Research Article

Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects

Volume: 17 Number: 1 March 15, 2025
TR EN

Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects

Abstract

In this study, accidents that occurred between 2012 and 2022 in five different sectors where occupational accidents are common in Turkey were compared using internationally accepted parameters. Using the trend analysis, the number of occupational accidents, accident rates, and accident frequency rates that may occur in the five sectors and in Turkey in 2023–2026 were calculated, and a future perspective was developed. Furthermore, a comparison was made between Turkey, the European Union (EU) in general, and some of the EU's developed and developing member countries. In Turkey, 2.29 out of every 100 employees experience an occupational accident each year. The mining and metal sectors have the highest risk of accidents. However, 9 out of every 100,000 workers in Turkey die as a result of occupational accidents. The frequency of fatal accidents in Turkey is significantly higher than the average of the 27 EU member states and other countries surveyed. Turkey loses five times more employees than the average of the 27 EU member countries and ten times more than Germany, a locomotive country with a European Union-based industry. Trend analysis was used to estimate the number of occupational accidents, accident rates, and accident frequency rates between 2023 and 2026 in Turkey based on 11 years of historical data.

Keywords

Occupational safety, occupational accidents, accident rates, trend analysis

Ethical Statement

The author(s) of this article declare that the materials and methods used in this study do not require ethical committee permission and/or legal-special permission

References

  1. Ahmad, S., Iraj, M., Abbas, M., Mahdi, A., (2016). Analysis of occupational accidents induced human injuries: a case study in construction industries and sites. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, 7(1), 1-7. doi.org/10.5897/JCECT2015.0379
  2. Aksüt, G., Alakaş, H., Eren, T., Karacam, H., (2022). Model proposal for physically ergonomic risky personnel scheduling problem: An application in textile industry for female employees. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 38(1), 245-256. doi: 10.17341/gazimmfd.882419
  3. Altın M., Kapıdaş İ. F., Lorasokkay M. A. (2017). Hatalı Kurulan Kalıp ve İskeleler Sonucu Meydana Gelen İş Kazalarının İnşaat Maliyetine Ve Ülke Ekonomisine Olan Etkileri. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 16(2), 55-70.
  4. Altunkaynak, B., (2018). A statistical study of occupational accidents in the manufacturing industry in Turkey. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 66, 101-109. doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.02.012
  5. Anitha Rajathi, V. M., Pavithra, P., (2017). Health and Safety Hazards Caused by Textile Industry. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 3, 1288-1292.
  6. Arıtan, A. E., Ataman, M., (2017). Kaza oranları hesaplamalarıyla iş kazası analizi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(1), 239-246. doi: 10.5578/fmbd.51762
  7. Asanka, W. A., Ranasinghe, M., (2015). Study on the impact of accidents on construction projects. In 6th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, pp. 58-67.
  8. Aşkın, A., Öztürk, Ö. F. (2022). Mobilya Sektörü Çalışanlarında İş Kazası ve Meslek Hastalıklarının İncelenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (2), 351-364. DOI:10.24011/barofd.1063359
  9. Balcı, B., Taçkın, E., Balcı, E. Ö., Yerden, A., (2013). İş kazalarında mali kayıplar. İstanbul Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (6), 66-83.
  10. Bayraktar, B, Uygucgil, H., & Konuk, A., (2018). Türkiye Madencilik Sektöründe İş Kazalarının İstatistiksel Analizi. Bilimsel Madencilik Dergisi, 57: 86-89.
APA
Zengin, M. A., & Sekmen, M. (2025). Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 17(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1461648
AMA
1.Zengin MA, Sekmen M. Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects. IJERAD. 2025;17(1):75-91. doi:10.29137/umagd.1461648
Chicago
Zengin, Mehmet Ali, and Mustafa Sekmen. 2025. “Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 17 (1): 75-91. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1461648.
EndNote
Zengin MA, Sekmen M (March 1, 2025) Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 17 1 75–91.
IEEE
[1]M. A. Zengin and M. Sekmen, “Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects”, IJERAD, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–91, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.29137/umagd.1461648.
ISNAD
Zengin, Mehmet Ali - Sekmen, Mustafa. “Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 17/1 (March 1, 2025): 75-91. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1461648.
JAMA
1.Zengin MA, Sekmen M. Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects. IJERAD. 2025;17:75–91.
MLA
Zengin, Mehmet Ali, and Mustafa Sekmen. “Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 75-91, doi:10.29137/umagd.1461648.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Ali Zengin, Mustafa Sekmen. Comparison of Occupational Incidence Rates in Risky Sectors and Future Prospects. IJERAD. 2025 Mar. 1;17(1):75-91. doi:10.29137/umagd.1461648