Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey

Cerenmelis Kıcıroğlu

EN TR

Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey

Öz

This study examines the right to conscientious objection to military service in Turkey in light of the Council of Europe’s (CoE) human rights system. The European Court of Human Rights recognized the right to conscientious objection (CO) in 2011. Accordingly, the member states of the CoE need to incorporate the right and make the necessary arrangements in their domestic law. However, Turkey is an exception to this rule. The internal tensions of modernization and historical specificities have been effective in this orientation. In conclusion, the non-recognition of the right to conscientious objection has had some negative effects on Turkish democracy and state-citizen relations. The objective of this study is to outline the approach of Turkey’s domestic law to CO and suggest proposals for harmonizing domestic legislation with international human rights standards binding on Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Council of Europe, Conscientious Objection, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Turkish Legal System

Kaynakça

Altınay, A. G. (2004). The Myth of the Military-Nation: Militarism, Gender, and Education in Turkey, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Altınay, A. G. (2009). “Refusing to identify as obedient wives, sacrificing mothers, and proud warriors”, Özgür Heval Çınar and Coşkun Üsterci (Ed.), Conscientious Objection: Resisting Militarized Society, London: Zed Books, pp. 88-104.
Aydın, S. (2009). “The militarization of society: Conscription and national armies in the process of citizen creation”, Özgür Heval Çınar and Coşkun Üsterci (Ed.), Conscientious Objection: Resisting Militarized Society, London: Zed Books, pp. 17-36.
Balcı, A. (2012). “Askeri mahkeme vicdani reddi tanıdı”, Sabah Gazetesi, 10 March 2012.
Berkes, N. (1998). The Development of Secularism in Turkey, New York: Routledge.
Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. (2003). Turkish Foreign Policy and Turkish Identity: A Constructivist Approach, New York: Routledge.
Brock, P. (1994). “Why did St. Maximilian refuse to serve in the Roman army?”, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, Vol:45, Issue: 2, pp. 195-209.
Canon, B. C. (1983). “Defining the dimensions of judicial activism”, Judicature, Vol: 66, pp. 236-247.
Committee of Ministers (2011). “Decision case no. 24: Case against Turkey, 8 June 2011 (115th Meeting)”, https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016805b0a14, Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Constitution of the Republic of Turkey (2019). Grand National Assembly of Turkey Printing House. Council of Europe (1949). “Statute of the Council of Europe”, https://rm.coe.int/1680306052, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).

