sector-specific AI-related venture capital investments, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade openness are included as explanatory variables. The long-run relationships are estimated using FMOLS, DOLS, and the Panel ARDL-PMG approach, while predictive relationships among the variables are examined using Granger causality analysis. The empirical findings indicate a negative and statistically significant long-run relationship between AI-related venture capital investments in the business processes and support services sector and CO2 emissions. The Granger causality results further reveal a bidirectional predictive relationship between sector-specific AI investments and CO2 emissions. These findings highlight the importance for policymakers and businesses of promoting environmentally sustainable AI investments in the business processes and support services sector, with particular attention to energy efficiency and carbon transparency in the associated digital infrastructure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CO2 emissions
• Artificial intelligence
• Sustainability

Destekleyen Kurum

This study received no financial support from any institution or organization.

Teşekkür

This study which does not require ethics committee approval and/or legal/specific permission complies with the Research and Publication Ethics.

Kaynakça

1. Akram, R., Shi, X., Khalid, F., & Srivastava, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and green investment: Driving corporate environmental responsibility. Business Strategy and The Environment, 34(7), 9188-9202. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70069
2. Alaganthiran, J. R., & Anaba, M. I. (2022). The effects of economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in selected Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Heliyon, 8(11), e11193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11193
3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
5. Blackburne, E. F., & Frank, M. W. (2007). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. The Stata Journal, 7(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700204
6. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
7. Chen, Y., & Jin, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and carbon emissions in manufacturing firms: The moderating role of green innovation. Processes, 11(9), 2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11092705
8. Dauvergne, P. (2020). AI in the wild: Sustainability in the age of artificial intelligence. Cambridge: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12350.001.0001

