GİRİŞİMCİ LİDERLİK VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR PERFORMANS: SİSTEMATİK LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ VE GELECEK ARAŞTIRMA GÜNDEMİ

Öz

Sürdürülebilirlik, son yıllarda işletme yönetimi literatüründe giderek daha fazla önem kazanan bir araştırma alanı haline gelmiştir. İşletmelerin uzun dönemli başarısının yalnızca finansal performansla açıklanamayacağı; çevresel ve sosyal etkilerin de performans değerlendirmesinde dikkate alınması gerektiği yönündeki görüşler giderek güçlenmektedir. Bu bağlamda liderlik yaklaşımlarının sürdürülebilir performans üzerindeki rolü araştırmacıların dikkatini çekmektedir. Özellikle fırsat tanıma, yenilik üretme ve belirsizlik altında stratejik karar alma kapasitesi ile ilişkilendirilen girişimci liderlik, sürdürülebilir değer yaratma süreçlerinde önemli bir yönetim yaklaşımı olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, girişimci liderlik ile sürdürülebilir performans arasındaki ilişkiyi sistematik ve yapılandırılmış bir literatür incelemesi yoluyla analiz etmek ve alandaki temel araştırma temalarını ortaya koymaktır. Araştırma kapsamında Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanında 2020–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan ve işletme ile yönetim kategorisinde yer alan 16 akademik makale incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları literatürde girişimci liderliğin sürdürülebilir performans üzerindeki etkisinin üç temel mekanizma aracılığıyla açıklandığını göstermektedir: yeşil inovasyon süreçleri, örgütsel yetenekler ve sosyal/kurumsal mekanizmalar. Çalışma, girişimci liderlik ile sürdürülebilir performans arasındaki ilişkiyi bütüncül bir çerçevede ele alarak literatürdeki araştırma eğilimlerini ortaya koymakta ve gelecekteki çalışmalar için kavramsal bir araştırma gündemi önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Girişimci liderlik
• sürdürülebilir performans
• sürdürülebilirlik
• yeşil inovasyon
• örgütsel yetenekler
• sistematik literatür incelemesi

ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP AND SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND A FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA

Öz

Sustainability has increasingly become a prominent research area in business and management literature in recent years. There is a growing consensus that the long-term success of organizations cannot be explained solely by financial performance and that environmental and social impacts should also be considered in performance evaluations. In this context, the role of leadership approaches in achieving sustainable performance has attracted increasing attention from researchers. Entrepreneurial leadership, associated with opportunity recognition, innovation capability, and strategic decision-making under uncertainty, is considered an important managerial approach for creating sustainable value. This study aims to analyze the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance through a systematic and structured literature review and identify the main research themes emerging in the field. Within the scope of this study, 16 academic articles published between 2020 and 2025 in the Business and Management categories of the Web of Science Core Collection database were examined. The findings indicate that the effect of entrepreneurial leadership on sustainable performance is primarily explained through three mechanisms: green innovation processes, organizational capabilities, and social or institutional mechanisms. By examining the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance within an integrated framework, this study reveals dominant research trends in the literature and proposes a conceptual research agenda for future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entrepreneurial leadership
• sustainable performance
• sustainability
• green innovation
• organizational capabilities
• systematic literature review

Kaynakça

1. Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Sakundarini, N., Raja Ghazilla, R. A., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2), 182–204.
2. Acevedo-Duque, Á., Alvarez-Becerra, R., Alcina De Fortoul, S., Barriga-Soto, O., Cúneo-Álvarez, G., Fernández-Mantilla, M. M., & Valdez-Alvarez, C. (2025). Entrepreneurial female leadership: A business policy approach to B Corp management in Latin America. Administrative Sciences, 15(6), 219.
3. Akkoç, İ., Çalışkan, A., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Girişimci davranış: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 14(1), 1-10.
4. Ali, Z., Qin, Z., Raza-Ullah, T., Ali, A., & Sherwani, M. (2025). Leading the way to greening: Aligning leadership styles and market learning for radical and incremental green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 8571–8589.
5. Amit, S., Levermore, R., Noor, S. S., & Kafy, A. A. (2024). Multidimensional analysis of entrepreneurial leadership and spatial innovation for sustainable startup success in emerging markets. Business Strategy & Development, 7(3), e70005.
6. Aparisi-Torrijo, S., & Ribes-Giner, G. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership factors: A bibliometric analysis for the 2000–2020 period. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22(1), 33–52.
7. Asad, M., et al. (2024). Green entrepreneurial leadership and performance of entrepreneurial firms: Does green product innovation mediate? Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2355685.
8. Bagheri, A., & Harrison, C. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership measurement: A multidimensional construct. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(4), 659–679.

9. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.
10. Chaniago, H., & Efawati, Y. (2024). Individual innovative behavior model: The role of entrepreneurial leadership in uncertain times. Calitatea, 25(202), 180–190.
11. Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2004). The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: Mutual lessons to be learned. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 771–799.
12. Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334.
13. Elkington, J. (25). years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard business review, 25(2-5), 6. Erişim:03.02.2026 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” Here’s Why It’s Time to Rethink It.
14. Elkington, J. (2018, June 25). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review.
15. https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line
16. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
17. García-Vidal, G., Guzmán-Vilar, L., Martínez-Vivar, R., Sánchez-Rodríguez, A., & Pérez-Campdesuñer, R. (2025). Entrepreneurial leadership and collaborative resilience: How positive relational dynamics shape entrepreneurial cognition in emerging economies. Administrative Sciences, 15(11), 444.
18. Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., & O'Brien, G. (2002). Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10(4), 187–196.
19. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 1: Foundation 2021. Global Reporting Initiative.
20. Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 1–24.
21. Harrison, C., Paul, S., & Burnard, K. (2016). Entrepreneurial leadership: A systematic literature review. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 235–264.
22. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
23. Indira, S. S., Sasmoko, S., Bandur, A., & Pradipto, Y. D. (2025). The role of entrepreneurial leadership, knowledge management, and digital capability in enhancing entrepreneurial performance and value co-creation in the education sector. Administrative Sciences, 15(12), 462.
24. Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., Nasim, A., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). A moderated mediation analysis of psychological empowerment: Sustainable leadership and sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121429.
25. Jan, B. K., & Maulida, M. (2022). The role of leaders’ motivation, entrepreneurial leadership, and organisational agility in social enterprise sustainability. South East Asian Journal of Management, 16(2), 54–74.
26. Kuratko, D. F. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: Guest editor’s perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1–11.
27. MSCI. (2024). MSCI ESG ratings methodology. MSCI Inc.
28. Nikolaou, I. E., Tsalis, T. A., & Evangelinos, K. I. (2019). A framework to measure corporate sustainability performance: A strong sustainability-based view of firm. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 1–18.
29. Nor-Aishah, H., Ahmad, N. H., & Thurasamy, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia: The contingent role of entrepreneurial bricolage. Sustainability, 12(8), 3100.
30. Norena-Chavez, D., Chavez-Limaylla, F., & Romani-Torres, R. (2025). Sustainable project success through entrepreneurial leadership: Insights from big data analytics, IPMA, and NCA integration. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2520913.
31. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
32. Pauceanu, A. M., Rabie, N., Moustafa, A., & Jiroveanu, D. C. (2021). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(21), 11695.
33. Rambakus, Z., Hoque, M., & Gerwel Proches, C. N. (2020). Evaluating the extent of intrapreneurship in a sugar producing company in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1736848.
34. Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54–74.
35. Sahibzada, U. F., Janjua, N. A., Afshari, L., & Shakil, M. (2025). Leading the transition toward sustainability through digital capabilities and digital innovation: The role of employee characteristics. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(3), 100723.
36. Sarker, M. R., Ali, S. M., Paul, S. K., & Munim, Z. H. (2021). Measuring sustainability performance using an integrated model. Measurement, 184, 109931.
37. Sarmawa, I. W. G., Widyani, A. A. D., Sugianingrat, I. A. P. W., & Martini, I. A. O. (2020). Ethical entrepreneurial leadership and organizational trust for organizational sustainability. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1818368.
38. Simmou, W., Shehadeh, M., Ed-Dafali, S., Hussainey, K., & Nandy, M. (2025). From culture to green innovation: The interplay of social capital, entrepreneurial leadership, and green knowledge sharing in Moroccan agricultural SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(5), 6264–6282.
39. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
40. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
41. Usta Kara, I. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of dark side of leadership literature. Journal of Current Debates in Social Sciences, 5(Special Issue 1), 69–84.
42. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.
43. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
44. van Rijnsoever, F. J., Sitzler, S., & Baggen, Y. (2023). The change agent teaching model: Educating entrepreneurial leaders to help solve grand societal challenges. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100893.