Council of Europe (1953). “The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights)”, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Council of Europe (1987). “Recommendation no. R (87) 8 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Regarding Conscientious Objection to Compulsory Military Service, 9 April 1987 (406th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)”, https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016804e6689, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Council of Europe (1994). “Protocol No. 11 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Restructuring the Control Machinery Established Thereby”, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Library_Collection_P11_ETS155E_ENG.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Council of Europe (2007). “Committee of Ministers, Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)109, Execution of the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights: Ülke against Turkey, 17 October 2007 (1007th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies”, https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016805adea0#globalcontainer, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Çınar, Ö. H. (2014). The Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Turkey’s Obligations under International Human Rights Law, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Çınar, Ö. H. and Üsterci, C. (2009). Conscientious Objection: Resisting Militarized Society, London: Zed Books.
Decker, C. D. and Fresa, L. (2001). “The status of conscientious objection under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights”, New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, Vol: 33, pp. 379-418.
European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (2019). “Annual Report: Conscientious Objection to military service in Europe”, http://ebco-beoc.org/sites/ebco-beoc.org/files/attachments/EBCOreport2018fin.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
European Commission (2005). “SEC (2005) 1426, Turkey: 2005 Progress Report”, http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/2/2005/EN/2-2005-1426-EN-1-0.Pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) (2016). “Opinion No. 831/2015, Penal Code of Turkey”, https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF(2016)011-e, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Green, C. (2009). “An intellectual history of judicial activism”, Emory Law Journal, Vol: 58, Issue: 5, pp. 1195-1264.
Karaca, E. (2012a). “Mahkeme, Delice’yi değil ama vicdani reddi tanıdı”, Bianet, 9 March 2012.
Karaca, E. (2012b). “Yehova Şahidi’ne vicdani ret hakkı”, Bianet, 13 March 2012.
Kessler, J. K. (2015). “A war for liberty: On the law of conscientious objection”, The Cambridge History of World War II, Vol: 3, pp. 447-474.
Kmiec, K. D. (2004). “The origin and current meanings of judicial activism”, California Law Review Vol: 92, Issue: 5, pp. 1441-1477.
Letsas, G. (2013). “The ECHR as a living instrument: Its meaning and legitimacy”, Andreas Føllesdal, Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein (Ed.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, New York: Cambridge University Press, 106-141.
Lewis, B. (1993). Modern Türkiye’nin Doğuşu, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
Lubell, N. (2002). “Selective conscientious objection in international law: Refusing to participate in a specific armed conflict”, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights Vol: 20, Issue: 4, pp. 407-422.
Macovei, M. (2004). Freedom of Expression: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. No. 2 of Human Rights Handbooks, Germany: Council of Europe, https://rm.coe.int/168007ff48, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Major, M. F. (1992). “Conscientious objection and international law: A human right. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law”, Vol: 24, Issue: 2, pp. 349-378.
Moskos, C. C. and John, W. C. (1993). The New Conscientious Objection: From Sacred to Secular Resistance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Munyar, V. (2018). “5.5 Milyonun askerlik sorunu çözüm bekliyor”, Hürriyet, 4 June 2018.
Muzny, P. (2012). “Bayatyan v Armenia: The Grand Chamber renders a grand judgment”, Human Rights Law Review Vol: 12, Issue: 1, pp. 135-147.
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (1967). “Resolution 337, Right of Conscientious Objection (22nd Sitting)”, http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=15752&lang=en, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (1977). “Recommendation 816, Right of Conscientious Objection to Military Service (10th Sitting)”, http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=14850&lang=en, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2001). “Recommendation 1518, Exercise of the Right of Conscientious Objection to Military Service in Council of Europe Member States”, https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=16909&lang=en, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2004). “Resolution 1380, Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Turkey (18th Sitting)”, http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-DocDetails-EN.asp?FileID=17225&lang=EN, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2006). “Recommendation 1742, Human Rights of Members of the Armed Forces (11th Sitting)”, http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17424&lang=en, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Resmi Gazete, 1111 Sayılı Askerlik Kanunu, 12-17 July 1927, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.3.1111.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Resmi Gazete, 1632 Sayılı Askeri Ceza Kanunu, 15 June 1930, http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.3.1632.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Resmi Gazete, 3713 Sayılı Terörle Mücadele Kanunu, 12 April 1991, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.3713.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Resmi Gazete, 5237 Sayılı Türk Ceza Kanunu, 12 October 2004, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.5237.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Resmi Gazete, 765 Sayılı Türk Ceza Kanunu (mülga), 13 March 1926, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/5.3.765.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Resmi Gazete, 93/4613 Sayılı Bakanlar Kurulu Kararı Birden Fazla Tabiiyetli Vatandaşların Askerlik Yükümlülüklerini Yerine Getirmiş Sayılmalarına Dair Esaslar, 25 July 1993, http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/21648.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Rumelili, B., Keyman, F. and Isyar, B. (2011). “Turkey’s conscientious objectors and the contestation of European citizenship”, J. Peter Burgess and Serge Gutwirth (Ed.), A Threat Against Europe? Security, Migration and Integration, Brussels: VUBPRESS Brussels University Press, pp. 47-62.
Schroeder, J. B. (2011). “The role of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergent right of conscientious objection to military service in international law”, Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte, Vol: 24, Issue: 1, pp. 169-206.
Tachau, F. and Heper, M. (1983). “The state, Politics, and the Military in Turkey”, Comparative Politics, Vol: 16, Issue: 1, pp. 17-33.
The European Commission of Human Rights (1996). “Thomas Spöttl v. Austria. No. 22956/93”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%2222956/93\%22%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-2889%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (1966). “Grandrath v. Germany. No: 2299/64”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22grandrath%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-73650%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (1973). “G.Z. v. Autriche. No: 5591/72”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22g.z.%20autriche%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-100491%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023). The European Court of Human Rights (1977). “X. v. Federal Republic of Germany. No: 7705/76”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%227705/76\%22%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-74554%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (1984). “N. v. Sweden. No: 10410/83”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%2210410/83\%22%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-74737%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023). The European Court of Human Rights (1994). “Peters v. The Netherlands. No: 22793/93”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%2222793/93\%22%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-2432%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2000). “Thlimmenos v. Greece. No: 34369/97”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%2234369%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-58561%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2006). “Ülke v. Turkey. No: 39437/98”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%2239437%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-72146%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2009). “Bayatyan v. Armenia. No: 23459/03, Chamber”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%22BAYATYAN%20v.%20ARMENIA\%22%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22CHAMBER%22,%22DECISIONS%22,%22COMMUNICATEDCASES%22,%22CLIN%22,%22ADVISORYOPINIONS%22,%22REPORTS%22,%22RESOLUTIONS%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-95386%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2011). “Bayatyan v. Armenia. No: 23459/03, Grand Chamber”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22appno%22:[%2223459/03%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-105611%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2011). “Erçep v. Turkey. No: 43965/04”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-121130%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2012). “Feti Demirtaş v. Turkey. No: 5260/07”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-120170%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2014). “Buldu and Others v. Turkey. No: 14017/08”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-156378%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2016). “Enver Aydemir v. Turkey. No: 26012/11”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-169942%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2016). “Mammadov and Huseynov v. Azerbaijan. No: 14604/08”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22mammadov%20huseynov%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-170069%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2016). “Papavasilakis v. Greece. No: 66899/14”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%2266899%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-166850%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2016). “Savda v. Turkey (No. 2). No: 2458/12”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-172977%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2017). “Adyan and Others v. Armenia. No: 75604/11”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%2275604/11\%22%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-177429%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2017). “Mirzayev v. Azerbaijan. No: 41792/15”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%2241792/15\%22%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-171871%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Court of Human Rights (2018). “Baydar v. Turkey. No. 25632/13”, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\%22BAYDAR%20v.%20TURKEY\%22%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-184882%22]}, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
The European Parliament (2006). “Resolution No. 2006/2118(INI), Turkey’s Progress towards Accession”, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0381_EN.html?redirect, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Turkey: Military Courts Recognise Right to Conscientious Objection (2012). War Resisters’ International, 1 May 2012, https://www.wri-irg.org/en/story/2012/turkey-military-courts-recognise-right-conscientious-objection, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi (The Grand National Assembly of Turkey), 5170 Sayılı Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasının Bazı Maddelerinin Değiştirilmesi Hakkında Kanun, 7 May 2004, http://www.anayasa.gen.tr/5170sk.htm, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi (The Grand National Assembly of Turkey), 5532 Sayılı Terörle Mücadele Kanununda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun, 29 June 2006, https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k5532.html, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Türkiye’de Vicdani Ret İlk Defa Tanındı (2012). Birgün Gazetesi, 10 March 2012.
United Nations General Assembly (1948). “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
United Nations General Assembly (1966). “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”, https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20999/volume-999-i-14668-english.pdf, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Vicdani Red Davasında Tarihi Karar (2012). Agos Gazetesi, 9 March 2012.
Vicdani Ret Derneği (T.Y.). “Vicdani retlerini açıklayanlar”, https://vicdaniret.org/tarih-sirasina-gore/, (Accessed: 13.12.2023).
Wiberg, M. (1985). “Grounds for recognition of conscientious objection to military service: The deontological–teleological distinction considered”, Journal of Peace Research Vol: 22, Issue: 4, pp. 359-364.
Young, E. A. (2002). “Judicial activism and conservative politics”, University of Colorado Law Review, Vol: 73, Issue:4, pp. 1139-1216.
Zürcher, E. (2000). Modernleşen Türkiye’nin Tarihi, İstanbul: İletişim.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Uluslararası Kurumlar, Uluslararası Hukuk, Uluslararası Kuruluşlar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Cerenmelis Kıcıroğlu ^*
0000-0001-7111-4986
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