9. Dian, J., Li, S., & Song, T. (2025). Achieving the synergy of pollution and carbon emission reductions: Can artificial intelligence applications work? China Economic Review, 91, 102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102389
10. Ding, T., Li, J., Shi, X., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2023). Is artificial intelligence associated with carbon emissions reduction? Case of China. Resources Policy, 85(B), 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103892
11. Dong, M., Wang, G., & Han, X. (2023). Artificial intelligence, industrial structure optimization, and CO2 emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(50), 108757-108773. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2954106/v1
12. Dong, X., Zhou, N., Zhao, X., & Yang, S. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on corporate green innovation: Can “increasing quantity” and “improving quality” go hand in hand? Journal of Environmental Management, 376, 124439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124439
13. Fan, J., Li, W., & Chen, L. (2025). How does artificial intelligence affect energy efficiency? Evidence from supply chain digitization pilot program. Energy Economics, 149, 108728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108728
14. Fei, Y-M., Liou, J-C., & Sun, P. J. (2025). Evaluating the dual impact of AI and RPA on sustainability and brand equity: A case study of digital transformation in Taiwan’s service sector. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 29, 101106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.101106
15. Feng, Y., Yan, Y., Shi, K., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Reducing carbon emission at the corporate level: Does artificial intelligence matter? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 114, 107911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107911
16. Giachino, C., Cepel, M., Truant, E., & Bargoni, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven decision making and firm performance: A quantitative approach. Management Decision, 63(10), 3454-3476. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1966
17. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
18. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
19. Iqbal, A., Zhang, W., & Jahangir, S. (2025). Building a sustainable future: The nexus between artificial intelligence, renewable energy, green human capital, geopolitical risk, and carbon emissions through the moderating role of institutional quality. Sustainability, 17(3), 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030990
20. Jiang, L., Xuan, Y., & Zhang, K. (2025). Enhancing sustainable development in Chinese cities: The impact of artificial intelligence technology and spatio-temporal evolution analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 131(1), 106747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106747
21. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
22. Kao, C. & Chiang, M. H. (2001). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, R. C. Hill. (Eds.). Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, pp. 161-178). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15007-8
23. Koyamparambath, A., Adibi, N., Szablewski, C., Adibi, S. A., & Sonnemann, G. (2022). Implementing artificial intelligence techniques to predict environmental impacts: Case of construction products. Sustainability, 14(6), 3699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063699
24. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
25. Li, H., Lu, Z., Zhang, Z., & Tanasescu, C. (2025). How does artificial intelligence affect manufacturing firms’ energy intensity? Energy Economics, 141, 108109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108109
26. Lin, J., Zeng, Y., Wu, S., & Luo, X. R. (2024). How does artificial intelligence affect the environmental performance of organizations? The role of green innovation and green culture. Information & Management, 61(2), 103924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.103924
27. Liu, J., Liu, L., Qian, Y., & Song, S. (2022). The effect of artificial intelligence on carbon intensity: Evidence from China’s industrial sector. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 83, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.101002
28. Liu, S., Gao, L., & Chen, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption and corporate financial risk. Finance Research Letters, 85(A), 107938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107938
29. Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
30. Ojong, N. (2025). Interrogating the economic, environmental, and social impact of artificial intelligence and big data in sustainable entrepreneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 8305-8320. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70031
31. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
32. Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, R. C. Hill. (Eds.). Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, pp. 93-130). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2
33. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 621-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
34. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panel data. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics (CWPE), Discussion Paper No. 1240. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113
35. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/2018.0072
36. Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x
37. Shaik, A. S., Alshibani, S. M., Jain, G., Gupta, B., & Mehrotra, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven strategic business model innovations in small‐and medium‐sized enterprises. Insights on technological and strategic enablers for carbon neutral businesses. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 2731-2751. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3617
38. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated system. Economometrica, 61(4), 783-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2951763
39. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2020). Energy and policy considerations for modern deep learning research. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(09), 13693-13696. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7123
40. Tekbaş, M., & İslamoğlu, A. E. (2025). The impact of digitalization and economic growth on sustainable environmental management in Asian countries. Journal of Sustainable Digital Futures , 1(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.29228/jsdf.86826
41. Wamba, S. F., Queiroz, M. M., & Trinchera, L. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence-enabled dynamic capability on environmental performance: The mediation effect of a data-driven culture in France and the USA. International Journal of Production Economics, 268, 109131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109131
42. Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: The business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893-1924. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0411
43. Wang, Q., Zhang, F., Li, R., & Sun, J. (2024a). Does artificial intelligence promote energy transition and curb carbon emissions? The role of trade openness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 447(1), 141298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141298
44. Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2024b). Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: The impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1043. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03520-5
45. Wang, Y., Xie, F., Zhang, B., & You, J. (2025). How can AI application affect the enterprise carbon reduction performance?. Journal of Environmental Management, 395, 127777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127777
46. Wang, Q., Liu, T., & Li, R. (2026). Artificial intelligence and environmental sustainability: Investigating the AI‐EKC nexus for SDG 7 and SDG 13. Sustainable Development, 34(1), 1141-1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70294
47. Weng, M. (2025). Green innovation through artificial intelligence technology: Enhancing environmental, social, and governance performance. Finance Research Letters, 75, 106921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.106921
48. Xie, S., Jamaani, F., & Bashir, M. F. (2025). Natural resources consumption, renewable energy investments and digital infrastructure: Analyzing climate change in top‐10 resource consuming economies. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 6328-6342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3483
49. Zhao, P., Gao, Y., & Sun, X. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on pollution emission intensity–Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(40), 91173-91188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28866-2
50. Zhao, K., Wu, C., & Liu, J. (2024). Can artificial intelligence effectively improve China’s environmental quality? A study based on the perspective of energy conservation, carbon reduction, and emission reduction. Sustainability, 16(17), 7574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177574
51. Zhong, W., Liu, Y., Dong, K., & Ni, G. (2024). Assessing the synergistic effects of artificial intelligence on pollutant and carbon emission mitigation in China. Energy Economics, 138, 107829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107829
52. Zhong, K., & Song, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption and corporate green innovation capability. Finance Research Letters, 72, 106480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106480
53. Zhu, B., Chen, G., & Wang, P. (2025). Nonlinear impacts of industrial intelligence on synergistic reduction of pollution and carbon emissions: The role of technological factors. Energy Economics, 149, 108797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108797