Araştırma Makalesi

China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the “Zhoubian Zhengce” Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality

Cilt: 6 Sayı: Geopolitical Fault Lines 20 Temmuz 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the “Zhoubian Zhengce” Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality

Öz

China manages its network of relations in the Middle East in a pragmatic manner by grounding it in balance and neutrality. However, each crisis and state of war experienced in the Middle East places China’s measured and low-profile policy under strain. This is because China is expected to pursue a neutral policy toward Middle Eastern countries in accordance with the doctrine of Peripheral Diplomacy, “Zhoubian Zhengce.” Within the framework of Peripheral Diplomacy, Iran—positioned in the intermediate ring—renders the implementation of China’s policies more difficult in the context of its war with Israel. This study analyzes how China’s Peripheral Diplomacy, “Zhoubian Zhengce,” is sustained in the Iran–Israel war through the preservation of the principle of limited neutrality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

China, Peripheral Diplomacy “Zhoubian Zhengce”, Limited Neutrality, Middle East, Iran–Israel War

Kaynakça

  1. Bazoobandi, S. (2024). “Iran’s Strategies in Response to Changes in US–China Relations”, Middle East Policy, 31(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12727
  2. Bolt, P. J. and Cross, S. N. (2018). China, Russia, and Twenty-first Century Global Geopolitics, England: Oxford University Press.
  3. Brummer, M. (2007). “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Iran: A Power-full Union”, Journal of International Affairs, 60(2), 185–198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24357978
  4. Callaghan, M. and Hubbard, P. (2016). “The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Multilateralism on the Silk Road”, China Economic Journal, 9(2), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2016.1162970
  5. Callahan, W. A. (2016). “China’s “Asia dream”: The Belt Road Initiative and The New Regional Order”, Journal of Contemporary China, 1(3), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116647806
  6. Chaziza, M. (2020). “China and Iran Reach a New Stage in Their Strategic Partnership”, BESA Center for Strategic Studies Perspectives Paper, 1(1654), 1-4. https://besacenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1654-China-Iran-Partnership-Chaziza-final.pdf, (Access Date: 06.03.2026).
  7. Downs, E. and Maloney, S. (2011). “Getting China to Sanction Iran: The Chinese-Iranian Oil Connection”, Foreign Affairs, 90(2), 15–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25800453
  8. Ehteshami, A. (2023). “China’s Grand Vision and the Persian Gulf”, Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), 23(7), 1-20.
  9. Emadi, H. (2026). The Dragon’s Reach: China’s Rise as An Imperial Power in the Middle East, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Fattah, A. (2025). “China’s Strategic Approach to the Persian Gulf: Balancing Relations Between Iran and Saudi Arabia”, International Politics, 1(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-025-00746-1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aydın, F. (2026). China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the “Zhoubian Zhengce” Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi, 6(Geopolitical Fault Lines), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.62334/ulipod.1937949
AMA
1.Aydın F. China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the “Zhoubian Zhengce” Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality. ULİPOD. 2026;6(Geopolitical Fault Lines):98-117. doi:10.62334/ulipod.1937949
Chicago
Aydın, Figen. 2026. “China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the ‘Zhoubian Zhengce’ Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi 6 (Geopolitical Fault Lines): 98-117. https://doi.org/10.62334/ulipod.1937949.
EndNote
Aydın F (01 Temmuz 2026) China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the “Zhoubian Zhengce” Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi 6 Geopolitical Fault Lines 98–117.
IEEE
[1]F. Aydın, “China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the ‘Zhoubian Zhengce’ Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality”, ULİPOD, c. 6, sy Geopolitical Fault Lines, ss. 98–117, Tem. 2026, doi: 10.62334/ulipod.1937949.
ISNAD
Aydın, Figen. “China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the ‘Zhoubian Zhengce’ Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi 6/Geopolitical Fault Lines (01 Temmuz 2026): 98-117. https://doi.org/10.62334/ulipod.1937949.
JAMA
1.Aydın F. China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the “Zhoubian Zhengce” Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality. ULİPOD. 2026;6:98–117.
MLA
Aydın, Figen. “China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the ‘Zhoubian Zhengce’ Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Politika Dergisi, c. 6, sy Geopolitical Fault Lines, Temmuz 2026, ss. 98-117, doi:10.62334/ulipod.1937949.
Vancouver
1.Figen Aydın. China’s Peripheral Diplomacy and Crisis Management within the Framework of the “Zhoubian Zhengce” Doctrine: The Iran–Israel War and Limited Neutrality. ULİPOD. 01 Temmuz 2026;6(Geopolitical Fault Lines):98-117. doi:10.62334/ulipod.1937949