20 Aralık 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

10 Ocak 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Ekim 2023

Kabul Tarihi

13 Aralık 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL

APA

Kıcıroğlu, C. (2024). Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi, 4(1), 67-85. https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL

AMA

1.Kıcıroğlu C. Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey. ULİPOD. 2024;4(1):67-85. https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL

Chicago

Kıcıroğlu, Cerenmelis. 2024. “Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi 4 (1): 67-85. https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL.

EndNote

Kıcıroğlu C (01 Ocak 2024) Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi 4 1 67–85.

IEEE

[1]C. Kıcıroğlu, “Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey”, ULİPOD, c. 4, sy 1, ss. 67–85, Oca. 2024, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL

ISNAD

Kıcıroğlu, Cerenmelis. “Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi 4/1 (01 Ocak 2024): 67-85. https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL.

JAMA

1.Kıcıroğlu C. Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey. ULİPOD. 2024;4:67–85.

MLA

Kıcıroğlu, Cerenmelis. “Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi, c. 4, sy 1, Ocak 2024, ss. 67-85, https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL.

Vancouver

1.Cerenmelis Kıcıroğlu. Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey. ULİPOD [Internet]. 01 Ocak 2024;4(1):67-85. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA72DW83GL

Yayıncı Kuruluş

34426

Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi (ULİPOD), Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Derneği (ULİPOD) tarafından yayımlanmaktadır.

Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Derneği, uluslararası ilişkiler, uluslararası politika, siyasi tarih, devletler hukuku, güvenlik çalışmaları, bölge çalışmaları, göç çalışmaları, diplomasi, ekonomi politik, dış politika gibi alanlarda bilimsel çalışmalar yürütmek, akademik etkinlikler düzenlemek ve kamu yararını gözeten, açık erişimli, kâr amacı gütmeyen yayınlar yapmak amacıyla kurulmuş bir sivil toplum kuruluşudur. Dernek; seminer, konferans, çalıştay, kongre ve eğitim programları gibi çok yönlü akademik faaliyetler düzenlemekte ve bu alanlarda ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde projeler geliştirmektedir.

Dergimiz, Dernek’in bu misyonu doğrultusunda yayımladığı süreli akademik yayınlardan biridir.

Dergi ya da Dernek ile ilgili her türlü soru, görüş ve yazışmalar için aşağıdaki iletişim bilgilerini kullanabilirsiniz:

📍 Adres: Yalı Mahallesi, İstanbul Caddesi, No:12, Akçakoca / Düzce
📧 E-posta: ulipod@ulipod.com / ulipodergisi@gmail.com

🌐 Web: https://ulipod.com/

Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey

Conscientious Objection under European Regime of Human Rights: An Analysis on Turkey

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Rejimi Kapsamında Vicdani Ret: Türk İstisnacılığı

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster